Loading…

Two Birds, One Stone, or How Learning a Foreign Language Makes You a Better Language Learner

Experience with a second language (L2) has been shown to facilitate learning of a third or subsequent language (L3) (Sanz 2000). However, little is known about how much L2 experience is needed before benefits for L3 development emerge, or about whether effects depend on type of L3 instruction. We re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hispania 2017-09, Vol.100 (3), p.361-378
Main Authors: Lado, Beatriz, Bowden, Harriet Wood, Stafford, Catherine, Sanz, Cristina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6f6550f919756738fb1452023a691153cfe83cc2547d99f0ba60a5bc1343c8d23
cites
container_end_page 378
container_issue 3
container_start_page 361
container_title Hispania
container_volume 100
creator Lado, Beatriz
Bowden, Harriet Wood
Stafford, Catherine
Sanz, Cristina
description Experience with a second language (L2) has been shown to facilitate learning of a third or subsequent language (L3) (Sanz 2000). However, little is known about how much L2 experience is needed before benefits for L3 development emerge, or about whether effects depend on type of L3 instruction. We report two experiments investigating initial learning of semantic role (agent/patient) assignment in L3 Latin by native English speakers at different levels of formal experience in L2 Spanish (Beginning, Intermediate, Advanced, Very Advanced). In Experiment 1, (N 5 76), learners engaged in a computerized Latin practice session that included metalinguistic information in feedback. In Experiment 2, (N 5 0), feedback indicated only if learners’ responses in practice were right or wrong. Development was operationalized as improvement in accuracy and/or reaction time. Results showed that when feedback was metalinguistic, an intermediate level of formal L2 experience was enough to yield an advantage, however only those learners with very advanced L2 experience showed longer-term retention of that advantage. In contrast, in the absence of metalinguistic feedback, very advanced experience was required for any advantage to appear. These results inform classroom accommodations for learners with different levels of previous language experience.
doi_str_mv 10.1353/hpn.2017.0064
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1353_hpn_2017_0064</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1156404</ericid><jstor_id>26387737</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26387737</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6f6550f919756738fb1452023a691153cfe83cc2547d99f0ba60a5bc1343c8d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMFOAjEQhhujiYgePZr0AVicdrbt7lEIiAbDATyYmDSldHFRtqRdQnx7d8XIaQ7fP_9kPkJuGfQZCrz_2FV9Dkz1AWR6RjqcCUxkytJz0gFgWcIZ4iW5inEDAApBdMj74uDpoAyr2KOzytF57SvXoz7QiT_QqTOhKqs1NXTsgyvXFZ2aar03a0dfzKeL9M3vGzhwde3Cif3uuXBNLgrzFd3N3-yS1_FoMZwk09nj0_Bhmljksk5kIYWAIme5ElJhVixZKjhwNDJnzQ-2cBlay0WqVnlewNJIMGJpGaZosxXHLkmOvTb4GIMr9C6UWxO-NQPdqtGNGt2q0a2aJn93zLtQ2v_s6Lk5JlNoeXrku-A3ztbbfXR64_ehar7QUoFApeet3tYua0wCYHaq3cTah_9eLjFTChX-ANrHd-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two Birds, One Stone, or How Learning a Foreign Language Makes You a Better Language Learner</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Lado, Beatriz ; Bowden, Harriet Wood ; Stafford, Catherine ; Sanz, Cristina</creator><creatorcontrib>Lado, Beatriz ; Bowden, Harriet Wood ; Stafford, Catherine ; Sanz, Cristina</creatorcontrib><description>Experience with a second language (L2) has been shown to facilitate learning of a third or subsequent language (L3) (Sanz 2000). However, little is known about how much L2 experience is needed before benefits for L3 development emerge, or about whether effects depend on type of L3 instruction. We report two experiments investigating initial learning of semantic role (agent/patient) assignment in L3 Latin by native English speakers at different levels of formal experience in L2 Spanish (Beginning, Intermediate, Advanced, Very Advanced). In Experiment 1, (N 5 76), learners engaged in a computerized Latin practice session that included metalinguistic information in feedback. In Experiment 2, (N 5 0), feedback indicated only if learners’ responses in practice were right or wrong. Development was operationalized as improvement in accuracy and/or reaction time. Results showed that when feedback was metalinguistic, an intermediate level of formal L2 experience was enough to yield an advantage, however only those learners with very advanced L2 experience showed longer-term retention of that advantage. In contrast, in the absence of metalinguistic feedback, very advanced experience was required for any advantage to appear. These results inform classroom accommodations for learners with different levels of previous language experience.