Loading…

Discussion of “Correlations for Fully Softened Shear Strength Parameters” by B. A. Castellanos, T. L., Brandon, and D. R. VandenBerge, This Article Was Published in Geotechnical Testing Journal , Vol. 39, No. 4, 2016. [DOI: 10.1520/GTJ20150184]

In this paper, the authors criticize the fully softened strength (FSS) correlation by Stark and Eid (Stark, T. D. and Eid, H. T., 1997, “Slope Stability Analyses in Stiff Fissured Clays,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., Vol. 123, No. 4, pp. 335–343) and subsequent updates (Stark, T.D., Choi, H., and M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geotechnical testing journal 2017-05, Vol.40 (3), p.517-525
Main Author: Stark, T. D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c163t-7efe26611ea68d5bbdca2ff923461623c1eca198ac93b8acdacb53aa856e56bc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c163t-7efe26611ea68d5bbdca2ff923461623c1eca198ac93b8acdacb53aa856e56bc3
container_end_page 525
container_issue 3
container_start_page 517
container_title Geotechnical testing journal
container_volume 40
creator Stark, T. D.
description In this paper, the authors criticize the fully softened strength (FSS) correlation by Stark and Eid (Stark, T. D. and Eid, H. T., 1997, “Slope Stability Analyses in Stiff Fissured Clays,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., Vol. 123, No. 4, pp. 335–343) and subsequent updates (Stark, T.D., Choi, H., and McCone, S., 2005, “Shear Strengths for Analysis of Landslides,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 5, pp. 575–588; Stark, T. D. and Hussain, M., 2010, “Shear Strength in Preexisting Landslides,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 7, pp. 957–962; Gamez, J. and Stark, T. D., 2014, “Fully Softened Shear Strength at Low Stresses for Levee and Embankment Design,” Geotech. Geoenviron. J., Vol. 140, No. 9) in the following five areas: (1) use of a torsional ring shear device, (2) converting the ring shear results to the triaxial compression mode of shear, (3) sample processing, (4) a non- continuous strength envelope, and (5) use of three distinct clay-size fraction groups even though admitting that the Stark and Eid (Stark, T.D. and Eid, H.T., 1997, “Slope Stability Analyses in Stiff Fissured Clays,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., Vol. 123, No. 4, pp. 335–343) correlation “is used widely and has been generally accepted in practice.” The authors also use questionable direct shear test data from Castellanos (2014, “Use and Measurement of Fully Softened Shear Strength,” Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, p. 805, https://www.dropbox.com/s/0k0ym51d8jdmn4v/Castellanos-FSS-Thesis-2014.pdf?dl=0.) to develop a fully softened strength correlation based on index properties, i.e., clay-size fraction (CF) and plasticity index (PI). The following paragraphs address these five criticisms, the questionable ring shear and direct shear testing presented in Castellanos (2014, “Use and Measurement of Fully Softened Shear Strength,” Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, p. 805, https://www.dropbox.com/s/0k0ym51d8jdmn4v/Castellanos-FSS-Thesis-2014.pdf?dl=0.), and the proposed FSS correlation.
doi_str_mv 10.1520/GTJ20160148
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1520_GTJ20160148</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1520_GTJ20160148</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c163t-7efe26611ea68d5bbdca2ff923461623c1eca198ac93b8acdacb53aa856e56bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1v1DAQtRBILC0n_sDcSUycxN6E237QpdWKVuxSDgitHGeyMXLtyvYe9tYfAn-uv4JjXcGhvcybeRrNm3lDyDtWUMbL4sNqe1EWTBSsbl6QCWtrnk95zV-SSaLaXDDGX5M3IfwqCtaU03JC_i51UIcQtLPgBri_-71w3qORMTEBBufh7GDMETZuiGixh82I0sMmerT7OMKV9PIGI_pwf_cHuiPMKcwoLGSIaIy0LmSwpbCmGcy9tL2zGSSAJYWvFK5TinaOfo-pbdQBZj5qZRC-ywBXh87oMCZRbWGFLqIarVbSwBZD1HYPF-7gbaozuHaGQtVm8MVRqDN49IHCj-Xl-Ud4bg9Pt9c_T8mrQZqAb__jCfl29mm7-JyvL1fni9k6V0xUMZ_igKVIxqEUTc-7rleyHIa2rGrBRFkphkqytpGqrboUe6k6XknZcIFcdKo6Ie__zVXeheBx2N16fSP9cceK3eNWuydPqx4Ap7CH9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discussion of “Correlations for Fully Softened Shear Strength Parameters” by B. A. Castellanos, T. L., Brandon, and D. R. VandenBerge, This Article Was Published in Geotechnical Testing Journal , Vol. 39, No. 4, 2016. [DOI: 10.1520/GTJ20150184]</title><source>ASTM Journals</source><creator>Stark, T. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stark, T. D.