Loading…

Maturity and storage quality of 'Honeycrisp' apples

'Honeycrisp' apples (Malus x domestica) were harvested over 3-week periods in 2001 and 2002. Maturity and quality indices were determined at harvest. Fruit quality was evaluated after air storage 0.0 to 2.2 degrees C (32 to 36 degrees), 95% relative humidity for 10-13 weeks and 15-18 weeks...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:HortTechnology (Alexandria, Va.) Va.), 2004, Vol.14 (4), p.496-499
Main Authors: Wargo, J.M, Watkins, C.B
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-a60075fab8955ce4839bb1e0074c6455ab9fb61e9fd587e7581e6842a206a4e3
cites
container_end_page 499
container_issue 4
container_start_page 496
container_title HortTechnology (Alexandria, Va.)
container_volume 14
creator Wargo, J.M
Watkins, C.B
description 'Honeycrisp' apples (Malus x domestica) were harvested over 3-week periods in 2001 and 2002. Maturity and quality indices were determined at harvest. Fruit quality was evaluated after air storage 0.0 to 2.2 degrees C (32 to 36 degrees), 95% relative humidity for 10-13 weeks and 15-18 weeks for the 2001 and 2002 harvests, respectively. Internal ethylene concentrations (IEC), starch indices (1-8 scale), firmness and soluble solids content (SSC) did not show consistent patterns of change over time. Starch hydrolysis was advanced on all harvest dates, but it is suggested that a starch index of 7 is a useful guide for timing harvest of fruit in western New York. After storage, firmness closely followed that observed immediately after harvest, and softening during storage was slow. No change in SSC was observed during storage in either year. Incidence of bitter pit and soft scald was generally low and was not affected consistently by harvest date. The incidence of stem punctures averaged 18.5% over both years, but was not affected by harvest date. Development of stem end cracking in both years, and rot development in one year, increased with later harvest dates. A panel of storage operators, packers, growers, and fruit extension specialists evaluated the samples for appearance and eating quality after storage, and results suggested that a 2-week harvest window is optimal for 'Honeycrisp' apples that are spot picked to select the most mature fruit at each harvest.
doi_str_mv 10.21273/horttech.14.4.0496
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>fao_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_21273_HORTTECH_14_4_0496</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>US201300961383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-a60075fab8955ce4839bb1e0074c6455ab9fb61e9fd587e7581e6842a206a4e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gQdzkZ4Sd7PfRynVCJWCxvOy2c42kdjE3RTpvzc1nmZ4ed6BZxC6JTjLSS7pQ92FYQBXZ4RlLMNMizM0I5rRVErCzscdC5piotUluorxE-NcUCJniL7a4RCa4ZjY_TaJQxfsDpLvg21PWeeTRdHt4ehCE_tFYvu-hXiNLrxtI9z8zzkqn1blskjXm-eX5eM6dZSpIbUCY8m9rZTm3AFTVFcVgTFkTjDObaV9JQhov-VKguSKgFAstzkWlgGdIzqddaGLMYA3fWi-bDgags2ftik2b2W5WhaGMMPMSXts3U-tutnVP00Ac_pN4w7t6AkTOHF3E-dtZ-xu9DMf7zkmFGMtCFWU_gJ1B2Ki</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maturity and storage quality of 'Honeycrisp' apples</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Wargo, J.M ; Watkins, C.B</creator><creatorcontrib>Wargo, J.M ; Watkins, C.B</creatorcontrib><description>'Honeycrisp' apples (Malus x domestica) were harvested over 3-week periods in 2001 and 2002. Maturity and quality indices were determined at harvest. Fruit quality was evaluated after air storage 0.0 to 2.2 degrees C (32 to 36 degrees), 95% relative humidity for 10-13 weeks and 15-18 weeks for the 2001 and 2002 harvests, respectively. Internal ethylene concentrations (IEC), starch indices (1-8 scale), firmness and soluble solids content (SSC) did not show consistent patterns of change over time. Starch hydrolysis was advanced on all harvest dates, but it is suggested that a starch index of 7 is a useful guide for timing harvest of fruit in western New York. After storage, firmness closely followed that observed immediately after harvest, and softening during storage was slow. No change in SSC was observed during