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-2133</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2153-6414</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2153-6414</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/hpn.2017.0064</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Advanced Students ; Bilingualism ; Computer Assisted Instruction ; Educational Benefits ; Educational Experiments ; English ; Feedback (Response) ; Language Tests ; Latin ; Learning Processes ; Linguistics and Language Science ; Listening Comprehension Tests ; Metalinguistics ; Multilingualism ; Novices ; Pretests Posttests ; Prior Learning ; Second Language Learning ; Semantics ; Statistical Analysis ; Vocabulary Development</subject><ispartof>Hispania, 2017-09, Vol.100 (3), p.361-378</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017</rights><rights>Copyright © The American Association for Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese (AATSP)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6f6550f919756738fb1452023a691153cfe83cc2547d99f0ba60a5bc1343c8d23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26387737$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26387737$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,58237,58470</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1156404$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lado, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowden, Harriet Wood</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stafford, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz, Cristina</creatorcontrib><title>Two Birds, One Stone, or How Learning a Foreign Language Makes You a Better Language Learner</title><title>Hispania</title><description>Experience with a second language (L2) has been shown to facilitate learning of a third or subsequent language (L3) (Sanz 2000). However, little is known about how much L2 experience is needed before benefits for L3 development emerge, or about whether effects depend on type of L3 instruction. We report two experiments investigating initial learning of semantic role (agent/patient) assignment in L3 Latin by native English speakers at different levels of formal experience in L2 Spanish (Beginning, Intermediate, Advanced, Very Advanced). In Experiment 1, (N 5 76), learners engaged in a computerized Latin practice session that included metalinguistic information in feedback. In Experiment 2, (N 5 0), feedback indicated only if learners’ responses in practice were right or wrong. Development was operationalized as improvement in accuracy and/or reaction time. Results showed that when feedback was metalinguistic, an intermediate level of formal L2 experience was enough to yield an advantage, however only those learners with very advanced L2 experience showed longer-term retention of that advantage. In contrast, in the absence of metalinguistic feedback, very advanced experience was required for any advantage to appear. These results inform classroom accommodations for learners with different levels of previous language experience.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Advanced Students</subject><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</subject><subject>Educational Benefits</subject><subject>Educational Experiments</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Language Tests</subject><subject>Latin</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Linguistics and Language Science</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension Tests</subject><subject>Metalinguistics</subject><subject>Multilingualism</subject><subject>Novices</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Prior Learning</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Vocabulary Development</subject><issn>0018-2133</issn><issn>2153-6414</issn><issn>2153-6414</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMFOAjEQhhujiYgePZr0AVicdrbt7lEIiAbDATyYmDSldHFRtqRdQnx7d8XIaQ7fP_9kPkJuGfQZCrz_2FV9Dkz1AWR6RjqcCUxkytJz0gFgWcIZ4iW5inEDAApBdMj74uDpoAyr2KOzytF57SvXoz7QiT_QqTOhKqs1NXTsgyvXFZ2aar03a0dfzKeL9M3vGzhwde3Cif3uuXBNLgrzFd3N3-yS1_FoMZwk09nj0_Bhmljksk5kIYWAIme5ElJhVixZKjhwNDJnzQ-2cBlay0WqVnlewNJIMGJpGaZosxXHLkmOvTb4GIMr9C6UWxO-NQPdqtGNGt2q0a2aJn93zLtQ2v_s6Lk5JlNoeXrku-A3ztbbfXR64_ehar7QUoFApeet3tYua0wCYHaq3cTah_9eLjFTChX-ANrHd-w</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Lado, Beatriz</creator><creator>Bowden, Harriet Wood</creator><creator>Stafford, Catherine</creator><creator>Sanz, Cristina</creator><general>American Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese, Inc</general><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Two Birds, One Stone, or How Learning a Foreign