Loading…
Peer instruction’s Achilles’ heel: An analysis of its ineffectiveness in confronting counterintuitive physics questions
This paper examines peer instruction, an educational technique that enhances student-student interaction and student-teacher interaction, influencing students’ performance on counterintuitive physics questions. The study employed a quantitative approach with 40 participants, 22.5% of whom were male...
Saved in:
Published in: | Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education Science and Technology Education, 2024-08, Vol.20 (8), p.em2480 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1758-f58105d03e1be5da4741737501ae2e4e8a70d57045d700d4ef3dbf762addb3993 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | em2480 |
container_title | Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Ospanbekov, Yerbol Maxutov, Samat Sandybayev, Yerbol Boranbekova, Aknur Balta, Nuri |
description | This paper examines peer instruction, an educational technique that enhances student-student interaction and student-teacher interaction, influencing students’ performance on counterintuitive physics questions. The study employed a quantitative approach with 40 participants, 22.5% of whom were male and 77.5% were female. The counterintuitive dynamics test was used to measure students’ counter intuitions in dynamics. The study results on counterintuitive questions showed no noticeable effect from peer instruction. Surprisingly, more students shifted from correct to incorrect responses after group discussions, leading to a decrease in the overall accuracy rate. Although peer instruction did not show a clear impact on counterintuitive physics questions, it is important for educators to recognize the complexity of peer instructions. Exploring different teaching methods that use peer interaction might help improve learning outcomes for counterintuitive physics questions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.29333/ejmste/14778 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_29333_ejmste_14778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3099287696</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1758-f58105d03e1be5da4741737501ae2e4e8a70d57045d700d4ef3dbf762addb3993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UMtOwzAQtBBIVKVH7pY4h9pxHMfcqoqXVAkOcI6ceE1dpU7xJkgVF36D3-NLSFPEaWekmR3NEHLJ2XWqhRBz2GyxgznPlCpOyIQLJpMiTcXpP-bynMwQfcW4LrhO83xCPp8BIvUBu9jXnW_Dz9c30kW99k0DOBC6Bmhu6CJQE0yzR4-0ddR3OJjAORhMHxAAD5zWbXCxDZ0PbwPuQwfRh673Bw3drQd3jfS9Bzwk4QU5c6ZBmP3dKXm9u31ZPiSrp_vH5WKV1FzJInGy4ExaJoBXIK3JVMaVUJJxAylkUBjFrFQsk1YxZjNwwlZO5amxthJaiym5Ov7dxXYMLzdtH4c2WAqmdVqoXOeDKjmq6tgiRnDlLvqtifuSs3KcuDxOXI4Ti1-3rXTm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3099287696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peer instruction’s Achilles’ heel: An analysis of its ineffectiveness in confronting counterintuitive physics questions</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Ospanbekov, Yerbol ; Maxutov, Samat ; Sandybayev, Yerbol ; Boranbekova, Aknur ; Balta, Nuri</creator><creatorcontrib>Ospanbekov, Yerbol ; Maxutov, Samat ; Sandybayev, Yerbol ; Boranbekova, Aknur ; Balta, Nuri</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines peer instruction, an educational technique that enhances student-student interaction and student-teacher interaction, influencing students’ performance on counterintuitive physics questions. The study employed a quantitative approach with 40 participants, 22.5% of whom were male and 77.5% were female. The counterintuitive dynamics test was used to measure students’ counter intuitions in dynamics. The study results on counterintuitive questions showed no noticeable effect from peer instruction. Surprisingly, more students shifted from correct to incorrect responses after group discussions, leading to a decrease in the overall accuracy rate. Although peer instruction did not show a clear impact on counterintuitive physics questions, it is important for educators to recognize the complexity of peer instructions. Exploring different teaching methods that use peer interaction might help improve learning outcomes for counterintuitive physics questions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1305-8215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1305-8223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.29333/ejmste/14778</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>East Sussex</publisher><subject>Educational objectives ; Learning ; Literature reviews ; Pedagogy ; Physics ; Problem solving ; Science education ; Secondary school students ; Secondary schools ; Success ; Teachers ; Teaching methods</subject><ispartof>Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2024-08, Vol.20 (8), p.em2480</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1758-f58105d03e1be5da4741737501ae2e4e8a70d57045d700d4ef3dbf762addb3993</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9366-6722 ; 0000-0001-6143-7589 ; 0000-0002-4453-5512 ; 0000-0002-6364-5346 ; 0000-0002-4521-4104</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ospanbekov, Yerbol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxutov, Samat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandybayev, Yerbol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boranbekova, Aknur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balta, Nuri</creatorcontrib><title>Peer instruction’s Achilles’ heel: An analysis of its ineffectiveness in confronting counterintuitive physics questions</title><title>Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education</title><description>This paper examines peer instruction, an educational technique that enhances student-student interaction and student-teacher interaction, influencing students’ performance on counterintuitive physics questions. The study employed a quantitative approach with 40 participants, 22.5% of whom were male and 77.5% were female. The counterintuitive dynamics test was used to measure students’ counter intuitions in dynamics. The study results on counterintuitive questions showed no noticeable effect from peer instruction. Surprisingly, more students shifted from correct to incorrect responses after group discussions, leading to a decrease in the overall accuracy rate. Although peer instruction did not show a clear impact on counterintuitive physics questions, it is important for educators to recognize the complexity of peer instructions. Exploring different teaching methods that use peer interaction might help improve learning outcomes for counterintuitive physics questions.</description><subject>Educational objectives</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Secondary school students</subject><subject>Secondary schools</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><issn>1305-8215</issn><issn>1305-8223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UMtOwzAQtBBIVKVH7pY4h9pxHMfcqoqXVAkOcI6ceE1dpU7xJkgVF36D3-NLSFPEaWekmR3NEHLJ2XWqhRBz2GyxgznPlCpOyIQLJpMiTcXpP-bynMwQfcW4LrhO83xCPp8BIvUBu9jXnW_Dz9c30kW99k0DOBC6Bmhu6CJQE0yzR4-0ddR3OJjAORhMHxAAD5zWbXCxDZ0PbwPuQwfRh673Bw3drQd3jfS9Bzwk4QU5c6ZBmP3dKXm9u31ZPiSrp_vH5WKV1FzJInGy4ExaJoBXIK3JVMaVUJJxAylkUBjFrFQsk1YxZjNwwlZO5amxthJaiym5Ov7dxXYMLzdtH4c2WAqmdVqoXOeDKjmq6tgiRnDlLvqtifuSs3KcuDxOXI4Ti1-3rXTm</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Ospanbekov, Yerbol</creator><creator>Maxutov, Samat</creator><creator>Sandybayev, Yerbol</creator><creator>Boranbekova, Aknur</creator><creator>Balta, Nuri</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9366-6722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6143-7589</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4453-5512</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6364-5346</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4521-4104</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Peer instruction’s Achilles’ heel: An analysis of its ineffectiveness in confronting counterintuitive physics questions</title><author>Ospanbekov, Yerbol ; Maxutov, Samat ; Sandybayev, Yerbol ; Boranbekova, Aknur ; Balta, Nuri</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1758-f58105d03e1be5da4741737501ae2e4e8a70d57045d700d4ef3dbf762addb3993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Educational objectives</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Secondary school students</topic><topic>Secondary schools</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ospanbekov, Yerbol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxutov, Samat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandybayev, Yerbol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boranbekova, Aknur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balta, Nuri</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ospanbekov, Yerbol</au><au>Maxutov, Samat</au><au>Sandybayev, Yerbol</au><au>Boranbekova, Aknur</au><au>Balta, Nuri</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peer instruction’s Achilles’ heel: An analysis of its ineffectiveness in confronting counterintuitive physics questions</atitle><jtitle>Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education</jtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>em2480</spage><pages>em2480-</pages><issn>1305-8215</issn><eissn>1305-8223</eissn><abstract>This paper examines peer instruction, an educational technique that enhances student-student interaction and student-teacher interaction, influencing students’ performance on counterintuitive physics questions. The study employed a quantitative approach with 40 participants, 22.5% of whom were male and 77.5% were female. The counterintuitive dynamics test was used to measure students’ counter intuitions in dynamics. The study results on counterintuitive questions showed no noticeable effect from peer instruction. Surprisingly, more students shifted from correct to incorrect responses after group discussions, leading to a decrease in the overall accuracy rate. Although peer instruction did not show a clear impact on counterintuitive physics questions, it is important for educators to recognize the complexity of peer instructions. Exploring different teaching methods that use peer interaction might help improve learning outcomes for counterintuitive physics questions.</abstract><cop>East Sussex</cop><doi>10.29333/ejmste/14778</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9366-6722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6143-7589</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4453-5512</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6364-5346</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4521-4104</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1305-8215 |
ispartof | Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2024-08, Vol.20 (8), p.em2480 |
issn | 1305-8215 1305-8223 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_29333_ejmste_14778 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Educational objectives Learning Literature reviews Pedagogy Physics Problem solving Science education Secondary school students Secondary schools Success Teachers Teaching methods |
title | Peer instruction’s Achilles’ heel: An analysis of its ineffectiveness in confronting counterintuitive physics questions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T03%3A30%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peer%20instruction%E2%80%99s%20Achilles%E2%80%99%20heel:%20An%20analysis%20of%20its%20ineffectiveness%20in%20confronting%20counterintuitive%20physics%20questions&rft.jtitle=Eurasia%20Journal%20of%20Mathematics,%20Science%20and%20Technology%20Education&rft.au=Ospanbekov,%20Yerbol&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=em2480&rft.pages=em2480-&rft.issn=1305-8215&rft.eissn=1305-8223&rft_id=info:doi/10.29333/ejmste/14778&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3099287696%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1758-f58105d03e1be5da4741737501ae2e4e8a70d57045d700d4ef3dbf762addb3993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3099287696&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |