Individualistic versus Paired/Cooperative Computer-Assisted Instruction: Matching Instructional Method with Cognitive Style

This study showed that pairing students for computer-assisted instruction (CAI) is efficient and cost-effective. The interactive effects of individual cognitive style on paired/cooperative CAI were also examined. Three different student pairings were analyzed—field independent with field independent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of educational technology systems 1991-06, Vol.19 (4), p.299-312
Main Authors: Whyte, Michael M., Knirk, Frederick G., Casey, Robert J., Willard, Marsha L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Academic Achievement
Analysis of Variance
Comparative Analysis
Computer Assisted Instruction
Cooperative Learning
Field Dependence Independence
Group Embedded Figures Test
Individual Instruction
Instructional Effectiveness
Intermode Differences
Pretests Posttests
Questionnaires
Student Attitudes
Tables (Data)
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study showed that pairing students for computer-assisted instruction (CAI) is efficient and cost-effective. The interactive effects of individual cognitive style on paired/cooperative CAI were also examined. Three different student pairings were analyzed—field independent with field independent, field dependent with field independent, and field dependent with field dependent. A three-group, posttest-only design was utilized. No significant difference existed between the mean posttest scores of participants who worked individually and those who worked in pairs. The manner in which individuals were paired by individual cognitive style also made a significant difference. Groups made up of either two field independent students or a mixed group of one field dependent student and one field independent student significantly outperformed groups made up of two field dependents.
ISSN:0047-2395
1541-3810
DOI:10.2190/BM2H-TA0F-T02B-9TDB