Comparison of treatment records and inventory of empty drug containers to quantify antimicrobial usage in dairy herds

• Published in: Journal of dairy science 2017-12, Vol.100 (12), p.9736-9745
• Main Authors: Nobrega, Diego B., De Buck, Jeroen, Naqvi, S. Ali, Liu, Gang, Naushad, Sohail, Saini, Vineet, Barkema, Herman W.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Anti-Infective Agents - therapeutic use; antimicrobial daily dose; antimicrobial resistance; antimicrobial use; Canada; Cattle; Dairying - methods; Drug Packaging - statistics & numerical data; Female; inventory of empty drug containers; Medical Records - statistics & numerical data; treatment record
• ISSN: 0022-0302; 1525-3198
• DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13116

Assessment of antimicrobial use (AMU) is vital for interpreting the origin of changes in antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The objectives of the present study were to estimate the association between AMU determined using on-farm treatment records (TR) and inventory of empty drug containers (INV). Herds were selected to represent Canadian dairy farms. Producers were asked to record animal health events and treatments on a standard General Health Event form. For inventory data, 40-L receptacles were placed at various locations considered convenient to deposit all empty drug containers. Antimicrobial defined-daily dosages (ADD) were calculated for 51 Canadian herds using the 2 methods. Estimation of AMU was 31,840 ADD using the INV and 14,487 ADD using the TR, indicating that for every TR entry, 2.20 times more treatments were observed using the INV. Mastitis, reproductive conditions, and dry cow therapy were the most frequent reasons for antimicrobial therapy when assessing TR. For all antimicrobials evaluated, mean ADD was higher using the INV versus TR. Regardless, a strong positive correlation (0.80) was observed between the 2 methods, indicating that herds with increased number of ADD recorded using the INV also had increased number of ADD recorded using TR. Furthermore, a positive association was observed for the 6 most commonly used antimicrobials. In comparison to methods used in surveillance programs on AMU in livestock that assume a constant use in all herds (i.e., sales data), INV provided a herd-level specific quantity of AMU positively correlated with AMU recorded at the animal level in general. The INV was easy to implement and provided a measure of total AMU in the herd. Availability of such information would be valuable for interpreting changes in AMR at the herd level and enabling evaluation of interventions for decreasing AMR.