Loading…
Behavioral and Environmental Factors in the Spatial Distribution and Popualtion Dynamics of a Yellow‐Bellied Marmot Population
Behavioral and environmental factors in the spatial distribution and population dynamics of a yellow—bellied marmot (Marmota flaviventris) population were studied in 1971 and 1972 in Gunnison Co., Colorado. Yellow—bellied marmots are generally considered to be colonial; however, this is not their on...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecology (Durham) 1974-07, Vol.55 (4), p.760-771 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1660-9a1548e4dc613c424d165f32556b3e4c06f646e846b865644f10e6959a6b8d3a3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 771 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 760 |
container_title | Ecology (Durham) |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Svendsen, Gerald E. |
description | Behavioral and environmental factors in the spatial distribution and population dynamics of a yellow—bellied marmot (Marmota flaviventris) population were studied in 1971 and 1972 in Gunnison Co., Colorado. Yellow—bellied marmots are generally considered to be colonial; however, this is not their only option, depending upon the marmots' behavioral profile and the size and composition of the habitat. Of the adult—yearling group 75% lived as members of colonies, 16% lived at satellite sites, and 8% were transients. Satellite sites differed from colonies mainly in size and topographic diversity; they may be considered mini—habitats, with the most limited resources being burrow sites. Marmots can be classified, by means of mirror—image stimulation (MIS), as aggressive, social, and avoider. Aggressive females tended to occupy small harems at large sites, or to live as solitary individuals regardless of the size of the site. Social females occurred primarily at large sites, in harems. Avoider females lived in peripheral burrows at colonies, or in satellite sites. All behavioral types reproduced successfully, but reproductive fitness was correlated with social structure. Aggressive females were most fit in small harems or at satellite sites, whereas social females were most fit in large social groups. Avoiders were least fit in all social situations. Data presently available fails to show that the behavioral profile of the female is reflected in the social tendencies of her young. In general, social behavior is a major factor affecting the distribution and dynamics of populations of yellow—bellied marmots, but dispersion is also related to the distribution of suitable habitat. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1934412 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_1934412</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1934412</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1934412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1660-9a1548e4dc613c424d165f32556b3e4c06f646e846b865644f10e6959a6b8d3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1OwzAQhS0EEqUgjoAXSKwCdvyTZAn9AaQikEoXXUXTxKGukriy01bd9QickZPgNt3CbGbm6X2zeIPQNSX3ISPRA00Y5zQ8QR0_JUFCI3KKOoTQMEikiM_RhXML4ovyuIN2T2oOa20slBjqHA_qtbamrlTdeGUIWWOsw7rGzVzh8RIa7eW-do3Vs1WjTX2gPsxyBeVh7W9rqHTmsCkw4KkqS7P52X0_-UGrHL-BrUxzAErYA5forIDSqatj76LJcPDZewlG78-vvcdRkFEpSZAAFTxWPM8kZRkPeU6lKFgohJwxxTMiC8mlirmcxVJIzgtKlExEAl7IGbAuumvvZtY4Z1WRLq2uwG5TStJ9cOkxOO8MW-dGl2r7ly0d9KY0ibgQPJLEQ7cttHA-sX9u37S2AkwKX1a7dDIOCZX-HRFlMWW_aI2Ekw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Behavioral and Environmental Factors in the Spatial Distribution and Popualtion Dynamics of a Yellow‐Bellied Marmot Population</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley Archive</source><creator>Svendsen, Gerald E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Svendsen, Gerald E.</creatorcontrib><description>Behavioral and environmental factors in the spatial distribution and population dynamics of a yellow—bellied marmot (Marmota flaviventris) population were studied in 1971 and 1972 in Gunnison Co., Colorado. Yellow—bellied marmots are generally considered to be colonial; however, this is not their only option, depending upon the marmots' behavioral profile and the size and composition of the habitat. Of the adult—yearling group 75% lived as members of colonies, 16% lived at satellite sites, and 8% were transients. Satellite sites differed from colonies mainly in size and topographic diversity; they may be considered mini—habitats, with the most limited resources being burrow sites. Marmots can be classified, by means of mirror—image stimulation (MIS), as aggressive, social, and avoider. Aggressive females tended to occupy small harems at large sites, or to live as solitary individuals regardless of the size of the site. Social females occurred primarily at large sites, in harems. Avoider females lived in peripheral burrows at colonies, or in satellite sites. All behavioral types reproduced successfully, but reproductive fitness was correlated with social structure. Aggressive females were most fit in small harems or at satellite sites, whereas social females were most fit in large social groups. Avoiders were least fit in all social situations. Data presently available fails to show that the behavioral profile of the female is reflected in the social tendencies of her young. In general, social behavior is a major factor affecting the distribution and dynamics of populations of yellow—bellied marmots, but dispersion is also related to the distribution of suitable habitat.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1934412</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animals ; Artificial satellites ; Female animals ; Human aggression ; Male animals ; Marmots ; Mating behavior ; Population ecology ; Social behavior ; Yearlings</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 1974-07, Vol.55 (4), p.760-771</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1974 The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1974 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1660-9a1548e4dc613c424d165f32556b3e4c06f646e846b865644f10e6959a6b8d3a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1934412$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1934412$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27924,27925,46049,46473,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Svendsen, Gerald E.