storage in either year. Incidence of bitter pit and soft scald was generally low and was not affected consistently by harvest date. The incidence of stem punctures averaged 18.5% over both years, but was not affected by harvest date. Development of stem end cracking in both years, and rot development in one year, increased with later harvest dates. A panel of storage operators, packers, growers, and fruit extension specialists evaluated the samples for appearance and eating quality after storage, and results suggested that a 2-week harvest window is optimal for 'Honeycrisp' apples that are spot picked to select the most mature fruit at each harvest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-0198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21273/horttech.14.4.0496</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>appearance (quality) ; apples ; cultivars ; ethylene ; ethylene production ; firmness ; fruit quality ; harvest date ; hydrolysis ; Malus domestica ; postharvest diseases ; sensory properties ; shelf life ; soluble solids ; starch ; storage quality</subject><ispartof>HortTechnology (Alexandria, Va.), 2004, Vol.14 (4), p.496-499</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-a60075fab8955ce4839bb1e0074c6455ab9fb61e9fd587e7581e6842a206a4e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wargo, J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkins, C.B</creatorcontrib><title>Maturity and storage quality of 'Honeycrisp' apples</title><title>HortTechnology (Alexandria, Va.)</title><description>'Honeycrisp' apples (Malus x domestica) were harvested over 3-week periods in 2001 and 2002. Maturity and quality indices were determined at harvest. Fruit quality was evaluated after air storage 0.0 to 2.2 degrees C (32 to 36 degrees), 95% relative humidity for 10-13 weeks and 15-18 weeks for the 2001 and 2002 harvests, respectively. Internal ethylene concentrations (IEC), starch indices (1-8 scale), firmness and soluble solids content (SSC) did not show consistent patterns of change over time. Starch hydrolysis was advanced on all harvest dates, but it is suggested that a starch index of 7 is a useful guide for timing harvest of fruit in western New York. After storage, firmness closely followed that observed immediately after harvest, and softening during storage was slow. No change in SSC was observed during storage in either year. Incidence of bitter pit and soft scald was generally low and was not affected consistently by harvest date. The incidence of stem punctures averaged 18.5% over both years, but was not affected by harvest date. Development of stem end cracking in both years, and rot development in one year, increased with later harvest dates. A panel of storage operators, packers, growers, and fruit extension specialists evaluated the samples for appearance and eating quality after storage, and results suggested that a 2-week harvest window is optimal for 'Honeycrisp' apples that are spot picked to select the most mature fruit at each harvest.</description><subject>appearance (quality)</subject><subject>apples</subject><subject>cultivars</subject><subject>ethylene</subject><subject>ethylene production</subject><subject>firmness</subject><subject>fruit quality</subject><subject>harvest date</subject><subject>hydrolysis</subject><subject>Malus domestica</subject><subject>postharvest diseases</subject><subject>sensory properties</subject><subject>shelf life</subject><subject>soluble solids</subject><subject>starch</subject><subject>storage quality</subject><issn>1063-0198</issn><issn>1943-7714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gQdzkZ4Sd7PfRynVCJWCxvOy2c42kdjE3RTpvzc1nmZ4ed6BZxC6JTjLSS7pQ92FYQBXZ4RlLMNMizM0I5rRVErCzscdC5piotUluorxE-NcUCJniL7a4RCa4ZjY_TaJQxfsDpLvg21PWeeTRdHt4ehCE_tFYvu-hXiNLrxtI9z8zzkqn1blskjXm-eX5eM6dZSpIbUCY8m9rZTm3AFTVFcVgTFkTjDObaV9JQhov-VKguSKgFAstzkWlgGdIzqddaGLMYA3fWi-bDgags2ftik2b2W5WhaGMMPMSXts3U-tutnVP00Ac_pN4w7t6AkTOHF3E-dtZ-xu9DMf7zkmFGMtCFWU_gJ1B2Ki</recordid><startdate>2004</startdate><enddate>2004</enddate><creator>Wargo, J.M</creator><creator>Watkins, C.B</creator><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2004</creationdate><title>Maturity