Loading…

Behavioral and Environmental Factors in the Spatial Distribution and Popualtion Dynamics of a Yellow‐Bellied Marmot Population

Behavioral and environmental factors in the spatial distribution and population dynamics of a yellow—bellied marmot (Marmota flaviventris) population were studied in 1971 and 1972 in Gunnison Co., Colorado. Yellow—bellied marmots are generally considered to be colonial; however, this is not their on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology (Durham) 1974-07, Vol.55 (4), p.760-771
Main Author: Svendsen, Gerald E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1660-9a1548e4dc613c424d165f32556b3e4c06f646e846b865644f10e6959a6b8d3a3
cites
container_end_page 771
container_issue 4
container_start_page 760
container_title Ecology (Durham)
container_volume 55
creator Svendsen, Gerald E.
description Behavioral and environmental factors in the spatial distribution and population dynamics of a yellow—bellied marmot (Marmota flaviventris) population were studied in 1971 and 1972 in Gunnison Co., Colorado. Yellow—bellied marmots are generally considered to be colonial; however, this is not their only option, depending upon the marmots' behavioral profile and the size and composition of the habitat. Of the adult—yearling group 75% lived as members of colonies, 16% lived at satellite sites, and 8% were transients. Satellite sites differed from colonies mainly in size and topographic diversity; they may be considered mini—habitats, with the most limited resources being burrow sites. Marmots can be classified, by means of mirror—image stimulation (MIS), as aggressive, social, and avoider. Aggressive females tended to occupy small harems at large sites, or to live as solitary individuals regardless of the size of the site. Social females occurred primarily at large sites, in harems. Avoider females lived in peripheral burrows at colonies, or in satellite sites. All behavioral types reproduced successfully, but reproductive fitness was correlated with social structure. Aggressive females were most fit in small harems or at satellite sites, whereas social females were most fit in large social groups. Avoiders were least fit in all social situations. Data presently available fails to show that the behavioral profile of the female is reflected in the social tendencies of her young. In general, social behavior is a major factor affecting the distribution and dynamics of populations of yellow—bellied marmots, but dispersion is also related to the distribution of suitable habitat.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1934412
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_1934412</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1934412</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1934412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1660-9a1548e4dc613c424d165f32556b3e4c06f646e846b865644f10e6959a6b8d3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1OwzAQhS0EEqUgjoAXSKwCdvyTZAn9AaQikEoXXUXTxKGukriy01bd9QickZPgNt3CbGbm6X2zeIPQNSX3ISPRA00Y5zQ8QR0_JUFCI3KKOoTQMEikiM_RhXML4ovyuIN2T2oOa20slBjqHA_qtbamrlTdeGUIWWOsw7rGzVzh8RIa7eW-do3Vs1WjTX2gPsxyBeVh7W9rqHTmsCkw4KkqS7P52X0_-UGrHL-BrUxzAErYA5forIDSqatj76LJcPDZewlG78-vvcdRkFEpSZAAFTxWPM8kZRkPeU6lKFgohJwxxTMiC8mlirmcxVJIzgtKlExEAl7IGbAuumvvZtY4Z1WRLq2uwG5TStJ9cOkxOO8MW-dGl2r7ly0d9KY0ibgQPJLEQ7cttHA-sX9u37S2AkwKX1a7dDIOCZX-HRFlMWW_aI2Ekw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Behavioral and Environmental Factors in the Spatial Distribution and Popualtion Dynamics of a Yellow‐Bellied Marmot Population</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley Archive</source><creator>Svendsen, Gerald E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Svendsen, Gerald E.</creatorcontrib><description>Behavioral and environmental factors in the spatial distribution and population dynamics of a yellow—bellied marmot (Marmota flaviventris) population were studied in 1971 and 1972 in Gunnison Co., Colorado. Yellow—bellied marmots are generally considered to be colonial; however, this is not their only option, depending upon the marmots' behavioral profile and the size and composition of the habitat. Of the adult—yearling group 75% lived as members of colonies, 16% lived at satellite sites, and 8% were transients. Satellite sites differed from colonies mainly in size and topographic diversity; they may be considered mini—habitats, with the most limited resources being burrow sites. Marmots can be classified, by means of mirror—image stimulation (MIS), as aggressive, social, and avoider. Aggressive females tended to occupy small harems at large sites, or to live as solitary individuals regardless of the size of the site. Social females occurred primarily at large sites, in harems. Avoider females lived in peripheral burrows at colonies, or in satellite sites. All behavioral types reproduced successfully, but reproductive fitness was correlated with social structure. Aggressive females were most fit in small harems or at satellite sites, whereas social females were most fit in large social groups. Avoiders were least fit in all social situations. Data presently available fails to show that the behavioral profile of the female is reflected in the social tendencies of her young. In general, social behavior is a major factor affecting the distribution and dynamics of populations of yellow—bellied marmots, but dispersion is also related to the distribution of suitable habitat.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1934412</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animals ; Artificial satellites ; Female animals ; Human aggression ; Male animals ; Marmots ; Mating behavior ; Population ecology ; Social behavior ; Yearlings</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 1974-07, Vol.55 (4), p.760-771</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1974 The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1974 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1660-9a1548e4dc613c424d165f32556b3e4c06f646e846b865644f10e6959a6b8d3a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1934412$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1934412$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27924,27925,46049,46473,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Svendsen, Gerald E.