Loading…
The Effects of Computer-Assisted Learning-Strategy Training on the Achievement of Learning Objectives
This study investigated the effects of comprehension-directed and memory-directed computer-based learning-strategy training on the achievement of learning objectives. The subjects were sixty undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory computing course. Learners completed a tutorial about micr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of educational computing research 1994-03, Vol.10 (2), p.153-160 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-4c5788395a67984f877205c01e1b49c84bb2239acf09a77e77bfeb9da927bfe63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-4c5788395a67984f877205c01e1b49c84bb2239acf09a77e77bfeb9da927bfe63 |
container_end_page | 160 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 153 |
container_title | Journal of educational computing research |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Cardinale, Loretta A. Smith, Charles M. |
description | This study investigated the effects of comprehension-directed and memory-directed computer-based learning-strategy training on the achievement of learning objectives. The subjects were sixty undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory computing course. Learners completed a tutorial about microcomputer components on the first day of the study. Two treatment groups completed a strategy-training tutorial focusing on comprehension or memory. The control group received extra time on the microcomputer-components tutorial and no strategy training. One week later, all subjects completed two separately administered tests including cued recall and recognition. The strategy training effects were significant on the fifty-item cued recall test, however, group mean scores were at or below 50 percent. Group mean scores on a recognition text suggested that comprehension-directed training was the most effective. All treatment group mean scores were significantly higher than the control group. The findings of this study provide a basis for further research into the design of computer-based learning-strategy training and assessment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2190/KM67-TXK3-0NNY-N063 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2190_KM67_TXK3_0NNY_N063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ483726</ericid><sage_id>10.2190_KM67-TXK3-0NNY-N063</sage_id><sourcerecordid>EJ483726</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-4c5788395a67984f877205c01e1b49c84bb2239acf09a77e77bfeb9da927bfe63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOAjEUQBujiYh-gS76A9W-ZjpdEoIvEBaOia6aTrmFITJj2oGEv3ca1KWr3vTmnOQehK4ZveVM07vpS65I-T4VhM7nH2ROc3GCBiyTjEgm6SkaUCUykgvBztFFjBtKOc0ZHyAo14An3oPrIm49Hrfbr10HgYxirGMHSzwDG5q6WZHXLtgOVgdcBlunH9w2uOvxkVvXsIctNF1S_AJ4UW16bb2HeInOvP2McPXzDtHb_aQcP5LZ4uFpPJoRxyXriHSZKgqhM5srXUhfKMVp5igDVkntCllVnAttnafaKgVKVR4qvbSapykXQySOXhfaGAN48xXqrQ0Hw6hJpUwqZVIpk0qZVKqnbo4UhNr9EZNnWQjFk5Qe19GuwGzaXWj6G_41fgPwf3bb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Computer-Assisted Learning-Strategy Training on the Achievement of Learning Objectives</title><source>ERIC</source><source>SAGE Deep Backfile Upgrade 2016</source><creator>Cardinale, Loretta A. ; Smith, Charles M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cardinale, Loretta A. ; Smith, Charles M.</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated the effects of comprehension-directed and memory-directed computer-based learning-strategy training on the achievement of learning objectives. The subjects were sixty undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory computing course. Learners completed a tutorial about microcomputer components on the first day of the study. Two treatment groups completed a strategy-training tutorial focusing on comprehension or memory. The control group received extra time on the microcomputer-components tutorial and no strategy training. One week later, all subjects completed two separately administered tests including cued recall and recognition. The strategy training effects were significant on the fifty-item cued recall test, however, group mean scores were at or below 50 percent. Group mean scores on a recognition text suggested that comprehension-directed training was the most effective. All treatment group mean scores were significantly higher than the control group. The findings of this study provide a basis for further research into the design of computer-based learning-strategy training and assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-6331</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-4140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2190/KM67-TXK3-0NNY-N063</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Behavioral Objectives ; Comprehension ; Computer Assisted Instruction ; Evaluation Methods ; Higher Education ; Hypothesis Testing ; Instructional Design ; Learning Strategies ; Memory ; Microcomputers ; Old Dominion University VA ; Research Needs ; Theoretical Analysis ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Journal of educational computing research, 1994-03, Vol.10 (2), p.153-160</ispartof><rights>1994 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-4c5788395a67984f877205c01e1b49c84bb2239acf09a77e77bfeb9da927bfe63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-4c5788395a67984f877205c01e1b49c84bb2239acf09a77e77bfeb9da927bfe63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2190/KM67-TXK3-0NNY-N063$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2190/KM67-TXK3-0NNY-N063$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21860,27924,27925,44857,45245</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ483726$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cardinale, Loretta A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Charles M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Computer-Assisted Learning-Strategy Training on the Achievement of Learning Objectives</title><title>Journal of educational computing research</title><description>This study investigated the effects of comprehension-directed and memory-directed computer-based learning-strategy training on the achievement