Loading…

Soil microbial and nematode communities as affected by glyphosate and tillage practices in a glyphosate-resistant cropping system

Field experiments were conducted at Ashland Bottoms in northeastern Kansas and at Hays in western Kansas in 2001, 2002, and 2003 to determine the response of soil microbial and nematode communities to different herbicides and tillage practices under a glyphosate-resistant cropping system. Convention...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Weed science 2005-07, Vol.53 (4), p.536-545
Main Authors: Liphadzi, Konanani B., Al-Khatib, Kassim, Bensch, Curtis N., Stahlman, Phillip W., Dille, J. Anita, Todd, Timothy, Rice, Charles W., Horak, Michael J., Head, Graham
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b326t-335501d8a29d0f9880ad32b1c92daae0943de4c98a26194f73a2e9a3cd3781a03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b326t-335501d8a29d0f9880ad32b1c92daae0943de4c98a26194f73a2e9a3cd3781a03
container_end_page 545
container_issue 4
container_start_page 536
container_title Weed science
container_volume 53
creator Liphadzi, Konanani B.
Al-Khatib, Kassim
Bensch, Curtis N.
Stahlman, Phillip W.
Dille, J. Anita
Todd, Timothy
Rice, Charles W.
Horak, Michael J.
Head, Graham
description Field experiments were conducted at Ashland Bottoms in northeastern Kansas and at Hays in western Kansas in 2001, 2002, and 2003 to determine the response of soil microbial and nematode communities to different herbicides and tillage practices under a glyphosate-resistant cropping system. Conventional herbicide treatments were a tank mixture of cloransulam plus S-metolachlor plus sulfentrazone for soybean and a commercially available mixture of acetochlor and atrazine for corn. Glyphosate was applied at 1.12 kg ai ha−1 when weeds were 10 or 20 cm tall in both corn and soybean. Soil samples were collected monthly at Ashland Bottoms during the growing period for soil microbial biomass (SMB) carbon determination. In addition, substrate-induced respiration (SIR) and BIOLOG substrate utilization were determined at the end of the growing season each year at Ashland Bottoms, and nematode populations were determined at the beginning and the end of the growing season at both sites. Direct effects of glyphosate rates on soil microbial and nematode communities were also studied in a controlled environment. Values for SMB carbon, SIR, and BIOLOG substrate utilization were not altered by glyphosate. Nematode community response to the glyphosate treatment was similar under both conventional tillage and no-till environments. Total nematode densities were similar with the glyphosate and conventional herbicide treatments. SMB carbon and BIOLOG substrate utilization did not differ between tillage treatments. Nematode densities were greater under conventional tillage than in the no-till system. This study showed that soil health when glyphosate was applied in a glyphosate-resistant cropping system was similar to that of cropping systems that used conventional herbicides. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; corn, Zea mays L. ‘Asgrow RX718RR’, ‘DeKalb 520RRYG’, ‘DeKalb 53-34’; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Asgrow 3003RR’, ‘Asgrow 3302RR’.
