Loading…
Survey of Tillage Trends Following The Adoption of Glyphosate-Resistant Crops
A phone survey was administered to 1,195 growers in six states (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, and North Carolina). The survey measured producers' crop history, perception of glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds, past and present weed pressure, tillage practices, and herbicide use a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Weed technology 2009-01, Vol.23 (1), p.150-155 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b313t-4683c57804c44cf697ceadf92768612c38b414fc04779ce77da698e579d6f6d93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b313t-4683c57804c44cf697ceadf92768612c38b414fc04779ce77da698e579d6f6d93 |
container_end_page | 155 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 150 |
container_title | Weed technology |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Givens, Wade A Shaw, David R Kruger, Greg R Johnson, William G Weller, Stephen C Young, Bryan G Wilson, Robert G Owen, Micheal D. K Jordan, David |
description | A phone survey was administered to 1,195 growers in six states (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, and North Carolina). The survey measured producers' crop history, perception of glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds, past and present weed pressure, tillage practices, and herbicide use as affected by the adoption of GR crops. This article describes the changes in tillage practice reported in the survey. The adoption of a GR cropping system resulted in a large increase in the percentage of growers using no-till and reduced-till systems. Tillage intensity declined more in continuous GR cotton and GR soybean (45 and 23%, respectively) than in rotations that included GR corn or non-GR crops. Tillage intensity declined more in the states of Mississippi and North Carolina than in the other states, with 33% of the growers in these states shifting to more conservative tillage practices after the adoption of a GR crop. This was primarily due to the lower amount of conservation tillage adoption in these states before GR crop availability. Adoption rates of no-till and reduced-till systems increased as farm size decreased. Overall, producers in a crop rotation that included a GR crop shifted from a relatively more tillage-intense system to reduced-till or no-till systems after implementing a GR crop into their production system. Nomenclature: 2,4-D, glyphosate; corn, Zea mays L.; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr |
doi_str_mv | 10.1614/WT-08-038.1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1614_WT_08_038_1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40587053</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40587053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b313t-4683c57804c44cf697ceadf92768612c38b414fc04779ce77da698e579d6f6d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFLwzAUh4MoOKcnz2KvIp0vTZqkxzHcFCaC65i3kKXJ1lGbklSl_70dFY-e3uH7-D34ELrGMMEM04dNHoOIgYgJPkEjnKYQJ5zCKRqByKAH_P0cXYRwAMAsSWCEXlaf_st0kbNRXlaV2pko96YuQjR3VeW-y3oX5XsTTQvXtKWrj-Ki6pq9C6o18ZsJZWhV3UYz75pwic6sqoK5-r1jtJ4_5rOnePm6eJ5Nl_GWYNLGlAmiUy6Aakq1ZRnXRhU2SzgTDCeaiC3F1GqgnGfacF4olgmT8qxglhUZGaP7YVd7F4I3Vja-_FC-kxjksYTc5BKE7EtI3Ns3g30IrfN_KoVUcEhJz28HbpWTaufLINerBDDpI-EkpbQ37gZjWzpXm3-__QBvHHCj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survey of Tillage Trends Following The Adoption of Glyphosate-Resistant Crops</title><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Givens, Wade A ; Shaw, David R ; Kruger, Greg R ; Johnson, William G ; Weller, Stephen C ; Young, Bryan G ; Wilson, Robert G ; Owen, Micheal D. K ; Jordan, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Givens, Wade A ; Shaw, David R ; Kruger, Greg R ; Johnson, William G ; Weller, Stephen C ; Young, Bryan G ; Wilson, Robert G ; Owen, Micheal D. K ; Jordan, David</creatorcontrib><description>A phone survey was administered to 1,195 growers in six states (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, and North Carolina). The survey measured producers' crop history, perception of glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds, past and present weed pressure, tillage practices, and herbicide use as affected by the adoption of GR crops. This article describes the changes in tillage practice reported in the survey. The adoption of a GR cropping system resulted in a large increase in the percentage of growers using no-till and reduced-till systems. Tillage intensity declined more in continuous GR cotton and GR soybean (45 and 23%, respectively) than in rotations that included GR corn or non-GR crops. Tillage intensity declined more in the states of Mississippi and North Carolina than in the other states, with 33% of the growers in these states shifting to more conservative tillage practices after the adoption of a GR crop. This was primarily due to the lower amount of conservation tillage adoption in these states before GR crop availability. Adoption rates of no-till and reduced-till systems increased as farm size decreased. Overall, producers in a crop rotation that included a GR crop shifted from a relatively more tillage-intense system to reduced-till or no-till systems after implementing a GR crop into their production system. Nomenclature: 2,4-D, glyphosate; corn, Zea mays L.; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/WT-08-038.