Loading…
Organization and Information Handling in Task Groups
Organizational factors in information handling in task-oriented groups have been studied recently at M.I.T. Laboratory groups were given very simple information-collection tasks under rigidly controlled conditions and the communication recorded completely. Decisions were restricted to choices of mes...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the Operations Research Society of America 1954-05, Vol.2 (2), p.188-196 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-509ddc50884d448a7e343e0fa95dee3d131e8555b479ece41f84e263dc22ceb63 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 196 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 188 |
container_title | Journal of the Operations Research Society of America |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Christie, Lee S |
description | Organizational factors in information handling in task-oriented groups have been studied recently at M.I.T. Laboratory groups were given very simple information-collection tasks under rigidly controlled conditions and the communication recorded completely. Decisions were restricted to choices of message destination and the influence of various imposed communication nets on the adequacy of group performance analysed. A technique of group-action quantization was used, which made possible a well-defined measure of group efficiency and an easily understood group goal. Experimental results show that an equiprobable random assumption is a poor model even for initial behavior. Centralized nets are shown to learn to do as well as the net permits fairly rapidly but to be characterized by high minimum-action. A net designed to give the lowest average action for task completion with random message-destination choices is shown to be essentially incapable of achieving its limiting minimum. Another similar net with a higher random average and a favorable minimum is shown to learn its minimum readily. Differences among the results for different nets are found to be explained in terms of a concept of "locally rational behavior" and the combinatorial characteristics of the nets.
Operations Research , ISSN 0030-364X, was published as Journal of the Operations Research Society of America from 1952 to 1955 under ISSN 0096-3984. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1287/opre.2.2.188 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1287_opre_2_2_188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>166604</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>166604</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-509ddc50884d448a7e343e0fa95dee3d131e8555b479ece41f84e263dc22ceb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWKs3b14WxJNuzfdmj1K0LRR6qeeQbrJtapusyRbRv96s68dR5jDMvN-8gQfAJYIjhEVx75tgRjgVEuIIDBDDPGeUk2MwgLDkOSkFPQVnMW5hmhlnA0AXYa2c_VCt9S5TTmczV_uw7-dpWuysW2fWZUsVX7JJ8IcmnoOTWu2iufjuQ_D89LgcT_P5YjIbP8zzChdlmzNYal0xKATVlApVGEKJgbUqmTaGaESQEYyxFS1KUxmKakEN5kRXGFdmxckQXPe-TfCvBxNbufWH4NJLiQgksGCEikTd9VQVfIzB1LIJdq_Cu0RQdrnILheJU6VcEn7V49vY-vDHcs4hTeptr9qvGOJ_Xjc9vbHrzZtNys9Zh8Vf7hM-M3qz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1303075348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Organization and Information Handling in Task Groups</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><creator>Christie, Lee S</creator><creatorcontrib>Christie, Lee S</creatorcontrib><description>Organizational factors in information handling in task-oriented groups have been studied recently at M.I.T. Laboratory groups were given very simple information-collection tasks under rigidly controlled conditions and the communication recorded completely. Decisions were restricted to choices of message destination and the influence of various imposed communication nets on the adequacy of group performance analysed. A technique of group-action quantization was used, which made possible a well-defined measure of group efficiency and an easily understood group goal. Experimental results show that an equiprobable random assumption is a poor model even for initial behavior. Centralized nets are shown to learn to do as well as the net permits fairly rapidly but to be characterized by high minimum-action. A net designed to give the lowest average action for task completion with random message-destination choices is shown to be essentially incapable of achieving its limiting minimum. Another similar net with a higher random average and a favorable minimum is shown to learn its minimum readily. Differences among the results for different nets are found to be explained in terms of a concept of "locally rational behavior" and the combinatorial characteristics of the nets.
Operations Research , ISSN 0030-364X, was published as Journal of the Operations Research Society of America from 1952 to 1955 under ISSN 0096-3984.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-3984</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0030-364X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2326-3229</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/opre.2.2.188</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore, Md: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Design analysis ; Experimentation ; Learning ; Mathematical minima ; Operations research ; Rational choice theory ; Rationality ; Research and development laboratories ; Research facilities ; Zero</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 1954-05, Vol.2 (2), p.188-196</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-509ddc50884d448a7e343e0fa95dee3d131e8555b479ece41f84e263dc22ceb63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/166604$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/166604$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Christie, Lee S</creatorcontrib><title>Organization and Information Handling in Task Groups</title><title>Journal of the Operations Research Society of America</title><description>Organizational factors in information handling in task-oriented groups have been studied recently at M.I.T. Laboratory groups were given very simple information-collection tasks under rigidly controlled conditions and the communication recorded completely. Decisions were restricted to choices of message destination and the influence of various imposed communication nets on the adequacy of group performance analysed. A technique of group-action quantization was used, which made possible a well-defined measure of group efficiency and an easily understood group goal. Experimental results show that an equiprobable random assumption is a poor model even for initial behavior. Centralized nets are shown to learn to do as well as the net permits fairly rapidly but to be characterized by high minimum-action. A net designed to give the lowest average action for task completion with random message-destination choices is shown to be essentially incapable of achieving its limiting minimum. Another similar net with a higher random average and a favorable minimum is shown to learn its minimum readily. Differences among the results for different nets are found to be explained in terms of a concept of "locally rational behavior" and the combinatorial characteristics of the nets.