doi_str_mv 10.1614/WS-04-129R1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1614_WS_04_129R1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1614_WS_04_129R1</cupid><jstor_id>4047062</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4047062</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b326t-335501d8a29d0f9880ad32b1c92daae0943de4c98a26194f73a2e9a3cd3781a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LxDAQxYMouK6evHrIVSSar7aboyx-wYLgKnss0yZds7RNSbKHHv3PjbsiXhQG5jC_eY_3EDpn9JrlTN6sloRKwrh6YQdowrKMEl5k6hBNKJWCsEJmx-gkhA2lLOdMTdDH0tkWd7b2rrLQYug17k0H0WmDa9d1295GawKGNE1j6mg0rka8bsfh3QWIZvcSbdvC2uDBQx1tnXjbY_hFEW-CDRH6iJPVMNh-jcMYoulO0VEDbTBn33uK3u7vXuePZPH88DS_XZBK8DwSIVIapmfAlaaNms0oaMErViuuAQxVUmgja5WAnCnZFAK4USBqLYoZAyqm6Gqvm_xD8KYpB2878GPJaPnVXrlallSWu_YSfbGnNyE6_4NKKgua83Qm32LQVd7qtSk3buv7FOAPucs9X1nnevOv9Sf2voqF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soil microbial and nematode communities as affected by glyphosate and tillage practices in a glyphosate-resistant cropping system</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Liphadzi, Konanani B. ; Al-Khatib, Kassim ; Bensch, Curtis N. ; Stahlman, Phillip W. ; Dille, J. Anita ; Todd, Timothy ; Rice, Charles W. ; Horak, Michael J. ; Head, Graham</creator><creatorcontrib>Liphadzi, Konanani B. ; Al-Khatib, Kassim ; Bensch, Curtis N. ; Stahlman, Phillip W. ; Dille, J. Anita ; Todd, Timothy ; Rice, Charles W. ; Horak, Michael J. ; Head, Graham</creatorcontrib><description>Field experiments were conducted at Ashland Bottoms in northeastern Kansas and at Hays in western Kansas in 2001, 2002, and 2003 to determine the response of soil microbial and nematode communities to different herbicides and tillage practices under a glyphosate-resistant cropping system. Conventional herbicide treatments were a tank mixture of cloransulam plus S-metolachlor plus sulfentrazone for soybean and a commercially available mixture of acetochlor and atrazine for corn. Glyphosate was applied at 1.12 kg ai ha−1 when weeds were 10 or 20 cm tall in both corn and soybean. Soil samples were collected monthly at Ashland Bottoms during the growing period for soil microbial biomass (SMB) carbon determination. In addition, substrate-induced respiration (SIR) and BIOLOG substrate utilization were determined at the end of the growing season each year at Ashland Bottoms, and nematode populations were determined at the beginning and the end of the growing season at both sites. Direct effects of glyphosate rates on soil microbial and nematode communities were also studied in a controlled environment. Values for SMB carbon, SIR, and BIOLOG substrate utilization were not altered by glyphosate. Nematode community response to the glyphosate treatment was similar under both conventional tillage and no-till environments. Total nematode densities were similar with the glyphosate and conventional herbicide treatments. SMB carbon and BIOLOG substrate utilization did not differ between tillage treatments. Nematode densities were greater under conventional tillage than in the no-till system. This study showed that soil health when glyphosate was applied in a glyphosate-resistant cropping system was similar to that of cropping systems that used conventional herbicides. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; corn, Zea mays L. ‘Asgrow RX718RR’, ‘DeKalb 520RRYG’, ‘DeKalb 53-34’; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Asgrow 3003RR’, ‘Asgrow 3302RR’.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2759</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/WS-04-129R1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural soils ; Agrology ; BIOLOG ; biological indicator ; glyphosate-resistant crops ; Herbicides ; Nematodes ; Soil biochemistry ; soil microbial biomass carbon ; Soil microorganisms ; Soil nematodes ; Soil organic matter ; Soil quality ; SPECIAL TOPICS ; Tillage</subject><ispartof>Weed science, 2005-07, Vol.53 (4), p.536-545</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright © Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b326t-335501d8a29d0f9880ad32b1c92daae0943de4c98a26194f73a2e9a3cd3781a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b326t-335501d8a29d0f9880ad32b1c92daae0943de4c98a26194f73a2e9a3cd3781a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4047062$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4047062$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liphadzi, Konanani B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Khatib, Kassim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bensch, Curtis N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stahlman, Phillip W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dille, J. Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todd, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horak, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Head, Graham</creatorcontrib><title>Soil microbial and nematode communities as affected by glyphosate and tillage practices in a glyphosate-resistant cropping system</title><title>Weed science</title><addtitle>Weed sci</addtitle><description>Field experiments were conducted at Ashland Bottoms in northeastern Kansas and at Hays in western Kansas in 2001, 2002, and 2003 to determine the response of soil microbial and nematode communities to different herbicides and tillage practices under a glyphosate-resistant cropping system. Conventional herbicide treatments were a tank mixture of cloransulam plus S-metolachlor plus sulfentrazone for soybean and a commercially available mixture of acetochlor and atrazine for corn. Glyphosate was applied at 1.12 kg ai ha−1 when weeds were 10 or 20 cm tall in both corn and soybean. Soil samples were collected monthly at Ashland Bottoms during the growing period for soil microbial biomass (SMB) carbon determination. In addition, substrate-induced respiration (SIR) and BIOLOG substrate utilization were determined at the end of the growing season each year at Ashland Bottoms, and nematode populations were determined at the beginning and the end of the growing season at both sites. Direct effects of glyphosate rates on soil microbial and nematode communities were also studied in a controlled environment. Values for SMB carbon, SIR, and BIOLOG substrate utilization were not altered by glyphosate. Nematode community response to the glyphosate treatment was similar under both conventional tillage and no-till environments. Total nematode densities were similar with the glyphosate and conventional herbicide treatments. SMB carbon and BIOLOG substrate utilization did not differ between tillage treatments. Nematode densities were greater under conventional tillage than in the no-till system. This study showed that soil health when glyphosate was applied in a glyphosate-resistant cropping system was similar to that of cropping systems that used conventional herbicides. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; corn, Zea mays L. ‘Asgrow RX718RR’, ‘DeKalb 520RRYG’, ‘DeKalb 53-34’; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Asgrow 3003RR’, ‘Asgrow 3302RR’.</description><subject>Agricultural soils</subject><subject>Agrology</subject><subject>BIOLOG</subject><subject>biological indicator</subject><subject>glyphosate-resistant crops</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Nematodes</subject><subject>Soil biochemistry</subject><subject>soil microbial biomass carbon</subject><subject>Soil microorganisms</subject><subject>Soil nematodes</subject><subject>Soil organic matter</subject><subject>Soil quality</subject><subject>SPECIAL TOPICS</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><issn>0043-1745</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LxDAQxYMouK6evHrIVSSar7aboyx-wYLgKnss0yZds7RNSbKHHv3PjbsiXhQG5jC_eY_3EDpn9JrlTN6sloRKwrh6YQdowrKMEl5k6hBNKJWCsEJmx-gkhA2lLOdMTdDH0tkWd7b2rrLQYug17k0H0WmDa9d1295GawKGNE1j6mg0rka8bsfh3QWIZvcSbdvC2uDBQx1tnXjbY_hFEW-CDRH6iJPVMNh-jcMYoulO0VEDbTBn33uK3u7vXuePZPH88DS_XZBK8DwSIVIapmfAlaaNms0oaMErViuuAQxVUmgja5WAnCnZFAK4USBqLYoZAyqm6Gqvm_xD8KYpB2878GPJaPnVXrlallSWu_YSfbGnNyE6_4NKKgua83Qm32LQVd7qtSk3buv7FOAPucs9X1nnevOv9Sf2voqF</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>Liphadzi, Konanani B.</creator><creator>Al-Khatib, Kassim</creator><creator>Bensch, Curtis N.</creator><creator>Stahlman, Phillip W.</creator><creator>Dille, J. Anita</creator><creator>Todd, Timothy</creator><creator>Rice, Charles W.</creator><creator>Horak, Michael J.</creator><creator>Head, Graham</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>Soil microbial and nematode communities as affected by glyphosate and tillage practices in a glyphosate-resistant cropping system</title><author>Liphadzi, Konanani B. ; Al-Khatib, Kassim ; Bensch, Curtis N. ; Stahlman, Phillip W. ; Dille, J. Anita ; Todd, Timothy ; Rice, Charles W. ; Horak, Michael J. ; Head, Graham</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b326t-335501d8a29d0f9880ad32b1c92daae0943de4c98a26194f73a2e9a3cd3781a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Agricultural soils</topic><topic>Agrology</topic><topic>BIOLOG</topic><topic>biological indicator</topic><topic>glyphosate-resistant crops</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Nematodes</topic><topic>Soil biochemistry</topic><topic>soil microbial biomass carbon</topic><topic>Soil microorganisms</topic><topic>Soil nematodes</topic><topic>Soil organic matter</topic><topic>Soil quality</topic><topic>SPECIAL TOPICS</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liphadzi, Konanani B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Khatib, Kassim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bensch, Curtis N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stahlman, Phillip W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dille, J. Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todd, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horak, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Head, Graham</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liphadzi, Konanani B.</au><au>Al-Khatib, Kassim</au><au>Bensch, Curtis N.</au><au>Stahlman, Phillip W.</au><au>Dille, J. Anita</au><au>Todd, Timothy</au><au>Rice, Charles W.</au><au>Horak, Michael J.</au><au>Head, Graham</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soil microbial and nematode communities as affected by glyphosate and tillage practices in a glyphosate-resistant cropping system</atitle><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle><addtitle>Weed sci</addtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>536</spage><epage>545</epage><pages>536-545</pages><issn>0043-1745</issn><eissn>1550-2759</eissn><abstract>Field experiments were conducted at Ashland Bottoms in northeastern Kansas and at Hays in western Kansas in 2001, 2002, and 2003 to determine the response of soil microbial and nematode communities to different herbicides and tillage practices under a glyphosate-resistant cropping system. Conventional herbicide treatments were a tank mixture of cloransulam plus S-metolachlor plus sulfentrazone for soybean and a commercially available mixture of acetochlor and atrazine for corn. Glyphosate was applied at 1.12 kg ai ha−1 when weeds were 10 or 20 cm tall in both corn and soybean. Soil samples were collected monthly at Ashland Bottoms during the growing period for soil microbial biomass (SMB) carbon determination. In addition, substrate-induced respiration (SIR) and BIOLOG substrate utilization were determined at the end of the growing season each year at Ashland Bottoms, and nematode populations were determined at the beginning and the end of the growing season at both sites. Direct effects of glyphosate rates on soil microbial and nematode communities were also studied in a controlled environment. Values for SMB carbon, SIR, and BIOLOG substrate utilization were not altered by glyphosate. Nematode community response to the glyphosate treatment was similar under both conventional tillage and no-till environments. Total nematode densities were similar with the glyphosate and conventional herbicide treatments. SMB carbon and BIOLOG substrate utilization did not differ between tillage treatments. Nematode densities were greater under conventional tillage than in the no-till system. This study showed that soil health when glyphosate was applied in a glyphosate-resistant cropping system was similar to that of cropping systems that used conventional herbicides. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; corn, Zea mays L. ‘Asgrow RX718RR’, ‘DeKalb 520RRYG’, ‘DeKalb 53-34’; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Asgrow 3003RR’, ‘Asgrow 3302RR’.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1614/WS-04-129R1</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1745
ispartof Weed science, 2005-07, Vol.53 (4), p.536-545
issn 0043-1745
1550-2759
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1614_WS_04_129R1
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Agricultural soils
Agrology
BIOLOG
biological indicator
glyphosate-resistant crops
Herbicides
Nematodes
Soil biochemistry
soil microbial biomass carbon
Soil microorganisms
Soil nematodes
Soil organic matter
Soil quality
SPECIAL TOPICS
Tillage
title Soil microbial and nematode communities as affected by glyphosate and tillage practices in a glyphosate-resistant cropping system
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T05%3A14%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soil%20microbial%20and%20nematode%20communities%20as%20affected%20by%20glyphosate%20and%20tillage%20practices%20in%20a%20glyphosate-resistant%20cropping%20system&rft.jtitle=Weed%20science&rft.au=Liphadzi,%20Konanani%20B.&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=536&rft.epage=545&rft.pages=536-545&rft.issn=0043-1745&rft.eissn=1550-2759&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/WS-04-129R1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E4047062%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b326t-335501d8a29d0f9880ad32b1c92daae0943de4c98a26194f73a2e9a3cd3781a03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1614_WS_04_129R1&rft_jstor_id=4047062&rfr_iscdi=true