Loading…
Two Birds, One Stone, or How Learning a Foreign Language Makes You a Better Language Learner
Experience with a second language (L2) has been shown to facilitate learning of a third or subsequent language (L3) (Sanz 2000). However, little is known about how much L2 experience is needed before benefits for L3 development emerge, or about whether effects depend on type of L3 instruction. We re...
Saved in:
Published in: | Hispania 2017-09, Vol.100 (3), p.361-378 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6f6550f919756738fb1452023a691153cfe83cc2547d99f0ba60a5bc1343c8d23 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 378 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 361 |
container_title | Hispania |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Lado, Beatriz Bowden, Harriet Wood Stafford, Catherine Sanz, Cristina |
description | Experience with a second language (L2) has been shown to facilitate learning of a third or subsequent language (L3) (Sanz 2000). However, little is known about how much L2 experience is needed before benefits for L3 development emerge, or about whether effects depend on type of L3 instruction. We report two experiments investigating initial learning of semantic role (agent/patient) assignment in L3 Latin by native English speakers at different levels of formal experience in L2 Spanish (Beginning, Intermediate, Advanced, Very Advanced). In Experiment 1, (N 5 76), learners engaged in a computerized Latin practice session that included metalinguistic information in feedback. In Experiment 2, (N 5 0), feedback indicated only if learners’ responses in practice were right or wrong. Development was operationalized as improvement in accuracy and/or reaction time. Results showed that when feedback was metalinguistic, an intermediate level of formal L2 experience was enough to yield an advantage, however only those learners with very advanced L2 experience showed longer-term retention of that advantage. In contrast, in the absence of metalinguistic feedback, very advanced experience was required for any advantage to appear. These results inform classroom accommodations for learners with different levels of previous language experience. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1353/hpn.2017.0064 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1353_hpn_2017_0064</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1156404</ericid><jstor_id>26387737</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26387737</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6f6550f919756738fb1452023a691153cfe83cc2547d99f0ba60a5bc1343c8d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMFOAjEQhhujiYgePZr0AVicdrbt7lEIiAbDATyYmDSldHFRtqRdQnx7d8XIaQ7fP_9kPkJuGfQZCrz_2FV9Dkz1AWR6RjqcCUxkytJz0gFgWcIZ4iW5inEDAApBdMj74uDpoAyr2KOzytF57SvXoz7QiT_QqTOhKqs1NXTsgyvXFZ2aar03a0dfzKeL9M3vGzhwde3Cif3uuXBNLgrzFd3N3-yS1_FoMZwk09nj0_Bhmljksk5kIYWAIme5ElJhVixZKjhwNDJnzQ-2cBlay0WqVnlewNJIMGJpGaZosxXHLkmOvTb4GIMr9C6UWxO-NQPdqtGNGt2q0a2aJn93zLtQ2v_s6Lk5JlNoeXrku-A3ztbbfXR64_ehar7QUoFApeet3tYua0wCYHaq3cTah_9eLjFTChX-ANrHd-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two Birds, One Stone, or How Learning a Foreign Language Makes You a Better Language Learner</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Lado, Beatriz ; Bowden, Harriet Wood ; Stafford, Catherine ; Sanz, Cristina</creator><creatorcontrib>Lado, Beatriz ; Bowden, Harriet Wood ; Stafford, Catherine ; Sanz, Cristina</creatorcontrib><description>Experience with a second language (L2) has been shown to facilitate learning of a third or subsequent language (L3) (Sanz 2000). However, little is known about how much L2 experience is needed before benefits for L3 development emerge, or about whether effects depend on type of L3 instruction. We report two experiments investigating initial learning of semantic role (agent/patient) assignment in L3 Latin by native English speakers at different levels of formal experience in L2 Spanish (Beginning, Intermediate, Advanced, Very Advanced). In Experiment 1, (N 5 76), learners engaged in a computerized Latin practice session that included metalinguistic information in feedback. In Experiment 2, (N 5 0), feedback indicated only if learners’ responses in practice were right or wrong. Development was operationalized as improvement in accuracy and/or reaction time. Results showed that when feedback was metalinguistic, an intermediate level of formal L2 experience was enough to yield an advantage, however only those learners with very advanced L2 experience showed longer-term retention of that advantage. In contrast, in the absence of metalinguistic feedback, very advanced experience was required for any advantage to appear. These results inform classroom accommodations for learners with different levels of previous language experience.