Loading…
Managing Investment in Information Technology: Mini Case Examples and Implications
While businesses are investing enormous resources in information technology (IT), there is little evidence linking IT investment to organizational performance. The purpose of this article, therefore, is to increase understanding of the basis for IT investment in firms. Six mini case studies of compa...
Saved in:
Published in: | MIS quarterly 1989-03, Vol.13 (1), p.3-17 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-b07445cba13d062391ab3a08e28ec55a0fefeea533d5646ca238705ae1271c673 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 17 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | MIS quarterly |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Weill, Peter Olson, Margrethe H. |
description | While businesses are investing enormous resources in information technology (IT), there is little evidence linking IT investment to organizational performance. The purpose of this article, therefore, is to increase understanding of the basis for IT investment in firms. Six mini case studies of companies in five different industries address questions of how they define IT for the purpose of determining the level of investment, how they track IT investments, and what other factors influence IT investment decisions. Each organization uses a different definition of IT, but there appears to be an overall trend to broaden the definition. Although companies track IT investment with varying degrees of rigor, they appear to be generally moving toward centralized tracking of all IT investment. Political considerations are important and significantly impact investment decisions. In all cases, the effectiveness with which IT investment is converted to useful output is acknowledged to be affected by the implementation process, the culture of the organization, and the skill of management. Three major implications for practitioners responsible for IT investment are: the need to adopt a broad definition of IT and track it over time against a convenient base; the need to separate different types of investment and match them to appropriate organizational performance measures; and the need to take into account factors such as management commitment and previous experience with IT. The latter impacts the effectiveness with which the firm converts it investment into useful outputs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/248694 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_248694</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>248694</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>248694</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-b07445cba13d062391ab3a08e28ec55a0fefeea533d5646ca238705ae1271c673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j11LwzAYhXOh4Jz6GwKCd9V8NEnnnZQ5CxuCzOvyNn1bM9p0JEXcv7dab70658DDgYeQG87uhWTmQaSZXqVnZMGE0YkxmbwglzEeGGPccLMgbzvw0Drf0sJ_Yhx79CN1flrNEHoY3eDpHu2HH7qhPT3SnfOO5hCRrr-gP3YYKfiaFlN19hePV-S8gS7i9V8uyfvzep-_JNvXTZE_bRMruRmTipk0VbYCLmumhVxxqCSwDEWGVilgDTaIoKSslU61BSEzwxQgF4ZbbeSS3M2_NgwxBmzKY3A9hFPJWfljX872E3g7g4c4DuE_6htekVlc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Managing Investment in Information Technology: Mini Case Examples and Implications</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>JSTOR Journals and Primary Sources</source><creator>Weill, Peter ; Olson, Margrethe H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weill, Peter ; Olson, Margrethe H.</creatorcontrib><description>While businesses are investing enormous resources in information technology (IT), there is little evidence linking IT investment to organizational performance. The purpose of this article, therefore, is to increase understanding of the basis for IT investment in firms. Six mini case studies of companies in five different industries address questions of how they define IT for the purpose of determining the level of investment, how they track IT investments, and what other factors influence IT investment decisions. Each organization uses a different definition of IT, but there appears to be an overall trend to broaden the definition. Although companies track IT investment with varying degrees of rigor, they appear to be generally moving toward centralized tracking of all IT investment. Political considerations are important and significantly impact investment decisions. In all cases, the effectiveness with which IT investment is converted to useful output is acknowledged to be affected by the implementation process, the culture of the organization, and the skill of management. Three major implications for practitioners responsible for IT investment are: the need to adopt a broad definition of IT and track it over time against a convenient base; the need to separate different types of investment and match them to appropriate organizational performance measures; and the need to take into account factors such as management commitment and previous experience with IT. The latter impacts the effectiveness with which the firm converts it investment into useful outputs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0276-7783</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/248694</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Society for Information Management and The Management Information Systems Research Center of the University of Minnesota</publisher><subject>Application ; Business structures ; Financial budgets ; Financial investments ; Financial management ; Information technology ; Investment companies ; Investment management companies ; Investment strategies ; Management information systems ; Return on investment</subject><ispartof>MIS quarterly, 1989-03, Vol.13 (1), p.3-17</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1989 The Society for Information Management and the Management Information Systems Research Center</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-b07445cba13d062391ab3a08e28ec55a0fefeea533d5646ca238705ae1271c673</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/248694$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/248694$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,58236,58469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weill, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Margrethe H.