Loading…

Peer instruction’s Achilles’ heel: An analysis of its ineffectiveness in confronting counterintuitive physics questions

This paper examines peer instruction, an educational technique that enhances student-student interaction and student-teacher interaction, influencing students’ performance on counterintuitive physics questions. The study employed a quantitative approach with 40 participants, 22.5% of whom were male...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education Science and Technology Education, 2024-08, Vol.20 (8), p.em2480
Main Authors: Ospanbekov, Yerbol, Maxutov, Samat, Sandybayev, Yerbol, Boranbekova, Aknur, Balta, Nuri
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1758-f58105d03e1be5da4741737501ae2e4e8a70d57045d700d4ef3dbf762addb3993
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page em2480
container_title Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
container_volume 20
creator Ospanbekov, Yerbol
Maxutov, Samat
Sandybayev, Yerbol
Boranbekova, Aknur
Balta, Nuri
description This paper examines peer instruction, an educational technique that enhances student-student interaction and student-teacher interaction, influencing students’ performance on counterintuitive physics questions. The study employed a quantitative approach with 40 participants, 22.5% of whom were male and 77.5% were female. The counterintuitive dynamics test was used to measure students’ counter intuitions in dynamics. The study results on counterintuitive questions showed no noticeable effect from peer instruction. Surprisingly, more students shifted from correct to incorrect responses after group discussions, leading to a decrease in the overall accuracy rate. Although peer instruction did not show a clear impact on counterintuitive physics questions, it is important for educators to recognize the complexity of peer instructions. Exploring different teaching methods that use peer interaction might help improve learning outcomes for counterintuitive physics questions.
doi_str_mv 10.29333/ejmste/14778
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_29333_ejmste_14778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3099287696</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1758-f58105d03e1be5da4741737501ae2e4e8a70d57045d700d4ef3dbf762addb3993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UMtOwzAQtBBIVKVH7pY4h9pxHMfcqoqXVAkOcI6ceE1dpU7xJkgVF36D3-NLSFPEaWekmR3NEHLJ2XWqhRBz2GyxgznPlCpOyIQLJpMiTcXpP-bynMwQfcW4LrhO83xCPp8BIvUBu9jXnW_Dz9c30kW99k0DOBC6Bmhu6CJQE0yzR4-0ddR3OJjAORhMHxAAD5zWbXCxDZ0PbwPuQwfRh673Bw3drQd3jfS9Bzwk4QU5c6ZBmP3dKXm9u31ZPiSrp_vH5WKV1FzJInGy4ExaJoBXIK3JVMaVUJJxAylkUBjFrFQsk1YxZjNwwlZO5amxthJaiym5Ov7dxXYMLzdtH4c2WAqmdVqoXOeDKjmq6tgiRnDlLvqtifuSs3KcuDxOXI4Ti1-3rXTm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3099287696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peer instruction’s Achilles’ heel: An analysis of its ineffectiveness in confronting counterintuitive physics questions</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Ospanbekov, Yerbol ; Maxutov, Samat ; Sandybayev, Yerbol ; Boranbekova, Aknur ; Balta, Nuri</creator><creatorcontrib>Ospanbekov, Yerbol ; Maxutov, Samat ; Sandybayev, Yerbol ; Boranbekova, Aknur ; Balta, Nuri</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines peer instruction, an educational technique that enhances student-student interaction and student-teacher interaction, influencing students’ performance on counterintuitive physics questions. The study employed a quantitative approach with 40 participants, 22.5% of whom were male and 77.5% were female. The counterintuitive dynamics test was used to measure students’ counter intuitions in dynamics. The study results on counterintuitive questions showed no noticeable effect from peer instruction. Surprisingly, more students shifted from correct to incorrect responses after group discussions, leading to a decrease in the overall accuracy rate. Although peer instruction did not show a clear impact on counterintuitive physics questions, it is important for educators to recognize the complexity of peer instructions. Exploring different teaching methods that use peer interaction might help improve learning outcomes for counterintuitive physics questions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1305-8215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1305-8223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.29333/ejmste/14778</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>East Sussex</publisher><subject>Educational objectives ; Learning ; Literature reviews ; Pedagogy ; Physics ; Problem solving ; Science education ; Secondary school students ; Secondary schools ; Success ; Teachers ; Teaching methods</subject><ispartof>Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2024-08, Vol.20 (8), p.em2480</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1758-f58105d03e1be5da4741737501ae2e4e8a70d57045d700d4ef3dbf762addb3993</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9366-6722 ; 0000-0001-6143-7589 ; 0000-0002-4453-5512 ; 0000-0002-6364-5346 ; 0000-0002-4521-4104</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ospanbekov, Yerbol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxutov, Samat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandybayev, Yerbol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boranbekova, Aknur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balta, Nuri</creatorcontrib><title>Peer instruction’s Achilles’ heel: An analysis of its ineffectiveness in confronting counterintuitive physics questions</title><title>Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education</title><description>This paper examines peer instruction, an educational technique that enhances student-student interaction and student-teacher interaction, influencing students’ performance on counterintuitive physics questions. The study employed a quantitative approach with 40 participants, 22.5% of whom were male and 77.5% were female. The counterintuitive dynamics test was used to measure students’ counter intuitions in dynamics. The study results on counterintuitive questions showed no noticeable effect from peer instruction. Surprisingly, more students shifted from correct to incorrect responses after group discussions, leading to a decrease in the overall accuracy rate. Although peer instruction did not show a clear impact on counterintuitive physics questions, it is important for educators to recognize the complexity of peer instructions. Exploring different teaching methods that use peer interaction might help improve learning outcomes for counterintuitive physics questions.