Loading…

Optimizing beach topographical field surveys: matching the effort with the objectives

Silveira, T.M., Carapuço, A.M., Sousa, H., Taborda, R., Psuty, N.P., Andrade, C. and Freitas, C., 2013. Optimizing beach topographic field surveys: matching the effort with the objectives In any study design, the surveying approach should match the objectives, thereby limiting the effort to focus on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of coastal research 2013-01, Vol.65 (sp1), p.588-593
Main Authors: Silveira, Tanya M., Carapuço, Ana Mafalda, Sousa, Hugo, Taborda, Rui, Psuty, Norbert P., Andrade, César, da Conceição Freitas, Maria
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b216t-4ce3be20560f6135af647166ff7de50061122608b9735b349fda3e0065a2c8c23
cites
container_end_page 593
container_issue sp1
container_start_page 588
container_title Journal of coastal research
container_volume 65
creator Silveira, Tanya M.
Carapuço, Ana Mafalda
Sousa, Hugo
Taborda, Rui
Psuty, Norbert P.
Andrade, César
da Conceição Freitas, Maria
description Silveira, T.M., Carapuço, A.M., Sousa, H., Taborda, R., Psuty, N.P., Andrade, C. and Freitas, C., 2013. Optimizing beach topographic field surveys: matching the effort with the objectives In any study design, the surveying approach should match the objectives, thereby limiting the effort to focus on the purpose of the inquiry. Often, in beach geomorphological research, study design is based on expert judgment, that does not assure the optimization of the field surveys. In this study, several dimensions of survey strategies were evaluated to compare the outcomes and uncertainties associated with field data collection. The objective of this work is to assess the accuracy of the derived volumes achieved by different survey strategies, including cross- and alongshore lines, with varying density and spatial distribution, to optimize the field survey effort. A number of survey strategies are simulated, covering a range of data resolutions and configurations, replicating a number of possibilities for field data gathering. Topographical data from different field surveying approaches were analyzed for a 4 km long coastal stretch in Portugal. Measures of beach volume were computed from cross-shore as well as alongshore information, and the errors associated with each approach evaluated. Results show that beach volume varies with the adopted survey strategy. As an example, beach volume change can be adequately portrayed and survey effort minimized either through the surveying of 3 alongshore lines, or through 200 m spacing beach profiling. This work highlights the importance of the study design in beach contexts because of its inevitable influence on the results of volumetric change analyses.
doi_str_mv 10.2112/SI65-100.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2112_SI65_100_1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26482034</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26482034</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b216t-4ce3be20560f6135af647166ff7de50061122608b9735b349fda3e0065a2c8c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEUxIMoWKsX70KOImx9-dytNyl-FAo9aM9LkibdlLZZklipf71bVzx6esybHwMzCF0TGFFC6P3bVIqCAIzICRoQIUghgMlTNICSjwugUJ2ji5TWAERWvBygxbzNfuu__G6FtVWmwTm0YRVV23ijNth5u1ni9BH39pAe8FZl0xzZ3FhsnQsx40-fmx8d9Nqa7Pc2XaIzpzbJXv3eIVo8P71PXovZ_GU6eZwVmhKZC24s05aCkOAkYUI5yUsipXPl0goA2VWiEio9LpnQjI_dUjHb_YWipjKUDdFdn2tiSClaV7fRb1U81ATq4yD1cZBOQE06-KaH1ymH-EdSySsKjHf-be9rH8LO_hf1DWBXaY8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimizing beach topographical field surveys: matching the effort with the objectives</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><source>Allen Press Journals</source><creator>Silveira, Tanya M. ; Carapuço, Ana Mafalda ; Sousa, Hugo ; Taborda, Rui ; Psuty, Norbert P. ; Andrade, César ; da Conceição Freitas, Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Silveira, Tanya M. ; Carapuço, Ana Mafalda ; Sousa, Hugo ; Taborda, Rui ; Psuty, Norbert P. ; Andrade, César ; da Conceição Freitas, Maria</creatorcontrib><description>Silveira, T.M., Carapuço, A.M., Sousa, H., Taborda, R., Psuty, N.P., Andrade, C. and Freitas, C., 2013. Optimizing beach topographic field surveys: matching the effort with the objectives In any study design, the surveying approach should match the objectives, thereby limiting the effort to focus on the purpose of the inquiry. Often, in beach geomorphological research, study design is based on expert judgment, that does not assure the optimization of the field surveys. In this study, several dimensions of survey strategies were evaluated to compare the outcomes and uncertainties associated with field data collection. The objective of this work is to assess the accuracy of the derived volumes achieved by different survey strategies, including cross- and alongshore lines, with varying density and spatial distribution, to optimize the field survey effort. A number of survey strategies are simulated, covering a range of data resolutions and configurations, replicating a number of possibilities for field data gathering. Topographical data from different field surveying approaches were analyzed for a 4 km long coastal stretch in Portugal. Measures of beach volume were computed from cross-shore as well as alongshore information, and the errors associated with each approach evaluated. Results show that beach volume varies with the adopted survey strategy. As an example, beach volume change can be adequately portrayed and survey effort minimized either through the surveying of 3 alongshore lines, or through 200 m spacing beach profiling. This work highlights the importance of the study design in beach contexts because of its inevitable influence on the results of volumetric change analyses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-0208</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2112/SI65-100.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Coastal Education and Research Foundation</publisher><subject>alongshore ; Beach profiles ; beach volumes ; Coastal Evolution and Geomorphology</subject><ispartof>Journal of coastal research, 2013-01, Vol.65 (sp1), p.588-593</ispartof><rights>2013 Coastal Education and Research Foundation</rights><rights>Coastal Education &amp; Research Foundation 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b216t-4ce3be20560f6135af647166ff7de50061122608b9735b349fda3e0065a2c8c23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26482034$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26482034$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,58217,58450</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Silveira, Tanya M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carapuço, Ana Mafalda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taborda, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Psuty, Norbert P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade, César</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Conceição Freitas, Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Optimizing beach topographical field surveys: matching the effort with the objectives</title><title>Journal of coastal research</title><description>Silveira, T.M., Carapuço, A.M., Sousa, H., Taborda, R., Psuty, N.P., Andrade, C. and Freitas, C., 2013. Optimizing beach topographic field surveys: matching the effort with the objectives In any study design, the surveying approach should match the objectives, thereby limiting the effort to focus on the purpose of the inquiry. Often, in beach geomorphological research, study design is based on expert judgment, that does not assure the optimization of the field surveys. In this study, several dimensions of survey strategies were evaluated to compare the outcomes and uncertainties associated with field data collection. The objective of this work is to assess the accuracy of the derived volumes achieved by different survey strategies, including cross- and alongshore lines, with varying density and spatial distribution, to optimize the field survey effort. A number of survey strategies are simulated, covering a range of data resolutions and configurations, replicating a number of possibilities for field data gathering. Topographical data from different field surveying approaches were analyzed for a 4 km long coastal stretch in Portugal. Measures of beach volume were computed from cross-shore as well as alongshore information, and the errors associated with each approach evaluated. Results show that beach volume varies with the adopted survey strategy. As an example, beach volume change can be adequately portrayed and survey effort minimized either through the surveying of 3 alongshore lines, or through 200 m spacing beach profiling. This work highlights the importance of the study design in beach contexts because of its inevitable influence on the results of volumetric change analyses.</description><subject>alongshore</subject><subject>Beach profiles</subject><subject>beach volumes</subject><subject>Coastal Evolution and Geomorphology</subject><issn>0749-0208</issn><issn>1551-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEUxIMoWKsX70KOImx9-dytNyl-FAo9aM9LkibdlLZZklipf71bVzx6esybHwMzCF0TGFFC6P3bVIqCAIzICRoQIUghgMlTNICSjwugUJ2ji5TWAERWvBygxbzNfuu__G6FtVWmwTm0YRVV23ijNth5u1ni9BH39pAe8FZl0xzZ3FhsnQsx40-fmx8d9Nqa7Pc2XaIzpzbJXv3eIVo8P71PXovZ_GU6eZwVmhKZC24s05aCkOAkYUI5yUsipXPl0goA2VWiEio9LpnQjI_dUjHb_YWipjKUDdFdn2tiSClaV7fRb1U81ATq4yD1cZBOQE06-KaH1ymH-EdSySsKjHf-be9rH8LO_hf1DWBXaY8</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Silveira, Tanya M.</creator><creator>Carapuço, Ana Mafalda</creator><creator>Sousa, Hugo</creator><creator>Taborda, Rui</creator><creator>Psuty, Norbert P.