Loading…
What Explains the German Labor Market Miracle in the Great Recession? [with Comments and Discussion]
Germany experienced an even deeper fall in GDP in the Great Recession than the United States, with little employment loss. Employers' reticence to hire in the preceding expansion, associated in part with a lack of confidence it would last, contributed to an employment shortfall equivalent to 40...
Saved in:
Published in: | Brookings papers on economic activity 2011-04, Vol.2011 (1), p.273-335 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-f09fcd37bb523d495e155ff07020b4d16386041365c690b4f1fdaefe4cca2ceb3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 335 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 273 |
container_title | Brookings papers on economic activity |
container_volume | 2011 |
creator | BURDA, MICHAEL C. HUNT, JENNIFER ELSBY, MICHAEL W. L. HALTIWANGER, JOHN |
description | Germany experienced an even deeper fall in GDP in the Great Recession than the United States, with little employment loss. Employers' reticence to hire in the preceding expansion, associated in part with a lack of confidence it would last, contributed to an employment shortfall equivalent to 40 percent of the missing employment decline in the recession. Another 20 percent may be explained by wage moderation. A third important element was the widespread adoption of working time accounts, which permit employers to avoid overtime pay if hours per worker average to standard hours over a window of time. We find that this provided disincentives for employers to lay off workers in the downturn. Although the overall cuts in hours per worker were consistent with the severity of the Great Recession, reduction of working time account balances substituted for traditional government-sponsored short-time work. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1353/eca.2011.0004 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1353_eca_2011_0004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41228527</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41228527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-f09fcd37bb523d495e155ff07020b4d16386041365c690b4f1fdaefe4cca2ceb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kFtLw0AQhRdRsFYffRT2D6TuNWmeRGpbhRbBCz6ILJvNLE1skrK7Rf33bhrxaZgz58wMH0KXlEwol_wajJ4wQumEECKO0IhKzhMhUnmMRlHKEsYJP0Vn3texlVLyESrfNjrg-fduq6vW47ABvATX6BavdNE5vNbuEwJeV06bLeCqHSwOYuoJDHhfde0Nfv-qwgbPuqaBNnis2xLfVd7sD-OPc3Ri9dbDxV8do9fF_GV2n6welw-z21ViBElDYkluTcmzopCMlyKXQKW0lmSEkUKUNOXTlAjKU2nSPCqW2lKDBWGMZgYKPkbJsNe4znsHVu1c1Wj3oyhRPSIVEakekeoRRb8Y_DvX1WBCs_eg6m7v2vilEiLPMqGee4w9RUrpIRVjV0Os9qFz_zcEZWwqWcZ_AeJ2dAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Explains the German Labor Market Miracle in the Great Recession? [with Comments and Discussion]</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><creator>BURDA, MICHAEL C. ; HUNT, JENNIFER ; ELSBY, MICHAEL W. L. ; HALTIWANGER, JOHN</creator><creatorcontrib>BURDA, MICHAEL C. ; HUNT, JENNIFER ; ELSBY, MICHAEL W. L. ; HALTIWANGER, JOHN</creatorcontrib><description>Germany experienced an even deeper fall in GDP in the Great Recession than the United States, with little employment loss. Employers' reticence to hire in the preceding expansion, associated in part with a lack of confidence it would last, contributed to an employment shortfall equivalent to 40 percent of the missing employment decline in the recession. Another 20 percent may be explained by wage moderation. A third important element was the widespread adoption of working time accounts, which permit employers to avoid overtime pay if hours per worker average to standard hours over a window of time. We find that this provided disincentives for employers to lay off workers in the downturn. Although the overall cuts in hours per worker were consistent with the severity of the Great Recession, reduction of working time account balances substituted for traditional government-sponsored short-time work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-2303</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1533-4465</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/eca.2011.0004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brookings Institution</publisher><subject>Economic recessions ; Employment ; Great Recession ; Gross domestic product ; Labor costs ; Labor markets ; Labor time ; Productivity ; Unemployment ; Wages</subject><ispartof>Brookings papers on economic activity, 2011-04, Vol.2011 (1), p.273-335</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 The Brookings Institution.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-f09fcd37bb523d495e155ff07020b4d16386041365c690b4f1fdaefe4cca2ceb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41228527$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41228527$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BURDA, MICHAEL C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUNT, JENNIFER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELSBY, MICHAEL W. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HALTIWANGER, JOHN</creatorcontrib><title>What Explains the German Labor Market Miracle in the Great Recession? [with Comments and Discussion]</title><title>Brookings papers on economic activity</title><description>Germany experienced an even deeper fall in GDP in the Great Recession than the United States, with little employment loss. Employers' reticence to hire in the preceding expansion, associated in part with a lack of confidence it would last, contributed to an employment shortfall equivalent to 40 percent of the missing employment decline in the recession. Another 20 percent may be explained by wage moderation. A third important element was the widespread adoption of working time accounts, which permit employers to avoid overtime pay if hours per worker average to standard hours over a window of time. We find that this provided disincentives for employers to lay off workers in the downturn. Although the overall cuts in hours per worker were consistent with the severity of the Great Recession, reduction of working time account balances substituted for traditional government-sponsored short-time work.