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, the authors criticize the fully softened strength (FSS) correlation by Stark and Eid (Stark, T. D. and Eid, H. T., 1997, “Slope Stability Analyses in Stiff Fissured Clays,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., Vol. 123, No. 4, pp. 335–343) and subsequent updates (Stark, T.D., Choi, H., and McCone, S., 2005, “Shear Strengths for Analysis of Landslides,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 5, pp. 575–588; Stark, T. D. and Hussain, M., 2010, “Shear Strength in Preexisting Landslides,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 7, pp. 957–962; Gamez, J. and Stark, T. D., 2014, “Fully Softened Shear Strength at Low Stresses for Levee and Embankment Design,” Geotech. Geoenviron. J., Vol. 140, No. 9) in the following five areas: (1) use of a torsional ring shear device, (2) converting the ring shear results to the triaxial compression mode of shear, (3) sample processing, (4) a non- continuous strength envelope, and (5) use of three distinct clay-size fraction groups even though admitting that the Stark and Eid (Stark, T.D. and Eid, H.T., 1997, “Slope Stability Analyses in Stiff Fissured Clays,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., Vol. 123, No. 4, pp. 335–343) correlation “is used widely and has been generally accepted in practice.” The authors also use questionable direct shear test data from Castellanos (2014, “Use and Measurement of Fully Softened Shear Strength,” Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, p. 805, https://www.dropbox.com/s/0k0ym51d8jdmn4v/Castellanos-FSS-Thesis-2014.pdf?dl=0.) to develop a fully softened strength correlation based on index properties, i.e., clay-size fraction (CF) and plasticity index (PI). The following paragraphs address these five criticisms, the questionable ring shear and direct shear testing presented in Castellanos (2014, “Use and Measurement of Fully Softened Shear Strength,” Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, p. 805, https://www.dropbox.com/s/0k0ym51d8jdmn4v/Castellanos-FSS-Thesis-2014.pdf?dl=0.), and the proposed FSS correlation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-6115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-7545</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1520/GTJ20160148</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Geotechnical testing journal, 2017-05, Vol.40 (3), p.517-525</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c163t-7efe26611ea68d5bbdca2ff923461623c1eca198ac93b8acdacb53aa856e56bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c163t-7efe26611ea68d5bbdca2ff923461623c1eca198ac93b8acdacb53aa856e56bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stark, T. D.</creatorcontrib><title>Discussion of “Correlations for Fully Softened Shear Strength Parameters” by B. A. Castellanos, T. L., Brandon, and D. R. VandenBerge, This Article Was Published in Geotechnical Testing Journal , Vol. 39, No. 4, 2016. [DOI: 10.1520/GTJ20150184]</title><title>Geotechnical testing journal</title><description>In this paper, the authors criticize the fully softened strength (FSS) correlation by Stark and Eid (Stark, T. D. and Eid, H. T., 1997, “Slope Stability Analyses in Stiff Fissured Clays,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., Vol. 123, No. 4, pp. 335–343) and subsequent updates (Stark, T.D., Choi, H., and McCone, S., 2005, “Shear Strengths for Analysis of Landslides,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 5, pp. 575–588; Stark, T. D. and Hussain, M., 2010, “Shear Strength in Preexisting Landslides,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 7, pp. 957–962; Gamez, J. and Stark, T. D., 2014, “Fully Softened Shear Strength at Low Stresses for Levee and Embankment Design,” Geotech. Geoenviron. J., Vol. 140, No. 9) in the following five areas: (1) use of a torsional ring shear device, (2) converting the ring shear results to the triaxial compression mode of shear, (3) sample processing, (4) a non- continuous strength envelope, and (5) use of three distinct clay-size fraction groups even though admitting that the Stark and Eid (Stark, T.D. and Eid, H.T., 1997, “Slope Stability Analyses in Stiff Fissured Clays,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., Vol. 123, No. 4, pp. 335–343) correlation “is used widely and has been generally accepted in practice.” The authors also use questionable direct shear test data from Castellanos (2014, “Use and Measurement of Fully Softened Shear Strength,” Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, p. 805, https://www.dropbox.com/s/0k0ym51d8jdmn4v/Castellanos-FSS-Thesis-2014.pdf?dl=0.) to develop a fully softened strength correlation based on index properties, i.e., clay-size fraction (CF) and plasticity index (PI). The following paragraphs address these five criticisms, the questionable ring shear and direct shear testing presented in Castellanos (2014, “Use and Measurement of Fully Softened Shear Strength,” Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, p. 805, https://www.dropbox.com/s/0k0ym51d8jdmn4v/Castellanos-FSS-Thesis-2014.pdf?dl=0.), and the proposed FSS correlation.</description><issn>0149-6115</issn><issn>1945-7545</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1v1DAQtRBILC0n_sDcSUycxN6E237QpdWKVuxSDgitHGeyMXLtyvYe9tYfAn-uv4JjXcGhvcybeRrNm3lDyDtWUMbL4sNqe1EWTBSsbl6QCWtrnk95zV-SSaLaXDDGX5M3IfwqCtaU03JC_i51UIcQtLPgBri_-71w3qORMTEBBufh7GDMETZuiGixh82I0sMmerT7OMKV9PIGI_pwf_cHuiPMKcwoLGSIaIy0LmSwpbCmGcy9tL2zGSSAJYWvFK5TinaOfo-pbdQBZj5qZRC-ywBXh87oMCZRbWGFLqIarVbSwBZD1HYPF-7gbaozuHaGQtVm8MVRqDN49IHCj-Xl-Ud4bg9Pt9c_T8mrQZqAb__jCfl29mm7-JyvL1fni9k6V0xUMZ_igKVIxqEUTc-7rleyHIa2rGrBRFkphkqytpGqrboUe6k6XknZcIFcdKo6Ie__zVXeheBx2N16fSP9cceK3eNWuydPqx4Ap7CH9Q</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Stark, T. D.