Operations Research , ISSN 0030-364X, was published as Journal of the Operations Research Society of America from 1952 to 1955 under ISSN 0096-3984.</description><subject>Design analysis</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Mathematical minima</subject><subject>Operations research</subject><subject>Rational choice theory</subject><subject>Rationality</subject><subject>Research and development laboratories</subject><subject>Research facilities</subject><subject>Zero</subject><issn>0096-3984</issn><issn>0030-364X</issn><issn>1526-5463</issn><issn>2326-3229</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1954</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1LAzEQxYMoWKs3b14WxJNuzfdmj1K0LRR6qeeQbrJtapusyRbRv96s68dR5jDMvN-8gQfAJYIjhEVx75tgRjgVEuIIDBDDPGeUk2MwgLDkOSkFPQVnMW5hmhlnA0AXYa2c_VCt9S5TTmczV_uw7-dpWuysW2fWZUsVX7JJ8IcmnoOTWu2iufjuQ_D89LgcT_P5YjIbP8zzChdlmzNYal0xKATVlApVGEKJgbUqmTaGaESQEYyxFS1KUxmKakEN5kRXGFdmxckQXPe-TfCvBxNbufWH4NJLiQgksGCEikTd9VQVfIzB1LIJdq_Cu0RQdrnILheJU6VcEn7V49vY-vDHcs4hTeptr9qvGOJ_Xjc9vbHrzZtNys9Zh8Vf7hM-M3qz</recordid><startdate>19540501</startdate><enddate>19540501</enddate><creator>Christie, Lee S</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Operations Research Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HJHVS</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19540501</creationdate><title>Organization and Information Handling in Task Groups</title><author>Christie, Lee S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-509ddc50884d448a7e343e0fa95dee3d131e8555b479ece41f84e263dc22ceb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1954</creationdate><topic>Design analysis</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Mathematical minima</topic><topic>Operations research</topic><topic>Rational choice theory</topic><topic>Rationality</topic><topic>Research and development laboratories</topic><topic>Research facilities</topic><topic>Zero</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Christie, Lee S</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 19</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Operations Research Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Christie, Lee S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Organization and Information Handling in Task Groups</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Operations Research Society of America</jtitle><date>1954-05-01</date><risdate>1954</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>188</spage><epage>196</epage><pages>188-196</pages><issn>0096-3984</issn><issn>0030-364X</issn><eissn>1526-5463</eissn><eissn>2326-3229</eissn><abstract>Organizational factors in information handling in task-oriented groups have been studied recently at M.I.T. Laboratory groups were given very simple information-collection tasks under rigidly controlled conditions and the communication recorded completely. Decisions were restricted to choices of message destination and the influence of various imposed communication nets on the adequacy of group performance analysed. A technique of group-action quantization was used, which made possible a well-defined measure of group efficiency and an easily understood group goal. Experimental results show that an equiprobable random assumption is a poor model even for initial behavior. Centralized nets are shown to learn to do as well as the net permits fairly rapidly but to be characterized by high minimum-action. A net designed to give the lowest average action for task completion with random message-destination choices is shown to be essentially incapable of achieving its limiting minimum. Another similar net with a higher random average and a favorable minimum is shown to learn its minimum readily. Differences among the results for different nets are found to be explained in terms of a concept of "locally rational behavior" and the combinatorial characteristics of the nets.
Operations Research , ISSN 0030-364X, was published as Journal of the Operations Research Society of America from 1952 to 1955 under ISSN 0096-3984.</abstract><cop>Baltimore, Md</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/opre.2.2.188</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0096-3984 |
ispartof | Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 1954-05, Vol.2 (2), p.188-196 |
issn | 0096-3984 0030-364X 1526-5463 2326-3229 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1287_opre_2_2_188 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate) |
subjects | Design analysis Experimentation Learning Mathematical minima Operations research Rational choice theory Rationality Research and development laboratories Research facilities Zero |
title | Organization and Information Handling in Task Groups |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A15%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Organization%20and%20Information%20Handling%20in%20Task%20Groups&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Operations%20Research%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Christie,%20Lee%20S&rft.date=1954-05-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=188&rft.epage=196&rft.pages=188-196&rft.issn=0096-3984&rft.eissn=1526-5463&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/opre.2.2.188&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E166604%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-509ddc50884d448a7e343e0fa95dee3d131e8555b479ece41f84e263dc22ceb63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1303075348&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=166604&rfr_iscdi=true |