</description><subject>Economic recessions</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Great Recession</subject><subject>Gross domestic product</subject><subject>Labor costs</subject><subject>Labor markets</subject><subject>Labor time</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><subject>Wages</subject><issn>0007-2303</issn><issn>1533-4465</issn><issn>1533-4465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kFtLw0AQhRdRsFYffRT2D6TuNWmeRGpbhRbBCz6ILJvNLE1skrK7Rf33bhrxaZgz58wMH0KXlEwol_wajJ4wQumEECKO0IhKzhMhUnmMRlHKEsYJP0Vn3texlVLyESrfNjrg-fduq6vW47ABvATX6BavdNE5vNbuEwJeV06bLeCqHSwOYuoJDHhfde0Nfv-qwgbPuqaBNnis2xLfVd7sD-OPc3Ri9dbDxV8do9fF_GV2n6welw-z21ViBElDYkluTcmzopCMlyKXQKW0lmSEkUKUNOXTlAjKU2nSPCqW2lKDBWGMZgYKPkbJsNe4znsHVu1c1Wj3oyhRPSIVEakekeoRRb8Y_DvX1WBCs_eg6m7v2vilEiLPMqGee4w9RUrpIRVjV0Os9qFz_zcEZWwqWcZ_AeJ2dAQ</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>BURDA, MICHAEL C.</creator><creator>HUNT, JENNIFER</creator><creator>ELSBY, MICHAEL W. L.</creator><creator>HALTIWANGER, JOHN</creator><general>Brookings Institution</general><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>What Explains the German Labor Market Miracle in the Great Recession? [with Comments and Discussion]</title><author>BURDA, MICHAEL C. ; HUNT, JENNIFER ; ELSBY, MICHAEL W. L. ; HALTIWANGER, JOHN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-f09fcd37bb523d495e155ff07020b4d16386041365c690b4f1fdaefe4cca2ceb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Economic recessions</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Great Recession</topic><topic>Gross domestic product</topic><topic>Labor costs</topic><topic>Labor markets</topic><topic>Labor time</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><topic>Wages</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BURDA, MICHAEL C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUNT, JENNIFER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELSBY, MICHAEL W. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HALTIWANGER, JOHN</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Brookings papers on economic activity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BURDA, MICHAEL C.</au><au>HUNT, JENNIFER</au><au>ELSBY, MICHAEL W. L.</au><au>HALTIWANGER, JOHN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Explains the German Labor Market Miracle in the Great Recession? [with Comments and Discussion]</atitle><jtitle>Brookings papers on economic activity</jtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>2011</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>273</spage><epage>335</epage><pages>273-335</pages><issn>0007-2303</issn><issn>1533-4465</issn><eissn>1533-4465</eissn><abstract>Germany experienced an even deeper fall in GDP in the Great Recession than the United States, with little employment loss. Employers' reticence to hire in the preceding expansion, associated in part with a lack of confidence it would last, contributed to an employment shortfall equivalent to 40 percent of the missing employment decline in the recession. Another 20 percent may be explained by wage moderation. A third important element was the widespread adoption of working time accounts, which permit employers to avoid overtime pay if hours per worker average to standard hours over a window of time. We find that this provided disincentives for employers to lay off workers in the downturn. Although the overall cuts in hours per worker were consistent with the severity of the Great Recession, reduction of working time account balances substituted for traditional government-sponsored short-time work.</abstract><pub>Brookings Institution</pub><doi>10.1353/eca.2011.0004</doi><tpages>63</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-2303 |
ispartof | Brookings papers on economic activity, 2011-04, Vol.2011 (1), p.273-335 |
issn | 0007-2303 1533-4465 1533-4465 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1353_eca_2011_0004 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection |
subjects | Economic recessions Employment Great Recession Gross domestic product Labor costs Labor markets Labor time Productivity Unemployment Wages |
title | What Explains the German Labor Market Miracle in the Great Recession? [with Comments and Discussion] |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T04%3A13%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Explains%20the%20German%20Labor%20Market%20Miracle%20in%20the%20Great%20Recession?%20%5Bwith%20Comments%20and%20Discussion%5D&rft.jtitle=Brookings%20papers%20on%20economic%20activity&rft.au=BURDA,%20MICHAEL%20C.&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=2011&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=273&rft.epage=335&rft.pages=273-335&rft.issn=0007-2303&rft.eissn=1533-4465&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/eca.2011.0004&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E41228527%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-f09fcd37bb523d495e155ff07020b4d16386041365c690b4f1fdaefe4cca2ceb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41228527&rfr_iscdi=true |