Loading…
Use of Drones for Trough Reading, Animal Counting, and Production Monitoring in Feedlot Systems
In line with the concept of precision agriculture, this study aimed to validate the use of digital aerial images captured using a remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) for collecting zootechnical data on cattle feedlot systems in a tropical environment. Images were captured on 21 non-consecutive days in 1...
Saved in:
Published in: | AgriEngineering 2024-12, Vol.6 (4), p.4460-4475 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-891abbce448762cd2cd69dd5b3d6d72a5559b40f36e906927878c0a50374934d3 |
container_end_page | 4475 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 4460 |
container_title | AgriEngineering |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Bastos, Kécia M. Barcelos, Jardel P. Orioli, Guilherme F. Nascimento, Sheila T. |
description | In line with the concept of precision agriculture, this study aimed to validate the use of digital aerial images captured using a remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) for collecting zootechnical data on cattle feedlot systems in a tropical environment. Images were captured on 21 non-consecutive days in 110 pens with up to 150 animals each. Conventional and RPA-based methods were adopted to determine animal behavior, feed trough levels, animal counts, and pen conditions. Data analysis revealed almost perfect agreement (kappa coefficient = 0.901) between trough readings taken by conventional and RPA methods as well as substantial agreement for fecal score (kappa coefficient = 0.785) and surface conditions (kappa coefficient = 0.737). However, animal counts and water quality scores showed only fair agreement, suggesting challenges in using RPA for these specific tasks. The results indicated that RPA represents a viable alternative to conventional methods for monitoring zootechnical indices in feedlots, offering benefits in terms of accuracy, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. The implementation of RPA-based methods holds potential for improving animal management, welfare, and yield in feedlot systems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/agriengineering6040253 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3390_agriengineering6040253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0b2b8d7dcac9475da113191f520ca8a9</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3149494342</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-891abbce448762cd2cd69dd5b3d6d72a5559b40f36e906927878c0a50374934d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUU1LAzEQXUTBUvsXJODV1Wy-dnMs1Wqhomh7Dtkku6Zsk5rsHvrvTVsRDzIDM_N4vPdgsuy6gHcYc3gv22CNa60zJljXMkggovgsGyGGSF6m6_zPfplNYtxAmDiQUM5HmVhHA3wDHoJ3JoLGB7AKfmg_wbuROinegqmzW9mBmR9cfwSk0-AteD2o3noHXryzvT-4A-vA3Bjd-R587GNvtvEqu2hkF83kZ46z9fxxNXvOl69Pi9l0mSvEaJ9XvJB1rQwhVcmQ0qkZ15rWWDNdIkkp5TWBDWaGQ8ZRWZWVgpJCXBKOicbjbHHS1V5uxC6kyGEvvLTiCPjQChl6qzojYI3qSpdaScVJSbUsClzwoqEIKllJnrRuTlq74L8GE3ux8UNwKb7ABeGpMEGJxU4sFXyMwTS_rgUUh9-I_3-DvwHaE4W_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3149494342</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Drones for Trough Reading, Animal Counting, and Production Monitoring in Feedlot Systems</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Bastos, Kécia M. ; Barcelos, Jardel P. ; Orioli, Guilherme F. ; Nascimento, Sheila T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bastos, Kécia M. ; Barcelos, Jardel P. ; Orioli, Guilherme F. ; Nascimento, Sheila T.</creatorcontrib><description>In line with the concept of precision agriculture, this study aimed to validate the use of digital aerial images captured using a remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) for collecting zootechnical data on cattle feedlot systems in a tropical environment. Images were captured on 21 non-consecutive days in 110 pens with up to 150 animals each. Conventional and RPA-based methods were adopted to determine animal behavior, feed trough levels, animal counts, and pen conditions. Data analysis revealed almost perfect agreement (kappa coefficient = 0.901) between trough readings taken by conventional and RPA methods as well as substantial agreement for fecal score (kappa coefficient = 0.785) and surface conditions (kappa coefficient = 0.737). However, animal counts and water quality scores showed only fair agreement, suggesting challenges in using RPA for these specific tasks. The results indicated that RPA represents a viable alternative to conventional methods for monitoring zootechnical indices in feedlots, offering benefits in terms of accuracy, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. The implementation of RPA-based methods holds potential for improving animal management, welfare, and yield in feedlot systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2624-7402</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2624-7402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/agriengineering6040253</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>aerial imaging ; Agricultural aircraft ; Aircraft ; Animal behavior ; Animal welfare ; beef cattle ; Cattle ; Climate ; Cost effectiveness ; Data analysis ; Digital imaging ; Drone aircraft ; Drones ; Factory farming ; Farms ; feedlot ; Feedlots ; Feeds ; Livestock ; Monitoring methods ; Precision farming ; Remote monitoring ; Remotely piloted aircraft ; RPA ; Tropical environment ; Tropical environments ; Water quality</subject><ispartof>AgriEngineering, 2024-12, Vol.6 (4), p.4460-4475</ispartof><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-891abbce448762cd2cd69dd5b3d6d72a5559b40f36e906927878c0a50374934d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0020-6968 ; 0009-0004-8464-8492 ; 0000-0001-8396-753X ; 0009-0002-1375-3071</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3149494342/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3149494342?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25732,27903,27904,36991,44569,74872</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bastos, Kécia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barcelos, Jardel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orioli, Guilherme F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nascimento, Sheila T.</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Drones for Trough Reading, Animal Counting, and Production Monitoring in Feedlot Systems</title><title>AgriEngineering</title><description>In line with the concept of precision agriculture, this study aimed to validate the use of digital aerial images captured using a remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) for collecting zootechnical data on cattle feedlot systems in a tropical environment. Images were captured on 21 non-consecutive days in 110 pens with up to 150 animals each. Conventional and RPA-based methods were adopted to determine animal behavior, feed trough levels, animal counts, and pen conditions. Data analysis revealed almost perfect agreement (kappa coefficient = 0.901) between trough readings taken by conventional and RPA methods as well as substantial agreement for fecal score (kappa coefficient = 0.785) and surface conditions (kappa coefficient = 0.737). However, animal counts and water quality scores showed only fair agreement, suggesting challenges in using RPA for these specific tasks. The results indicated that RPA represents a viable alternative to conventional methods for monitoring zootechnical indices in feedlots, offering benefits in terms of accuracy, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. The implementation of RPA-based methods holds potential for improving animal management, welfare, and yield in feedlot systems.</description><subject>aerial imaging</subject><subject>Agricultural aircraft</subject><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal welfare</subject><subject>beef cattle</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Cost effectiveness</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Digital imaging</subject><subject>Drone aircraft</subject><subject>Drones</subject><subject>Factory farming</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>feedlot</subject><subject>Feedlots</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Monitoring methods</subject><subject>Precision farming</subject><subject>Remote monitoring</subject><subject>Remotely piloted aircraft</subject><subject>RPA</subject><subject>Tropical environment</subject><subject>Tropical environments</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><issn>2624-7402</issn><issn>2624-7402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUU1LAzEQXUTBUvsXJODV1Wy-dnMs1Wqhomh7Dtkku6Zsk5rsHvrvTVsRDzIDM_N4vPdgsuy6gHcYc3gv22CNa60zJljXMkggovgsGyGGSF6m6_zPfplNYtxAmDiQUM5HmVhHA3wDHoJ3JoLGB7AKfmg_wbuROinegqmzW9mBmR9cfwSk0-AteD2o3noHXryzvT-4A-vA3Bjd-R587GNvtvEqu2hkF83kZ46z9fxxNXvOl69Pi9l0mSvEaJ9XvJB1rQwhVcmQ0qkZ15rWWDNdIkkp5TWBDWaGQ8ZRWZWVgpJCXBKOicbjbHHS1V5uxC6kyGEvvLTiCPjQChl6qzojYI3qSpdaScVJSbUsClzwoqEIKllJnrRuTlq74L8GE3ux8UNwKb7ABeGpMEGJxU4sFXyMwTS_rgUUh9-I_3-DvwHaE4W_</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Bastos, Kécia M.</creator><creator>Barcelos, Jardel P.</creator><creator>Orioli, Guilherme F.</creator><creator>Nascimento, Sheila T.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0020-6968</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8464-8492</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8396-753X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1375-3071</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Use of Drones for Trough Reading, Animal Counting, and Production Monitoring in Feedlot Systems</title><author>Bastos, Kécia M. ; Barcelos, Jardel P. ; Orioli, Guilherme F. ; Nascimento, Sheila T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-891abbce448762cd2cd69dd5b3d6d72a5559b40f36e906927878c0a50374934d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>aerial imaging</topic><topic>Agricultural aircraft</topic><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal welfare</topic><topic>beef cattle</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Cost effectiveness</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Digital imaging</topic><topic>Drone aircraft</topic><topic>Drones</topic><topic>Factory farming</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>feedlot</topic><topic>Feedlots</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Monitoring methods</topic><topic>Precision farming</topic><topic>Remote monitoring</topic><topic>Remotely piloted aircraft</topic><topic>RPA</topic><topic>Tropical environment</topic><topic>Tropical environments</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bastos, Kécia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barcelos, Jardel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orioli, Guilherme F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nascimento, Sheila T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>AgriEngineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bastos, Kécia M.</au><au>Barcelos, Jardel P.</au><au>Orioli, Guilherme F.</au><au>Nascimento, Sheila T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of Drones for Trough Reading, Animal Counting, and Production Monitoring in Feedlot Systems</atitle><jtitle>AgriEngineering</jtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>4460</spage><epage>4475</epage><pages>4460-4475</pages><issn>2624-7402</issn><eissn>2624-7402</eissn><abstract>In line with the concept of precision agriculture, this study aimed to validate the use of digital aerial images captured using a remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) for collecting zootechnical data on cattle feedlot systems in a tropical environment. Images were captured on 21 non-consecutive days in 110 pens with up to 150 animals each. Conventional and RPA-based methods were adopted to determine animal behavior, feed trough levels, animal counts, and pen conditions. Data analysis revealed almost perfect agreement (kappa coefficient = 0.901) between trough readings taken by conventional and RPA methods as well as substantial agreement for fecal score (kappa coefficient = 0.785) and surface conditions (kappa coefficient = 0.737). However, animal counts and water quality scores showed only fair agreement, suggesting challenges in using RPA for these specific tasks. The results indicated that RPA represents a viable alternative to conventional methods for monitoring zootechnical indices in feedlots, offering benefits in terms of accuracy, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. The implementation of RPA-based methods holds potential for improving animal management, welfare, and yield in feedlot systems.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/agriengineering6040253</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0020-6968</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8464-8492</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8396-753X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1375-3071</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2624-7402 |
ispartof | AgriEngineering, 2024-12, Vol.6 (4), p.4460-4475 |
issn | 2624-7402 2624-7402 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_3390_agriengineering6040253 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | aerial imaging Agricultural aircraft Aircraft Animal behavior Animal welfare beef cattle Cattle Climate Cost effectiveness Data analysis Digital imaging Drone aircraft Drones Factory farming Farms feedlot Feedlots Feeds Livestock Monitoring methods Precision farming Remote monitoring Remotely piloted aircraft RPA Tropical environment Tropical environments Water quality |
title | Use of Drones for Trough Reading, Animal Counting, and Production Monitoring in Feedlot Systems |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T02%3A57%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Drones%20for%20Trough%20Reading,%20Animal%20Counting,%20and%20Production%20Monitoring%20in%20Feedlot%20Systems&rft.jtitle=AgriEngineering&rft.au=Bastos,%20K%C3%A9cia%20M.&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=4460&rft.epage=4475&rft.pages=4460-4475&rft.issn=2624-7402&rft.eissn=2624-7402&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/agriengineering6040253&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3149494342%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-891abbce448762cd2cd69dd5b3d6d72a5559b40f36e906927878c0a50374934d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3149494342&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |