Loading…

Socializing Minds, Socializing Bodies: Implications of a View to the Bodily Side of Lenz’s Spinozist Theory of Mind

Martin Lenz introduces Spinoza to us as a bundle theorist of mind, for whom there cannot be a single finite mind. Since Spinoza conceives of the mind as the idea of the body, a reinterpretation of his theory of mind will have a bodily concurrence. As a corporeal interlude to Lenz’ Spinozist theory o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Spinoza Studies 2023-12, Vol.2 (2)
Main Author: Blättler, Andrea Carmen
Format: Article
Language:eng ; ger
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Journal of Spinoza Studies
container_volume 2
creator Blättler, Andrea Carmen
description Martin Lenz introduces Spinoza to us as a bundle theorist of mind, for whom there cannot be a single finite mind. Since Spinoza conceives of the mind as the idea of the body, a reinterpretation of his theory of mind will have a bodily concurrence. As a corporeal interlude to Lenz’ Spinozist theory of mind, I enquire what follows for the latter if one takes into account more explicitly the structural complexity of the attribute of extension, expressing itself in the plurality and variability of bodies. While Lenz reads Spinoza through a lens of intersubjectivity and parallelism, my reflection leads to the consideration that the plurality and variability of bodies might call for a transindividual rather than an intersubjective account and for conceiving of body and mind as equal rather than parallel. That this complicates Lenz’ account of the identity of the mind over time is an avail rather than a problem. It invites developing Lenz’ reading beyond what the context of his book allows, helping us to navigate the intricate dynamics in which we strive for our bodies to become more capable, our minds more eternal.
doi_str_mv 10.21827/jss.2.2.41290
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_21827_jss_2_2_41290</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_afef60a0adf04431b2a8bc7ddc44cd70</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_afef60a0adf04431b2a8bc7ddc44cd70</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1450-6ee700ebbbdc8f3384f93d30f17a697e4b99d610c1c161cfb3dce9e20a1d9a473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkc1OAjEUhRujiQTZuu4DOHj743TqTok_JBgXoNum0x8oGaZkOsbAytfw9XwSB1BjzuLenHPz3cVB6JzAkJKCistlSkPaiRMq4Qj1qBAsAwLi-HcHyU7RIKUlADBGWF6IHnqbRhN0FbahnuOnUNt0gf9bt9EGl67xeLWugtFtiHXC0WONX4N7x23E7cLtr6oNngbrduHE1duvj8-Ep-tQx21ILZ4tXGw2u3D35AydeF0lN_iZffRyfzcbPWaT54fx6GaSGcKvIMudEwCuLEtrCs9Ywb1kloEnQudSOF5KaXMChhiSE-NLZo2TjoImVmouWB-ND1wb9VKtm7DSzUZFHdTeiM1c6aYNpnJKe-dz0KCtB84ZKakuSiOsNZwbK6BjDQ8s08SUGuf_eATUvgPVdaBop30H7BvyKnyj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Socializing Minds, Socializing Bodies: Implications of a View to the Bodily Side of Lenz’s Spinozist Theory of Mind</title><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Blättler, Andrea Carmen</creator><creatorcontrib>Blättler, Andrea Carmen</creatorcontrib><description>Martin Lenz introduces Spinoza to us as a bundle theorist of mind, for whom there cannot be a single finite mind. Since Spinoza conceives of the mind as the idea of the body, a reinterpretation of his theory of mind will have a bodily concurrence. As a corporeal interlude to Lenz’ Spinozist theory of mind, I enquire what follows for the latter if one takes into account more explicitly the structural complexity of the attribute of extension, expressing itself in the plurality and variability of bodies. While Lenz reads Spinoza through a lens of intersubjectivity and parallelism, my reflection leads to the consideration that the plurality and variability of bodies might call for a transindividual rather than an intersubjective account and for conceiving of body and mind as equal rather than parallel. That this complicates Lenz’ account of the identity of the mind over time is an avail rather than a problem. It invites developing Lenz’ reading beyond what the context of his book allows, helping us to navigate the intricate dynamics in which we strive for our bodies to become more capable, our minds more eternal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2773-0093</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2773-0107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21827/jss.2.2.41290</identifier><language>eng ; ger</language><publisher>University of Groningen Press</publisher><subject>body ; bundle theory of mind ; equality ; identity ; intersubjectivity ; martin lenz ; mind ; parallelism ; spinoza ; transindividuality</subject><ispartof>Journal of Spinoza Studies, 2023-12, Vol.2 (2)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-5655-0210</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blättler, Andrea Carmen</creatorcontrib><title>Socializing Minds, Socializing Bodies: Implications of a View to the Bodily Side of Lenz’s Spinozist Theory of Mind</title><title>Journal of Spinoza Studies</title><description>Martin Lenz introduces Spinoza to us as a bundle theorist of mind, for whom there cannot be a single finite mind. Since Spinoza conceives of the mind as the idea of the body, a reinterpretation of his theory of mind will have a bodily concurrence. As a corporeal interlude to Lenz’ Spinozist theory of mind, I enquire what follows for the latter if one takes into account more explicitly the structural complexity of the attribute of extension, expressing itself in the plurality and variability of bodies. While Lenz reads Spinoza through a lens of intersubjectivity and parallelism, my reflection leads to the consideration that the plurality and variability of bodies might call for a transindividual rather than an intersubjective account and for conceiving of body and mind as equal rather than parallel. That this complicates Lenz’ account of the identity of the mind over time is an avail rather than a problem. It invites developing Lenz’ reading beyond what the context of his book allows, helping us to navigate the intricate dynamics in which we strive for our bodies to become more capable, our minds more eternal.