Loading…
Activity and rumination of implanted Charolais × Angus feedlot steers versus non-implanted counterparts consuming 3 levels of roughage throughout a 361-day feeding duration
Rumination and activity of growing feedlot steers were evaluated in response to growth-promoting implant administration, feeding duration, and dietary rough- age. Charolais × Angus steers (n = 80) were randomized to harvest (1, 42, 84, 126, 168, 210, 252, 294, 336, or 378 d on feed) and implant trea...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied Animal Science 2024-04, Vol.40 (2), p.227-235 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2017-3b8e6a696699681a2974c11a915b651e0a718dbac815fe227a17181be3252d8b3 |
container_end_page | 235 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 227 |
container_title | Applied Animal Science |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Pillmore, Sierra L. Kirkpatrick, Tylo J. Wesley, Kaitlyn R. Cooper, Kimberly B. Francis, Forest L. Tennant, Travis C. Nichols, Wade T. Hutcheson, John P. Lawrence, Ty E. |
description | Rumination and activity of growing feedlot steers were evaluated in response to growth-promoting implant administration, feeding duration, and dietary rough- age.
Charolais × Angus steers (n = 80) were randomized to harvest (1, 42, 84, 126, 168, 210, 252, 294, 336, or 378 d on feed) and implant treatment (REV: Revalor-XS on d 0 and d 190; CON: no implant). Activity and rumination were objectively monitored via accelerometers attached to the left ear. Steers consumed 3 rations throughout the study: starter (38.5% roughage), intermediate (23% roughage), and finishing (8.5% rough- age). Data were logged in 2-h increments from 77 steers across 361 d and analyzed using mixed models.
Rumination and activity varied within 24-h, exhibiting bimodal patterns; rumination peaked at 0600 and 1400 h and troughed at 1000 and 1800 h. Activity peaked at 0800 and 1800 h and troughed at 0400, 1200 to 1400, and 2200 h. Steers administered REV ruminated less (331 vs. 354 min/d) than CON; however, activity was similar between treatments. Treatment × roughage interactions occurred for rumination and activity. Rumination tended to be greater for CON steers consuming 38.5% than CON steers consuming 23% roughage, furthermore, CON steers ruminated more than REV when consuming 8.5% roughage. Implanted and non-implanted steers ruminated less as roughage inclusion decreased from 38.5% and 23% to 8.5% (457 and 439 vs. 317 min/d, respectively) in the finishing ration. Activity was greatest for steers consuming 38.5% roughage and was similar between treatments; however, activity decreased upon transition to 23% and 8.5% roughage. Observed surges and declines in activity can be attributed to processing days and weather events. Implanted steers consuming 8.5% roughage were more active (342 vs. 337 and 333 min/d) than CON and REV steers consuming 23% roughage.
In conclusion, rumination and activity are responsive to hour of day, dietary roughage and growth-promoting implants. |
doi_str_mv | 10.15232/aas.2023-02517 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_15232_aas_2023_02517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2590286524000302</els_id><sourcerecordid>S2590286524000302</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2017-3b8e6a696699681a2974c11a915b651e0a718dbac815fe227a17181be3252d8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtqwzAQhk1poaHNultdwIkkR34sQ-gLAt20azOWxo6KIwVJNuQkPUVP0YtVcQrtppt5wTf_zJ8kd4wumOAZXwL4Bac8SykXrLhIZlxUNOVlLi7_1NfJ3Pt3Sikv6ark1Sz5XMugRx2OBIwibthrA0FbQ2xL9P7QgwmoyGYHzvagPfn6IGvTDZ60iKq3gfiA6DwZY4hTY036i0k7xOwO4IKPjfGn9R3JSI8j9v6k4ezQ7aBDEnZTaYdAgGQ5SxUcJ5EToQY3XXWbXLXQe5z_5Jvk7eH-dfOUbl8enzfrbSo5ZUWaNSXmkFd5XlV5yYBXxUoyBhUTTS4YUihYqRqQJRMtcl4AiwPWYMYFV2WT3STL817prPcO2_rg9B7csWa0ngyvo-H1yfB6MjwS1ZmIf-Go0dVeajQy3u9QhlpZ_S_7DY8xitY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Activity and rumination of implanted Charolais × Angus feedlot steers versus non-implanted counterparts consuming 3 levels of roughage throughout a 361-day feeding duration</title><source>ScienceDirect</source><creator>Pillmore, Sierra L. ; Kirkpatrick, Tylo J. ; Wesley, Kaitlyn R. ; Cooper, Kimberly B. ; Francis, Forest L. ; Tennant, Travis C. ; Nichols, Wade T. ; Hutcheson, John P. ; Lawrence, Ty E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pillmore, Sierra L. ; Kirkpatrick, Tylo J. ; Wesley, Kaitlyn R. ; Cooper, Kimberly B. ; Francis, Forest L. ; Tennant, Travis C. ; Nichols, Wade T. ; Hutcheson, John P. ; Lawrence, Ty E.</creatorcontrib><description>Rumination and activity of growing feedlot steers were evaluated in response to growth-promoting implant administration, feeding duration, and dietary rough- age.
