Effect of Model Fidelity on High-Speed Aeroelastic Behavior of a Cantilever Plate

Turbulence, flow separation, and shock dynamics challenge the modeling and analysis of high-speed aeroelastic behavior. Motivated by this, the importance of modeling the fidelity of the flow is explored in the aeroelastic response of a cantilever plate in an Ma=2.0 separating turbulent flow using un...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:AIAA journal 2024-10, Vol.62 (10), p.3881-3892
Main Authors: Thayer, Jordan D., McNamara, Jack J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accuracy
Aeroelasticity
Cantilever plates
Flow separation
Fluid flow
High speed
Limit cycle oscillations
Modelling
Nonlinearity
Piston theory
Predictions
Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes method
Reynolds number
Turbulence
Turbulent flow
Velocity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a178t-f15a6ce00bde799f8cd8ba90c9442a07136d30732ef92d934a339b0019162fd73
container_end_page 3892
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3881
container_title AIAA journal
container_volume 62
creator Thayer, Jordan D.
McNamara, Jack J.
description Turbulence, flow separation, and shock dynamics challenge the modeling and analysis of high-speed aeroelastic behavior. Motivated by this, the importance of modeling the fidelity of the flow is explored in the aeroelastic response of a cantilever plate in an Ma=2.0 separating turbulent flow using unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) and URANS-enriched local piston theory (LPT). Structural modeling assumptions are also evaluated using both linear and nonlinear representations. Close agreement in the predicted aeroelastic steady state is observed. However, large discrepancies in the dynamic aeroelastic response predictions are found and ultimately linked to the neglect of deformation-induced cavity pressure fluctuations and dynamic flow separation in the LPT model. Interestingly, the dynamic flow separation induces a fluid-driven limit cycle oscillation in the postflutter regime. Furthermore, structural nonlinearity is not found to have a strong impact on the conditions and configurations considered.
doi_str_mv 10.2514/1.J063758
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2514_1_J063758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3111247232</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a178t-f15a6ce00bde799f8cd8ba90c9442a07136d30732ef92d934a339b0019162fd73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEFLw0AQhRdRsFYP_oMFQfCQurObZLPHWlqrVFRU8BamyazdErtxkxb6701pwYOXeQx8897wGLsEMZAJxLcweBSp0kl2xHqQKBWpLPk8Zj0hBEQQJ_KUnTXNstukzqDHXsfWUtFyb_mTL6niE9dN1265X_Gp-1pEbzVRyYcUPFXYtK7gd7TAjfNhd4R8hKvWVbShwF8qbOmcnVisGro4aJ99TMbvo2k0e75_GA1nEYLO2shCgmlBQsxL0sbYrCizORpRmDiWKDSotFRCK0nWyNKoGJUy8-5vA6m0pVZ9drX3rYP_WVPT5ku_DqsuMlcAIGMtleyomz1VBN80gWxeB_eNYZuDyHeN5ZAfGuvY6z2LDvHP7T_4C8IWZzA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3111247232</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Model Fidelity on High-Speed Aeroelastic Behavior of a Cantilever Plate</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Thayer, Jordan D. ; McNamara, Jack J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thayer, Jordan D. ; McNamara, Jack J.</creatorcontrib><description>Turbulence, flow separation, and shock dynamics challenge the modeling and analysis of high-speed aeroelastic behavior. Motivated by this, the importance of modeling the fidelity of the flow is explored in the aeroelastic response of a cantilever plate in an Ma=2.0 separating turbulent flow using unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) and URANS-enriched local piston theory (LPT). Structural modeling assumptions are also evaluated using both linear and nonlinear representations. Close agreement in the predicted aeroelastic steady state is observed. However, large discrepancies in the dynamic aeroelastic response predictions are found and ultimately linked to the neglect of deformation-induced cavity pressure fluctuations and dynamic flow separation in the LPT model. Interestingly, the dynamic flow separation induces a fluid-driven limit cycle oscillation in the postflutter regime. Furthermore, structural nonlinearity is not found to have a strong impact on the conditions and configurations considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-385X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.J063758</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Aeroelasticity ; Cantilever plates ; Flow separation ; Fluid flow ; High speed ; Limit cycle oscillations ; Modelling ; Nonlinearity ; Piston theory ; Predictions ; Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes method ; Reynolds number ; Turbulence ; Turbulent flow ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>AIAA journal, 2024-10, Vol.62 (10), p.3881-3892</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 by J. Thayer and J. McNamara. published by AIAA with permission. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at ; employ the eISSN to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions .</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 by J. Thayer and J. McNamara. published by AIAA with permission. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-385X to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a178t-f15a6ce00bde799f8cd8ba90c9442a07136d30732ef92d934a339b0019162fd73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thayer, Jordan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNamara, Jack J.