Loading…

Activity and rumination of implanted Charolais × Angus feedlot steers versus non-implanted counterparts consuming 3 levels of roughage throughout a 361-day feeding duration

Rumination and activity of growing feedlot steers were evaluated in response to growth-promoting implant administration, feeding duration, and dietary rough- age. Charolais × Angus steers (n = 80) were randomized to harvest (1, 42, 84, 126, 168, 210, 252, 294, 336, or 378 d on feed) and implant trea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied Animal Science 2024-04, Vol.40 (2), p.227-235
Main Authors: Pillmore, Sierra L., Kirkpatrick, Tylo J., Wesley, Kaitlyn R., Cooper, Kimberly B., Francis, Forest L., Tennant, Travis C., Nichols, Wade T., Hutcheson, John P., Lawrence, Ty E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2017-3b8e6a696699681a2974c11a915b651e0a718dbac815fe227a17181be3252d8b3
container_end_page 235
container_issue 2
container_start_page 227
container_title Applied Animal Science
container_volume 40
creator Pillmore, Sierra L.
Kirkpatrick, Tylo J.
Wesley, Kaitlyn R.
Cooper, Kimberly B.
Francis, Forest L.
Tennant, Travis C.
Nichols, Wade T.
Hutcheson, John P.
Lawrence, Ty E.
description Rumination and activity of growing feedlot steers were evaluated in response to growth-promoting implant administration, feeding duration, and dietary rough- age. Charolais × Angus steers (n = 80) were randomized to harvest (1, 42, 84, 126, 168, 210, 252, 294, 336, or 378 d on feed) and implant treatment (REV: Revalor-XS on d 0 and d 190; CON: no implant). Activity and rumination were objectively monitored via accelerometers attached to the left ear. Steers consumed 3 rations throughout the study: starter (38.5% roughage), intermediate (23% roughage), and finishing (8.5% rough- age). Data were logged in 2-h increments from 77 steers across 361 d and analyzed using mixed models. Rumination and activity varied within 24-h, exhibiting bimodal patterns; rumination peaked at 0600 and 1400 h and troughed at 1000 and 1800 h. Activity peaked at 0800 and 1800 h and troughed at 0400, 1200 to 1400, and 2200 h. Steers administered REV ruminated less (331 vs. 354 min/d) than CON; however, activity was similar between treatments. Treatment × roughage interactions occurred for rumination and activity. Rumination tended to be greater for CON steers consuming 38.5% than CON steers consuming 23% roughage, furthermore, CON steers ruminated more than REV when consuming 8.5% roughage. Implanted and non-implanted steers ruminated less as roughage inclusion decreased from 38.5% and 23% to 8.5% (457 and 439 vs. 317 min/d, respectively) in the finishing ration. Activity was greatest for steers consuming 38.5% roughage and was similar between treatments; however, activity decreased upon transition to 23% and 8.5% roughage. Observed surges and declines in activity can be attributed to processing days and weather events. Implanted steers consuming 8.5% roughage were more active (342 vs. 337 and 333 min/d) than CON and REV steers consuming 23% roughage. In conclusion, rumination and activity are responsive to hour of day, dietary roughage and growth-promoting implants.
