Loading…
Framing humanitarian action through design thinking: integrating vulnerable end-users into complex multi-stakeholder systems through 'Agenda Space mapping'
This article explains how design thinking was applied as a research approach for the purpose of framing 'Humanitarian Action'. Insights from an initial study demonstrated the challenging experience of designing for humanitarian emergencies. Inability of the humanitarian market to integrate...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of design research (Geneva, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2017, Vol.15 (1), p.1-16 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 16 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of design research (Geneva, Switzerland) |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Nielsen, Brita Fladvad |
description | This article explains how design thinking was applied as a research approach for the purpose of framing 'Humanitarian Action'. Insights from an initial study demonstrated the challenging experience of designing for humanitarian emergencies. Inability of the humanitarian market to integrate the perspective of the refugee as end-users results in stakeholders not working together. Through a design thinking research process, 'Agenda Spaces' emerged as a novel way of describing humanitarian action. 'Agenda Spaces' demonstrates each stakeholder's interests mapped in relation to others based on findings from participatory processes. The 'Agenda Spaces' approach also allows for the vulnerable end-user to be located as an integrated part of the system. This is a starting point for discussing long-term solutions to the problems inherent in humanitarian action. This approach is of relevance to anyone working within multiple stakeholder systems that include vulnerable and/or hard-to-reach end-users. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1504/JDR.2017.084502 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1504_JDR_2017_084502</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2012895342</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2652-919b1004aa55ca2afaaeabc12a357fe48a41e35cd2f5e1283033edb1c818c0133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctKxDAUhosoOKhrtwEXs-qYSzPtuBvGO4LgZV1O09NOtE1rkoo-iy9ryoi60VUS-L7_kPNH0SGjMyZpcnx9ejfjlKUzmiWS8q1owuR8ETMp2Xa4p0kWCyrpbnTgnC4onTOZLqSYRB_nFlptarIeWjDag9VgCCivO0P82nZDvSYlOl2PT22eA3tCtPFYW_Cj-Do0Bi0UDRI0ZTw4tG4EOqK6tm_wjbRD43XsPDzjumtKtMS9O4-t-x4wXdbBBXLfg0LSQt-H5Ol-tFNB4_Dg69yLHs_PHlaX8c3txdVqeRMrPpc8XrBFwShNAKRUwKECQCgU4yBkWmGSQcJQSFXySiLjmaBCYFkwlbFMUSbEXnS0ye1t9zKg8_lTN1gTRuZhpzwLi0p4oI43lLKdcxarvLe6BfueM5qPJeShhFFI800JwUg2hjbh005pNAp_sv_W6H_aU2l_43lfVuITES6fGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2012895342</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Framing humanitarian action through design thinking: integrating vulnerable end-users into complex multi-stakeholder systems through 'Agenda Space mapping'</title><source>Inderscience Journals</source><source>Design & Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</source><creator>Nielsen, Brita Fladvad</creator><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Brita Fladvad</creatorcontrib><description>This article explains how design thinking was applied as a research approach for the purpose of framing 'Humanitarian Action'. Insights from an initial study demonstrated the challenging experience of designing for humanitarian emergencies. Inability of the humanitarian market to integrate the perspective of the refugee as end-users results in stakeholders not working together. Through a design thinking research process, 'Agenda Spaces' emerged as a novel way of describing humanitarian action. 'Agenda Spaces' demonstrates each stakeholder's interests mapped in relation to others based on findings from participatory processes. The 'Agenda Spaces' approach also allows for the vulnerable end-user to be located as an integrated part of the system. This is a starting point for discussing long-term solutions to the problems inherent in humanitarian action. This approach is of relevance to anyone working within multiple stakeholder systems that include vulnerable and/or hard-to-reach end-users.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-3050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1569-1551</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1504/JDR.2017.084502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Geneva: Inderscience Publishers (IEL)</publisher><subject>Design ; Design thinking ; Framing ; Humanitarian aid ; Stakeholders</subject><ispartof>Journal of design research (Geneva, Switzerland), 2017, Vol.15 (1), p.1-16</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1504/JDR.2017.084502$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginderscience$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/JDR.2017.084502$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginderscience$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27424,27923,27924,27925,34130,75359,75415</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Brita Fladvad</creatorcontrib><title>Framing humanitarian action through design thinking: integrating vulnerable end-users into complex multi-stakeholder systems through 'Agenda Space mapping'</title><title>Journal of design research (Geneva, Switzerland)</title><addtitle>jdr</addtitle><description>This article explains how design thinking was applied as a research approach for the purpose of framing 'Humanitarian Action'. Insights from an initial study demonstrated the challenging experience of designing for humanitarian emergencies. Inability of the humanitarian market to integrate the perspective of the refugee as end-users results in stakeholders not working together. Through a design thinking research process, 'Agenda Spaces' emerged as a novel way of describing humanitarian action. 'Agenda Spaces' demonstrates each stakeholder's interests mapped in relation to others based on findings from participatory processes. The 'Agenda Spaces' approach also allows for the vulnerable end-user to be located as an integrated part of the system. This is a starting point for discussing long-term solutions to the problems inherent in humanitarian action. This approach is of relevance to anyone working within multiple stakeholder systems that include vulnerable and/or hard-to-reach end-users.</description><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design thinking</subject><subject>Framing</subject><subject>Humanitarian aid</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><issn>1748-3050</issn><issn>1569-1551</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RTD</sourceid><sourceid>F29</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctKxDAUhosoOKhrtwEXs-qYSzPtuBvGO4LgZV1O09NOtE1rkoo-iy9ryoi60VUS-L7_kPNH0SGjMyZpcnx9ejfjlKUzmiWS8q1owuR8ETMp2Xa4p0kWCyrpbnTgnC4onTOZLqSYRB_nFlptarIeWjDag9VgCCivO0P82nZDvSYlOl2PT22eA3tCtPFYW_Cj-Do0Bi0UDRI0ZTw4tG4EOqK6tm_wjbRD43XsPDzjumtKtMS9O4-t-x4wXdbBBXLfg0LSQt-H5Ol-tFNB4_Dg69yLHs_PHlaX8c3txdVqeRMrPpc8XrBFwShNAKRUwKECQCgU4yBkWmGSQcJQSFXySiLjmaBCYFkwlbFMUSbEXnS0ye1t9zKg8_lTN1gTRuZhpzwLi0p4oI43lLKdcxarvLe6BfueM5qPJeShhFFI800JwUg2hjbh005pNAp_sv_W6H_aU2l_43lfVuITES6fGA</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Nielsen, Brita Fladvad</creator><general>Inderscience Publishers (IEL)</general><general>Inderscience Enterprises Ltd</general><scope>RTD</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F29</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Framing humanitarian action through design thinking: integrating vulnerable end-users into complex multi-stakeholder systems through 'Agenda Space mapping'</title><author>Nielsen, Brita Fladvad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2652-919b1004aa55ca2afaaeabc12a357fe48a41e35cd2f5e1283033edb1c818c0133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design thinking</topic><topic>Framing</topic><topic>Humanitarian aid</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Brita Fladvad</creatorcontrib><collection>Inderscience Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Design & Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of design research (Geneva, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nielsen, Brita Fladvad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Framing humanitarian action through design thinking: integrating vulnerable end-users into complex multi-stakeholder systems through 'Agenda Space mapping'</atitle><jtitle>Journal of design research (Geneva, Switzerland)</jtitle><addtitle>jdr</addtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>1-16</pages><issn>1748-3050</issn><eissn>1569-1551</eissn><abstract>This article explains how design thinking was applied as a research approach for the purpose of framing 'Humanitarian Action'. Insights from an initial study demonstrated the challenging experience of designing for humanitarian emergencies. Inability of the humanitarian market to integrate the perspective of the refugee as end-users results in stakeholders not working together. Through a design thinking research process, 'Agenda Spaces' emerged as a novel way of describing humanitarian action. 'Agenda Spaces' demonstrates each stakeholder's interests mapped in relation to others based on findings from participatory processes. The 'Agenda Spaces' approach also allows for the vulnerable end-user to be located as an integrated part of the system. This is a starting point for discussing long-term solutions to the problems inherent in humanitarian action. This approach is of relevance to anyone working within multiple stakeholder systems that include vulnerable and/or hard-to-reach end-users.</abstract><cop>Geneva</cop><pub>Inderscience Publishers (IEL)</pub><doi>10.1504/JDR.2017.084502</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-3050 |
ispartof | Journal of design research (Geneva, Switzerland), 2017, Vol.15 (1), p.1-16 |
issn | 1748-3050 1569-1551 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1504_JDR_2017_084502 |
source | Inderscience Journals; Design & Applied Arts Index (DAAI) |
subjects | Design Design thinking Framing Humanitarian aid Stakeholders |
title | Framing humanitarian action through design thinking: integrating vulnerable end-users into complex multi-stakeholder systems through 'Agenda Space mapping' |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A21%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Framing%20humanitarian%20action%20through%20design%20thinking:%20integrating%20vulnerable%20end-users%20into%20complex%20multi-stakeholder%20systems%20through%20'Agenda%20Space%20mapping'&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20design%20research%20(Geneva,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Nielsen,%20Brita%20Fladvad&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=1-16&rft.issn=1748-3050&rft.eissn=1569-1551&rft_id=info:doi/10.1504/JDR.2017.084502&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2012895342%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2652-919b1004aa55ca2afaaeabc12a357fe48a41e35cd2f5e1283033edb1c818c0133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2012895342&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |