Loading…

The Effects of Computer-Assisted Learning-Strategy Training on the Achievement of Learning Objectives

This study investigated the effects of comprehension-directed and memory-directed computer-based learning-strategy training on the achievement of learning objectives. The subjects were sixty undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory computing course. Learners completed a tutorial about micr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of educational computing research 1994-03, Vol.10 (2), p.153-160
Main Authors: Cardinale, Loretta A., Smith, Charles M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-4c5788395a67984f877205c01e1b49c84bb2239acf09a77e77bfeb9da927bfe63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-4c5788395a67984f877205c01e1b49c84bb2239acf09a77e77bfeb9da927bfe63
container_end_page 160
container_issue 2
container_start_page 153
container_title Journal of educational computing research
container_volume 10
creator Cardinale, Loretta A.
Smith, Charles M.
description This study investigated the effects of comprehension-directed and memory-directed computer-based learning-strategy training on the achievement of learning objectives. The subjects were sixty undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory computing course. Learners completed a tutorial about microcomputer components on the first day of the study. Two treatment groups completed a strategy-training tutorial focusing on comprehension or memory. The control group received extra time on the microcomputer-components tutorial and no strategy training. One week later, all subjects completed two separately administered tests including cued recall and recognition. The strategy training effects were significant on the fifty-item cued recall test, however, group mean scores were at or below 50 percent. Group mean scores on a recognition text suggested that comprehension-directed training was the most effective. All treatment group mean scores were significantly higher than the control group. The findings of this study provide a basis for further research into the design of computer-based learning-strategy training and assessment.
doi_str_mv 10.2190/KM67-TXK3-0NNY-N063
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2190_KM67_TXK3_0NNY_N063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ483726</ericid><sage_id>10.2190_KM67-TXK3-0NNY-N063</sage_id><sourcerecordid>EJ483726</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-4c5788395a67984f877205c01e1b49c84bb2239acf09a77e77bfeb9da927bfe63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOAjEUQBujiYh-gS76A9W-ZjpdEoIvEBaOia6aTrmFITJj2oGEv3ca1KWr3vTmnOQehK4ZveVM07vpS65I-T4VhM7nH2ROc3GCBiyTjEgm6SkaUCUykgvBztFFjBtKOc0ZHyAo14An3oPrIm49Hrfbr10HgYxirGMHSzwDG5q6WZHXLtgOVgdcBlunH9w2uOvxkVvXsIctNF1S_AJ4UW16bb2HeInOvP2McPXzDtHb_aQcP5LZ4uFpPJoRxyXriHSZKgqhM5srXUhfKMVp5igDVkntCllVnAttnafaKgVKVR4qvbSapykXQySOXhfaGAN48xXqrQ0Hw6hJpUwqZVIpk0qZVKqnbo4UhNr9EZNnWQjFk5Qe19GuwGzaXWj6G_41fgPwf3bb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Computer-Assisted Learning-Strategy Training on the Achievement of Learning Objectives</title><source>ERIC</source><source>SAGE Deep Backfile Upgrade 2016</source><creator>Cardinale, Loretta A. ; Smith, Charles M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cardinale, Loretta A. ; Smith, Charles M.</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated the effects of comprehension-directed and memory-directed computer-based learning-strategy training on the achievement of learning objectives. The subjects were sixty undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory computing course. Learners completed a tutorial about microcomputer components on the first day of the study. Two treatment groups completed a strategy-training tutorial focusing on comprehension or memory. The control group received extra time on the microcomputer-components tutorial and no strategy training. One week later, all subjects completed two separately administered tests including cued recall and recognition. The strategy training effects were significant on the fifty-item cued recall test, however, group mean scores were at or below 50 percent. Group mean scores on a recognition text suggested that comprehension-directed training was the most effective. All treatment group mean scores were significantly higher than the control group. The findings of this study provide a basis for further research into the design of computer-based learning-strategy training and assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-6331</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-4140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2190/KM67-TXK3-0NNY-N063</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Behavioral Objectives ; Comprehension ; Computer Assisted Instruction ; Evaluation Methods ; Higher Education ; Hypothesis Testing ; Instructional Design ; Learning Strategies ; Memory ; Microcomputers ; Old Dominion University VA ; Research Needs ; Theoretical Analysis ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Journal of educational computing research, 1994-03, Vol.10 (2), p.153-160</ispartof><rights>1994 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-4c5788395a67984f877205c01e1b49c84bb2239acf09a77e77bfeb9da927bfe63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-4c5788395a67984f877205c01e1b49c84bb2239acf09a77e77bfeb9da927bfe63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2190/KM67-TXK3-0NNY-N063$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2190/KM67-TXK3-0NNY-N063$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21860,27924,27925,44857,45245</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ483726$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cardinale, Loretta A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Charles M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Computer-Assisted Learning-Strategy Training on the Achievement of Learning Objectives</title><title>Journal of educational computing research</title><description>This study investigated the effects of comprehension-directed and memory-directed computer-based learning-strategy training on the achievement of