Loading…
An updated procedure for cecal cannulation in sheep and cattle
Fifteen cattle (236-500 kg) and 38 sheep (36-55 kg) were fitted with 2 types of indwelling cecal cannulae. Cannulae were made of either clear silicone or plastic tubing. The surgery was conducted in a one-step procedure that involved pharmaceuticals and equipment that were readily available. Results...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of range management 1987-07, Vol.40 (4), p.375-377 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-9266dbef3a7acff5fff0d7254989ebd8b79c3a843f4769df225830ceb9982d313 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 377 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 375 |
container_title | Journal of range management |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Caton, J.S Krysl, L.J Freeman, A.S Ruttle, J.L Branine, M.E |
description | Fifteen cattle (236-500 kg) and 38 sheep (36-55 kg) were fitted with 2 types of indwelling cecal cannulae. Cannulae were made of either clear silicone or plastic tubing. The surgery was conducted in a one-step procedure that involved pharmaceuticals and equipment that were readily available. Results indicated a success rate of 67% (33% failure due to inability to locate the cecum at the time of surgery) in cattle and 100% in sheep. Both cannula types tested were acceptable, but the cannula made from plastic tubing was more desirable because it was less bulky, more durable, and easier to construct. Animals fitted with cecal cannulae appeared to be healthy and to have normal life spans. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3898742 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_3898742</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3898742</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3898742</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-9266dbef3a7acff5fff0d7254989ebd8b79c3a843f4769df225830ceb9982d313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j81KxDAYRYMoWEfxBVxkIbiqpl_S5stGGAb_YMCFDrgraX60Q01L0i58eyudtavL5R4uHEIuC3YLnMk7jgqlgCOSQVFBDhLwmGSMAeSCqY9TcpbSfq6VqFRG7teBToPVo7N0iL1xdoqO-j5S44zuqNEhTJ0e2z7QNtD05dxAdbDzMI6dOycnXnfJXRxyRXaPD--b53z7-vSyWW9zAxzHXEFV2cZ5rqU23pfee2YllEKhco3FRirDNQruhayU9QAlcmZcoxSC5QVfkZvl18Q-peh8PcT2W8efumD1n3Z90J7J64Xcp7GP_2BXC-Z1X-vP2KZ694bIBC8Akf8CeH9deg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>An updated procedure for cecal cannulation in sheep and cattle</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Caton, J.S ; Krysl, L.J ; Freeman, A.S ; Ruttle, J.L ; Branine, M.E</creator><creatorcontrib>Caton, J.S ; Krysl, L.J ; Freeman, A.S ; Ruttle, J.L ; Branine, M.E</creatorcontrib><description>Fifteen cattle (236-500 kg) and 38 sheep (36-55 kg) were fitted with 2 types of indwelling cecal cannulae. Cannulae were made of either clear silicone or plastic tubing. The surgery was conducted in a one-step procedure that involved pharmaceuticals and equipment that were readily available. Results indicated a success rate of 67% (33% failure due to inability to locate the cecum at the time of surgery) in cattle and 100% in sheep. Both cannula types tested were acceptable, but the cannula made from plastic tubing was more desirable because it was less bulky, more durable, and easier to construct. Animals fitted with cecal cannulae appeared to be healthy and to have normal life spans.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-409X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-2728</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3898742</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Society for Range Management</publisher><subject>BOVIN ; Cannulae ; Catheterization ; CATTLE ; Cecum ; Digestive physiology ; EQUIPO DE RIEGO ; GANADO BOVINO ; INSTRUMENT ; INSTRUMENTOS ; INSTRUMENTS ; IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT ; Large intestine ; MATERIEL D'IRRIGATION ; METHODE ; METHODS ; METODOS ; OPERACIONES QUIRURGICAS ; OPERATION CHIRURGICALE ; OVIN ; OVINOS ; Peritoneum ; SHEEP ; SILICONE TUBES ; Silicones ; SURGICAL OPERATIONS ; Surgical procedures ; Surgical specialties ; Technical Notes</subject><ispartof>Journal of range management, 1987-07, Vol.40 (4), p.375-377</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1987 The Society for Range Management</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-9266dbef3a7acff5fff0d7254989ebd8b79c3a843f4769df225830ceb9982d313</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3898742$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3898742$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,58216,58449</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caton, J.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krysl, L.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, A.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruttle, J.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branine, M.E</creatorcontrib><title>An updated procedure for cecal cannulation in sheep and cattle</title><title>Journal of range management</title><description>Fifteen cattle (236-500 kg) and 38 sheep (36-55 kg) were fitted with 2 types of indwelling cecal cannulae. Cannulae were made of either clear silicone or plastic tubing. The surgery was conducted in a one-step procedure that involved pharmaceuticals and equipment that were readily available. Results indicated a success rate of 67% (33% failure due to inability to locate the cecum at the time of surgery) in cattle and 100% in sheep. Both cannula types tested were acceptable, but the cannula made from plastic tubing was more desirable because it was less bulky, more durable, and easier to construct. Animals fitted with cecal cannulae appeared to be healthy and to have normal life spans.