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>810 East 10th St., Lawrence, KS 66044-7050: Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>conservation tillage ; Conventional tillage ; corn ; Cotton ; crop management ; Crop production ; Crop rotation ; Cropping systems ; Crops ; EDUCATION/EXTENSION ; farm size ; farm surveys ; farmer survey ; geographical variation ; Glycine max ; glyphosate ; Gossypium hirsutum ; herbicide resistance ; Herbicides ; innovation adoption ; No tillage ; soybeans ; Tillage ; Tillage system ; transgenic plants ; Weed control ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2009-01, Vol.23 (1), p.150-155</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright 2009 Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b313t-4683c57804c44cf697ceadf92768612c38b414fc04779ce77da698e579d6f6d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b313t-4683c57804c44cf697ceadf92768612c38b414fc04779ce77da698e579d6f6d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40587053$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40587053$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Givens, Wade A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Greg R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, William G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weller, Stephen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Bryan G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, Micheal D. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, David</creatorcontrib><title>Survey of Tillage Trends Following The Adoption of Glyphosate-Resistant Crops</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>A phone survey was administered to 1,195 growers in six states (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, and North Carolina). The survey measured producers' crop history, perception of glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds, past and present weed pressure, tillage practices, and herbicide use as affected by the adoption of GR crops. This article describes the changes in tillage practice reported in the survey. The adoption of a GR cropping system resulted in a large increase in the percentage of growers using no-till and reduced-till systems. Tillage intensity declined more in continuous GR cotton and GR soybean (45 and 23%, respectively) than in rotations that included GR corn or non-GR crops. Tillage intensity declined more in the states of Mississippi and North Carolina than in the other states, with 33% of the growers in these states shifting to more conservative tillage practices after the adoption of a GR crop. This was primarily due to the lower amount of conservation tillage adoption in these states before GR crop availability. Adoption rates of no-till and reduced-till systems increased as farm size decreased. Overall, producers in a crop rotation that included a GR crop shifted from a relatively more tillage-intense system to reduced-till or no-till systems after implementing a GR crop into their production system. Nomenclature: 2,4-D, glyphosate; corn, Zea mays L.; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr</description><subject>conservation tillage</subject><subject>Conventional tillage</subject><subject>corn</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>crop management</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Cropping systems</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>EDUCATION/EXTENSION</subject><subject>farm size</subject><subject>farm surveys</subject><subject>farmer survey</subject><subject>geographical variation</subject><subject>Glycine max</subject><subject>glyphosate</subject><subject>Gossypium hirsutum</subject><subject>herbicide resistance</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>innovation adoption</subject><subject>No tillage</subject><subject>soybeans</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Tillage system</subject><subject>transgenic plants</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFLwzAUh4MoOKcnz2KvIp0vTZqkxzHcFCaC65i3kKXJ1lGbklSl_70dFY-e3uH7-D34ELrGMMEM04dNHoOIgYgJPkEjnKYQJ5zCKRqByKAH_P0cXYRwAMAsSWCEXlaf_st0kbNRXlaV2pko96YuQjR3VeW-y3oX5XsTTQvXtKWrj-Ki6pq9C6o18ZsJZWhV3UYz75pwic6sqoK5-r1jtJ4_5rOnePm6eJ5Nl_GWYNLGlAmiUy6Aakq1ZRnXRhU2SzgTDCeaiC3F1GqgnGfacF4olgmT8qxglhUZGaP7YVd7F4I3Vja-_FC-kxjksYTc5BKE7EtI3Ns3g30IrfN_KoVUcEhJz28HbpWTaufLINerBDDpI-EkpbQ37gZjWzpXm3-__QBvHHCj</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Givens, Wade A</creator><creator>Shaw, David R</creator><creator>Kruger, Greg R</creator><creator>Johnson, William G</creator><creator>Weller, Stephen C</creator><creator>Young, Bryan G</creator><creator>Wilson, Robert G</creator><creator>Owen, Micheal D. K</creator><creator>Jordan, David</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Survey of Tillage Trends