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-2133</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2153-6414</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2153-6414</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/hpn.2017.0064</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Advanced Students ; Bilingualism ; Computer Assisted Instruction ; Educational Benefits ; Educational Experiments ; English ; Feedback (Response) ; Language Tests ; Latin ; Learning Processes ; Linguistics and Language Science ; Listening Comprehension Tests ; Metalinguistics ; Multilingualism ; Novices ; Pretests Posttests ; Prior Learning ; Second Language Learning ; Semantics ; Statistical Analysis ; Vocabulary Development</subject><ispartof>Hispania, 2017-09, Vol.100 (3), p.361-378</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017</rights><rights>Copyright © The American Association for Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese (AATSP)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6f6550f919756738fb1452023a691153cfe83cc2547d99f0ba60a5bc1343c8d23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26387737$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26387737$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,58237,58470</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1156404$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lado, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowden, Harriet Wood</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stafford, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz, Cristina</creatorcontrib><title>Two Birds, One Stone, or How Learning a Foreign Language Makes You a Better Language Learner</title><title>Hispania</title><description>Experience with a second language (L2) has been shown to facilitate learning of a third or subsequent language (L3) (Sanz 2000). However, little is known about how much L2 experience is needed before benefits for L3 development emerge, or about whether effects depend on type of L3 instruction. We report two experiments investigating initial learning of semantic role (agent/patient) assignment in L3 Latin by native English speakers at different levels of formal experience in L2 Spanish (Beginning, Intermediate, Advanced, Very Advanced). In Experiment 1, (N 5 76), learners engaged in a computerized Latin practice session that included metalinguistic information in feedback. In Experiment 2, (N 5 0), feedback indicated only if learners’ responses in practice were right or wrong. Development was operationalized as improvement in accuracy and/or reaction time. Results showed that when feedback was metalinguistic, an intermediate level of formal L2 experience was enough to yield an advantage, however only those learners with very advanced L2 experience showed longer-term retention of that advantage. In contrast, in the absence of metalinguistic feedback, very advanced experience was required for any advantage to appear. These results inform classroom accommodations for learners with different levels of previous language experience.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Advanced Students</subject><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</subject><subject>Educational Benefits</subject><subject>Educational Experiments</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Language Tests</subject><subject>Latin</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Linguistics and Language Science</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension Tests</subject><subject>Metalinguistics</subject><subject>Multilingualism</subject><subject>Novices</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Prior Learning</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Vocabulary Development</subject><issn>0018-2133</issn><issn>2153-6414</issn><issn>2153-6414</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMFOAjEQhhujiYgePZr0AVicdrbt7lEIiAbDATyYmDSldHFRtqRdQnx7d8XIaQ7fP_9kPkJuGfQZCrz_2FV9Dkz1AWR6RjqcCUxkytJz0gFgWcIZ4iW5inEDAApBdMj74uDpoAyr2KOzytF57SvXoz7QiT_QqTOhKqs1NXTsgyvXFZ2aar03a0dfzKeL9M3vGzhwde3Cif3uuXBNLgrzFd3N3-yS1_FoMZwk09nj0_Bhmljksk5kIYWAIme5ElJhVixZKjhwNDJnzQ-2cBlay0WqVnlewNJIMGJpGaZosxXHLkmOvTb4GIMr9C6UWxO-NQPdqtGNGt2q0a2aJn93zLtQ2v_s6Lk5JlNoeXrku-A3ztbbfXR64_ehar7QUoFApeet3tYua0wCYHaq3cTah_9eLjFTChX-ANrHd-w</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Lado, Beatriz</creator><creator>Bowden, Harriet Wood</creator><creator>Stafford, Catherine</creator><creator>Sanz, Cristina</creator><general>American Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese, Inc</general><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Two Birds, One Stone, or How Learning a Foreign Language