</creatorcontrib><title>Behavioral and Environmental Factors in the Spatial Distribution and Popualtion Dynamics of a Yellow‐Bellied Marmot Population</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><description>Behavioral and environmental factors in the spatial distribution and population dynamics of a yellow—bellied marmot (Marmota flaviventris) population were studied in 1971 and 1972 in Gunnison Co., Colorado. Yellow—bellied marmots are generally considered to be colonial; however, this is not their only option, depending upon the marmots' behavioral profile and the size and composition of the habitat. Of the adult—yearling group 75% lived as members of colonies, 16% lived at satellite sites, and 8% were transients. Satellite sites differed from colonies mainly in size and topographic diversity; they may be considered mini—habitats, with the most limited resources being burrow sites. Marmots can be classified, by means of mirror—image stimulation (MIS), as aggressive, social, and avoider. Aggressive females tended to occupy small harems at large sites, or to live as solitary individuals regardless of the size of the site. Social females occurred primarily at large sites, in harems. Avoider females lived in peripheral burrows at colonies, or in satellite sites. All behavioral types reproduced successfully, but reproductive fitness was correlated with social structure. Aggressive females were most fit in small harems or at satellite sites, whereas social females were most fit in large social groups. Avoiders were least fit in all social situations. Data presently available fails to show that the behavioral profile of the female is reflected in the social tendencies of her young. In general, social behavior is a major factor affecting the distribution and dynamics of populations of yellow—bellied marmots, but dispersion is also related to the distribution of suitable habitat.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Artificial satellites</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Human aggression</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Marmots</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Social behavior</subject><subject>Yearlings</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1974</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1OwzAQhS0EEqUgjoAXSKwCdvyTZAn9AaQikEoXXUXTxKGukriy01bd9QickZPgNt3CbGbm6X2zeIPQNSX3ISPRA00Y5zQ8QR0_JUFCI3KKOoTQMEikiM_RhXML4ovyuIN2T2oOa20slBjqHA_qtbamrlTdeGUIWWOsw7rGzVzh8RIa7eW-do3Vs1WjTX2gPsxyBeVh7W9rqHTmsCkw4KkqS7P52X0_-UGrHL-BrUxzAErYA5forIDSqatj76LJcPDZewlG78-vvcdRkFEpSZAAFTxWPM8kZRkPeU6lKFgohJwxxTMiC8mlirmcxVJIzgtKlExEAl7IGbAuumvvZtY4Z1WRLq2uwG5TStJ9cOkxOO8MW-dGl2r7ly0d9KY0ibgQPJLEQ7cttHA-sX9u37S2AkwKX1a7dDIOCZX-HRFlMWW_aI2Ekw</recordid><startdate>197407</startdate><enddate>197407</enddate><creator>Svendsen, Gerald E.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><general>Duke University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197407</creationdate><title>Behavioral and Environmental Factors in the Spatial Distribution and Popualtion Dynamics of a Yellow‐Bellied Marmot Population</title><author>Svendsen, Gerald E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1660-9a1548e4dc613c424d165f32556b3e4c06f646e846b865644f10e6959a6b8d3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1974</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Artificial satellites</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Human aggression</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Marmots</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Social behavior</topic><topic>Yearlings</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Svendsen, Gerald E.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Svendsen, Gerald E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Behavioral and Environmental Factors in the Spatial Distribution and Popualtion Dynamics of a Yellow‐Bellied Marmot Population</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><date>1974-07</date><risdate>1974</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>760</spage><epage>771</epage><pages>760-771</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><abstract>Behavioral and environmental factors in the spatial distribution and population dynamics of a yellow—bellied marmot (Marmota flaviventris) population were studied in 1971 and 1972 in Gunnison Co., Colorado. Yellow—bellied marmots are generally considered to be colonial; however, this is not their only option, depending upon the marmots' behavioral profile and the size and composition of the habitat. Of the adult—yearling group 75% lived as members of colonies, 16% lived at satellite sites, and 8% were transients. Satellite sites differed from colonies mainly in size and topographic diversity; they may be considered mini—habitats, with the most limited resources being burrow sites. Marmots can be classified, by means of mirror—image stimulation (MIS), as aggressive, social, and avoider. Aggressive females tended to occupy small harems at large sites, or to live as solitary individuals regardless of the size of the site. Social females occurred primarily at large sites, in harems. Avoider females lived in peripheral burrows at colonies, or in satellite sites. All behavioral types reproduced successfully, but reproductive fitness was correlated with social structure. Aggressive females were most fit in small harems or at satellite sites, whereas social females were most fit in large social groups. Avoiders were least fit in all social situations. Data presently available fails to show that the behavioral profile of the female is reflected in the social tendencies of her young. In general, social behavior is a major factor affecting the distribution and dynamics of populations of yellow—bellied marmots, but dispersion is also related to the distribution of suitable habitat.</abstract><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.2307/1934412</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-9658 |
ispartof | Ecology (Durham), 1974-07, Vol.55 (4), p.760-771 |
issn | 0012-9658 1939-9170 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_1934412 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley Archive |
subjects | Animals Artificial satellites Female animals Human aggression Male animals Marmots Mating behavior Population ecology Social behavior Yearlings |
title | Behavioral and Environmental Factors in the Spatial Distribution and Popualtion Dynamics of a Yellow‐Bellied Marmot Population |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A02%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Behavioral%20and%20Environmental%20Factors%20in%20the%20Spatial%20Distribution%20and%20Popualtion%20Dynamics%20of%20a%20Yellow%E2%80%90Bellied%20Marmot%20Population&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Svendsen,%20Gerald%20E.&rft.date=1974-07&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=760&rft.epage=771&rft.pages=760-771&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1934412&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E1934412%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1660-9a1548e4dc613c424d165f32556b3e4c06f646e846b865644f10e6959a6b8d3a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1934412&rfr_iscdi=true |