CHRONOKINETICS OF CEFTAZIDIME AFTER INTRAMUSCULAR ADMINISTRATION TO DOGS

• Published in: Chronobiology international 2010-04, Vol.27 (3), p.549-559
• Main Authors: Monfrinotti, Agustina, Ambros, Luis, Montoya, Laura, Prados, Ana Paula, Rebuelto, Marcela
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Antibiotics; Area Under Curve; Ceftazidime; Ceftazidime - administration & dosage; Ceftazidime - pharmacokinetics; Ceftazidime - pharmacology; Cephalosporin; Chronokinetics; Chronopharmacology; Circadian rhythms; Dogs; Female; Injections, Intramuscular; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas aeruginosa - drug effects; Pseudomonas Infections
• ISSN: 0742-0528; 1525-6073
• DOI: 10.3109/07420521003664239

Ceftazidime, a third-generation cephalosporin, is widely used for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. The aims of the present study were to characterize the pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime and to estimate the T > MIC against P. aeruginosa, after its intramuscular (im) administration at two different dosing times (08:30 h and 20:30 h) to dogs, in order to determine whether time-of-day administration modifies ceftazidime pharmacokinetics and or predicted clinical antipseudomonal efficacy. Six female healthy beagle dogs were administered ceftazidime pentahydrate by the intramuscular route in a single dose of 25 mg kg at both 08:30 and 20:30 h, two weeks apart. Plasma ceftazidime concentrations were determined by microbiological assay. Pharmacokinetic parameters and time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T > MIC) and 4xMIC for Pseudomonas aeruginosa were calculated from the disposition curve of each dog. No differences between the daytime and nighttime administrations were found for the main pharmacokinetic parameters, including Cmax, tmax, t½ λ, AUC, and MRT; however, the high interindividual variability shown by these values and the small number of individuals may account for this lack of difference. Rate of absorption (ka) was significantly higher after the 20:30 h than 08:30 h administration. No significant differences between T > MIC were found when comparing the 08:30 h and 20:30 h administrations. Mean T > MIC values predicted a favorable bacteriostatic effect for all susceptible strains of P. aeruginosa for the 12 h dosing interval at both dosing times. Our results suggest that similar antipseudomonal activity may be expected when ceftazidime is administered at 8:30 and 20:30 h; however, as only two timepoints of drug administration were explored, we are unable to draw any conclusions for other treatment times during the 24 h. (Author correspondence: [e-mail]).