Loading…
Categories of Auditory Performance: Inter-User Reliability
Abstract Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) describes a scale used to rate outcomes from paediatric cochlear implantation in everyday life. It differs from more technical measures by being readily applied and easily understood by non-specialist professionals and by parents. Being based on subj...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of audiology 1998-02, Vol.32 (1), p.7-12 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-b3ebd6bf8878acdd961145d0f7d50362a22937dd62711f758b10a62b9a0d80d03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-b3ebd6bf8878acdd961145d0f7d50362a22937dd62711f758b10a62b9a0d80d03 |
container_end_page | 12 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 7 |
container_title | British journal of audiology |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Archbold, Sue Lutman, Mark E. Nikolopoulos, Thomas |
description | Abstract
Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) describes a scale used to rate outcomes from paediatric cochlear implantation in everyday life. It differs from more technical measures by being readily applied and easily understood by non-specialist professionals and by parents. Being based on subjective assessments, there is a need to establish whether ratings by different persons are comparable. Therefore, an analysis of inter-user reliability was undertaken using ratings from 23 children followed up at various intervals after implantation. Analysis relating scores by local teachers of the deaf and the teachers of the deaf at the implant centre revealed very high inter-user reliability (correlation coefficient 0.97). This result establishes the reliability of CAP as an outcome measure for use in cochlear implant programmes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3109/03005364000000045 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3109_03005364000000045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79963276</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-b3ebd6bf8878acdd961145d0f7d50362a22937dd62711f758b10a62b9a0d80d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1LwzAUhnOhzDn9AV4IvRDvqvlok2Z6M4ZfMFDEXZe0SV1G1sykRfrvbW0diDBzc8I573tO8hwAzhC8Igjya0ggjAmNYH-i-ACMu1zYJY_AsfdrCBEhEI_AiNOou43BdC4q9W6dVj6wRTCrpa6sa4IX5QrrNqLM1TR4KivlwqVXLnhVRotMG101J-CwEMar0yFOwPL-7m3-GC6eH57ms0WYx5hVYUZUJmlWJAlLRC4lpwhFsYQFkzEkFAuMOWFSUswQKlicZAgKijMuoEyghGQCLvu-W2c_auWrdKN9rowRpbK1TxnnlGBG_xXGjCHOSNIKUS_MnfXeqSLdOr0RrkkRTDuY6R-Yred8aF5nGyV3joFkW78Y6sLnwhSuRaf9ToYRR3HUjb7tZbr85vtpnZFpJRpj3Y-H7HvFzS_7SglTrXLhVLq2tSvbPez5wxe-BqD9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57719738</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Categories of Auditory Performance: Inter-User Reliability</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Archbold, Sue ; Lutman, Mark E. ; Nikolopoulos, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Archbold, Sue ; Lutman, Mark E. ; Nikolopoulos, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) describes a scale used to rate outcomes from paediatric cochlear implantation in everyday life. It differs from more technical measures by being readily applied and easily understood by non-specialist professionals and by parents. Being based on subjective assessments, there is a need to establish whether ratings by different persons are comparable. Therefore, an analysis of inter-user reliability was undertaken using ratings from 23 children followed up at various intervals after implantation. Analysis relating scores by local teachers of the deaf and the teachers of the deaf at the implant centre revealed very high inter-user reliability (correlation coefficient 0.97). This result establishes the reliability of CAP as an outcome measure for use in cochlear implant programmes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5364</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/03005364000000045</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9643302</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJAYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Informa UK, Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Cochlear Implantation ; Cochlear implants ; Deafness - surgery ; Follow-Up Studies ; health-care purchasers ; Hearing ; Hearing Tests ; Humans ; Infant ; Interrater reliability ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Measures ; Medical sciences ; Otorhinolaryngology functional investigation (larynx, voice, audiometry, vestibular function, equilibration...) ; outcome ; paediatric cochlear implant ; parents ; Reproducibility of Results ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>British journal of audiology, 1998-02, Vol.32 (1), p.7-12</ispartof><rights>1998 Informa UK, Ltd. 1998</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-b3ebd6bf8878acdd961145d0f7d50362a22937dd62711f758b10a62b9a0d80d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-b3ebd6bf8878acdd961145d0f7d50362a22937dd62711f758b10a62b9a0d80d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2191548$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9643302$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Archbold, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutman, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikolopoulos, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Categories of Auditory Performance: Inter-User Reliability</title><title>British journal of audiology</title><addtitle>Br J Audiol</addtitle><description>Abstract
Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) describes a scale used to rate outcomes from paediatric cochlear implantation in everyday life. It differs from more technical measures by being readily applied and easily understood by non-specialist professionals and by parents. Being based on subjective assessments, there is a need to establish whether ratings by different persons are comparable. Therefore, an analysis of inter-user reliability was undertaken using ratings from 23 children followed up at various intervals after implantation. Analysis relating scores by local teachers of the deaf and the teachers of the deaf at the implant centre revealed very high inter-user reliability (correlation coefficient 0.97). This result establishes the reliability of CAP as an outcome measure for use in cochlear implant programmes.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation</subject><subject>Cochlear implants</subject><subject>Deafness - surgery</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>health-care purchasers</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Hearing Tests</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Interrater reliability</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Measures</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology functional investigation (larynx, voice, audiometry, vestibular function, equilibration...)</subject><subject>outcome</subject><subject>paediatric cochlear implant</subject><subject>parents</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0300-5364</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1LwzAUhnOhzDn9AV4IvRDvqvlok2Z6M4ZfMFDEXZe0SV1G1sykRfrvbW0diDBzc8I573tO8hwAzhC8Igjya0ggjAmNYH-i-ACMu1zYJY_AsfdrCBEhEI_AiNOou43BdC4q9W6dVj6wRTCrpa6sa4IX5QrrNqLM1TR4KivlwqVXLnhVRotMG101J-CwEMar0yFOwPL-7m3-GC6eH57ms0WYx5hVYUZUJmlWJAlLRC4lpwhFsYQFkzEkFAuMOWFSUswQKlicZAgKijMuoEyghGQCLvu-W2c_auWrdKN9rowRpbK1TxnnlGBG_xXGjCHOSNIKUS_MnfXeqSLdOr0RrkkRTDuY6R-Yred8aF5nGyV3joFkW78Y6sLnwhSuRaf9ToYRR3HUjb7tZbr85vtpnZFpJRpj3Y-H7HvFzS_7SglTrXLhVLq2tSvbPez5wxe-BqD9</recordid><startdate>19980201</startdate><enddate>19980201</enddate><creator>Archbold, Sue</creator><creator>Lutman, Mark E.</creator><creator>Nikolopoulos, Thomas</creator><general>Informa UK, Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Whurr</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980201</creationdate><title>Categories of Auditory Performance: Inter-User Reliability</title><author>Archbold, Sue ; Lutman, Mark E. ; Nikolopoulos, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-b3ebd6bf8878acdd961145d0f7d50362a22937dd62711f758b10a62b9a0d80d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation</topic><topic>Cochlear implants</topic><topic>Deafness - surgery</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>health-care purchasers</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Hearing Tests</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Interrater reliability</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Measures</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology functional investigation (larynx, voice, audiometry, vestibular function, equilibration...)</topic><topic>outcome</topic><topic>paediatric cochlear implant</topic><topic>parents</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Archbold, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutman, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikolopoulos, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>British journal of audiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Archbold, Sue</au><au>Lutman, Mark E.</au><au>Nikolopoulos, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Categories of Auditory Performance: Inter-User Reliability</atitle><jtitle>British journal of audiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Audiol</addtitle><date>1998-02-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>7</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>7-12</pages><issn>0300-5364</issn><coden>BJAYAC</coden><abstract>Abstract
Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) describes a scale used to rate outcomes from paediatric cochlear implantation in everyday life. It differs from more technical measures by being readily applied and easily understood by non-specialist professionals and by parents. Being based on subjective assessments, there is a need to establish whether ratings by different persons are comparable. Therefore, an analysis of inter-user reliability was undertaken using ratings from 23 children followed up at various intervals after implantation. Analysis relating scores by local teachers of the deaf and the teachers of the deaf at the implant centre revealed very high inter-user reliability (correlation coefficient 0.97). This result establishes the reliability of CAP as an outcome measure for use in cochlear implant programmes.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Informa UK, Ltd</pub><pmid>9643302</pmid><doi>10.3109/03005364000000045</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0300-5364 |
ispartof | British journal of audiology, 1998-02, Vol.32 (1), p.7-12 |
issn | 0300-5364 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_3109_03005364000000045 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Child, Preschool Children Cochlear Implantation Cochlear implants Deafness - surgery Follow-Up Studies health-care purchasers Hearing Hearing Tests Humans Infant Interrater reliability Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Measures Medical sciences Otorhinolaryngology functional investigation (larynx, voice, audiometry, vestibular function, equilibration...) outcome paediatric cochlear implant parents Reproducibility of Results Treatment Outcome |
title | Categories of Auditory Performance: Inter-User Reliability |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A55%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Categories%20of%20Auditory%20Performance:%20Inter-User%20Reliability&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20audiology&rft.au=Archbold,%20Sue&rft.date=1998-02-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=7-12&rft.issn=0300-5364&rft.coden=BJAYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/03005364000000045&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79963276%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-b3ebd6bf8878acdd961145d0f7d50362a22937dd62711f758b10a62b9a0d80d03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57719738&rft_id=info:pmid/9643302&rfr_iscdi=true |