Loading…

Simple Approaches to Improve Restoration of Coastal Sage Scrub Habitat in Southern California

Much of the coastal sage scrub habitat in Southern California that existed prior to European settlement has been developed for human uses. Over the past two to three decades, public agencies and land conservation organizations have worked to acquire some of the remaining lands for preservation. Many...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Natural areas journal 2016-01, Vol.36 (1), p.20-28
Main Authors: Bell, Carl E, Allen, Edith B, Weathers, Kristin A, McGiffen, Milton
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b354t-28c718dab80399203d4ac27d9eef1c4ce1fdec4850cccc89cf3797014082dcca3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b354t-28c718dab80399203d4ac27d9eef1c4ce1fdec4850cccc89cf3797014082dcca3
container_end_page 28
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20
container_title Natural areas journal
container_volume 36
creator Bell, Carl E
Allen, Edith B
Weathers, Kristin A
McGiffen, Milton
description Much of the coastal sage scrub habitat in Southern California that existed prior to European settlement has been developed for human uses. Over the past two to three decades, public agencies and land conservation organizations have worked to acquire some of the remaining lands for preservation. Many of these lands are degraded by past intensive livestock grazing, farming, and frequent fires, and the native flora has been replaced by weedy, exotic annual grasses and forbs, mostly of Mediterranean origin. Restoration of native flora is challenging and there are few successful examples to provide guidance on effective methods. Cost is also an important and prohibitive factor. Competition from weeds is one of the most difficult impediments to establishing native vegetation, which often persists in the seedbank. We compared annual applications of the nonselective herbicide glyphosate over multiple years, followed by a final year with the grass-specific fluazifop, as a simple, low cost method of reducing the exotic seedbank sufficiently to allow native vegetation to establish. This approach was combined with seeding native forbs, herbaceous perennials, and shrubs in one half of each treatment plot. Herbicide treatments were made in the spring each year from 2006 to 2010, and were combined with weed trimming in 2010 and 2011 to remove exotic forb inflorescences, and raking to remove litter. In 2010, native plant cover in herbicide-treated plots was about 50%, consisting of 43 species, compared to
doi_str_mv 10.3375/043.036.0107
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3375_043_036_0107</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44028309</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44028309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b354t-28c718dab80399203d4ac27d9eef1c4ce1fdec4850cccc89cf3797014082dcca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LwzAUwIMoOKc3r2LOYufLR9v0OIa6wUCw7ighTdMto2tK0gn-92ZUPPouj8f78T5-CN0SmDGWp0_A2QxYNgMC-RmaUJLRhLOiOEcTECJNRAbiEl2FsAfIANJ0gj5Le-hbg-d9753SOxPw4PDqEKsvg99NGJxXg3Uddg1eOBUG1eJSbQ0utT9WeKkqO6gB2w6X7jjsjO_wQrW2cb6z6hpdNKoN5uY3T9Hm5fljsUzWb6-rxXydVCzlQ0KFzomoVSUgXkuB1VxpmteFMQ3RXBvS1EZzkYKOIQrdsLzIgXAQtNZasSl6HOdq70LwppG9twflvyUBeVIjoxoZ1ciTmojfjfj-9N4fyzlQwaCI_fux3ygn1dbbIDclBRKdEZGxFCLxMBKVda4z_6_7AUvRdt8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Simple Approaches to Improve Restoration of Coastal Sage Scrub Habitat in Southern California</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><creator>Bell, Carl E ; Allen, Edith B ; Weathers, Kristin A ; McGiffen, Milton</creator><creatorcontrib>Bell, Carl E ; Allen, Edith B ; Weathers, Kristin A ; McGiffen, Milton</creatorcontrib><description>Much of the coastal sage scrub habitat in Southern California that existed prior to European settlement has been developed for human uses. Over the past two to three decades, public agencies and land conservation organizations have worked to acquire some of the remaining lands for preservation. Many of these lands are degraded by past intensive livestock grazing, farming, and frequent fires, and the native flora has been replaced by weedy, exotic annual grasses and forbs, mostly of Mediterranean origin. Restoration of native flora is challenging and there are few successful examples to provide guidance on effective methods. Cost is also an important and prohibitive factor. Competition from weeds is one of the most difficult impediments to establishing native vegetation, which often persists in the seedbank. We compared annual applications of the nonselective herbicide glyphosate over multiple years, followed by a final year with the grass-specific fluazifop, as a simple, low cost method of reducing the exotic seedbank sufficiently to allow native vegetation to establish. This approach was combined with seeding native forbs, herbaceous perennials, and shrubs in one half of each treatment plot. Herbicide treatments were made in the spring each year from 2006 to 2010, and were combined with weed trimming in 2010 and 2011 to remove exotic forb inflorescences, and raking to remove litter. In 2010, native plant cover in herbicide-treated plots was about 50%, consisting of 43 species, compared to &lt;5% cover in the control plots. Most of the native plants came from the existing seedbank, and very few from the seed mix. A cost analysis showed that a once-yearly herbicide treatment was as effective as one application plus spot spraying or hand inflorescence trimming, and is more cost-effective than hand weed control and raking for restoration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8608</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-4399</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3375/043.036.0107</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Natural Areas Association</publisher><subject>coastal sage scrub ; cost analysis ; cost effectiveness ; deblossoming ; farming systems ; fires ; flora ; fluazifop ; forbs ; glyphosate ; government agencies ; grasses ; grazing ; habitats ; herbicide ; humans ; indigenous species ; inflorescences ; land management ; livestock ; perennials ; shrublands ; shrubs ; sowing ; spraying ; spring ; weed control ; weeds</subject><ispartof>Natural areas journal, 2016-01, Vol.36 (1), p.20-28</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b354t-28c718dab80399203d4ac27d9eef1c4ce1fdec4850cccc89cf3797014082dcca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b354t-28c718dab80399203d4ac27d9eef1c4ce1fdec4850cccc89cf3797014082dcca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44028309$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44028309$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bell, Carl E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Edith B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weathers, Kristin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGiffen, Milton</creatorcontrib><title>Simple Approaches to Improve Restoration of Coastal Sage Scrub Habitat in Southern California</title><title>Natural areas journal</title><description>Much of the coastal sage scrub habitat in Southern California that existed prior to European settlement has been developed for human uses. Over the past two to three decades, public agencies and land conservation organizations have worked to acquire some of the remaining lands for preservation. Many of these lands are degraded by past intensive livestock grazing, farming, and frequent fires, and the native flora has been replaced by weedy, exotic annual grasses and forbs, mostly of Mediterranean origin. Restoration of native flora is challenging and there are few successful examples to provide guidance on effective methods. Cost is also an important and prohibitive factor. Competition from weeds is one of the most difficult impediments to establishing native vegetation, which often persists in the seedbank. We compared annual applications of the nonselective herbicide glyphosate over multiple years, followed by a final year with the grass-specific fluazifop, as a simple, low cost method of reducing the exotic seedbank sufficiently to allow native vegetation to establish. This approach was combined with seeding native forbs, herbaceous perennials, and shrubs in one half of each treatment plot. Herbicide treatments were made in the spring each year from 2006 to 2010, and were combined with weed trimming in 2010 and 2011 to remove exotic forb inflorescences, and raking to remove litter. In 2010, native plant cover in herbicide-treated plots was about 50%, consisting of 43 species, compared to &lt;5% cover in the control plots. Most of the native plants came from the existing seedbank, and very few from the seed mix. A cost analysis showed that a once-yearly herbicide treatment was as effective as one application plus spot spraying or hand inflorescence trimming, and is more cost-effective than hand weed control and raking for restoration.</description><subject>coastal sage scrub</subject><subject>cost analysis</subject><subject>cost effectiveness</subject><subject>deblossoming</subject><subject>farming systems</subject><subject>fires</subject><subject>flora</subject><subject>fluazifop</subject><subject>forbs</subject><subject>glyphosate</subject><subject>government agencies</subject><subject>grasses</subject><subject>grazing</subject><subject>habitats</subject><subject>herbicide</subject><subject>humans</subject><subject>indigenous species</subject><subject>inflorescences</subject><subject>land management</subject><subject>livestock</subject><subject>perennials</subject><subject>shrublands</subject><subject>shrubs</subject><subject>sowing</subject><subject>spraying</subject><subject>spring</subject><subject>weed control</subject><subject>weeds</subject><issn>0885-8608</issn><issn>2162-4399</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LwzAUwIMoOKc3r2LOYufLR9v0OIa6wUCw7ighTdMto2tK0gn-92ZUPPouj8f78T5-CN0SmDGWp0_A2QxYNgMC-RmaUJLRhLOiOEcTECJNRAbiEl2FsAfIANJ0gj5Le-hbg-d9753SOxPw4PDqEKsvg99NGJxXg3Uddg1eOBUG1eJSbQ0utT9WeKkqO6gB2w6X7jjsjO_wQrW2cb6z6hpdNKoN5uY3T9Hm5fljsUzWb6-rxXydVCzlQ0KFzomoVSUgXkuB1VxpmteFMQ3RXBvS1EZzkYKOIQrdsLzIgXAQtNZasSl6HOdq70LwppG9twflvyUBeVIjoxoZ1ciTmojfjfj-9N4fyzlQwaCI_fux3ygn1dbbIDclBRKdEZGxFCLxMBKVda4z_6_7AUvRdt8</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Bell, Carl E</creator><creator>Allen, Edith B</creator><creator>Weathers, Kristin A</creator><creator>McGiffen, Milton</creator><general>Natural Areas Association</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Simple Approaches to Improve Restoration of Coastal Sage Scrub Habitat in Southern California</title><author>Bell, Carl E ; Allen, Edith B ; Weathers, Kristin A ; McGiffen, Milton</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b354t-28c718dab80399203d4ac27d9eef1c4ce1fdec4850cccc89cf3797014082dcca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>coastal sage scrub</topic><topic>cost analysis</topic><topic>cost effectiveness</topic><topic>deblossoming</topic><topic>farming systems</topic><topic>fires</topic><topic>flora</topic><topic>fluazifop</topic><topic>forbs</topic><topic>glyphosate</topic><topic>government agencies</topic><topic>grasses</topic><topic>grazing</topic><topic>habitats</topic><topic>herbicide</topic><topic>humans</topic><topic>indigenous species</topic><topic>inflorescences</topic><topic>land management</topic><topic>livestock</topic><topic>perennials</topic><topic>shrublands</topic><topic>shrubs</topic><topic>sowing</topic><topic>spraying</topic><topic>spring</topic><topic>weed control</topic><topic>weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bell, Carl E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Edith B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weathers, Kristin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGiffen, Milton</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Natural areas journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bell, Carl E</au><au>Allen, Edith B</au><au>Weathers, Kristin A</au><au>McGiffen, Milton</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Simple Approaches to Improve Restoration of Coastal Sage Scrub Habitat in Southern California</atitle><jtitle>Natural areas journal</jtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>20-28</pages><issn>0885-8608</issn><eissn>2162-4399</eissn><abstract>Much of the coastal sage scrub habitat in Southern California that existed prior to European settlement has been developed for human uses. Over the past two to three decades, public agencies and land conservation organizations have worked to acquire some of the remaining lands for preservation. Many of these lands are degraded by past intensive livestock grazing, farming, and frequent fires, and the native flora has been replaced by weedy, exotic annual grasses and forbs, mostly of Mediterranean origin. Restoration of native flora is challenging and there are few successful examples to provide guidance on effective methods. Cost is also an important and prohibitive factor. Competition from weeds is one of the most difficult impediments to establishing native vegetation, which often persists in the seedbank. We compared annual applications of the nonselective herbicide glyphosate over multiple years, followed by a final year with the grass-specific fluazifop, as a simple, low cost method of reducing the exotic seedbank sufficiently to allow native vegetation to establish. This approach was combined with seeding native forbs, herbaceous perennials, and shrubs in one half of each treatment plot. Herbicide treatments were made in the spring each year from 2006 to 2010, and were combined with weed trimming in 2010 and 2011 to remove exotic forb inflorescences, and raking to remove litter. In 2010, native plant cover in herbicide-treated plots was about 50%, consisting of 43 species, compared to &lt;5% cover in the control plots. Most of the native plants came from the existing seedbank, and very few from the seed mix. A cost analysis showed that a once-yearly herbicide treatment was as effective as one application plus spot spraying or hand inflorescence trimming, and is more cost-effective than hand weed control and raking for restoration.</abstract><pub>Natural Areas Association</pub><doi>10.3375/043.036.0107</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-8608
ispartof Natural areas journal, 2016-01, Vol.36 (1), p.20-28
issn 0885-8608
2162-4399
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3375_043_036_0107
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】
subjects coastal sage scrub
cost analysis
cost effectiveness
deblossoming
farming systems
fires
flora
fluazifop
forbs
glyphosate
government agencies
grasses
grazing
habitats
herbicide
humans
indigenous species
inflorescences
land management
livestock
perennials
shrublands
shrubs
sowing
spraying
spring
weed control
weeds
title Simple Approaches to Improve Restoration of Coastal Sage Scrub Habitat in Southern California
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T07%3A04%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simple%20Approaches%20to%20Improve%20Restoration%20of%20Coastal%20Sage%20Scrub%20Habitat%20in%20Southern%20California&rft.jtitle=Natural%20areas%20journal&rft.au=Bell,%20Carl%20E&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=20-28&rft.issn=0885-8608&rft.eissn=2162-4399&rft_id=info:doi/10.3375/043.036.0107&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E44028309%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b354t-28c718dab80399203d4ac27d9eef1c4ce1fdec4850cccc89cf3797014082dcca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44028309&rfr_iscdi=true