Loading…
Parua magnis: Die Villenbeschreibungen des jüngeren Plinius im intertextuellen Größenvergleich (epistulae 2,17 und 5,6)
Despite the frequent use of the antithesis of and in Latin literature, the expression in Pliny 5,6,43–44 need not be read as proverbial but as a quotation of Vergil, 4,176. This attribution follows from the naming of Vergil and of Aratus in . 5,6,43–44. Combined allusions as in 5,6,43–44, consisting...
Saved in:
Published in: | Philologus 2023-06, Vol.167 (1), p.124-143 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng ; ger |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Despite the frequent use of the antithesis of
and
in Latin literature, the expression
in Pliny 5,6,43–44 need not be read as proverbial but as a quotation of Vergil,
4,176. This attribution follows from the naming of Vergil and of Aratus in
. 5,6,43–44. Combined allusions as in 5,6,43–44, consisting of a quotation, the naming of the author and/or narrative structures, are a pattern in the corpus of the younger Pliny’s correspondence. The context of
. 4,169–179, too, supports the attribution of the phrase as a quotation, since in Vergil’s lines a comparison of genres is made, which Pliny adopts for his own literary positioning in the descriptions of villas in
2,17 und 5,6. Further, the attribution to Vergil’s didactic poem, in combination with the reference to Aratus, which other interpretations hardly take into account, permits a new understanding of the narrative structure of the villa descriptions and their allusive affinity not only to ecphrasis but also to didactic poetry. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0031-7985 2196-7008 |
DOI: | 10.1515/phil-2023-0112 |