</description><subject>BOVIN</subject><subject>Cannulae</subject><subject>Catheterization</subject><subject>CATTLE</subject><subject>Cecum</subject><subject>Digestive physiology</subject><subject>EQUIPO DE RIEGO</subject><subject>GANADO BOVINO</subject><subject>INSTRUMENT</subject><subject>INSTRUMENTOS</subject><subject>INSTRUMENTS</subject><subject>IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT</subject><subject>Large intestine</subject><subject>MATERIEL D'IRRIGATION</subject><subject>METHODE</subject><subject>METHODS</subject><subject>METODOS</subject><subject>OPERACIONES QUIRURGICAS</subject><subject>OPERATION CHIRURGICALE</subject><subject>OVIN</subject><subject>OVINOS</subject><subject>Peritoneum</subject><subject>SHEEP</subject><subject>SILICONE TUBES</subject><subject>Silicones</subject><subject>SURGICAL OPERATIONS</subject><subject>Surgical procedures</subject><subject>Surgical specialties</subject><subject>Technical Notes</subject><issn>0022-409X</issn><issn>2162-2728</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j81KxDAYRYMoWEfxBVxkIbiqpl_S5stGGAb_YMCFDrgraX60Q01L0i58eyudtavL5R4uHEIuC3YLnMk7jgqlgCOSQVFBDhLwmGSMAeSCqY9TcpbSfq6VqFRG7teBToPVo7N0iL1xdoqO-j5S44zuqNEhTJ0e2z7QNtD05dxAdbDzMI6dOycnXnfJXRxyRXaPD--b53z7-vSyWW9zAxzHXEFV2cZ5rqU23pfee2YllEKhco3FRirDNQruhayU9QAlcmZcoxSC5QVfkZvl18Q-peh8PcT2W8efumD1n3Z90J7J64Xcp7GP_2BXC-Z1X-vP2KZ694bIBC8Akf8CeH9deg</recordid><startdate>198707</startdate><enddate>198707</enddate><creator>Caton, J.S</creator><creator>Krysl, L.J</creator><creator>Freeman, A.S</creator><creator>Ruttle, J.L</creator><creator>Branine, M.E</creator><general>Society for Range Management</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198707</creationdate><title>An updated procedure for cecal cannulation in sheep and cattle</title><author>Caton, J.S ; Krysl, L.J ; Freeman, A.S ; Ruttle, J.L ; Branine, M.E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-9266dbef3a7acff5fff0d7254989ebd8b79c3a843f4769df225830ceb9982d313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>BOVIN</topic><topic>Cannulae</topic><topic>Catheterization</topic><topic>CATTLE</topic><topic>Cecum</topic><topic>Digestive physiology</topic><topic>EQUIPO DE RIEGO</topic><topic>GANADO BOVINO</topic><topic>INSTRUMENT</topic><topic>INSTRUMENTOS</topic><topic>INSTRUMENTS</topic><topic>IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT</topic><topic>Large intestine</topic><topic>MATERIEL D'IRRIGATION</topic><topic>METHODE</topic><topic>METHODS</topic><topic>METODOS</topic><topic>OPERACIONES QUIRURGICAS</topic><topic>OPERATION CHIRURGICALE</topic><topic>OVIN</topic><topic>OVINOS</topic><topic>Peritoneum</topic><topic>SHEEP</topic><topic>SILICONE TUBES</topic><topic>Silicones</topic><topic>SURGICAL OPERATIONS</topic><topic>Surgical procedures</topic><topic>Surgical specialties</topic><topic>Technical Notes</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caton, J.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krysl, L.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, A.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruttle, J.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branine, M.E</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of range management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caton, J.S</au><au>Krysl, L.J</au><au>Freeman, A.S</au><au>Ruttle, J.L</au><au>Branine, M.E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An updated procedure for cecal cannulation in sheep and cattle</atitle><jtitle>Journal of range management</jtitle><date>1987-07</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>375</spage><epage>377</epage><pages>375-377</pages><issn>0022-409X</issn><eissn>2162-2728</eissn><abstract>Fifteen cattle (236-500 kg) and 38 sheep (36-55 kg) were fitted with 2 types of indwelling cecal cannulae. Cannulae were made of either clear silicone or plastic tubing. The surgery was conducted in a one-step procedure that involved pharmaceuticals and equipment that were readily available. Results indicated a success rate of 67% (33% failure due to inability to locate the cecum at the time of surgery) in cattle and 100% in sheep. Both cannula types tested were acceptable, but the cannula made from plastic tubing was more desirable because it was less bulky, more durable, and easier to construct. Animals fitted with cecal cannulae appeared to be healthy and to have normal life spans.</abstract><pub>Society for Range Management</pub><doi>10.2307/3898742</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-409X |
ispartof | Journal of range management, 1987-07, Vol.40 (4), p.375-377 |
issn | 0022-409X 2162-2728 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_3898742 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | BOVIN Cannulae Catheterization CATTLE Cecum Digestive physiology EQUIPO DE RIEGO GANADO BOVINO INSTRUMENT INSTRUMENTOS INSTRUMENTS IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT Large intestine MATERIEL D'IRRIGATION METHODE METHODS METODOS OPERACIONES QUIRURGICAS OPERATION CHIRURGICALE OVIN OVINOS Peritoneum SHEEP SILICONE TUBES Silicones SURGICAL OPERATIONS Surgical procedures Surgical specialties Technical Notes |
title | An updated procedure for cecal cannulation in sheep and cattle |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T00%3A43%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20updated%20procedure%20for%20cecal%20cannulation%20in%20sheep%20and%20cattle&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20range%20management&rft.au=Caton,%20J.S&rft.date=1987-07&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=375&rft.epage=377&rft.pages=375-377&rft.issn=0022-409X&rft.eissn=2162-2728&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3898742&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3898742%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-9266dbef3a7acff5fff0d7254989ebd8b79c3a843f4769df225830ceb9982d313%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3898742&rfr_iscdi=true |