Framing humanitarian action through design thinking: integrating vulnerable end-users into complex multi-stakeholder systems through 'Agenda Space mapping'

This article explains how design thinking was applied as a research approach for the purpose of framing 'Humanitarian Action'. Insights from an initial study demonstrated the challenging experience of designing for humanitarian emergencies. Inability of the humanitarian market to integrate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of design research (Geneva, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2017, Vol.15 (1), p.1-16
Main Author: Nielsen, Brita Fladvad
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Design
Design thinking
Framing
Humanitarian aid
Stakeholders
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article explains how design thinking was applied as a research approach for the purpose of framing 'Humanitarian Action'. Insights from an initial study demonstrated the challenging experience of designing for humanitarian emergencies. Inability of the humanitarian market to integrate the perspective of the refugee as end-users results in stakeholders not working together. Through a design thinking research process, 'Agenda Spaces' emerged as a novel way of describing humanitarian action. 'Agenda Spaces' demonstrates each stakeholder's interests mapped in relation to others based on findings from participatory processes. The 'Agenda Spaces' approach also allows for the vulnerable end-user to be located as an integrated part of the system. This is a starting point for discussing long-term solutions to the problems inherent in humanitarian action. This approach is of relevance to anyone working within multiple stakeholder systems that include vulnerable and/or hard-to-reach end-users.
ISSN:1748-3050
1569-1551
DOI:10.1504/JDR.2017.084502