Language Makes You a Better Language Learner</title><author>Lado, Beatriz ; Bowden, Harriet Wood ; Stafford, Catherine ; Sanz, Cristina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6f6550f919756738fb1452023a691153cfe83cc2547d99f0ba60a5bc1343c8d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Advanced Students</topic><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>Computer Assisted Instruction</topic><topic>Educational Benefits</topic><topic>Educational Experiments</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Language Tests</topic><topic>Latin</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Linguistics and Language Science</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension Tests</topic><topic>Metalinguistics</topic><topic>Multilingualism</topic><topic>Novices</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Prior Learning</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Vocabulary Development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lado, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowden, Harriet Wood</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stafford, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz, Cristina</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Hispania</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lado, Beatriz</au><au>Bowden, Harriet Wood</au><au>Stafford, Catherine</au><au>Sanz, Cristina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1156404</ericid><atitle>Two Birds, One Stone, or How Learning a Foreign Language Makes You a Better Language Learner</atitle><jtitle>Hispania</jtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>361</spage><epage>378</epage><pages>361-378</pages><issn>0018-2133</issn><issn>2153-6414</issn><eissn>2153-6414</eissn><abstract>Experience with a second language (L2) has been shown to facilitate learning of a third or subsequent language (L3) (Sanz 2000). However, little is known about how much L2 experience is needed before benefits for L3 development emerge, or about whether effects depend on type of L3 instruction. We report two experiments investigating initial learning of semantic role (agent/patient) assignment in L3 Latin by native English speakers at different levels of formal experience in L2 Spanish (Beginning, Intermediate, Advanced, Very Advanced). In Experiment 1, (N 5 76), learners engaged in a computerized Latin practice session that included metalinguistic information in feedback. In Experiment 2, (N 5 0), feedback indicated only if learners’ responses in practice were right or wrong. Development was operationalized as improvement in accuracy and/or reaction time. Results showed that when feedback was metalinguistic, an intermediate level of formal L2 experience was enough to yield an advantage, however only those learners with very advanced L2 experience showed longer-term retention of that advantage. In contrast, in the absence of metalinguistic feedback, very advanced experience was required for any advantage to appear. These results inform classroom accommodations for learners with different levels of previous language experience.</abstract><pub>American Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese, Inc</pub><doi>10.1353/hpn.2017.0064</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-2133
ispartof Hispania, 2017-09, Vol.100 (3), p.361-378
issn 0018-2133
2153-6414
2153-6414
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1353_hpn_2017_0064
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection; ERIC
subjects Accuracy
Advanced Students
Bilingualism
Computer Assisted Instruction
Educational Benefits
Educational Experiments
English
Feedback (Response)
Language Tests
Latin
Learning Processes
Linguistics and Language Science
Listening Comprehension Tests
Metalinguistics
Multilingualism
Novices
Pretests Posttests
Prior Learning
Second Language Learning
Semantics
Statistical Analysis
Vocabulary Development
title Two Birds, One Stone, or How Learning a Foreign Language Makes You a Better Language Learner
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A45%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20Birds,%20One%20Stone,%20or%20How%20Learning%20a%20Foreign%20Language%20Makes%20You%20a%20Better%20Language%20Learner&rft.jtitle=Hispania&rft.au=Lado,%20Beatriz&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=378&rft.pages=361-378&rft.issn=0018-2133&rft.eissn=2153-6414&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/hpn.2017.0064&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E26387737%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6f6550f919756738fb1452023a691153cfe83cc2547d99f0ba60a5bc1343c8d23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1156404&rft_jstor_id=26387737&rfr_iscdi=true