learning objectives. The subjects were sixty undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory computing course. Learners completed a tutorial about microcomputer components on the first day of the study. Two treatment groups completed a strategy-training tutorial focusing on comprehension or memory. The control group received extra time on the microcomputer-components tutorial and no strategy training. One week later, all subjects completed two separately administered tests including cued recall and recognition. The strategy training effects were significant on the fifty-item cued recall test, however, group mean scores were at or below 50 percent. Group mean scores on a recognition text suggested that comprehension-directed training was the most effective. All treatment group mean scores were significantly higher than the control group. The findings of this study provide a basis for further research into the design of computer-based learning-strategy training and assessment.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Behavioral Objectives</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Hypothesis Testing</subject><subject>Instructional Design</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Microcomputers</subject><subject>Old Dominion University VA</subject><subject>Research Needs</subject><subject>Theoretical Analysis</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>0735-6331</issn><issn>1541-4140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOAjEUQBujiYh-gS76A9W-ZjpdEoIvEBaOia6aTrmFITJj2oGEv3ca1KWr3vTmnOQehK4ZveVM07vpS65I-T4VhM7nH2ROc3GCBiyTjEgm6SkaUCUykgvBztFFjBtKOc0ZHyAo14An3oPrIm49Hrfbr10HgYxirGMHSzwDG5q6WZHXLtgOVgdcBlunH9w2uOvxkVvXsIctNF1S_AJ4UW16bb2HeInOvP2McPXzDtHb_aQcP5LZ4uFpPJoRxyXriHSZKgqhM5srXUhfKMVp5igDVkntCllVnAttnafaKgVKVR4qvbSapykXQySOXhfaGAN48xXqrQ0Hw6hJpUwqZVIpk0qZVKqnbo4UhNr9EZNnWQjFk5Qe19GuwGzaXWj6G_41fgPwf3bb</recordid><startdate>199403</startdate><enddate>199403</enddate><creator>Cardinale, Loretta A.</creator><creator>Smith, Charles M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199403</creationdate><title>The Effects of Computer-Assisted Learning-Strategy Training on the Achievement of Learning Objectives</title><author>Cardinale, Loretta A. ; Smith, Charles M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-4c5788395a67984f877205c01e1b49c84bb2239acf09a77e77bfeb9da927bfe63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Behavioral Objectives</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Computer Assisted Instruction</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Hypothesis Testing</topic><topic>Instructional Design</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Microcomputers</topic><topic>Old Dominion University VA</topic><topic>Research Needs</topic><topic>Theoretical Analysis</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cardinale, Loretta A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Charles M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of educational computing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cardinale, Loretta A.</au><au>Smith, Charles M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ483726</ericid><atitle>The Effects of Computer-Assisted Learning-Strategy Training on the Achievement of Learning Objectives</atitle><jtitle>Journal of educational computing research</jtitle><date>1994-03</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>153-160</pages><issn>0735-6331</issn><eissn>1541-4140</eissn><abstract>This study investigated the effects of comprehension-directed and memory-directed computer-based learning-strategy training on the achievement of learning objectives. The subjects were sixty undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory computing course. Learners completed a tutorial about microcomputer components on the first day of the study. Two treatment groups completed a strategy-training tutorial focusing on comprehension or memory. The control group received extra time on the microcomputer-components tutorial and no strategy training. One week later, all subjects completed two separately administered tests including cued recall and recognition. The strategy training effects were significant on the fifty-item cued recall test, however, group mean scores were at or below 50 percent. Group mean scores on a recognition text suggested that comprehension-directed training was the most effective. All treatment group mean scores were significantly higher than the control group. The findings of this study provide a basis for further research into the design of computer-based learning-strategy training and assessment.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.2190/KM67-TXK3-0NNY-N063</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-6331
ispartof Journal of educational computing research, 1994-03, Vol.10 (2), p.153-160
issn 0735-6331
1541-4140
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2190_KM67_TXK3_0NNY_N063
source ERIC; SAGE Deep Backfile Upgrade 2016
subjects Analysis of Variance
Behavioral Objectives
Comprehension
Computer Assisted Instruction
Evaluation Methods
Higher Education
Hypothesis Testing
Instructional Design
Learning Strategies
Memory
Microcomputers
Old Dominion University VA
Research Needs
Theoretical Analysis
Undergraduate Students
title The Effects of Computer-Assisted Learning-Strategy Training on the Achievement of Learning Objectives
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T13%3A02%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Computer-Assisted%20Learning-Strategy%20Training%20on%20the%20Achievement%20of%20Learning%20Objectives&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20educational%20computing%20research&rft.au=Cardinale,%20Loretta%20A.&rft.date=1994-03&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=153-160&rft.issn=0735-6331&rft.eissn=1541-4140&rft_id=info:doi/10.2190/KM67-TXK3-0NNY-N063&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ483726%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-4c5788395a67984f877205c01e1b49c84bb2239acf09a77e77bfeb9da927bfe63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ483726&rft_sage_id=10.2190_KM67-TXK3-0NNY-N063&rfr_iscdi=true