of learning objectives. The subjects were sixty undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory computing course. Learners completed a tutorial about microcomputer components on the first day of the study. Two treatment groups completed a strategy-training tutorial focusing on comprehension or memory. The control group received extra time on the microcomputer-components tutorial and no strategy training. One week later, all subjects completed two separately administered tests including cued recall and recognition. The strategy training effects were significant on the fifty-item cued recall test, however, group mean scores were at or below 50 percent. Group mean scores on a recognition text suggested that comprehension-directed training was the most effective. All treatment group mean scores were significantly higher than the control group. The findings of this study provide a basis for further research into the design of computer-based learning-strategy training and assessment.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Behavioral Objectives</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Hypothesis Testing</subject><subject>Instructional Design</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Microcomputers</subject><subject>Old Dominion University VA</subject><subject>Research Needs</subject><subject>Theoretical Analysis</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>0735-6331</issn><issn>1541-4140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOAjEUQBujiYh-gS76A9W-ZjpdEoIvEBaOia6aTrmFITJj2oGEv3ca1KWr3vTmnOQehK4ZveVM07vpS65I-T4VhM7nH2ROc3GCBiyTjEgm6SkaUCUykgvBztFFjBtKOc0ZHyAo14An3oPrIm49Hrfbr10HgYxirGMHSzwDG5q6WZHXLtgOVgdcBlunH9w2uOvxkVvXsIctNF1S_AJ4UW16bb2HeInOvP2McPXzDtHb_aQcP5LZ4uFpPJoRxyXriHSZKgqhM5srXUhfKMVp5igDVkntCllVnAttnafaKgVKVR4qvbSapykXQySOXhfaGAN48xXqrQ0Hw6hJpUwqZVIpk0qZVKqnbo4UhNr9EZNnWQjFk5Qe19GuwGzaXWj6G_41fgPwf3bb</recordid><startdate>199403</startdate><enddate>199403</enddate><creator>Cardinale, Loretta A.</creator><creator>Smith, Charles M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199403</creationdate><title>The Effects of Computer-Assisted Learning-Strategy Training on the Achievement of Learning Objectives</title><author>Cardinale, Loretta A. ; Smith, Charles M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-4c5788395a67984f877205c01e1b49c84bb2239acf09a77e77bfeb9da927bfe63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Behavioral Objectives</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Computer Assisted Instruction</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Hypothesis Testing</topic><topic>Instructional Design</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Microcomputers</topic><topic>Old Dominion University VA</topic><topic>Research Needs</topic><topic>Theoretical Analysis</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cardinale, Loretta A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Charles M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of educational computing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cardinale, Loretta A.</au><au>Smith, Charles M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ483726</ericid><atitle>The Effects of Computer-Assisted Learning-Strategy Training on the Achievement of Learning Objectives</atitle><jtitle>Journal of educational computing research</jtitle><date>1994-03</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>153-160</pages><issn>0735-6331</issn><eissn>1541-4140</eissn><abstract>This study investigated the effects of comprehension-directed and memory-directed computer-based learning-strategy training on the achievement of learning objectives. The subjects were sixty undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory computing course. Learners completed a tutorial about microcomputer components on the first day of the study. Two treatment groups completed a strategy-training tutorial focusing on comprehension or memory. The control group received extra time on the microcomputer-components tutorial and no strategy training. One week later, all subjects completed two separately administered tests including cued recall and recognition. The strategy training effects were significant on the fifty-item cued recall test, however, group mean scores were at or below 50 percent. Group mean scores on a recognition text suggested that comprehension-directed training was the most effective. All treatment group mean scores were significantly higher than the control group. The findings of this study provide a basis for further research into the design of computer-based learning-strategy training and assessment.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.2190/KM67-TXK3-0NNY-N063</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-6331 |
ispartof | Journal of educational computing research, 1994-03, Vol.10 (2), p.153-160 |
issn | 0735-6331 1541-4140 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_2190_KM67_TXK3_0NNY_N063 |
source | ERIC; SAGE Deep Backfile Upgrade 2016 |
subjects | Analysis of Variance Behavioral Objectives Comprehension Computer Assisted Instruction Evaluation Methods Higher Education Hypothesis Testing Instructional Design Learning Strategies Memory Microcomputers Old Dominion University VA Research Needs Theoretical Analysis Undergraduate Students |
title | The Effects of Computer-Assisted Learning-Strategy Training on the Achievement of Learning Objectives |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T13%3A02%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Computer-Assisted%20Learning-Strategy%20Training%20on%20the%20Achievement%20of%20Learning%20Objectives&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20educational%20computing%20research&rft.au=Cardinale,%20Loretta%20A.&rft.date=1994-03&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=153-160&rft.issn=0735-6331&rft.eissn=1541-4140&rft_id=info:doi/10.2190/KM67-TXK3-0NNY-N063&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ483726%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-4c5788395a67984f877205c01e1b49c84bb2239acf09a77e77bfeb9da927bfe63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ483726&rft_sage_id=10.2190_KM67-TXK3-0NNY-N063&rfr_iscdi=true |