Charolais × Angus steers (n = 80) were randomized to harvest (1, 42, 84, 126, 168, 210, 252, 294, 336, or 378 d on feed) and implant treatment (REV: Revalor-XS on d 0 and d 190; CON: no implant). Activity and rumination were objectively monitored via accelerometers attached to the left ear. Steers consumed 3 rations throughout the study: starter (38.5% roughage), intermediate (23% roughage), and finishing (8.5% rough- age). Data were logged in 2-h increments from 77 steers across 361 d and analyzed using mixed models.
Rumination and activity varied within 24-h, exhibiting bimodal patterns; rumination peaked at 0600 and 1400 h and troughed at 1000 and 1800 h. Activity peaked at 0800 and 1800 h and troughed at 0400, 1200 to 1400, and 2200 h. Steers administered REV ruminated less (331 vs. 354 min/d) than CON; however, activity was similar between treatments. Treatment × roughage interactions occurred for rumination and activity. Rumination tended to be greater for CON steers consuming 38.5% than CON steers consuming 23% roughage, furthermore, CON steers ruminated more than REV when consuming 8.5% roughage. Implanted and non-implanted steers ruminated less as roughage inclusion decreased from 38.5% and 23% to 8.5% (457 and 439 vs. 317 min/d, respectively) in the finishing ration. Activity was greatest for steers consuming 38.5% roughage and was similar between treatments; however, activity decreased upon transition to 23% and 8.5% roughage. Observed surges and declines in activity can be attributed to processing days and weather events. Implanted steers consuming 8.5% roughage were more active (342 vs. 337 and 333 min/d) than CON and REV steers consuming 23% roughage.
In conclusion, rumination and activity are responsive to hour of day, dietary roughage and growth-promoting implants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2590-2865</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2590-2865</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15232/aas.2023-02517</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>activity ; feedlot ; implant ; rumination ; steer</subject><ispartof>Applied Animal Science, 2024-04, Vol.40 (2), p.227-235</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2017-3b8e6a696699681a2974c11a915b651e0a718dbac815fe227a17181be3252d8b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4857-8878 ; 0000-0002-2953-5370 ; 0000-0001-7088-5455 ; 0000-0002-9279-747X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524000302$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pillmore, Sierra L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkpatrick, Tylo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wesley, Kaitlyn R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Kimberly B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francis, Forest L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tennant, Travis C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Wade T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutcheson, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Ty E.</creatorcontrib><title>Activity and rumination of implanted Charolais × Angus feedlot steers versus non-implanted counterparts consuming 3 levels of roughage throughout a 361-day feeding duration</title><title>Applied Animal Science</title><description>Rumination and activity of growing feedlot steers were evaluated in response to growth-promoting implant administration, feeding duration, and dietary rough- age.