</description><subject>Educational objectives</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Secondary school students</subject><subject>Secondary schools</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><issn>1305-8215</issn><issn>1305-8223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UMtOwzAQtBBIVKVH7pY4h9pxHMfcqoqXVAkOcI6ceE1dpU7xJkgVF36D3-NLSFPEaWekmR3NEHLJ2XWqhRBz2GyxgznPlCpOyIQLJpMiTcXpP-bynMwQfcW4LrhO83xCPp8BIvUBu9jXnW_Dz9c30kW99k0DOBC6Bmhu6CJQE0yzR4-0ddR3OJjAORhMHxAAD5zWbXCxDZ0PbwPuQwfRh673Bw3drQd3jfS9Bzwk4QU5c6ZBmP3dKXm9u31ZPiSrp_vH5WKV1FzJInGy4ExaJoBXIK3JVMaVUJJxAylkUBjFrFQsk1YxZjNwwlZO5amxthJaiym5Ov7dxXYMLzdtH4c2WAqmdVqoXOeDKjmq6tgiRnDlLvqtifuSs3KcuDxOXI4Ti1-3rXTm</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Ospanbekov, Yerbol</creator><creator>Maxutov, Samat</creator><creator>Sandybayev, Yerbol</creator><creator>Boranbekova, Aknur</creator><creator>Balta, Nuri</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9366-6722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6143-7589</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4453-5512</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6364-5346</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4521-4104</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Peer instruction’s Achilles’ heel: An analysis of its ineffectiveness in confronting counterintuitive physics questions</title><author>Ospanbekov, Yerbol ; Maxutov, Samat ; Sandybayev, Yerbol ; Boranbekova, Aknur ; Balta, Nuri</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1758-f58105d03e1be5da4741737501ae2e4e8a70d57045d700d4ef3dbf762addb3993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Educational objectives</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Secondary school students</topic><topic>Secondary schools</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ospanbekov, Yerbol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxutov, Samat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandybayev, Yerbol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boranbekova, Aknur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balta, Nuri</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ospanbekov, Yerbol</au><au>Maxutov, Samat</au><au>Sandybayev, Yerbol</au><au>Boranbekova, Aknur</au><au>Balta, Nuri</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peer instruction’s Achilles’ heel: An analysis of its ineffectiveness in confronting counterintuitive physics questions</atitle><jtitle>Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education</jtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>em2480</spage><pages>em2480-</pages><issn>1305-8215</issn><eissn>1305-8223</eissn><abstract>This paper examines peer instruction, an educational technique that enhances student-student interaction and student-teacher interaction, influencing students’ performance on counterintuitive physics questions. The study employed a quantitative approach with 40 participants, 22.5% of whom were male and 77.5% were female. The counterintuitive dynamics test was used to measure students’ counter intuitions in dynamics. The study results on counterintuitive questions showed no noticeable effect from peer instruction. Surprisingly, more students shifted from correct to incorrect responses after group discussions, leading to a decrease in the overall accuracy rate. Although peer instruction did not show a clear impact on counterintuitive physics questions, it is important for educators to recognize the complexity of peer instructions. Exploring different teaching methods that use peer interaction might help improve learning outcomes for counterintuitive physics questions.</abstract><cop>East Sussex</cop><doi>10.29333/ejmste/14778</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9366-6722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6143-7589</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4453-5512</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6364-5346</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4521-4104</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1305-8215
ispartof Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2024-08, Vol.20 (8), p.em2480
issn 1305-8215
1305-8223
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_29333_ejmste_14778
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Educational objectives
Learning
Literature reviews
Pedagogy
Physics
Problem solving
Science education
Secondary school students
Secondary schools
Success
Teachers
Teaching methods
title Peer instruction’s Achilles’ heel: An analysis of its ineffectiveness in confronting counterintuitive physics questions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T03%3A30%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peer%20instruction%E2%80%99s%20Achilles%E2%80%99%20heel:%20An%20analysis%20of%20its%20ineffectiveness%20in%20confronting%20counterintuitive%20physics%20questions&rft.jtitle=Eurasia%20Journal%20of%20Mathematics,%20Science%20and%20Technology%20Education&rft.au=Ospanbekov,%20Yerbol&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=em2480&rft.pages=em2480-&rft.issn=1305-8215&rft.eissn=1305-8223&rft_id=info:doi/10.29333/ejmste/14778&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3099287696%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1758-f58105d03e1be5da4741737501ae2e4e8a70d57045d700d4ef3dbf762addb3993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3099287696&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true