Loading…
Forage production of reclaimed mined lands as influenced by nitrogen fertilization and mulching practice
Fertilizer nitrogen (N) management and other cultural practices used in reclamation can have a significant effect on the successful revegetation of mined lands. Repeated fertilization of revegetated lands creates management and economic concerns. Nitrogen fertilizer was broadcast at 67 kg ha(-1) yr(...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of range management 1991-07, Vol.44 (4), p.382-384 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-2cfb183942f0eb04e2fed8aa9db5d361bc00e074567b1bd41542e737eb6389663 |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | 384 |
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 382 |
| container_title | Journal of range management |
| container_volume | 44 |
| creator | Schuman, G.E. (Agricultural Research Service, USDA, High Plains Grasslands Research Station, Cheyenne, WY) Taylor, E.M. Jr Rauzi, F |
| description | Fertilizer nitrogen (N) management and other cultural practices used in reclamation can have a significant effect on the successful revegetation of mined lands. Repeated fertilization of revegetated lands creates management and economic concerns. Nitrogen fertilizer was broadcast at 67 kg ha(-1) yr(-1) for 4 years and at 268 ha(-1) for 1 year on revegetated mined land to evaluate N management effects on forage production. Seeded grass production over 5 years did not exhibit consistent increases for the single N fertilizer application compared to the 4 annual applications. Although the single, higher N fertilization treatment only produced significantly greater forage in 3 instances compared to the lower annual fertilization treatment, it would result in a significant savings in application costs. Seeded grass production was higher and annual forb production lower when established using a standing grain stubble mulch compared to a crimped straw mulch. A single, higher application rate of nitrogen and a stubble mulch are recommended because of their production, management, and economic benefits |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/4002404 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_4002404</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4002404</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4002404</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-2cfb183942f0eb04e2fed8aa9db5d361bc00e074567b1bd41542e737eb6389663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWB-4d5WF4Go0r0lmllKsCgUXWnA35DlNmUlKMl3UX2-0Xbu5h3v4-BYHgBuMHghF4pEhRBhiJ2BGMCcVEaQ5BbNSkoqh9uscXOS8KS9nvJ2B9SIm2Vu4TdHs9ORjgNHBZPUg_WgNHH0od5DBZCgz9MENOxt06dQeBj-l2NsAnU2TH_y3_BMUGI67Qa996ItYFq22V-DMySHb62NegtXi-XP-Wi3fX97mT8tKU8SmimincENbRhyyCjFLnDWNlK1RtaEcK42QRYLVXCisDMM1I1ZQYRWnTcs5vQT3B69OMedkXbdNfpRp32HU_Q7UHQcq5N2B3OQppn-w2wPmZOxkn3zuVh8trlshGvoD9gRsxg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forage production of reclaimed mined lands as influenced by nitrogen fertilization and mulching practice</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Schuman, G.E. (Agricultural Research Service, USDA, High Plains Grasslands Research Station, Cheyenne, WY) ; Taylor, E.M. Jr ; Rauzi, F</creator><creatorcontrib>Schuman, G.E. (Agricultural Research Service, USDA, High Plains Grasslands Research Station, Cheyenne, WY) ; Taylor, E.M. Jr ; Rauzi, F</creatorcontrib><description>Fertilizer nitrogen (N) management and other cultural practices used in reclamation can have a significant effect on the successful revegetation of mined lands. Repeated fertilization of revegetated lands creates management and economic concerns. Nitrogen fertilizer was broadcast at 67 kg ha(-1) yr(-1) for 4 years and at 268 ha(-1) for 1 year on revegetated mined land to evaluate N management effects on forage production. Seeded grass production over 5 years did not exhibit consistent increases for the single N fertilizer application compared to the 4 annual applications. Although the single, higher N fertilization treatment only produced significantly greater forage in 3 instances compared to the lower annual fertilization treatment, it would result in a significant savings in application costs. Seeded grass production was higher and annual forb production lower when established using a standing grain stubble mulch compared to a crimped straw mulch. A single, higher application rate of nitrogen and a stubble mulch are recommended because of their production, management, and economic benefits</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-409X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-2728</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/4002404</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Society for Range Management</publisher><subject>ABONADO ANUAL ; ABONADO FRACCIONADO ; ALIMENT POUR ANIMAUX ; APPORT FRACTIONNE ; BIOMASA ; BIOMASSE ; COBERTURA CON PAJA ; CUBRIMIENTO DEL SUELO ; DOSE D'APPLICATION ; DOSIS DE APLICACION ; Forage production ; Forbs ; FUMURE ANNUELLE ; GRAMINEAE ; GRAMINEAS ; GRAMINEE ; NITRATE D'AMMONIUM ; NITRATO DE AMONIO ; Nitrogen ; Nutrient management ; PAILLAGE ; PAILLIS ; PIENSOS ; PRODUCCION ; PRODUCTION ; Reclamation ; RECUPERATION DES SOLS ; REGENERACION VEGETAL ; REHABILITACION DE TIERRAS ; RESTAURATION COUVERTURE VEGETALE ; Revegetation ; Seed management ; Straw ; Straw mulches ; Stubble ; Stubble mulching ; TERRE ; TIERRAS ; WYOMING</subject><ispartof>Journal of range management, 1991-07, Vol.44 (4), p.382-384</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1991 The Society for Range Management</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-2cfb183942f0eb04e2fed8aa9db5d361bc00e074567b1bd41542e737eb6389663</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schuman, G.E. (Agricultural Research Service, USDA, High Plains Grasslands Research Station, Cheyenne, WY)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, E.M. Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauzi, F</creatorcontrib><title>Forage production of reclaimed mined lands as influenced by nitrogen fertilization and mulching practice</title><title>Journal of range management</title><description>Fertilizer nitrogen (N) management and other cultural practices used in reclamation can have a significant effect on the successful revegetation of mined lands. Repeated fertilization of revegetated lands creates management and economic concerns. Nitrogen fertilizer was broadcast at 67 kg ha(-1) yr(-1) for 4 years and at 268 ha(-1) for 1 year on revegetated mined land to evaluate N management effects on forage production. Seeded grass production over 5 years did not exhibit consistent increases for the single N fertilizer application compared to the 4 annual applications. Although the single, higher N fertilization treatment only produced significantly greater forage in 3 instances compared to the lower annual fertilization treatment, it would result in a significant savings in application costs. Seeded grass production was higher and annual forb production lower when established using a standing grain stubble mulch compared to a crimped straw mulch. A single, higher application rate of nitrogen and a stubble mulch are recommended because of their production, management, and economic benefits</description><subject>ABONADO ANUAL</subject><subject>ABONADO FRACCIONADO</subject><subject>ALIMENT POUR ANIMAUX</subject><subject>APPORT FRACTIONNE</subject><subject>BIOMASA</subject><subject>BIOMASSE</subject><subject>COBERTURA CON PAJA</subject><subject>CUBRIMIENTO DEL SUELO</subject><subject>DOSE D'APPLICATION</subject><subject>DOSIS DE APLICACION</subject><subject>Forage production</subject><subject>Forbs</subject><subject>FUMURE ANNUELLE</subject><subject>GRAMINEAE</subject><subject>GRAMINEAS</subject><subject>GRAMINEE</subject><subject>NITRATE D'AMMONIUM</subject><subject>NITRATO DE AMONIO</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nutrient management</subject><subject>PAILLAGE</subject><subject>PAILLIS</subject><subject>PIENSOS</subject><subject>PRODUCCION</subject><subject>PRODUCTION</subject><subject>Reclamation</subject><subject>RECUPERATION DES SOLS</subject><subject>REGENERACION VEGETAL</subject><subject>REHABILITACION DE TIERRAS</subject><subject>RESTAURATION COUVERTURE VEGETALE</subject><subject>Revegetation</subject><subject>Seed management</subject><subject>Straw</subject><subject>Straw mulches</subject><subject>Stubble</subject><subject>Stubble mulching</subject><subject>TERRE</subject><subject>TIERRAS</subject><subject>WYOMING</subject><issn>0022-409X</issn><issn>2162-2728</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWB-4d5WF4Go0r0lmllKsCgUXWnA35DlNmUlKMl3UX2-0Xbu5h3v4-BYHgBuMHghF4pEhRBhiJ2BGMCcVEaQ5BbNSkoqh9uscXOS8KS9nvJ2B9SIm2Vu4TdHs9ORjgNHBZPUg_WgNHH0od5DBZCgz9MENOxt06dQeBj-l2NsAnU2TH_y3_BMUGI67Qa996ItYFq22V-DMySHb62NegtXi-XP-Wi3fX97mT8tKU8SmimincENbRhyyCjFLnDWNlK1RtaEcK42QRYLVXCisDMM1I1ZQYRWnTcs5vQT3B69OMedkXbdNfpRp32HU_Q7UHQcq5N2B3OQppn-w2wPmZOxkn3zuVh8trlshGvoD9gRsxg</recordid><startdate>19910701</startdate><enddate>19910701</enddate><creator>Schuman, G.E. (Agricultural Research Service, USDA, High Plains Grasslands Research Station, Cheyenne, WY)</creator><creator>Taylor, E.M. Jr</creator><creator>Rauzi, F</creator><general>Society for Range Management</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910701</creationdate><title>Forage production of reclaimed mined lands as influenced by nitrogen fertilization and mulching practice</title><author>Schuman, G.E. (Agricultural Research Service, USDA, High Plains Grasslands Research Station, Cheyenne, WY) ; Taylor, E.M. Jr ; Rauzi, F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-2cfb183942f0eb04e2fed8aa9db5d361bc00e074567b1bd41542e737eb6389663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>ABONADO ANUAL</topic><topic>ABONADO FRACCIONADO</topic><topic>ALIMENT POUR ANIMAUX</topic><topic>APPORT FRACTIONNE</topic><topic>BIOMASA</topic><topic>BIOMASSE</topic><topic>COBERTURA CON PAJA</topic><topic>CUBRIMIENTO DEL SUELO</topic><topic>DOSE D'APPLICATION</topic><topic>DOSIS DE APLICACION</topic><topic>Forage production</topic><topic>Forbs</topic><topic>FUMURE ANNUELLE</topic><topic>GRAMINEAE</topic><topic>GRAMINEAS</topic><topic>GRAMINEE</topic><topic>NITRATE D'AMMONIUM</topic><topic>NITRATO DE AMONIO</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nutrient management</topic><topic>PAILLAGE</topic><topic>PAILLIS</topic><topic>PIENSOS</topic><topic>PRODUCCION</topic><topic>PRODUCTION</topic><topic>Reclamation</topic><topic>RECUPERATION DES SOLS</topic><topic>REGENERACION VEGETAL</topic><topic>REHABILITACION DE TIERRAS</topic><topic>RESTAURATION COUVERTURE VEGETALE</topic><topic>Revegetation</topic><topic>Seed management</topic><topic>Straw</topic><topic>Straw mulches</topic><topic>Stubble</topic><topic>Stubble mulching</topic><topic>TERRE</topic><topic>TIERRAS</topic><topic>WYOMING</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schuman, G.E. (Agricultural Research Service, USDA, High Plains Grasslands Research Station, Cheyenne, WY)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, E.M. Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauzi, F</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of range management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schuman, G.E. (Agricultural Research Service, USDA, High Plains Grasslands Research Station, Cheyenne, WY)</au><au>Taylor, E.M. Jr</au><au>Rauzi, F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forage production of reclaimed mined lands as influenced by nitrogen fertilization and mulching practice</atitle><jtitle>Journal of range management</jtitle><date>1991-07-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>382</spage><epage>384</epage><pages>382-384</pages><issn>0022-409X</issn><eissn>2162-2728</eissn><abstract>Fertilizer nitrogen (N) management and other cultural practices used in reclamation can have a significant effect on the successful revegetation of mined lands. Repeated fertilization of revegetated lands creates management and economic concerns. Nitrogen fertilizer was broadcast at 67 kg ha(-1) yr(-1) for 4 years and at 268 ha(-1) for 1 year on revegetated mined land to evaluate N management effects on forage production. Seeded grass production over 5 years did not exhibit consistent increases for the single N fertilizer application compared to the 4 annual applications. Although the single, higher N fertilization treatment only produced significantly greater forage in 3 instances compared to the lower annual fertilization treatment, it would result in a significant savings in application costs. Seeded grass production was higher and annual forb production lower when established using a standing grain stubble mulch compared to a crimped straw mulch. A single, higher application rate of nitrogen and a stubble mulch are recommended because of their production, management, and economic benefits</abstract><pub>Society for Range Management</pub><doi>10.2307/4002404</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-409X |
| ispartof | Journal of range management, 1991-07, Vol.44 (4), p.382-384 |
| issn | 0022-409X 2162-2728 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_4002404 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | ABONADO ANUAL ABONADO FRACCIONADO ALIMENT POUR ANIMAUX APPORT FRACTIONNE BIOMASA BIOMASSE COBERTURA CON PAJA CUBRIMIENTO DEL SUELO DOSE D'APPLICATION DOSIS DE APLICACION Forage production Forbs FUMURE ANNUELLE GRAMINEAE GRAMINEAS GRAMINEE NITRATE D'AMMONIUM NITRATO DE AMONIO Nitrogen Nutrient management PAILLAGE PAILLIS PIENSOS PRODUCCION PRODUCTION Reclamation RECUPERATION DES SOLS REGENERACION VEGETAL REHABILITACION DE TIERRAS RESTAURATION COUVERTURE VEGETALE Revegetation Seed management Straw Straw mulches Stubble Stubble mulching TERRE TIERRAS WYOMING |
| title | Forage production of reclaimed mined lands as influenced by nitrogen fertilization and mulching practice |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A53%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forage%20production%20of%20reclaimed%20mined%20lands%20as%20influenced%20by%20nitrogen%20fertilization%20and%20mulching%20practice&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20range%20management&rft.au=Schuman,%20G.E.%20(Agricultural%20Research%20Service,%20USDA,%20High%20Plains%20Grasslands%20Research%20Station,%20Cheyenne,%20WY)&rft.date=1991-07-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=382&rft.epage=384&rft.pages=382-384&rft.issn=0022-409X&rft.eissn=2162-2728&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/4002404&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E4002404%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c304t-2cfb183942f0eb04e2fed8aa9db5d361bc00e074567b1bd41542e737eb6389663%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4002404&rfr_iscdi=true |