</creatorcontrib><title>Managing Investment in Information Technology: Mini Case Examples and Implications</title><title>MIS quarterly</title><description>While businesses are investing enormous resources in information technology (IT), there is little evidence linking IT investment to organizational performance. The purpose of this article, therefore, is to increase understanding of the basis for IT investment in firms. Six mini case studies of companies in five different industries address questions of how they define IT for the purpose of determining the level of investment, how they track IT investments, and what other factors influence IT investment decisions. Each organization uses a different definition of IT, but there appears to be an overall trend to broaden the definition. Although companies track IT investment with varying degrees of rigor, they appear to be generally moving toward centralized tracking of all IT investment. Political considerations are important and significantly impact investment decisions. In all cases, the effectiveness with which IT investment is converted to useful output is acknowledged to be affected by the implementation process, the culture of the organization, and the skill of management. Three major implications for practitioners responsible for IT investment are: the need to adopt a broad definition of IT and track it over time against a convenient base; the need to separate different types of investment and match them to appropriate organizational performance measures; and the need to take into account factors such as management commitment and previous experience with IT. The latter impacts the effectiveness with which the firm converts it investment into useful outputs.</description><subject>Application</subject><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Financial budgets</subject><subject>Financial investments</subject><subject>Financial management</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Investment companies</subject><subject>Investment management companies</subject><subject>Investment strategies</subject><subject>Management information systems</subject><subject>Return on investment</subject><issn>0276-7783</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j11LwzAYhXOh4Jz6GwKCd9V8NEnnnZQ5CxuCzOvyNn1bM9p0JEXcv7dab70658DDgYeQG87uhWTmQaSZXqVnZMGE0YkxmbwglzEeGGPccLMgbzvw0Drf0sJ_Yhx79CN1flrNEHoY3eDpHu2HH7qhPT3SnfOO5hCRrr-gP3YYKfiaFlN19hePV-S8gS7i9V8uyfvzep-_JNvXTZE_bRMruRmTipk0VbYCLmumhVxxqCSwDEWGVilgDTaIoKSslU61BSEzwxQgF4ZbbeSS3M2_NgwxBmzKY3A9hFPJWfljX872E3g7g4c4DuE_6htekVlc</recordid><startdate>19890301</startdate><enddate>19890301</enddate><creator>Weill, Peter</creator><creator>Olson, Margrethe H.</creator><general>The Society for Information Management and The Management Information Systems Research Center of the University of Minnesota</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890301</creationdate><title>Managing Investment in Information Technology: Mini Case Examples and Implications</title><author>Weill, Peter ; Olson, Margrethe H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-b07445cba13d062391ab3a08e28ec55a0fefeea533d5646ca238705ae1271c673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Application</topic><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Financial budgets</topic><topic>Financial investments</topic><topic>Financial management</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Investment companies</topic><topic>Investment management companies</topic><topic>Investment strategies</topic><topic>Management information systems</topic><topic>Return on investment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weill, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Margrethe H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>MIS quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weill, Peter</au><au>Olson, Margrethe H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Managing Investment in Information Technology: Mini Case Examples and Implications</atitle><jtitle>MIS quarterly</jtitle><date>1989-03-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>3-17</pages><issn>0276-7783</issn><abstract>While businesses are investing enormous resources in information technology (IT), there is little evidence linking IT investment to organizational performance. The purpose of this article, therefore, is to increase understanding of the basis for IT investment in firms. Six mini case studies of companies in five different industries address questions of how they define IT for the purpose of determining the level of investment, how they track IT investments, and what other factors influence IT investment decisions. Each organization uses a different definition of IT, but there appears to be an overall trend to broaden the definition. Although companies track IT investment with varying degrees of rigor, they appear to be generally moving toward centralized tracking of all IT investment. Political considerations are important and significantly impact investment decisions. In all cases, the effectiveness with which IT investment is converted to useful output is acknowledged to be affected by the implementation process, the culture of the organization, and the skill of management. Three major implications for practitioners responsible for IT investment are: the need to adopt a broad definition of IT and track it over time against a convenient base; the need to separate different types of investment and match them to appropriate organizational performance measures; and the need to take into account factors such as management commitment and previous experience with IT. The latter impacts the effectiveness with which the firm converts it investment into useful outputs.</abstract><pub>The Society for Information Management and The Management Information Systems Research Center of the University of Minnesota</pub><doi>10.2307/248694</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0276-7783 |
ispartof | MIS quarterly, 1989-03, Vol.13 (1), p.3-17 |
issn | 0276-7783 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_248694 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Business Source Ultimate; JSTOR Journals and Primary Sources |
subjects | Application Business structures Financial budgets Financial investments Financial management Information technology Investment companies Investment management companies Investment strategies Management information systems Return on investment |
title | Managing Investment in Information Technology: Mini Case Examples and Implications |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A53%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Managing%20Investment%20in%20Information%20Technology:%20Mini%20Case%20Examples%20and%20Implications&rft.jtitle=MIS%20quarterly&rft.au=Weill,%20Peter&rft.date=1989-03-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=3-17&rft.issn=0276-7783&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/248694&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E248694%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-b07445cba13d062391ab3a08e28ec55a0fefeea533d5646ca238705ae1271c673%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=248694&rfr_iscdi=true |