doi_str_mv 10.15232/aas.2023-02517
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_15232_aas_2023_02517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2590286524000302</els_id><sourcerecordid>S2590286524000302</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2017-3b8e6a696699681a2974c11a915b651e0a718dbac815fe227a17181be3252d8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtqwzAQhk1poaHNultdwIkkR34sQ-gLAt20azOWxo6KIwVJNuQkPUVP0YtVcQrtppt5wTf_zJ8kd4wumOAZXwL4Bac8SykXrLhIZlxUNOVlLi7_1NfJ3Pt3Sikv6ark1Sz5XMugRx2OBIwibthrA0FbQ2xL9P7QgwmoyGYHzvagPfn6IGvTDZ60iKq3gfiA6DwZY4hTY036i0k7xOwO4IKPjfGn9R3JSI8j9v6k4ezQ7aBDEnZTaYdAgGQ5SxUcJ5EToQY3XXWbXLXQe5z_5Jvk7eH-dfOUbl8enzfrbSo5ZUWaNSXmkFd5XlV5yYBXxUoyBhUTTS4YUihYqRqQJRMtcl4AiwPWYMYFV2WT3STL817prPcO2_rg9B7csWa0ngyvo-H1yfB6MjwS1ZmIf-Go0dVeajQy3u9QhlpZ_S_7DY8xitY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Activity and rumination of implanted Charolais × Angus feedlot steers versus non-implanted counterparts consuming 3 levels of roughage throughout a 361-day feeding duration</title><source>ScienceDirect</source><creator>Pillmore, Sierra L. ; Kirkpatrick, Tylo J. ; Wesley, Kaitlyn R. ; Cooper, Kimberly B. ; Francis, Forest L. ; Tennant, Travis C. ; Nichols, Wade T. ; Hutcheson, John P. ; Lawrence, Ty E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pillmore, Sierra L. ; Kirkpatrick, Tylo J. ; Wesley, Kaitlyn R. ; Cooper, Kimberly B. ; Francis, Forest L. ; Tennant, Travis C. ; Nichols, Wade T. ; Hutcheson, John P. ; Lawrence, Ty E.</creatorcontrib><description>Rumination and activity of growing feedlot steers were evaluated in response to growth-promoting implant administration, feeding duration, and dietary rough- age. Charolais × Angus steers (n = 80) were randomized to harvest (1, 42, 84, 126, 168, 210, 252, 294, 336, or 378 d on feed) and implant treatment (REV: Revalor-XS on d 0 and d 190; CON: no implant). Activity and rumination were objectively monitored via accelerometers attached to the left ear. Steers consumed 3 rations throughout the study: starter (38.5% roughage), intermediate (23% roughage), and finishing (8.5% rough- age). Data were logged in 2-h increments from 77 steers across 361 d and analyzed using mixed models. Rumination and activity varied within 24-h, exhibiting bimodal patterns; rumination peaked at 0600 and 1400 h and troughed at 1000 and 1800 h. Activity peaked at 0800 and 1800 h and troughed at 0400, 1200 to 1400, and 2200 h. Steers administered REV ruminated less (331 vs. 354 min/d) than CON; however, activity was similar between treatments. Treatment × roughage interactions occurred for rumination and activity. Rumination tended to be greater for CON steers consuming 38.5% than CON steers consuming 23% roughage, furthermore, CON steers ruminated more than REV when consuming 8.5% roughage. Implanted and non-implanted steers ruminated less as roughage inclusion decreased from 38.5% and 23% to 8.5% (457 and 439 vs. 317 min/d, respectively) in the finishing ration. Activity was greatest for steers consuming 38.5% roughage and was similar between treatments; however, activity decreased upon transition to 23% and 8.5% roughage. Observed surges and declines in activity can be attributed to processing days and weather events. Implanted steers consuming 8.5% roughage were more active (342 vs. 337 and 333 min/d) than CON and REV steers consuming 23% roughage. In conclusion, rumination and activity are responsive to hour of day, dietary roughage and growth-promoting implants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2590-2865</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2590-2865</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15232/aas.2023-02517</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>activity ; feedlot ; implant ; rumination ; steer</subject><ispartof>Applied Animal Science, 2024-04, Vol.40 (2), p.227-235</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2017-3b8e6a696699681a2974c11a915b651e0a718dbac815fe227a17181be3252d8b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4857-8878 ; 0000-0002-2953-5370 ; 0000-0001-7088-5455 ; 0000-0002-9279-747X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524000302$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pillmore, Sierra L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkpatrick, Tylo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wesley, Kaitlyn R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Kimberly B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francis, Forest L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tennant, Travis C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Wade T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutcheson, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Ty E.