Charolais × Angus steers (n = 80) were randomized to harvest (1, 42, 84, 126, 168, 210, 252, 294, 336, or 378 d on feed) and implant treatment (REV: Revalor-XS on d 0 and d 190; CON: no implant). Activity and rumination were objectively monitored via accelerometers attached to the left ear. Steers consumed 3 rations throughout the study: starter (38.5% roughage), intermediate (23% roughage), and finishing (8.5% rough- age). Data were logged in 2-h increments from 77 steers across 361 d and analyzed using mixed models.
Rumination and activity varied within 24-h, exhibiting bimodal patterns; rumination peaked at 0600 and 1400 h and troughed at 1000 and 1800 h. Activity peaked at 0800 and 1800 h and troughed at 0400, 1200 to 1400, and 2200 h. Steers administered REV ruminated less (331 vs. 354 min/d) than CON; however, activity was similar between treatments. Treatment × roughage interactions occurred for rumination and activity. Rumination tended to be greater for CON steers consuming 38.5% than CON steers consuming 23% roughage, furthermore, CON steers ruminated more than REV when consuming 8.5% roughage. Implanted and non-implanted steers ruminated less as roughage inclusion decreased from 38.5% and 23% to 8.5% (457 and 439 vs. 317 min/d, respectively) in the finishing ration. Activity was greatest for steers consuming 38.5% roughage and was similar between treatments; however, activity decreased upon transition to 23% and 8.5% roughage. Observed surges and declines in activity can be attributed to processing days and weather events. Implanted steers consuming 8.5% roughage were more active (342 vs. 337 and 333 min/d) than CON and REV steers consuming 23% roughage.
In conclusion, rumination and activity are responsive to hour of day, dietary roughage and growth-promoting implants.</description><subject>activity</subject><subject>feedlot</subject><subject>implant</subject><subject>rumination</subject><subject>steer</subject><issn>2590-2865</issn><issn>2590-2865</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtqwzAQhk1poaHNultdwIkkR34sQ-gLAt20azOWxo6KIwVJNuQkPUVP0YtVcQrtppt5wTf_zJ8kd4wumOAZXwL4Bac8SykXrLhIZlxUNOVlLi7_1NfJ3Pt3Sikv6ark1Sz5XMugRx2OBIwibthrA0FbQ2xL9P7QgwmoyGYHzvagPfn6IGvTDZ60iKq3gfiA6DwZY4hTY036i0k7xOwO4IKPjfGn9R3JSI8j9v6k4ezQ7aBDEnZTaYdAgGQ5SxUcJ5EToQY3XXWbXLXQe5z_5Jvk7eH-dfOUbl8enzfrbSo5ZUWaNSXmkFd5XlV5yYBXxUoyBhUTTS4YUihYqRqQJRMtcl4AiwPWYMYFV2WT3STL817prPcO2_rg9B7csWa0ngyvo-H1yfB6MjwS1ZmIf-Go0dVeajQy3u9QhlpZ_S_7DY8xitY</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Pillmore, Sierra L.</creator><creator>Kirkpatrick, Tylo J.</creator><creator>Wesley, Kaitlyn R.</creator><creator>Cooper, Kimberly B.</creator><creator>Francis, Forest L.</creator><creator>Tennant, Travis C.</creator><creator>Nichols, Wade T.</creator><creator>Hutcheson, John P.</creator><creator>Lawrence, Ty E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4857-8878</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2953-5370</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7088-5455</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9279-747X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>Activity and rumination of implanted Charolais × Angus feedlot steers versus non-implanted counterparts consuming 3 levels of roughage throughout a 361-day feeding duration</title><author>Pillmore, Sierra L. ; Kirkpatrick, Tylo J. ; Wesley, Kaitlyn R. ; Cooper, Kimberly B. ; Francis, Forest L. ; Tennant, Travis C. ; Nichols, Wade T. ; Hutcheson, John P. ; Lawrence, Ty E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2017-3b8e6a696699681a2974c11a915b651e0a718dbac815fe227a17181be3252d8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>activity</topic><topic>feedlot</topic><topic>implant</topic><topic>rumination</topic><topic>steer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pillmore, Sierra L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkpatrick, Tylo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wesley, Kaitlyn R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Kimberly B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francis, Forest L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tennant, Travis C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Wade T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutcheson, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Ty E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Applied Animal Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pillmore, Sierra L.</au><au>Kirkpatrick, Tylo J.</au><au>Wesley, Kaitlyn R.</au><au>Cooper, Kimberly B.</au><au>Francis, Forest L.</au><au>Tennant, Travis C.</au><au>Nichols, Wade T.</au><au>Hutcheson, John P.</au><au>Lawrence, Ty E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Activity and rumination of implanted Charolais × Angus feedlot steers versus non-implanted counterparts consuming 3 levels of roughage throughout a 361-day feeding duration</atitle><jtitle>Applied Animal Science</jtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>235</epage><pages>227-235</pages><issn>2590-2865</issn><eissn>2590-2865</eissn><abstract>Rumination and activity of growing feedlot steers were evaluated in response to growth-promoting implant administration, feeding duration, and dietary rough- age.
