Places of Otherness

This article looks at two urban landscapes critical for mobility within the Global South: Eastleigh, Kenya, and Xiaobei, China. While different, they are both centers of global trade that attract migrants seeking livelihoods, and are also regarded with great ambivalence within the countries that hos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Migration and society : advances in research 2020-06, Vol.3 (1), p.98-112
Main Authors: Carrier, Neil, Mathews, Gordon
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1309-a1ac5733588cd1e492a4cf976a37cc55cd7321b513f04d437348d9d2f566d1963
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1309-a1ac5733588cd1e492a4cf976a37cc55cd7321b513f04d437348d9d2f566d1963
container_end_page 112
container_issue 1
container_start_page 98
container_title Migration and society : advances in research
container_volume 3
creator Carrier, Neil
Mathews, Gordon
description This article looks at two urban landscapes critical for mobility within the Global South: Eastleigh, Kenya, and Xiaobei, China. While different, they are both centers of global trade that attract migrants seeking livelihoods, and are also regarded with great ambivalence within the countries that host them. We explore this ambivalence, showing how it links to fear of the “others” who animate them, and to broader politics in which migrants become caught. Such places often simultaneously attract members of the host society for a taste of the other, or business opportunities, yet also repel and induce fear as places of danger. For the migrant population, there is also ambivalence—as they are places that offer both opportunity for social mobility, yet also places of hard lives and immobility. In short, both are critical nodes in patterns of South-South mobility where dynamics of such mobility and reaction to it can be understood.
doi_str_mv 10.3167/arms.2020.030109
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3167_arms_2020_030109</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_3167_arms_2020_030109</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1309-a1ac5733588cd1e492a4cf976a37cc55cd7321b513f04d437348d9d2f566d1963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9z0tLQzEQBeBQFFpqV2667B-415lMHjdLKb6gUBe6DnGSoKW1knHjv7eXiqtzFocDn1JLhJ7Q-ZvUDtJr0NADAUKYqJm23nRIaC7-O7ipWojsAE5LJGdgpq6f94mLrI51tf1-L-2ziFypy5r2UhZ_OVev93cv68dus314Wt9uOj59hS5hYuuJ7DBwxmKCToZr8C6RZ7aWsyeNbxapgsmGPJkhh6yrdS5jcDRXcP7ldhRppcav9nFI7ScixNEVR1ccXfHsol-QPz5S</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Places of Otherness</title><source>Berghahn Journals</source><creator>Carrier, Neil ; Mathews, Gordon</creator><creatorcontrib>Carrier, Neil ; Mathews, Gordon</creatorcontrib><description>This article looks at two urban landscapes critical for mobility within the Global South: Eastleigh, Kenya, and Xiaobei, China. While different, they are both centers of global trade that attract migrants seeking livelihoods, and are also regarded with great ambivalence within the countries that host them. We explore this ambivalence, showing how it links to fear of the “others” who animate them, and to broader politics in which migrants become caught. Such places often simultaneously attract members of the host society for a taste of the other, or business opportunities, yet also repel and induce fear as places of danger. For the migrant population, there is also ambivalence—as they are places that offer both opportunity for social mobility, yet also places of hard lives and immobility. In short, both are critical nodes in patterns of South-South mobility where dynamics of such mobility and reaction to it can be understood.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2574-1306</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2574-1314</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3167/arms.2020.030109</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Migration and society : advances in research, 2020-06, Vol.3 (1), p.98-112</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1309-a1ac5733588cd1e492a4cf976a37cc55cd7321b513f04d437348d9d2f566d1963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1309-a1ac5733588cd1e492a4cf976a37cc55cd7321b513f04d437348d9d2f566d1963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carrier, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathews, Gordon</creatorcontrib><title>Places of Otherness</title><title>Migration and society : advances in research</title><description>This article looks at two urban landscapes critical for mobility within the Global South: Eastleigh, Kenya, and Xiaobei, China. While different, they are both centers of global trade that attract migrants seeking livelihoods, and are also regarded with great ambivalence within the countries that host them. We explore this ambivalence, showing how it links to fear of the “others” who animate them, and to broader politics in which migrants become caught. Such places often simultaneously attract members of the host society for a taste of the other, or business opportunities, yet also repel and induce fear as places of danger. For the migrant population, there is also ambivalence—as they are places that offer both opportunity for social mobility, yet also places of hard lives and immobility. In short, both are critical nodes in patterns of South-South mobility where dynamics of such mobility and reaction to it can be understood.</description><issn>2574-1306</issn><issn>2574-1314</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9z0tLQzEQBeBQFFpqV2667B-415lMHjdLKb6gUBe6DnGSoKW1knHjv7eXiqtzFocDn1JLhJ7Q-ZvUDtJr0NADAUKYqJm23nRIaC7-O7ipWojsAE5LJGdgpq6f94mLrI51tf1-L-2ziFypy5r2UhZ_OVev93cv68dus314Wt9uOj59hS5hYuuJ7DBwxmKCToZr8C6RZ7aWsyeNbxapgsmGPJkhh6yrdS5jcDRXcP7ldhRppcav9nFI7ScixNEVR1ccXfHsol-QPz5S</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Carrier, Neil</creator><creator>Mathews, Gordon</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Places of Otherness</title><author>Carrier, Neil ; Mathews, Gordon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1309-a1ac5733588cd1e492a4cf976a37cc55cd7321b513f04d437348d9d2f566d1963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carrier, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathews, Gordon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Migration and society : advances in research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carrier, Neil</au><au>Mathews, Gordon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Places of Otherness</atitle><jtitle>Migration and society : advances in research</jtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>98</spage><epage>112</epage><pages>98-112</pages><issn>2574-1306</issn><eissn>2574-1314</eissn><abstract>This article looks at two urban landscapes critical for mobility within the Global South: Eastleigh, Kenya, and Xiaobei, China. While different, they are both centers of global trade that attract migrants seeking livelihoods, and are also regarded with great ambivalence within the countries that host them. We explore this ambivalence, showing how it links to fear of the “others” who animate them, and to broader politics in which migrants become caught. Such places often simultaneously attract members of the host society for a taste of the other, or business opportunities, yet also repel and induce fear as places of danger. For the migrant population, there is also ambivalence—as they are places that offer both opportunity for social mobility, yet also places of hard lives and immobility. In short, both are critical nodes in patterns of South-South mobility where dynamics of such mobility and reaction to it can be understood.</abstract><doi>10.3167/arms.2020.030109</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2574-1306
ispartof Migration and society : advances in research, 2020-06, Vol.3 (1), p.98-112
issn 2574-1306
2574-1314
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3167_arms_2020_030109
source Berghahn Journals
title Places of Otherness
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T09%3A49%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Places%20of%20Otherness&rft.jtitle=Migration%20and%20society%20:%20advances%20in%20research&rft.au=Carrier,%20Neil&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=112&rft.pages=98-112&rft.issn=2574-1306&rft.eissn=2574-1314&rft_id=info:doi/10.3167/arms.2020.030109&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_3167_arms_2020_030109%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1309-a1ac5733588cd1e492a4cf976a37cc55cd7321b513f04d437348d9d2f566d1963%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true