and storage quality of 'Honeycrisp' apples</title><author>Wargo, J.M ; Watkins, C.B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-a60075fab8955ce4839bb1e0074c6455ab9fb61e9fd587e7581e6842a206a4e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>appearance (quality)</topic><topic>apples</topic><topic>cultivars</topic><topic>ethylene</topic><topic>ethylene production</topic><topic>firmness</topic><topic>fruit quality</topic><topic>harvest date</topic><topic>hydrolysis</topic><topic>Malus domestica</topic><topic>postharvest diseases</topic><topic>sensory properties</topic><topic>shelf life</topic><topic>soluble solids</topic><topic>starch</topic><topic>storage quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wargo, J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkins, C.B</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>HortTechnology (Alexandria, Va.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wargo, J.M</au><au>Watkins, C.B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maturity and storage quality of 'Honeycrisp' apples</atitle><jtitle>HortTechnology (Alexandria, Va.)</jtitle><date>2004</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>496</spage><epage>499</epage><pages>496-499</pages><issn>1063-0198</issn><eissn>1943-7714</eissn><abstract>'Honeycrisp' apples (Malus x domestica) were harvested over 3-week periods in 2001 and 2002. Maturity and quality indices were determined at harvest. Fruit quality was evaluated after air storage 0.0 to 2.2 degrees C (32 to 36 degrees), 95% relative humidity for 10-13 weeks and 15-18 weeks for the 2001 and 2002 harvests, respectively. Internal ethylene concentrations (IEC), starch indices (1-8 scale), firmness and soluble solids content (SSC) did not show consistent patterns of change over time. Starch hydrolysis was advanced on all harvest dates, but it is suggested that a starch index of 7 is a useful guide for timing harvest of fruit in western New York. After storage, firmness closely followed that observed immediately after harvest, and softening during storage was slow. No change in SSC was observed during storage in either year. Incidence of bitter pit and soft scald was generally low and was not affected consistently by harvest date. The incidence of stem punctures averaged 18.5% over both years, but was not affected by harvest date. Development of stem end cracking in both years, and rot development in one year, increased with later harvest dates. A panel of storage operators, packers, growers, and fruit extension specialists evaluated the samples for appearance and eating quality after storage, and results suggested that a 2-week harvest window is optimal for 'Honeycrisp' apples that are spot picked to select the most mature fruit at each harvest.</abstract><doi>10.21273/horttech.14.4.0496</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1063-0198
ispartof HortTechnology (Alexandria, Va.), 2004, Vol.14 (4), p.496-499
issn 1063-0198
1943-7714
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_21273_HORTTECH_14_4_0496
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects appearance (quality)
apples
cultivars
ethylene
ethylene production
firmness
fruit quality
harvest date
hydrolysis
Malus domestica
postharvest diseases
sensory properties
shelf life
soluble solids
starch
storage quality
title Maturity and storage quality of 'Honeycrisp' apples
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T00%3A16%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fao_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maturity%20and%20storage%20quality%20of%20'Honeycrisp'%20apples&rft.jtitle=HortTechnology%20(Alexandria,%20Va.)&rft.au=Wargo,%20J.M&rft.date=2004&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=496&rft.epage=499&rft.pages=496-499&rft.issn=1063-0198&rft.eissn=1943-7714&rft_id=info:doi/10.21273/horttech.14.4.0496&rft_dat=%3Cfao_cross%3EUS201300961383%3C/fao_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-a60075fab8955ce4839bb1e0074c6455ab9fb61e9fd587e7581e6842a206a4e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true