Loading…

Survey of Tillage Trends Following The Adoption of Glyphosate-Resistant Crops

A phone survey was administered to 1,195 growers in six states (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, and North Carolina). The survey measured producers' crop history, perception of glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds, past and present weed pressure, tillage practices, and herbicide use a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Weed technology 2009-01, Vol.23 (1), p.150-155
Main Authors: Givens, Wade A, Shaw, David R, Kruger, Greg R, Johnson, William G, Weller, Stephen C, Young, Bryan G, Wilson, Robert G, Owen, Micheal D. K, Jordan, David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b313t-4683c57804c44cf697ceadf92768612c38b414fc04779ce77da698e579d6f6d93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b313t-4683c57804c44cf697ceadf92768612c38b414fc04779ce77da698e579d6f6d93
container_end_page 155
container_issue 1
container_start_page 150
container_title Weed technology
container_volume 23
creator Givens, Wade A
Shaw, David R
Kruger, Greg R
Johnson, William G
Weller, Stephen C
Young, Bryan G
Wilson, Robert G
Owen, Micheal D. K
Jordan, David
description A phone survey was administered to 1,195 growers in six states (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, and North Carolina). The survey measured producers' crop history, perception of glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds, past and present weed pressure, tillage practices, and herbicide use as affected by the adoption of GR crops. This article describes the changes in tillage practice reported in the survey. The adoption of a GR cropping system resulted in a large increase in the percentage of growers using no-till and reduced-till systems. Tillage intensity declined more in continuous GR cotton and GR soybean (45 and 23%, respectively) than in rotations that included GR corn or non-GR crops. Tillage intensity declined more in the states of Mississippi and North Carolina than in the other states, with 33% of the growers in these states shifting to more conservative tillage practices after the adoption of a GR crop. This was primarily due to the lower amount of conservation tillage adoption in these states before GR crop availability. Adoption rates of no-till and reduced-till systems increased as farm size decreased. Overall, producers in a crop rotation that included a GR crop shifted from a relatively more tillage-intense system to reduced-till or no-till systems after implementing a GR crop into their production system. Nomenclature: 2,4-D, glyphosate; corn, Zea mays L.; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr
doi_str_mv 10.1614/WT-08-038.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1614_WT_08_038_1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40587053</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40587053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b313t-4683c57804c44cf697ceadf92768612c38b414fc04779ce77da698e579d6f6d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFLwzAUh4MoOKcnz2KvIp0vTZqkxzHcFCaC65i3kKXJ1lGbklSl_70dFY-e3uH7-D34ELrGMMEM04dNHoOIgYgJPkEjnKYQJ5zCKRqByKAH_P0cXYRwAMAsSWCEXlaf_st0kbNRXlaV2pko96YuQjR3VeW-y3oX5XsTTQvXtKWrj-Ki6pq9C6o18ZsJZWhV3UYz75pwic6sqoK5-r1jtJ4_5rOnePm6eJ5Nl_GWYNLGlAmiUy6Aakq1ZRnXRhU2SzgTDCeaiC3F1GqgnGfacF4olgmT8qxglhUZGaP7YVd7F4I3Vja-_FC-kxjksYTc5BKE7EtI3Ns3g30IrfN_KoVUcEhJz28HbpWTaufLINerBDDpI-EkpbQ37gZjWzpXm3-__QBvHHCj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survey of Tillage Trends Following The Adoption of Glyphosate-Resistant Crops</title><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Givens, Wade A ; Shaw, David R ; Kruger, Greg R ; Johnson, William G ; Weller, Stephen C ; Young, Bryan G ; Wilson, Robert G ; Owen, Micheal D. K ; Jordan, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Givens, Wade A ; Shaw, David R ; Kruger, Greg R ; Johnson, William G ; Weller, Stephen C ; Young, Bryan G ; Wilson, Robert G ; Owen, Micheal D. K ; Jordan, David</creatorcontrib><description>A phone survey was administered to 1,195 growers in six states (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, and North Carolina). The survey measured producers' crop history, perception of glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds, past and present weed pressure, tillage practices, and herbicide use as affected by the adoption of GR crops. This article describes the changes in tillage practice reported in the survey. The adoption of a GR cropping system resulted in a large increase in the percentage of growers using no-till and reduced-till systems. Tillage intensity declined more in continuous GR cotton and GR soybean (45 and 23%, respectively) than in rotations that included GR corn or non-GR crops. Tillage intensity declined more in the states of Mississippi and North Carolina than in the other states, with 33% of the growers in these states shifting to more conservative tillage practices after the adoption of a GR crop. This was primarily due to the lower amount of conservation tillage adoption in these states before GR crop availability. Adoption rates of no-till and reduced-till systems increased as farm size decreased. Overall, producers in a crop rotation that included a GR crop shifted from a relatively more tillage-intense system to reduced-till or no-till systems after implementing a GR crop into their production system. Nomenclature: 2,4-D, glyphosate; corn, Zea mays L.; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/WT-08-038.