</creatorcontrib><title>Activity and rumination of implanted Charolais × Angus feedlot steers versus non-implanted counterparts consuming 3 levels of roughage throughout a 361-day feeding duration</title><title>Applied Animal Science</title><description>Rumination and activity of growing feedlot steers were evaluated in response to growth-promoting implant administration, feeding duration, and dietary rough- age. Charolais × Angus steers (n = 80) were randomized to harvest (1, 42, 84, 126, 168, 210, 252, 294, 336, or 378 d on feed) and implant treatment (REV: Revalor-XS on d 0 and d 190; CON: no implant). Activity and rumination were objectively monitored via accelerometers attached to the left ear. Steers consumed 3 rations throughout the study: starter (38.5% roughage), intermediate (23% roughage), and finishing (8.5% rough- age). Data were logged in 2-h increments from 77 steers across 361 d and analyzed using mixed models. Rumination and activity varied within 24-h, exhibiting bimodal patterns; rumination peaked at 0600 and 1400 h and troughed at 1000 and 1800 h. Activity peaked at 0800 and 1800 h and troughed at 0400, 1200 to 1400, and 2200 h. Steers administered REV ruminated less (331 vs. 354 min/d) than CON; however, activity was similar between treatments. Treatment × roughage interactions occurred for rumination and activity. Rumination tended to be greater for CON steers consuming 38.5% than CON steers consuming 23% roughage, furthermore, CON steers ruminated more than REV when consuming 8.5% roughage. Implanted and non-implanted steers ruminated less as roughage inclusion decreased from 38.5% and 23% to 8.5% (457 and 439 vs. 317 min/d, respectively) in the finishing ration. Activity was greatest for steers consuming 38.5% roughage and was similar between treatments; however, activity decreased upon transition to 23% and 8.5% roughage. Observed surges and declines in activity can be attributed to processing days and weather events. Implanted steers consuming 8.5% roughage were more active (342 vs. 337 and 333 min/d) than CON and REV steers consuming 23% roughage. In conclusion, rumination and activity are responsive to hour of day, dietary roughage and growth-promoting implants.</description><subject>activity</subject><subject>feedlot</subject><subject>implant</subject><subject>rumination</subject><subject>steer</subject><issn>2590-2865</issn><issn>2590-2865</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtqwzAQhk1poaHNultdwIkkR34sQ-gLAt20azOWxo6KIwVJNuQkPUVP0YtVcQrtppt5wTf_zJ8kd4wumOAZXwL4Bac8SykXrLhIZlxUNOVlLi7_1NfJ3Pt3Sikv6ark1Sz5XMugRx2OBIwibthrA0FbQ2xL9P7QgwmoyGYHzvagPfn6IGvTDZ60iKq3gfiA6DwZY4hTY036i0k7xOwO4IKPjfGn9R3JSI8j9v6k4ezQ7aBDEnZTaYdAgGQ5SxUcJ5EToQY3XXWbXLXQe5z_5Jvk7eH-dfOUbl8enzfrbSo5ZUWaNSXmkFd5XlV5yYBXxUoyBhUTTS4YUihYqRqQJRMtcl4AiwPWYMYFV2WT3STL817prPcO2_rg9B7csWa0ngyvo-H1yfB6MjwS1ZmIf-Go0dVeajQy3u9QhlpZ_S_7DY8xitY</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Pillmore, Sierra L.</creator><creator>Kirkpatrick, Tylo J.</creator><creator>Wesley, Kaitlyn R.</creator><creator>Cooper, Kimberly B.</creator><creator>Francis, Forest L.</creator><creator>Tennant, Travis C.</creator><creator>Nichols, Wade T.</creator><creator>Hutcheson, John P.</creator><creator>Lawrence, Ty E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4857-8878</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2953-5370</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7088-5455</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9279-747X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>Activity and rumination of implanted Charolais × Angus feedlot steers versus non-implanted counterparts consuming 3 levels of roughage throughout a 361-day feeding duration</title><author>Pillmore, Sierra L. ; Kirkpatrick, Tylo J. ; Wesley, Kaitlyn R. ; Cooper, Kimberly B. ; Francis, Forest L. ; Tennant, Travis C. ; Nichols, Wade T. ; Hutcheson, John P. ; Lawrence, Ty E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2017-3b8e6a696699681a2974c11a915b651e0a718dbac815fe227a17181be3252d8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>activity</topic><topic>feedlot</topic><topic>implant</topic><topic>rumination</topic><topic>steer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pillmore, Sierra L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkpatrick, Tylo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wesley, Kaitlyn R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Kimberly B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francis, Forest L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tennant, Travis C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Wade T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutcheson, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, Ty E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Applied Animal Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pillmore, Sierra L.