Sobre el papel del juicio práctico en la filosofía moral de Kant

Standard readings of Kant's ethical thought usually focus on the Groundwork, and, more particularly, in the application of the categorial imperative to any given maxim. In doing so, the standard readings do not take into account the necessary role of judgment in this process. After sketching th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anuario filosófico 2018-09, p.733-747
Main Author: Von Wolff-Metternich, Brigitta-Sophie
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 747
container_issue
container_start_page 733
container_title Anuario filosófico
container_volume
creator Von Wolff-Metternich, Brigitta-Sophie
description Standard readings of Kant's ethical thought usually focus on the Groundwork, and, more particularly, in the application of the categorial imperative to any given maxim. In doing so, the standard readings do not take into account the necessary role of judgment in this process. After sketching the difference between determining and reflective judgment, and enlarging our view of Kant's ethics beyond the basic principles conveyed in Groundwork, the author discusses which may be the role of reflective judgment in Kant's moral thought. As a result, an entirely different approach to the socalled applied ethics emerges.
doi_str_mv 10.15581/009.37.29360
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_15581_009_37_29360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_15581_009_37_29360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_15581_009_37_293603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjr0NwjAUhC0EEuGnpPcCCe_ZckJaEAiJEnrLBFtylMSRHQrGYQCmyGIExAIUd1fcV3yErBASFGKDa4A84VnCcp7CiEQMMx6niDgmEUCaxoKhmJJZCCUA48Mbke3ZXb2muqKtaoe-DSnvtrCOtr5_Fp0tHNUNrRQ1tnLBmf6laO28-rD0pJpuQSZGVUEvfzsn8WF_2R3jwrsQvDay9bZW_iER5FdUDqKSZ_Iryv_l31QjRGs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sobre el papel del juicio práctico en la filosofía moral de Kant</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><creator>Von Wolff-Metternich, Brigitta-Sophie</creator><creatorcontrib>Von Wolff-Metternich, Brigitta-Sophie</creatorcontrib><description>Standard readings of Kant's ethical thought usually focus on the Groundwork, and, more particularly, in the application of the categorial imperative to any given maxim. In doing so, the standard readings do not take into account the necessary role of judgment in this process. After sketching the difference between determining and reflective judgment, and enlarging our view of Kant's ethics beyond the basic principles conveyed in Groundwork, the author discusses which may be the role of reflective judgment in Kant's moral thought. As a result, an entirely different approach to the socalled applied ethics emerges.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0066-5215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2173-6111</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15581/009.37.29360</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Anuario filosófico, 2018-09, p.733-747</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Von Wolff-Metternich, Brigitta-Sophie</creatorcontrib><title>Sobre el papel del juicio práctico en la filosofía moral de Kant</title><title>Anuario filosófico</title><description>Standard readings of Kant's ethical thought usually focus on the Groundwork, and, more particularly, in the application of the categorial imperative to any given maxim. In doing so, the standard readings do not take into account the necessary role of judgment in this process. After sketching the difference between determining and reflective judgment, and enlarging our view of Kant's ethics beyond the basic principles conveyed in Groundwork, the author discusses which may be the role of reflective judgment in Kant's moral thought. As a result, an entirely different approach to the socalled applied ethics emerges.</description><issn>0066-5215</issn><issn>2173-6111</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVjr0NwjAUhC0EEuGnpPcCCe_ZckJaEAiJEnrLBFtylMSRHQrGYQCmyGIExAIUd1fcV3yErBASFGKDa4A84VnCcp7CiEQMMx6niDgmEUCaxoKhmJJZCCUA48Mbke3ZXb2muqKtaoe-DSnvtrCOtr5_Fp0tHNUNrRQ1tnLBmf6laO28-rD0pJpuQSZGVUEvfzsn8WF_2R3jwrsQvDay9bZW_iER5FdUDqKSZ_Iryv_l31QjRGs</recordid><startdate>20180918</startdate><enddate>20180918</enddate><creator>Von Wolff-Metternich, Brigitta-Sophie</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180918</creationdate><title>Sobre el papel del juicio práctico en la filosofía moral de Kant</title><author>Von Wolff-Metternich, Brigitta-Sophie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_15581_009_37_293603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Von Wolff-Metternich, Brigitta-Sophie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Anuario filosófico</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Von Wolff-Metternich, Brigitta-Sophie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sobre el papel del juicio práctico en la filosofía moral de Kant</atitle><jtitle>Anuario filosófico</jtitle><date>2018-09-18</date><risdate>2018</risdate><spage>733</spage><epage>747</epage><pages>733-747</pages><issn>0066-5215</issn><eissn>2173-6111</eissn><abstract>Standard readings of Kant's ethical thought usually focus on the Groundwork, and, more particularly, in the application of the categorial imperative to any given maxim. In doing so, the standard readings do not take into account the necessary role of judgment in this process. After sketching the difference between determining and reflective judgment, and enlarging our view of Kant's ethics beyond the basic principles conveyed in Groundwork, the author discusses which may be the role of reflective judgment in Kant's moral thought. As a result, an entirely different approach to the socalled applied ethics emerges.</abstract><doi>10.15581/009.37.29360</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0066-5215
ispartof Anuario filosófico, 2018-09, p.733-747
issn 0066-5215
2173-6111
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_15581_009_37_29360
source Social Science Premium Collection
title Sobre el papel del juicio práctico en la filosofía moral de Kant
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A19%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sobre%20el%20papel%20del%20juicio%20pr%C3%A1ctico%20en%20la%20filosof%C3%ADa%20moral%20de%20Kant&rft.jtitle=Anuario%20filos%C3%B3fico&rft.au=Von%20Wolff-Metternich,%20Brigitta-Sophie&rft.date=2018-09-18&rft.spage=733&rft.epage=747&rft.pages=733-747&rft.issn=0066-5215&rft.eissn=2173-6111&rft_id=info:doi/10.15581/009.37.29360&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_15581_009_37_29360%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_15581_009_37_293603%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true