Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university

This study investigates the relationship between bibliometric indicators and the outcomes of peer reviews. Based on a case study of research groups at the University of Bergen, Norway, we examine how various bibliometric indicators correlate with evaluation ratings given by expert committees. The an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Research evaluation 2004-04, Vol.13 (1), p.33-41
Main Authors: Aksnes, Dag W, Taxt, Randi Elisabeth
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study investigates the relationship between bibliometric indicators and the outcomes of peer reviews. Based on a case study of research groups at the University of Bergen, Norway, we examine how various bibliometric indicators correlate with evaluation ratings given by expert committees. The analysis shows positive but relatively weak correlations for all the selected indicators. Particular attention is devoted to the reasons for the discrepancies. We find that shortcomings of the peers' assessments, of the bibliometric indicators, as well as lack of comparability, can explain why the correlation was not stronger.
ISSN:0958-2029
1471-5449
DOI:10.3152/147154404781776563