Loading…

An updated procedure for cecal cannulation in sheep and cattle

Fifteen cattle (236-500 kg) and 38 sheep (36-55 kg) were fitted with 2 types of indwelling cecal cannulae. Cannulae were made of either clear silicone or plastic tubing. The surgery was conducted in a one-step procedure that involved pharmaceuticals and equipment that were readily available. Results...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of range management 1987-07, Vol.40 (4), p.375-377
Main Authors: Caton, J.S, Krysl, L.J, Freeman, A.S, Ruttle, J.L, Branine, M.E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-9266dbef3a7acff5fff0d7254989ebd8b79c3a843f4769df225830ceb9982d313
cites
container_end_page 377
container_issue 4
container_start_page 375
container_title Journal of range management
container_volume 40
creator Caton, J.S
Krysl, L.J
Freeman, A.S
Ruttle, J.L
Branine, M.E
description Fifteen cattle (236-500 kg) and 38 sheep (36-55 kg) were fitted with 2 types of indwelling cecal cannulae. Cannulae were made of either clear silicone or plastic tubing. The surgery was conducted in a one-step procedure that involved pharmaceuticals and equipment that were readily available. Results indicated a success rate of 67% (33% failure due to inability to locate the cecum at the time of surgery) in cattle and 100% in sheep. Both cannula types tested were acceptable, but the cannula made from plastic tubing was more desirable because it was less bulky, more durable, and easier to construct. Animals fitted with cecal cannulae appeared to be healthy and to have normal life spans.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3898742
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_3898742</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3898742</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3898742</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-9266dbef3a7acff5fff0d7254989ebd8b79c3a843f4769df225830ceb9982d313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j81KxDAYRYMoWEfxBVxkIbiqpl_S5stGGAb_YMCFDrgraX60Q01L0i58eyudtavL5R4uHEIuC3YLnMk7jgqlgCOSQVFBDhLwmGSMAeSCqY9TcpbSfq6VqFRG7teBToPVo7N0iL1xdoqO-j5S44zuqNEhTJ0e2z7QNtD05dxAdbDzMI6dOycnXnfJXRxyRXaPD--b53z7-vSyWW9zAxzHXEFV2cZ5rqU23pfee2YllEKhco3FRirDNQruhayU9QAlcmZcoxSC5QVfkZvl18Q-peh8PcT2W8efumD1n3Z90J7J64Xcp7GP_2BXC-Z1X-vP2KZ694bIBC8Akf8CeH9deg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>An updated procedure for cecal cannulation in sheep and cattle</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Caton, J.S ; Krysl, L.J ; Freeman, A.S ; Ruttle, J.L ; Branine, M.E</creator><creatorcontrib>Caton, J.S ; Krysl, L.J ; Freeman, A.S ; Ruttle, J.L ; Branine, M.E</creatorcontrib><description>Fifteen cattle (236-500 kg) and 38 sheep (36-55 kg) were fitted with 2 types of indwelling cecal cannulae. Cannulae were made of either clear silicone or plastic tubing. The surgery was conducted in a one-step procedure that involved pharmaceuticals and equipment that were readily available. Results indicated a success rate of 67% (33% failure due to inability to locate the cecum at the time of surgery) in cattle and 100% in sheep. Both cannula types tested were acceptable, but the cannula made from plastic tubing was more desirable because it was less bulky, more durable, and easier to construct. Animals fitted with cecal cannulae appeared to be healthy and to have normal life spans.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-409X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-2728</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3898742</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Society for Range Management</publisher><subject>BOVIN ; Cannulae ; Catheterization ; CATTLE ; Cecum ; Digestive physiology ; EQUIPO DE RIEGO ; GANADO BOVINO ; INSTRUMENT ; INSTRUMENTOS ; INSTRUMENTS ; IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT ; Large intestine ; MATERIEL D'IRRIGATION ; METHODE ; METHODS ; METODOS ; OPERACIONES QUIRURGICAS ; OPERATION CHIRURGICALE ; OVIN ; OVINOS ; Peritoneum ; SHEEP ; SILICONE TUBES ; Silicones ; SURGICAL OPERATIONS ; Surgical procedures ; Surgical specialties ; Technical Notes</subject><ispartof>Journal of range management, 1987-07, Vol.40 (4), p.375-377</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1987 The Society for Range Management</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-9266dbef3a7acff5fff0d7254989ebd8b79c3a843f4769df225830ceb9982d313</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3898742$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3898742$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,58216,58449</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caton, J.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krysl, L.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, A.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruttle, J.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branine, M.E</creatorcontrib><title>An updated procedure for cecal cannulation in sheep and cattle</title><title>Journal of range management</title><description>Fifteen cattle (236-500 kg) and 38 sheep (36-55 kg) were fitted with 2 types of indwelling cecal cannulae. Cannulae were made of either clear silicone or plastic tubing. The surgery was conducted in a one-step procedure that involved pharmaceuticals and equipment that were readily available. Results indicated a success rate of 67% (33% failure due to inability to locate the cecum at the time of surgery) in cattle and 100% in sheep. Both cannula types tested were acceptable, but the cannula made from plastic tubing was more desirable because it was less bulky, more durable, and easier to construct. Animals fitted with cecal cannulae appeared to be healthy and to have normal life spans.