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Model Fidelity on High-Speed Aeroelastic Behavior of a Cantilever Plate</title><title>AIAA journal</title><description>Turbulence, flow separation, and shock dynamics challenge the modeling and analysis of high-speed aeroelastic behavior. Motivated by this, the importance of modeling the fidelity of the flow is explored in the aeroelastic response of a cantilever plate in an Ma=2.0 separating turbulent flow using unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) and URANS-enriched local piston theory (LPT). Structural modeling assumptions are also evaluated using both linear and nonlinear representations. Close agreement in the predicted aeroelastic steady state is observed. However, large discrepancies in the dynamic aeroelastic response predictions are found and ultimately linked to the neglect of deformation-induced cavity pressure fluctuations and dynamic flow separation in the LPT model. Interestingly, the dynamic flow separation induces a fluid-driven limit cycle oscillation in the postflutter regime. Furthermore, structural nonlinearity is not found to have a strong impact on the conditions and configurations considered.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Aeroelasticity</subject><subject>Cantilever plates</subject><subject>Flow separation</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>High speed</subject><subject>Limit cycle oscillations</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>Piston theory</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes method</subject><subject>Reynolds number</subject><subject>Turbulence</subject><subject>Turbulent flow</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>0001-1452</issn><issn>1533-385X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkEFLw0AQhRdRsFYP_oMFQfCQurObZLPHWlqrVFRU8BamyazdErtxkxb6701pwYOXeQx8897wGLsEMZAJxLcweBSp0kl2xHqQKBWpLPk8Zj0hBEQQJ_KUnTXNstukzqDHXsfWUtFyb_mTL6niE9dN1265X_Gp-1pEbzVRyYcUPFXYtK7gd7TAjfNhd4R8hKvWVbShwF8qbOmcnVisGro4aJ99TMbvo2k0e75_GA1nEYLO2shCgmlBQsxL0sbYrCizORpRmDiWKDSotFRCK0nWyNKoGJUy8-5vA6m0pVZ9drX3rYP_WVPT5ku_DqsuMlcAIGMtleyomz1VBN80gWxeB_eNYZuDyHeN5ZAfGuvY6z2LDvHP7T_4C8IWZzA</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Thayer, Jordan D.</creator><creator>McNamara, Jack J.</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Effect of Model Fidelity on High-Speed Aeroelastic Behavior of a Cantilever Plate</title><author>Thayer, Jordan D. ; McNamara, Jack J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a178t-f15a6ce00bde799f8cd8ba90c9442a07136d30732ef92d934a339b0019162fd73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Aeroelasticity</topic><topic>Cantilever plates</topic><topic>Flow separation</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>High speed</topic><topic>Limit cycle oscillations</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>Piston theory</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes method</topic><topic>Reynolds number</topic><topic>Turbulence</topic><topic>Turbulent flow</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thayer, Jordan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNamara, Jack J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thayer, Jordan D.</au><au>McNamara, Jack J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Model Fidelity on High-Speed Aeroelastic Behavior of a Cantilever Plate</atitle><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3881</spage><epage>3892</epage><pages>3881-3892</pages><issn>0001-1452</issn><eissn>1533-385X</eissn><abstract>Turbulence, flow separation, and shock dynamics challenge the modeling and analysis of high-speed aeroelastic behavior. Motivated by this, the importance of modeling the fidelity of the flow is explored in the aeroelastic response of a cantilever plate in an Ma=2.0 separating turbulent flow using unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) and URANS-enriched local piston theory (LPT). Structural modeling assumptions are also evaluated using both linear and nonlinear representations. Close agreement in the predicted aeroelastic steady state is observed. However, large discrepancies in the dynamic aeroelastic response predictions are found and ultimately linked to the neglect of deformation-induced cavity pressure fluctuations and dynamic flow separation in the LPT model. Interestingly, the dynamic flow separation induces a fluid-driven limit cycle oscillation in the postflutter regime. Furthermore, structural nonlinearity is not found to have a strong impact on the conditions and configurations considered.</abstract><cop>Virginia</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.J063758</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-1452
ispartof AIAA journal, 2024-10, Vol.62 (10), p.3881-3892
issn 0001-1452
1533-385X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2514_1_J063758
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accuracy
Aeroelasticity
Cantilever plates
Flow separation
Fluid flow
High speed
Limit cycle oscillations
Modelling
Nonlinearity
Piston theory
Predictions
Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes method
Reynolds number
Turbulence
Turbulent flow
Velocity
title Effect of Model Fidelity on High-Speed Aeroelastic Behavior of a Cantilever Plate
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T11%3A28%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Model%20Fidelity%20on%20High-Speed%20Aeroelastic%20Behavior%20of%20a%20Cantilever%20Plate&rft.jtitle=AIAA%20journal&rft.au=Thayer,%20Jordan%20D.&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3881&rft.epage=3892&rft.pages=3881-3892&rft.issn=0001-1452&rft.eissn=1533-385X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.J063758&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3111247232%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a178t-f15a6ce00bde799f8cd8ba90c9442a07136d30732ef92d934a339b0019162fd73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3111247232&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true