Makes You a Better Language Learner</title><author>Lado, Beatriz ; Bowden, Harriet Wood ; Stafford, Catherine ; Sanz, Cristina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6f6550f919756738fb1452023a691153cfe83cc2547d99f0ba60a5bc1343c8d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Advanced Students</topic><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>Computer Assisted Instruction</topic><topic>Educational Benefits</topic><topic>Educational Experiments</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Language Tests</topic><topic>Latin</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Linguistics and Language Science</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension Tests</topic><topic>Metalinguistics</topic><topic>Multilingualism</topic><topic>Novices</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Prior Learning</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Vocabulary Development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lado, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowden, Harriet Wood</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stafford, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz, Cristina</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Hispania</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lado, Beatriz</au><au>Bowden, Harriet Wood</au><au>Stafford, Catherine</au><au>Sanz, Cristina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1156404</ericid><atitle>Two Birds, One Stone, or How Learning a Foreign Language Makes You a Better Language Learner</atitle><jtitle>Hispania</jtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>361</spage><epage>378</epage><pages>361-378</pages><issn>0018-2133</issn><issn>2153-6414</issn><eissn>2153-6414</eissn><abstract>Experience with a second language (L2) has been shown to facilitate learning of a third or subsequent language (L3) (Sanz 2000). However, little is known about how much L2 experience is needed before benefits for L3 development emerge, or about whether effects depend on type of L3 instruction. We report two experiments investigating initial learning of semantic role (agent/patient) assignment in L3 Latin by native English speakers at different levels of formal experience in L2 Spanish (Beginning, Intermediate, Advanced, Very Advanced). In Experiment 1, (N 5 76), learners engaged in a computerized Latin practice session that included metalinguistic information in feedback. In Experiment 2, (N 5 0), feedback indicated only if learners’ responses in practice were right or wrong. Development was operationalized as improvement in accuracy and/or reaction time. Results showed that when feedback was metalinguistic, an intermediate level of formal L2 experience was enough to yield an advantage, however only those learners with very advanced L2 experience showed longer-term retention of that advantage. In contrast, in the absence of metalinguistic feedback, very advanced experience was required for any advantage to appear. These results inform classroom accommodations for learners with different levels of previous language experience.</abstract><pub>American Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese, Inc</pub><doi>10.1353/hpn.2017.0064</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-2133 |
ispartof | Hispania, 2017-09, Vol.100 (3), p.361-378 |
issn | 0018-2133 2153-6414 2153-6414 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1353_hpn_2017_0064 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection; ERIC |
subjects | Accuracy Advanced Students Bilingualism Computer Assisted Instruction Educational Benefits Educational Experiments English Feedback (Response) Language Tests Latin Learning Processes Linguistics and Language Science Listening Comprehension Tests Metalinguistics Multilingualism Novices Pretests Posttests Prior Learning Second Language Learning Semantics Statistical Analysis Vocabulary Development |
title | Two Birds, One Stone, or How Learning a Foreign Language Makes You a Better Language Learner |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A45%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20Birds,%20One%20Stone,%20or%20How%20Learning%20a%20Foreign%20Language%20Makes%20You%20a%20Better%20Language%20Learner&rft.jtitle=Hispania&rft.au=Lado,%20Beatriz&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=378&rft.pages=361-378&rft.issn=0018-2133&rft.eissn=2153-6414&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/hpn.2017.0064&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E26387737%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6f6550f919756738fb1452023a691153cfe83cc2547d99f0ba60a5bc1343c8d23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1156404&rft_jstor_id=26387737&rfr_iscdi=true |