Biodiversity effects and rates of spread of nonnative eucalypt woodlands in central California

• Published in: Ecological applications 2015-12, Vol.25 (8), p.2306-2319
• Main Authors: Fork, Susanne, Woolfolk, Andrea, Akhavan, Antonia, Van Dyke, Eric, Murphy, Shirley, Candiloro, Bree, Newberry, Todd, Schreibman, Sondra, Salisbury, Joshua, Wasson, Kerstin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Amphibians; Animals; Arthropoda; Arthropods; Biodiversity; Birds; California; canopy; community structure; ecosystem engineer; Elkhorn Slough, California, USA; environmental impact; Eucalyptus; Eucalyptus - physiology; Eucalyptus globulus; Forest ecology; Forest habitats; Forests; Groves; Habitat conservation; habitats; humans; indigenous species; Introduced Species; invasive species; perennials; planting; Plants; Population Dynamics; Quercus; soil arthropods; species diversity; Time Factors; time series analysis; trees; understory; Watersheds; Woodlands
• ISSN: 1051-0761; 1939-5582
• DOI: 10.1890/14-1943.1

Woodlands comprised of planted, nonnative trees are increasing in extent globally, while native woodlands continue to decline due to human activities. The ecological impacts of planted woodlands may include changes to the communities of understory plants and animals found among these nonnative trees relative to native woodlands, as well as invasion of adjacent habitat areas through spread beyond the originally planted areas. Eucalypts ( Eucalyptus spp.) are among the most widely planted trees worldwide, and are very common in California, USA. The goals of our investigation were to compare the biological communities of nonnative eucalypt woodlands to native oak woodlands in coastal central California, and to examine whether planted eucalypt groves have increased in size over the past decades. We assessed site and habitat attributes and characterized biological communities using understory plant, ground-dwelling arthropod, amphibian, and bird communities as indicators. Degree of difference between native and nonnative woodlands depended on the indicator used. Eucalypts had significantly greater canopy height and cover, and significantly lower cover by perennial plants and species richness of arthropods than oaks. Community composition of arthropods also differed significantly between eucalypts and oaks. Eucalypts had marginally significantly deeper litter depth, lower abundance of native plants with ranges limited to western North America, and lower abundance of amphibians. In contrast to these differences, eucalypt and oak groves had very similar bird community composition, species richness, and abundance. We found no evidence of "invasional meltdown," documenting similar abundance and richness of nonnatives in eucalypt vs. oak woodlands. Our time-series analysis revealed that planted eucalypt groves increased 271% in size, on average, over six decades, invading adjacent areas. Our results inform science-based management of California woodlands, revealing that while bird communities would probably not be affected by restoration of eucalypt to oak woodlands, such a restoration project would not only stop the spread of eucalypts into adjacent habitats but would also enhance cover by western North American native plants and perennials, enhance amphibian abundance, and increase arthropod richness.