</au><au>Kirkpatrick, Tylo J.</au><au>Wesley, Kaitlyn R.</au><au>Cooper, Kimberly B.</au><au>Francis, Forest L.</au><au>Tennant, Travis C.</au><au>Nichols, Wade T.</au><au>Hutcheson, John P.</au><au>Lawrence, Ty E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Activity and rumination of implanted Charolais × Angus feedlot steers versus non-implanted counterparts consuming 3 levels of roughage throughout a 361-day feeding duration</atitle><jtitle>Applied Animal Science</jtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>235</epage><pages>227-235</pages><issn>2590-2865</issn><eissn>2590-2865</eissn><abstract>Rumination and activity of growing feedlot steers were evaluated in response to growth-promoting implant administration, feeding duration, and dietary rough- age. Charolais × Angus steers (n = 80) were randomized to harvest (1, 42, 84, 126, 168, 210, 252, 294, 336, or 378 d on feed) and implant treatment (REV: Revalor-XS on d 0 and d 190; CON: no implant). Activity and rumination were objectively monitored via accelerometers attached to the left ear. Steers consumed 3 rations throughout the study: starter (38.5% roughage), intermediate (23% roughage), and finishing (8.5% rough- age). Data were logged in 2-h increments from 77 steers across 361 d and analyzed using mixed models. Rumination and activity varied within 24-h, exhibiting bimodal patterns; rumination peaked at 0600 and 1400 h and troughed at 1000 and 1800 h. Activity peaked at 0800 and 1800 h and troughed at 0400, 1200 to 1400, and 2200 h. Steers administered REV ruminated less (331 vs. 354 min/d) than CON; however, activity was similar between treatments. Treatment × roughage interactions occurred for rumination and activity. Rumination tended to be greater for CON steers consuming 38.5% than CON steers consuming 23% roughage, furthermore, CON steers ruminated more than REV when consuming 8.5% roughage. Implanted and non-implanted steers ruminated less as roughage inclusion decreased from 38.5% and 23% to 8.5% (457 and 439 vs. 317 min/d, respectively) in the finishing ration. Activity was greatest for steers consuming 38.5% roughage and was similar between treatments; however, activity decreased upon transition to 23% and 8.5% roughage. Observed surges and declines in activity can be attributed to processing days and weather events. Implanted steers consuming 8.5% roughage were more active (342 vs. 337 and 333 min/d) than CON and REV steers consuming 23% roughage. In conclusion, rumination and activity are responsive to hour of day, dietary roughage and growth-promoting implants.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.15232/aas.2023-02517</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4857-8878</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2953-5370</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7088-5455</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9279-747X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2590-2865
ispartof Applied Animal Science, 2024-04, Vol.40 (2), p.227-235
issn 2590-2865
2590-2865
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_15232_aas_2023_02517
source ScienceDirect
subjects activity
feedlot
implant
rumination
steer
title Activity and rumination of implanted Charolais × Angus feedlot steers versus non-implanted counterparts consuming 3 levels of roughage throughout a 361-day feeding duration
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T19%3A47%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Activity%20and%20rumination%20of%20implanted%20Charolais%20%C3%97%20Angus%20feedlot%20steers%20versus%20non-implanted%20counterparts%20consuming%203%20levels%20of%20roughage%20throughout%20a%20361-day%20feeding%20duration&rft.jtitle=Applied%20Animal%20Science&rft.au=Pillmore,%20Sierra%20L.&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=235&rft.pages=227-235&rft.issn=2590-2865&rft.eissn=2590-2865&rft_id=info:doi/10.15232/aas.2023-02517&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES2590286524000302%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2017-3b8e6a696699681a2974c11a915b651e0a718dbac815fe227a17181be3252d8b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true