</creatorcontrib><title>Behavioral and Environmental Factors in the Spatial Distribution and Popualtion Dynamics of a Yellow‐Bellied Marmot Population</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><description>Behavioral and environmental factors in the spatial distribution and population dynamics of a yellow—bellied marmot (Marmota flaviventris) population were studied in 1971 and 1972 in Gunnison Co., Colorado. Yellow—bellied marmots are generally considered to be colonial; however, this is not their only option, depending upon the marmots' behavioral profile and the size and composition of the habitat. Of the adult—yearling group 75% lived as members of colonies, 16% lived at satellite sites, and 8% were transients. Satellite sites differed from colonies mainly in size and topographic diversity; they may be considered mini—habitats, with the most limited resources being burrow sites. Marmots can be classified, by means of mirror—image stimulation (MIS), as aggressive, social, and avoider. Aggressive females tended to occupy small harems at large sites, or to live as solitary individuals regardless of the size of the site. Social females occurred primarily at large sites, in harems. Avoider females lived in peripheral burrows at colonies, or in satellite sites. All behavioral types reproduced successfully, but reproductive fitness was correlated with social structure. Aggressive females were most fit in small harems or at satellite sites, whereas social females were most fit in large social groups. Avoiders were least fit in all social situations. Data presently available fails to show that the behavioral profile of the female is reflected in the social tendencies of her young. In general, social behavior is a major factor affecting the distribution and dynamics of populations of yellow—bellied marmots, but dispersion is also related to the distribution of suitable habitat.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Artificial satellites</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Human aggression</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Marmots</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Social behavior</subject><subject>Yearlings</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1974</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1OwzAQhS0EEqUgjoAXSKwCdvyTZAn9AaQikEoXXUXTxKGukriy01bd9QickZPgNt3CbGbm6X2zeIPQNSX3ISPRA00Y5zQ8QR0_JUFCI3KKOoTQMEikiM_RhXML4ovyuIN2T2oOa20slBjqHA_qtbamrlTdeGUIWWOsw7rGzVzh8RIa7eW-do3Vs1WjTX2gPsxyBeVh7W9rqHTmsCkw4KkqS7P52X0_-UGrHL-BrUxzAErYA5forIDSqatj76LJcPDZewlG78-vvcdRkFEpSZAAFTxWPM8kZRkPeU6lKFgohJwxxTMiC8mlirmcxVJIzgtKlExEAl7IGbAuumvvZtY4Z1WRLq2uwG5TStJ9cOkxOO8MW-dGl2r7ly0d9KY0ibgQPJLEQ7cttHA-sX9u37S2AkwKX1a7dDIOCZX-HRFlMWW_aI2Ekw</recordid><startdate>197407</startdate><enddate>197407</enddate><creator>Svendsen, Gerald E.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><general>Duke University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197407</creationdate><title>Behavioral and Environmental Factors in the Spatial Distribution and Popualtion Dynamics of a Yellow‐Bellied Marmot Population</title><author>Svendsen, Gerald E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1660-9a1548e4dc613c424d165f32556b3e4c06f646e846b865644f10e6959a6b8d3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1974</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Artificial satellites</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Human aggression</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Marmots</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Social behavior</topic><topic>Yearlings</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Svendsen, Gerald E.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Svendsen, Gerald E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Behavioral and Environmental Factors in the Spatial Distribution and Popualtion Dynamics of a Yellow‐Bellied Marmot Population</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><date>1974-07</date><risdate>1974</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>760</spage><epage>771</epage><pages>760-771</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><abstract>Behavioral and environmental factors in the spatial distribution and population dynamics of a yellow—bellied marmot (Marmota flaviventris) population were studied in 1971 and 1972 in Gunnison Co., Colorado. Yellow—bellied marmots are generally considered to be colonial; however, this is not their only option, depending upon the marmots' behavioral profile and the size and composition of the habitat. Of the adult—yearling group 75% lived as members of colonies, 16% lived at satellite sites, and 8% were transients. Satellite sites differed from colonies mainly in size and topographic diversity; they may be considered mini—habitats, with the most limited resources being burrow sites. Marmots can be classified, by means of mirror—image stimulation (MIS), as aggressive, social, and avoider. Aggressive females tended to occupy small harems at large sites, or to live as solitary individuals regardless of the size of the site. Social females occurred primarily at large sites, in harems. Avoider females lived in peripheral burrows at colonies, or in satellite sites. All behavioral types reproduced successfully, but reproductive fitness was correlated with social structure. Aggressive females were most fit in small harems or at satellite sites, whereas social females were most fit in large social groups. Avoiders were least fit in all social situations. Data presently available fails to show that the behavioral profile of the female is reflected in the social tendencies of her young. In general, social behavior is a major factor affecting the distribution and dynamics of populations of yellow—bellied marmots, but dispersion is also related to the distribution of suitable habitat.</abstract><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.2307/1934412</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9658
ispartof Ecology (Durham), 1974-07, Vol.55 (4), p.760-771
issn 0012-9658
1939-9170
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_1934412
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley Archive
subjects Animals
Artificial satellites
Female animals
Human aggression
Male animals
Marmots
Mating behavior
Population ecology
Social behavior
Yearlings
title Behavioral and Environmental Factors in the Spatial Distribution and Popualtion Dynamics of a Yellow‐Bellied Marmot Population
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A02%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Behavioral%20and%20Environmental%20Factors%20in%20the%20Spatial%20Distribution%20and%20Popualtion%20Dynamics%20of%20a%20Yellow%E2%80%90Bellied%20Marmot%20Population&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Svendsen,%20Gerald%20E.&rft.date=1974-07&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=760&rft.epage=771&rft.pages=760-771&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1934412&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E1934412%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1660-9a1548e4dc613c424d165f32556b3e4c06f646e846b865644f10e6959a6b8d3a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1934412&rfr_iscdi=true