Loading…
What Is "Adequate Well-Baby Care"?
In reference to Hoekelman's study on "What Constitutes Adequate Well-Baby Care," I have concerns about how the study will be interpreted and would like to raise some issues I don't think were adequately covered in the article. My major concern is that people who read this may jum...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pediatrics (Evanston) 1976-11, Vol.58 (5), p.772-772 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 772 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 772 |
container_title | Pediatrics (Evanston) |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Chamberlin, Robert W. |
description | In reference to Hoekelman's study on "What Constitutes Adequate Well-Baby Care," I have concerns about how the study will be interpreted and would like to raise some issues I don't think were adequately covered in the article. My major concern is that people who read this may jump to the conclusion that three well-child visits during the first year are all that are necessary to provide "adequate well-baby care." My own feeling is that Hoekelman's measures do not, in fact, identify important aspects of "adequate well-baby care." |
doi_str_mv | 10.1542/peds.58.5.772a |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1542_peds_58_5_772a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1542_peds_58_5_772a</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c124t-145b282f5d6f818345a5455883d2c8d37f0909c1594bfb6a16a9b4b9c07f1f573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotz71LxDAYgPEgCtY7V-fSPfF9k7xNMslZ_Dg4cPG4MSRtgkrFs6nD_fdSdHq2B36M3SAIJC1vj2kogqwgYYwMZ6xCcJZraeicVQAKuQagS3ZVygcAaDKyYs3hLcz1ttTNZkjfP2FO9SGNI78P8VR3YUrN3Zpd5DCWdP3fFds_Prx2z3z38rTtNjveo9QzR01RWplpaLNFqzQF0kTWqkH2dlAmgwPXIzkdc2wDtsFFHV0PJmMmo1ZM_H376auUKWV_nN4_w3TyCH4R-kXoyXryi1D9AvoaQcY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Is "Adequate Well-Baby Care"?</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Chamberlin, Robert W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chamberlin, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><description>In reference to Hoekelman's study on "What Constitutes Adequate Well-Baby Care," I have concerns about how the study will be interpreted and would like to raise some issues I don't think were adequately covered in the article. My major concern is that people who read this may jump to the conclusion that three well-child visits during the first year are all that are necessary to provide "adequate well-baby care." My own feeling is that Hoekelman's measures do not, in fact, identify important aspects of "adequate well-baby care."</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-4005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-4275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1542/peds.58.5.772a</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Pediatrics (Evanston), 1976-11, Vol.58 (5), p.772-772</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chamberlin, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><title>What Is "Adequate Well-Baby Care"?</title><title>Pediatrics (Evanston)</title><description>In reference to Hoekelman's study on "What Constitutes Adequate Well-Baby Care," I have concerns about how the study will be interpreted and would like to raise some issues I don't think were adequately covered in the article. My major concern is that people who read this may jump to the conclusion that three well-child visits during the first year are all that are necessary to provide "adequate well-baby care." My own feeling is that Hoekelman's measures do not, in fact, identify important aspects of "adequate well-baby care."</description><issn>0031-4005</issn><issn>1098-4275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1976</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotz71LxDAYgPEgCtY7V-fSPfF9k7xNMslZ_Dg4cPG4MSRtgkrFs6nD_fdSdHq2B36M3SAIJC1vj2kogqwgYYwMZ6xCcJZraeicVQAKuQagS3ZVygcAaDKyYs3hLcz1ttTNZkjfP2FO9SGNI78P8VR3YUrN3Zpd5DCWdP3fFds_Prx2z3z38rTtNjveo9QzR01RWplpaLNFqzQF0kTWqkH2dlAmgwPXIzkdc2wDtsFFHV0PJmMmo1ZM_H376auUKWV_nN4_w3TyCH4R-kXoyXryi1D9AvoaQcY</recordid><startdate>19761101</startdate><enddate>19761101</enddate><creator>Chamberlin, Robert W.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19761101</creationdate><title>What Is "Adequate Well-Baby Care"?</title><author>Chamberlin, Robert W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c124t-145b282f5d6f818345a5455883d2c8d37f0909c1594bfb6a16a9b4b9c07f1f573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1976</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chamberlin, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chamberlin, Robert W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Is "Adequate Well-Baby Care"?</atitle><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle><date>1976-11-01</date><risdate>1976</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>772</spage><epage>772</epage><pages>772-772</pages><issn>0031-4005</issn><eissn>1098-4275</eissn><abstract>In reference to Hoekelman's study on "What Constitutes Adequate Well-Baby Care," I have concerns about how the study will be interpreted and would like to raise some issues I don't think were adequately covered in the article. My major concern is that people who read this may jump to the conclusion that three well-child visits during the first year are all that are necessary to provide "adequate well-baby care." My own feeling is that Hoekelman's measures do not, in fact, identify important aspects of "adequate well-baby care."</abstract><doi>10.1542/peds.58.5.772a</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-4005 |
ispartof | Pediatrics (Evanston), 1976-11, Vol.58 (5), p.772-772 |
issn | 0031-4005 1098-4275 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1542_peds_58_5_772a |
source | EZB Electronic Journals Library |
title | What Is "Adequate Well-Baby Care"? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A58%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Is%20%22Adequate%20Well-Baby%20Care%22?&rft.jtitle=Pediatrics%20(Evanston)&rft.au=Chamberlin,%20Robert%20W.&rft.date=1976-11-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=772&rft.epage=772&rft.pages=772-772&rft.issn=0031-4005&rft.eissn=1098-4275&rft_id=info:doi/10.1542/peds.58.5.772a&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1542_peds_58_5_772a%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c124t-145b282f5d6f818345a5455883d2c8d37f0909c1594bfb6a16a9b4b9c07f1f573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |