REPEATED REGENERATION OF CRINOID SPINES IN THE UPPER PENNSYLVANIAN OF EASTERN OHIO: EVIDENCE OF ELEVATED PREDATION INTENSITY AND SIGNIFICANCE FOR PREDATOR-DRIVEN EVOLUTION OF CRINOID MORPHOLOGY

Regeneration of portions of the crinoid endoskeleton following loss to predation attempts or autotomy is a well-known phenomenon. To date, however, most effort has focused on patterns, frequencies, and evidence of regeneration of arms and portions of the calyx, with few reports of unusual or signifi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Palaios 2018-11, Vol.33 (11), p.508-513
Main Authors: THOMKA, JAMES R, EDDY, DONALD B
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Ames Member
biologic evolution
Carboniferous
Conemaugh Group
Crinoidea
Crinozoa
Echinodermata
Glenshaw Formation
Guernsey County Ohio
invertebrate
Kasimovian
morphology
Ohio
Old Washington Ohio
paleoecology
Paleontology
paleopathology
Paleozoic
Pennsylvanian
Pirasocrinidae
predation
Research Article
spines
United States
Upper Pennsylvanian
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Regeneration of portions of the crinoid endoskeleton following loss to predation attempts or autotomy is a well-known phenomenon. To date, however, most effort has focused on patterns, frequencies, and evidence of regeneration of arms and portions of the calyx, with few reports of unusual or significant regeneration-related features preserved in isolated ossicles. Here we describe brachial spines belonging to undetermined pirasocrinid (cladid) crinoids from the Upper Pennsylvanian Ames Member of the Glenshaw Formation of east-central Ohio that display evidence for multiple episodes of breakage and regeneration. As evidenced by major size discontinuities along the length of single spines, some specimens regenerated at least two times during the lifespan of the individual; such a pattern of repeated regeneration of a single skeletal element has not previously been documented. Given the position of these spines on the elevated crown of a moderately long-stemmed crinoid, frequent snipping by predatory fishes seems the most likely interpretation for the observed pattern. The repeatedly regenerated specimens occur in an assemblage displaying an unusually high regeneration frequency among pirasocrinid brachial spines, with over 30% of spines displaying at least one plane of regeneration. Paradoxically, pirasocrinids are unfavorable as prey items relative to other organisms and co-occurring crinoids; hence, it is most likely that associated biota (e.g., commensals, parasites) were the true targets of predators. This assemblage supports the interpretation that the development of extreme spinosity in pirasocrinids was largely driven by predation. However, this morphological pattern may largely represent an evolutionary strategy rooted in minimizing collateral damage incurred by predation on other organisms rather than direct predation on the crinoids themselves.
ISSN:0883-1351
1938-5323
DOI:10.2110/palo.2018.058