Charolais × Angus steers (n = 80) were randomized to harvest (1, 42, 84, 126, 168, 210, 252, 294, 336, or 378 d on feed) and implant treatment (REV: Revalor-XS on d 0 and d 190; CON: no implant). Activity and rumination were objectively monitored via accelerometers attached to the left ear. Steers consumed 3 rations throughout the study: starter (38.5% roughage), intermediate (23% roughage), and finishing (8.5% rough- age). Data were logged in 2-h increments from 77 steers across 361 d and analyzed using mixed models.
Rumination and activity varied within 24-h, exhibiting bimodal patterns; rumination peaked at 0600 and 1400 h and troughed at 1000 and 1800 h. Activity peaked at 0800 and 1800 h and troughed at 0400, 1200 to 1400, and 2200 h. Steers administered REV ruminated less (331 vs. 354 min/d) than CON; however, activity was similar between treatments. Treatment × roughage interactions occurred for rumination and activity. Rumination tended to be greater for CON steers consuming 38.5% than CON steers consuming 23% roughage, furthermore, CON steers ruminated more than REV when consuming 8.5% roughage. Implanted and non-implanted steers ruminated less as roughage inclusion decreased from 38.5% and 23% to 8.5% (457 and 439 vs. 317 min/d, respectively) in the finishing ration. Activity was greatest for steers consuming 38.5% roughage and was similar between treatments; however, activity decreased upon transition to 23% and 8.5% roughage. Observed surges and declines in activity can be attributed to processing days and weather events. Implanted steers consuming 8.5% roughage were more active (342 vs. 337 and 333 min/d) than CON and REV steers consuming 23% roughage.
In conclusion, rumination and activity are responsive to hour of day, dietary roughage and growth-promoting implants.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.15232/aas.2023-02517</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4857-8878</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2953-5370</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7088-5455</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9279-747X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2590-2865 |
ispartof | Applied Animal Science, 2024-04, Vol.40 (2), p.227-235 |
issn | 2590-2865 2590-2865 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_15232_aas_2023_02517 |
source | ScienceDirect |
subjects | activity feedlot implant rumination steer |
title | Activity and rumination of implanted Charolais × Angus feedlot steers versus non-implanted counterparts consuming 3 levels of roughage throughout a 361-day feeding duration |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T19%3A47%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Activity%20and%20rumination%20of%20implanted%20Charolais%20%C3%97%20Angus%20feedlot%20steers%20versus%20non-implanted%20counterparts%20consuming%203%20levels%20of%20roughage%20throughout%20a%20361-day%20feeding%20duration&rft.jtitle=Applied%20Animal%20Science&rft.au=Pillmore,%20Sierra%20L.&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=235&rft.pages=227-235&rft.issn=2590-2865&rft.eissn=2590-2865&rft_id=info:doi/10.15232/aas.2023-02517&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES2590286524000302%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2017-3b8e6a696699681a2974c11a915b651e0a718dbac815fe227a17181be3252d8b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |