Assessment of long-distance detection of gillnets by porpoises: Reply to Dawson & Lusseau (2013)

Nielsen et al. (2012; Mar Ecol Prog Ser 453:241−248) analyzed surface observations of harbour porpoises in a small coastal area where a modified gillnet was introduced at randomized time intervals. The study concluded that porpoises reacted to the gillnet at surprisingly large distances (in some cas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) 2013-03, Vol.478, p.303-305
Main Authors: Nielsen, Torben P., Wahlberg, Magnus, Dabelsteen, Torben
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
REPLY COMMENT
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Nielsen et al. (2012; Mar Ecol Prog Ser 453:241−248) analyzed surface observations of harbour porpoises in a small coastal area where a modified gillnet was introduced at randomized time intervals. The study concluded that porpoises reacted to the gillnet at surprisingly large distances (in some cases >80 m). Dawson & Lusseau (2013; Mar Ecol Prog Ser 478:301−302) argue that the conclusions of Nielsen et al. (2012) are undermined by pseudo-replication (a matter of concern in many field studies of marine mammals). We acknowledge these concerns, but we think that the conclusions of Nielsen et al. (2012) remain valid, as the data are best explained by harbour porpoises being able to detect and avoid gillnets at very long ranges.
ISSN:0171-8630
1616-1599
DOI:10.3354/meps10338