</creator><creator>Andrade, César</creator><creator>da Conceição Freitas, Maria</creator><general>Coastal Education and Research Foundation</general><general>COASTAL EDUCATION &amp; RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC. [CERF]</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Optimizing beach topographical field surveys: matching the effort with the objectives</title><author>Silveira, Tanya M. ; Carapuço, Ana Mafalda ; Sousa, Hugo ; Taborda, Rui ; Psuty, Norbert P. ; Andrade, César ; da Conceição Freitas, Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b216t-4ce3be20560f6135af647166ff7de50061122608b9735b349fda3e0065a2c8c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>alongshore</topic><topic>Beach profiles</topic><topic>beach volumes</topic><topic>Coastal Evolution and Geomorphology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Silveira, Tanya M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carapuço, Ana Mafalda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taborda, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Psuty, Norbert P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade, César</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Conceição Freitas, Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of coastal research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Silveira, Tanya M.</au><au>Carapuço, Ana Mafalda</au><au>Sousa, Hugo</au><au>Taborda, Rui</au><au>Psuty, Norbert P.</au><au>Andrade, César</au><au>da Conceição Freitas, Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimizing beach topographical field surveys: matching the effort with the objectives</atitle><jtitle>Journal of coastal research</jtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>sp1</issue><spage>588</spage><epage>593</epage><pages>588-593</pages><issn>0749-0208</issn><eissn>1551-5036</eissn><abstract>Silveira, T.M., Carapuço, A.M., Sousa, H., Taborda, R., Psuty, N.P., Andrade, C. and Freitas, C., 2013. Optimizing beach topographic field surveys: matching the effort with the objectives In any study design, the surveying approach should match the objectives, thereby limiting the effort to focus on the purpose of the inquiry. Often, in beach geomorphological research, study design is based on expert judgment, that does not assure the optimization of the field surveys. In this study, several dimensions of survey strategies were evaluated to compare the outcomes and uncertainties associated with field data collection. The objective of this work is to assess the accuracy of the derived volumes achieved by different survey strategies, including cross- and alongshore lines, with varying density and spatial distribution, to optimize the field survey effort. A number of survey strategies are simulated, covering a range of data resolutions and configurations, replicating a number of possibilities for field data gathering. Topographical data from different field surveying approaches were analyzed for a 4 km long coastal stretch in Portugal. Measures of beach volume were computed from cross-shore as well as alongshore information, and the errors associated with each approach evaluated. Results show that beach volume varies with the adopted survey strategy. As an example, beach volume change can be adequately portrayed and survey effort minimized either through the surveying of 3 alongshore lines, or through 200 m spacing beach profiling. This work highlights the importance of the study design in beach contexts because of its inevitable influence on the results of volumetric change analyses.</abstract><pub>Coastal Education and Research Foundation</pub><doi>10.2112/SI65-100.1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-0208
ispartof Journal of coastal research, 2013-01, Vol.65 (sp1), p.588-593
issn 0749-0208
1551-5036
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2112_SI65_100_1
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】; Allen Press Journals
subjects alongshore
Beach profiles
beach volumes
Coastal Evolution and Geomorphology
title Optimizing beach topographical field surveys: matching the effort with the objectives
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T02%3A35%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimizing%20beach%20topographical%20field%20surveys:%20matching%20the%20effort%20with%20the%20objectives&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20coastal%20research&rft.au=Silveira,%20Tanya%20M.&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=sp1&rft.spage=588&rft.epage=593&rft.pages=588-593&rft.issn=0749-0208&rft.eissn=1551-5036&rft_id=info:doi/10.2112/SI65-100.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E26482034%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b216t-4ce3be20560f6135af647166ff7de50061122608b9735b349fda3e0065a2c8c23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26482034&rfr_iscdi=true