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Discussion of “Correlations for Fully Softened Shear Strength Parameters” by B. A. Castellanos, T. L., Brandon, and D. R. VandenBerge, This Article Was Published in Geotechnical Testing Journal , Vol. 39, No. 4, 2016. [DOI: 10.1520/GTJ20150184]</title><author>Stark, T. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c163t-7efe26611ea68d5bbdca2ff923461623c1eca198ac93b8acdacb53aa856e56bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stark, T. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Geotechnical testing journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stark, T. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discussion of “Correlations for Fully Softened Shear Strength Parameters” by B. A. Castellanos, T. L., Brandon, and D. R. VandenBerge, This Article Was Published in Geotechnical Testing Journal , Vol. 39, No. 4, 2016. [DOI: 10.1520/GTJ20150184]</atitle><jtitle>Geotechnical testing journal</jtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>517</spage><epage>525</epage><pages>517-525</pages><issn>0149-6115</issn><eissn>1945-7545</eissn><abstract>In this paper, the authors criticize the fully softened strength (FSS) correlation by Stark and Eid (Stark, T. D. and Eid, H. T., 1997, “Slope Stability Analyses in Stiff Fissured Clays,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., Vol. 123, No. 4, pp. 335–343) and subsequent updates (Stark, T.D., Choi, H., and McCone, S., 2005, “Shear Strengths for Analysis of Landslides,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 5, pp. 575–588; Stark, T. D. and Hussain, M., 2010, “Shear Strength in Preexisting Landslides,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 7, pp. 957–962; Gamez, J. and Stark, T. D., 2014, “Fully Softened Shear Strength at Low Stresses for Levee and Embankment Design,” Geotech. Geoenviron. J., Vol. 140, No. 9) in the following five areas: (1) use of a torsional ring shear device, (2) converting the ring shear results to the triaxial compression mode of shear, (3) sample processing, (4) a non- continuous strength envelope, and (5) use of three distinct clay-size fraction groups even though admitting that the Stark and Eid (Stark, T.D. and Eid, H.T., 1997, “Slope Stability Analyses in Stiff Fissured Clays,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., Vol. 123, No. 4, pp. 335–343) correlation “is used widely and has been generally accepted in practice.” The authors also use questionable direct shear test data from Castellanos (2014, “Use and Measurement of Fully Softened Shear Strength,” Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, p. 805, https://www.dropbox.com/s/0k0ym51d8jdmn4v/Castellanos-FSS-Thesis-2014.pdf?dl=0.) to develop a fully softened strength correlation based on index properties, i.e., clay-size fraction (CF) and plasticity index (PI). The following paragraphs address these five criticisms, the questionable ring shear and direct shear testing presented in Castellanos (2014, “Use and Measurement of Fully Softened Shear Strength,” Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, p. 805, https://www.dropbox.com/s/0k0ym51d8jdmn4v/Castellanos-FSS-Thesis-2014.pdf?dl=0.), and the proposed FSS correlation.</abstract><doi>10.1520/GTJ20160148</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-6115
ispartof Geotechnical testing journal, 2017-05, Vol.40 (3), p.517-525
issn 0149-6115
1945-7545
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1520_GTJ20160148
source ASTM Journals
title Discussion of “Correlations for Fully Softened Shear Strength Parameters” by B. A. Castellanos, T. L., Brandon, and D. R. VandenBerge, This Article Was Published in Geotechnical Testing Journal , Vol. 39, No. 4, 2016. [DOI: 10.1520/GTJ20150184]
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T13%3A51%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discussion%20of%20%E2%80%9CCorrelations%20for%20Fully%20Softened%20Shear%20Strength%20Parameters%E2%80%9D%20by%20B.%20A.%20Castellanos,%20T.%20L.,%20Brandon,%20and%20D.%20R.%20VandenBerge,%20This%20Article%20Was%20Published%20in%20Geotechnical%20Testing%20Journal%20,%20Vol.%2039,%20No.%204,%202016.%20%5BDOI:%2010.1520/GTJ20150184%5D&rft.jtitle=Geotechnical%20testing%20journal&rft.au=Stark,%20T.%20D.&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=517&rft.epage=525&rft.pages=517-525&rft.issn=0149-6115&rft.eissn=1945-7545&rft_id=info:doi/10.1520/GTJ20160148&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1520_GTJ20160148%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c163t-7efe26611ea68d5bbdca2ff923461623c1eca198ac93b8acdacb53aa856e56bc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true