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>810 East 10th St., Lawrence, KS 66044-7050: Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>conservation tillage ; Conventional tillage ; corn ; Cotton ; crop management ; Crop production ; Crop rotation ; Cropping systems ; Crops ; EDUCATION/EXTENSION ; farm size ; farm surveys ; farmer survey ; geographical variation ; Glycine max ; glyphosate ; Gossypium hirsutum ; herbicide resistance ; Herbicides ; innovation adoption ; No tillage ; soybeans ; Tillage ; Tillage system ; transgenic plants ; Weed control ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2009-01, Vol.23 (1), p.150-155</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright 2009 Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b313t-4683c57804c44cf697ceadf92768612c38b414fc04779ce77da698e579d6f6d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b313t-4683c57804c44cf697ceadf92768612c38b414fc04779ce77da698e579d6f6d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40587053$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40587053$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Givens, Wade A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Greg R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, William G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weller, Stephen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Bryan G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, Micheal D. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, David</creatorcontrib><title>Survey of Tillage Trends Following The Adoption of Glyphosate-Resistant Crops</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>A phone survey was administered to 1,195 growers in six states (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, and North Carolina). The survey measured producers' crop history, perception of glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds, past and present weed pressure, tillage practices, and herbicide use as affected by the adoption of GR crops. This article describes the changes in tillage practice reported in the survey. The adoption of a GR cropping system resulted in a large increase in the percentage of growers using no-till and reduced-till systems. Tillage intensity declined more in continuous GR cotton and GR soybean (45 and 23%, respectively) than in rotations that included GR corn or non-GR crops. Tillage intensity declined more in the states of Mississippi and North Carolina than in the other states, with 33% of the growers in these states shifting to more conservative tillage practices after the adoption of a GR crop. This was primarily due to the lower amount of conservation tillage adoption in these states before GR crop availability. Adoption rates of no-till and reduced-till systems increased as farm size decreased. Overall, producers in a crop rotation that included a GR crop shifted from a relatively more tillage-intense system to reduced-till or no-till systems after implementing a GR crop into their production system. Nomenclature: 2,4-D, glyphosate; corn, Zea mays L.; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr</description><subject>conservation tillage</subject><subject>Conventional tillage</subject><subject>corn</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>crop management</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Cropping systems</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>EDUCATION/EXTENSION</subject><subject>farm size</subject><subject>farm surveys</subject><subject>farmer survey</subject><subject>geographical variation</subject><subject>Glycine max</subject><subject>glyphosate</subject><subject>Gossypium hirsutum</subject><subject>herbicide resistance</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>innovation adoption</subject><subject>No tillage</subject><subject>soybeans</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Tillage system</subject><subject>transgenic plants</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFLwzAUh4MoOKcnz2KvIp0vTZqkxzHcFCaC65i3kKXJ1lGbklSl_70dFY-e3uH7-D34ELrGMMEM04dNHoOIgYgJPkEjnKYQJ5zCKRqByKAH_P0cXYRwAMAsSWCEXlaf_st0kbNRXlaV2pko96YuQjR3VeW-y3oX5XsTTQvXtKWrj-Ki6pq9C6o18ZsJZWhV3UYz75pwic6sqoK5-r1jtJ4_5rOnePm6eJ5Nl_GWYNLGlAmiUy6Aakq1ZRnXRhU2SzgTDCeaiC3F1GqgnGfacF4olgmT8qxglhUZGaP7YVd7F4I3Vja-_FC-kxjksYTc5BKE7EtI3Ns3g30IrfN_KoVUcEhJz28HbpWTaufLINerBDDpI-EkpbQ37gZjWzpXm3-__QBvHHCj</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Givens, Wade A</creator><creator>Shaw, David R</creator><creator>Kruger, Greg R</creator><creator>Johnson, William G</creator><creator>Weller, Stephen C</creator><creator>Young, Bryan G</creator><creator>Wilson, Robert G</creator><creator>Owen, Micheal D. K</creator><creator>Jordan, David</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Survey of Tillage Trends Following The Adoption of Glyphosate-Resistant Crops</title><author>Givens, Wade A ; Shaw, David R ; Kruger, Greg R ; Johnson, William G ; Weller, Stephen C ; Young, Bryan G ; Wilson, Robert G ; Owen, Micheal D. K ; Jordan, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b313t-4683c57804c44cf697ceadf92768612c38b414fc04779ce77da698e579d6f6d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>conservation tillage</topic><topic>Conventional tillage</topic><topic>corn</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>crop management</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Cropping systems</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>EDUCATION/EXTENSION</topic><topic>farm size</topic><topic>farm surveys</topic><topic>farmer survey</topic><topic>geographical variation</topic><topic>Glycine max</topic><topic>glyphosate</topic><topic>Gossypium hirsutum</topic><topic>herbicide resistance</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>innovation adoption</topic><topic>No tillage</topic><topic>soybeans</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Tillage system</topic><topic>transgenic plants</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Givens, Wade A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Greg R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, William G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weller, Stephen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Bryan G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, Micheal D. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, David</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Givens, Wade A</au><au>Shaw, David R</au><au>Kruger, Greg R</au><au>Johnson, William G</au><au>Weller, Stephen C</au><au>Young, Bryan G</au><au>Wilson, Robert G</au><au>Owen, Micheal D. K</au><au>Jordan, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survey of Tillage Trends Following The Adoption of Glyphosate-Resistant Crops</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>150</spage><epage>155</epage><pages>150-155</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>A phone survey was administered to 1,195 growers in six states (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, and North Carolina). The survey measured producers' crop history, perception of glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds, past and present weed pressure, tillage practices, and herbicide use as affected by the adoption of GR crops. This article describes the changes in tillage practice reported in the survey. The adoption of a GR cropping system resulted in a large increase in the percentage of growers using no-till and reduced-till systems. Tillage intensity declined more in continuous GR cotton and GR soybean (45 and 23%, respectively) than in rotations that included GR corn or non-GR crops. Tillage intensity declined more in the states of Mississippi and North Carolina than in the other states, with 33% of the growers in these states shifting to more conservative tillage practices after the adoption of a GR crop. This was primarily due to the lower amount of conservation tillage adoption in these states before GR crop availability. Adoption rates of no-till and reduced-till systems increased as farm size decreased. Overall, producers in a crop rotation that included a GR crop shifted from a relatively more tillage-intense system to reduced-till or no-till systems after implementing a GR crop into their production system. Nomenclature: 2,4-D, glyphosate; corn, Zea mays L.; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr</abstract><cop>810 East 10th St., Lawrence, KS 66044-7050</cop><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1614/WT-08-038.1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-037X
ispartof Weed technology, 2009-01, Vol.23 (1), p.150-155
issn 0890-037X
1550-2740
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1614_WT_08_038_1
source JSTOR
subjects conservation tillage
Conventional tillage
corn
Cotton
crop management
Crop production
Crop rotation
Cropping systems
Crops
EDUCATION/EXTENSION
farm size
farm surveys
farmer survey
geographical variation
Glycine max
glyphosate
Gossypium hirsutum
herbicide resistance
Herbicides
innovation adoption
No tillage
soybeans
Tillage
Tillage system
transgenic plants
Weed control
Zea mays
title Survey of Tillage Trends Following The Adoption of Glyphosate-Resistant Crops
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T09%3A37%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survey%20of%20Tillage%20Trends%20Following%20The%20Adoption%20of%20Glyphosate-Resistant%20Crops&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Givens,%20Wade%20A&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=150&rft.epage=155&rft.pages=150-155&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/WT-08-038.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E40587053%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b313t-4683c57804c44cf697ceadf92768612c38b414fc04779ce77da698e579d6f6d93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40587053&rfr_iscdi=true