</description><subject>BOVIN</subject><subject>Cannulae</subject><subject>Catheterization</subject><subject>CATTLE</subject><subject>Cecum</subject><subject>Digestive physiology</subject><subject>EQUIPO DE RIEGO</subject><subject>GANADO BOVINO</subject><subject>INSTRUMENT</subject><subject>INSTRUMENTOS</subject><subject>INSTRUMENTS</subject><subject>IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT</subject><subject>Large intestine</subject><subject>MATERIEL D'IRRIGATION</subject><subject>METHODE</subject><subject>METHODS</subject><subject>METODOS</subject><subject>OPERACIONES QUIRURGICAS</subject><subject>OPERATION CHIRURGICALE</subject><subject>OVIN</subject><subject>OVINOS</subject><subject>Peritoneum</subject><subject>SHEEP</subject><subject>SILICONE TUBES</subject><subject>Silicones</subject><subject>SURGICAL OPERATIONS</subject><subject>Surgical procedures</subject><subject>Surgical specialties</subject><subject>Technical Notes</subject><issn>0022-409X</issn><issn>2162-2728</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j81KxDAYRYMoWEfxBVxkIbiqpl_S5stGGAb_YMCFDrgraX60Q01L0i58eyudtavL5R4uHEIuC3YLnMk7jgqlgCOSQVFBDhLwmGSMAeSCqY9TcpbSfq6VqFRG7teBToPVo7N0iL1xdoqO-j5S44zuqNEhTJ0e2z7QNtD05dxAdbDzMI6dOycnXnfJXRxyRXaPD--b53z7-vSyWW9zAxzHXEFV2cZ5rqU23pfee2YllEKhco3FRirDNQruhayU9QAlcmZcoxSC5QVfkZvl18Q-peh8PcT2W8efumD1n3Z90J7J64Xcp7GP_2BXC-Z1X-vP2KZ694bIBC8Akf8CeH9deg</recordid><startdate>198707</startdate><enddate>198707</enddate><creator>Caton, J.S</creator><creator>Krysl, L.J</creator><creator>Freeman, A.S</creator><creator>Ruttle, J.L</creator><creator>Branine, M.E</creator><general>Society for Range Management</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198707</creationdate><title>An updated procedure for cecal cannulation in sheep and cattle</title><author>Caton, J.S ; Krysl, L.J ; Freeman, A.S ; Ruttle, J.L ; Branine, M.E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-9266dbef3a7acff5fff0d7254989ebd8b79c3a843f4769df225830ceb9982d313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>BOVIN</topic><topic>Cannulae</topic><topic>Catheterization</topic><topic>CATTLE</topic><topic>Cecum</topic><topic>Digestive physiology</topic><topic>EQUIPO DE RIEGO</topic><topic>GANADO BOVINO</topic><topic>INSTRUMENT</topic><topic>INSTRUMENTOS</topic><topic>INSTRUMENTS</topic><topic>IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT</topic><topic>Large intestine</topic><topic>MATERIEL D'IRRIGATION</topic><topic>METHODE</topic><topic>METHODS</topic><topic>METODOS</topic><topic>OPERACIONES QUIRURGICAS</topic><topic>OPERATION CHIRURGICALE</topic><topic>OVIN</topic><topic>OVINOS</topic><topic>Peritoneum</topic><topic>SHEEP</topic><topic>SILICONE TUBES</topic><topic>Silicones</topic><topic>SURGICAL OPERATIONS</topic><topic>Surgical procedures</topic><topic>Surgical specialties</topic><topic>Technical Notes</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caton, J.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krysl, L.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, A.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruttle, J.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branine, M.E</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of range management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caton, J.S</au><au>Krysl, L.J</au><au>Freeman, A.S</au><au>Ruttle, J.L</au><au>Branine, M.E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An updated procedure for cecal cannulation in sheep and cattle</atitle><jtitle>Journal of range management</jtitle><date>1987-07</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>375</spage><epage>377</epage><pages>375-377</pages><issn>0022-409X</issn><eissn>2162-2728</eissn><abstract>Fifteen cattle (236-500 kg) and 38 sheep (36-55 kg) were fitted with 2 types of indwelling cecal cannulae. Cannulae were made of either clear silicone or plastic tubing. The surgery was conducted in a one-step procedure that involved pharmaceuticals and equipment that were readily available. Results indicated a success rate of 67% (33% failure due to inability to locate the cecum at the time of surgery) in cattle and 100% in sheep. Both cannula types tested were acceptable, but the cannula made from plastic tubing was more desirable because it was less bulky, more durable, and easier to construct. Animals fitted with cecal cannulae appeared to be healthy and to have normal life spans.</abstract><pub>Society for Range Management</pub><doi>10.2307/3898742</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-409X
ispartof Journal of range management, 1987-07, Vol.40 (4), p.375-377
issn 0022-409X
2162-2728
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_3898742
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects BOVIN
Cannulae
Catheterization
CATTLE
Cecum
Digestive physiology
EQUIPO DE RIEGO
GANADO BOVINO
INSTRUMENT
INSTRUMENTOS
INSTRUMENTS
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
Large intestine
MATERIEL D'IRRIGATION
METHODE
METHODS
METODOS
OPERACIONES QUIRURGICAS
OPERATION CHIRURGICALE
OVIN
OVINOS
Peritoneum
SHEEP
SILICONE TUBES
Silicones
SURGICAL OPERATIONS
Surgical procedures
Surgical specialties
Technical Notes
title An updated procedure for cecal cannulation in sheep and cattle
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T00%3A43%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20updated%20procedure%20for%20cecal%20cannulation%20in%20sheep%20and%20cattle&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20range%20management&rft.au=Caton,%20J.S&rft.date=1987-07&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=375&rft.epage=377&rft.pages=375-377&rft.issn=0022-409X&rft.eissn=2162-2728&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3898742&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3898742%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-9266dbef3a7acff5fff0d7254989ebd8b79c3a843f4769df225830ceb9982d313%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3898742&rfr_iscdi=true