</description><subject>body</subject><subject>bundle theory of mind</subject><subject>equality</subject><subject>identity</subject><subject>intersubjectivity</subject><subject>martin lenz</subject><subject>mind</subject><subject>parallelism</subject><subject>spinoza</subject><subject>transindividuality</subject><issn>2773-0093</issn><issn>2773-0107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkc1OAjEUhRujiQTZuu4DOHj743TqTok_JBgXoNum0x8oGaZkOsbAytfw9XwSB1BjzuLenHPz3cVB6JzAkJKCistlSkPaiRMq4Qj1qBAsAwLi-HcHyU7RIKUlADBGWF6IHnqbRhN0FbahnuOnUNt0gf9bt9EGl67xeLWugtFtiHXC0WONX4N7x23E7cLtr6oNngbrduHE1duvj8-Ep-tQx21ILZ4tXGw2u3D35AydeF0lN_iZffRyfzcbPWaT54fx6GaSGcKvIMudEwCuLEtrCs9Ywb1kloEnQudSOF5KaXMChhiSE-NLZo2TjoImVmouWB-ND1wb9VKtm7DSzUZFHdTeiM1c6aYNpnJKe-dz0KCtB84ZKakuSiOsNZwbK6BjDQ8s08SUGuf_eATUvgPVdaBop30H7BvyKnyj</recordid><startdate>20231219</startdate><enddate>20231219</enddate><creator>Blättler, Andrea Carmen</creator><general>University of Groningen Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5655-0210</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231219</creationdate><title>Socializing Minds, Socializing Bodies: Implications of a View to the Bodily Side of Lenz’s Spinozist Theory of Mind</title><author>Blättler, Andrea Carmen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1450-6ee700ebbbdc8f3384f93d30f17a697e4b99d610c1c161cfb3dce9e20a1d9a473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; ger</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>body</topic><topic>bundle theory of mind</topic><topic>equality</topic><topic>identity</topic><topic>intersubjectivity</topic><topic>martin lenz</topic><topic>mind</topic><topic>parallelism</topic><topic>spinoza</topic><topic>transindividuality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blättler, Andrea Carmen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of Spinoza Studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blättler, Andrea Carmen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Socializing Minds, Socializing Bodies: Implications of a View to the Bodily Side of Lenz’s Spinozist Theory of Mind</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Spinoza Studies</jtitle><date>2023-12-19</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>2773-0093</issn><eissn>2773-0107</eissn><abstract>Martin Lenz introduces Spinoza to us as a bundle theorist of mind, for whom there cannot be a single finite mind. Since Spinoza conceives of the mind as the idea of the body, a reinterpretation of his theory of mind will have a bodily concurrence. As a corporeal interlude to Lenz’ Spinozist theory of mind, I enquire what follows for the latter if one takes into account more explicitly the structural complexity of the attribute of extension, expressing itself in the plurality and variability of bodies. While Lenz reads Spinoza through a lens of intersubjectivity and parallelism, my reflection leads to the consideration that the plurality and variability of bodies might call for a transindividual rather than an intersubjective account and for conceiving of body and mind as equal rather than parallel. That this complicates Lenz’ account of the identity of the mind over time is an avail rather than a problem. It invites developing Lenz’ reading beyond what the context of his book allows, helping us to navigate the intricate dynamics in which we strive for our bodies to become more capable, our minds more eternal.</abstract><pub>University of Groningen Press</pub><doi>10.21827/jss.2.2.41290</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5655-0210</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2773-0093
ispartof Journal of Spinoza Studies, 2023-12, Vol.2 (2)
issn 2773-0093
2773-0107
language eng ; ger
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_21827_jss_2_2_41290
source Directory of Open Access Journals
subjects body
bundle theory of mind
equality
identity
intersubjectivity
martin lenz
mind
parallelism
spinoza
transindividuality
title Socializing Minds, Socializing Bodies: Implications of a View to the Bodily Side of Lenz’s Spinozist Theory of Mind
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A50%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Socializing%20Minds,%20Socializing%20Bodies:%20Implications%20of%20a%20View%20to%20the%20Bodily%20Side%20of%20Lenz%E2%80%99s%20Spinozist%20Theory%20of%20Mind&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Spinoza%20Studies&rft.au=Bl%C3%A4ttler,%20Andrea%20Carmen&rft.date=2023-12-19&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=2773-0093&rft.eissn=2773-0107&rft_id=info:doi/10.21827/jss.2.2.41290&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_afef60a0adf04431b2a8bc7ddc44cd70%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1450-6ee700ebbbdc8f3384f93d30f17a697e4b99d610c1c161cfb3dce9e20a1d9a473%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true