Following The Adoption of Glyphosate-Resistant Crops</title><author>Givens, Wade A ; Shaw, David R ; Kruger, Greg R ; Johnson, William G ; Weller, Stephen C ; Young, Bryan G ; Wilson, Robert G ; Owen, Micheal D. K ; Jordan, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b313t-4683c57804c44cf697ceadf92768612c38b414fc04779ce77da698e579d6f6d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>conservation tillage</topic><topic>Conventional tillage</topic><topic>corn</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>crop management</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Cropping systems</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>EDUCATION/EXTENSION</topic><topic>farm size</topic><topic>farm surveys</topic><topic>farmer survey</topic><topic>geographical variation</topic><topic>Glycine max</topic><topic>glyphosate</topic><topic>Gossypium hirsutum</topic><topic>herbicide resistance</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>innovation adoption</topic><topic>No tillage</topic><topic>soybeans</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Tillage system</topic><topic>transgenic plants</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Givens, Wade A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Greg R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, William G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weller, Stephen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Bryan G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, Micheal D. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, David</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Givens, Wade A</au><au>Shaw, David R</au><au>Kruger, Greg R</au><au>Johnson, William G</au><au>Weller, Stephen C</au><au>Young, Bryan G</au><au>Wilson, Robert G</au><au>Owen, Micheal D. K</au><au>Jordan, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survey of Tillage Trends Following The Adoption of Glyphosate-Resistant Crops</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>150</spage><epage>155</epage><pages>150-155</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>A phone survey was administered to 1,195 growers in six states (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, and North Carolina). The survey measured producers' crop history, perception of glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds, past and present weed pressure, tillage practices, and herbicide use as affected by the adoption of GR crops. This article describes the changes in tillage practice reported in the survey. The adoption of a GR cropping system resulted in a large increase in the percentage of growers using no-till and reduced-till systems. Tillage intensity declined more in continuous GR cotton and GR soybean (45 and 23%, respectively) than in rotations that included GR corn or non-GR crops. Tillage intensity declined more in the states of Mississippi and North Carolina than in the other states, with 33% of the growers in these states shifting to more conservative tillage practices after the adoption of a GR crop. This was primarily due to the lower amount of conservation tillage adoption in these states before GR crop availability. Adoption rates of no-till and reduced-till systems increased as farm size decreased. Overall, producers in a crop rotation that included a GR crop shifted from a relatively more tillage-intense system to reduced-till or no-till systems after implementing a GR crop into their production system. Nomenclature: 2,4-D, glyphosate; corn, Zea mays L.; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr</abstract><cop>810 East 10th St., Lawrence, KS 66044-7050</cop><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1614/WT-08-038.1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-037X |
ispartof | Weed technology, 2009-01, Vol.23 (1), p.150-155 |
issn | 0890-037X 1550-2740 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1614_WT_08_038_1 |
source | JSTOR |
subjects | conservation tillage Conventional tillage corn Cotton crop management Crop production Crop rotation Cropping systems Crops EDUCATION/EXTENSION farm size farm surveys farmer survey geographical variation Glycine max glyphosate Gossypium hirsutum herbicide resistance Herbicides innovation adoption No tillage soybeans Tillage Tillage system transgenic plants Weed control Zea mays |
title | Survey of Tillage Trends Following The Adoption of Glyphosate-Resistant Crops |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T09%3A37%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survey%20of%20Tillage%20Trends%20Following%20The%20Adoption%20of%20Glyphosate-Resistant%20Crops&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Givens,%20Wade%20A&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=150&rft.epage=155&rft.pages=150-155&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/WT-08-038.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E40587053%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b313t-4683c57804c44cf697ceadf92768612c38b414fc04779ce77da698e579d6f6d93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40587053&rfr_iscdi=true |