Loading…

Quantitative comparison between simulated cloudiness and clouds objectively derived from satellite data

The cloud cover and cloud water content obtained from integration of a limited area mesoscale prediction model are compared with the corresponding quantities derived from AVHRR and SSM/I satellite data. The model has an elaborate condensation-cloud parameterization scheme, in which cloud water is a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Tellus. Series A, Dynamic meteorology and oceanography Dynamic meteorology and oceanography, 1991-01, Vol.43 (5), p.306-320
Main Authors: Raustein, Elmer, Sundqvist, Hilding, Katsaros, Kristina B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1944-80157ea8491d418edf36982e2da6daae2de4d31c9e0ef0c2e685dd40eca234fb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1944-80157ea8491d418edf36982e2da6daae2de4d31c9e0ef0c2e685dd40eca234fb3
container_end_page 320
container_issue 5
container_start_page 306
container_title Tellus. Series A, Dynamic meteorology and oceanography
container_volume 43
creator Raustein, Elmer
Sundqvist, Hilding
Katsaros, Kristina B.
description The cloud cover and cloud water content obtained from integration of a limited area mesoscale prediction model are compared with the corresponding quantities derived from AVHRR and SSM/I satellite data. The model has an elaborate condensation-cloud parameterization scheme, in which cloud water is a prognostic variable. From AVHRR data, both cloud cover and liquid water content are retrieved by utilization of radiances from the visible, near infrared and infrared channels. From the 37GHz polarization difference in the microwave data obtained from SSM/I measurements, liquid water content is interpreted; this is only possible over the sea. An important feature of this comparison exercise is that the retrieved data are distributed on the same grid as the model. The difference between the simulation and the analysed cloud fields can thus easily be quantified and exhibited on the model domain. It is demonstrated that this type of retrieved meteorological parameters constitutes potentially useful data samples for quantitative verification of model simulations. There are some weaknesses in the retrieval methods that have to be removed before we can have sufficient confidence in the data to make quantitative verification meaningful. Furthermore, calibration against cloud parameters obtained through other measurements is necessary, although the three data sets show a remarkably good agreement in pattern and range of magnitude in the liquid water content. Even if improvements are needed, the present study has made it possible to make inferences about some deficiencies in the parameterization scheme of the model.
doi_str_mv 10.3402/tellusa.v43i5.11954
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3402_tellusa_v43i5_11954</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_3402_tellusa_v43i5_11954</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1944-80157ea8491d418edf36982e2da6daae2de4d31c9e0ef0c2e685dd40eca234fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKtP4CYvMGMyyUxnNoIU_6Aggq7DbXIjKZlJSTItfXv7t3Dl6py7-A6Xj5B7zkohWfWQ0fsxQbmRwtUl510tL8iEN4wVrJ2xyz_9mtyktGKM8a4RE_LzOcKQXYbsNkh16NcQXQoDXWLeIg40uX70kNFQ7cNo3IApURjOZ6JhuUJ9gP2OGoz7YqiNoacJDl-5jNRAhltyZcEnvDvnlHy_PH_N34rFx-v7_GlRaN5JWbSM1zOEVnbcSN6isaLp2gorA40B2CdKI7jukKFlusKmrY2RDDVUQtqlmBJx2tUxpBTRqnV0PcSd4kwdXKmzK3V0pY6u9tTjiXKDDbGHbYjeqAw7H6KNMGiXlPhv4BcKCHmK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative comparison between simulated cloudiness and clouds objectively derived from satellite data</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><creator>Raustein, Elmer ; Sundqvist, Hilding ; Katsaros, Kristina B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Raustein, Elmer ; Sundqvist, Hilding ; Katsaros, Kristina B.</creatorcontrib><description>The cloud cover and cloud water content obtained from integration of a limited area mesoscale prediction model are compared with the corresponding quantities derived from AVHRR and SSM/I satellite data. The model has an elaborate condensation-cloud parameterization scheme, in which cloud water is a prognostic variable. From AVHRR data, both cloud cover and liquid water content are retrieved by utilization of radiances from the visible, near infrared and infrared channels. From the 37GHz polarization difference in the microwave data obtained from SSM/I measurements, liquid water content is interpreted; this is only possible over the sea. An important feature of this comparison exercise is that the retrieved data are distributed on the same grid as the model. The difference between the simulation and the analysed cloud fields can thus easily be quantified and exhibited on the model domain. It is demonstrated that this type of retrieved meteorological parameters constitutes potentially useful data samples for quantitative verification of model simulations. There are some weaknesses in the retrieval methods that have to be removed before we can have sufficient confidence in the data to make quantitative verification meaningful. Furthermore, calibration against cloud parameters obtained through other measurements is necessary, although the three data sets show a remarkably good agreement in pattern and range of magnitude in the liquid water content. Even if improvements are needed, the present study has made it possible to make inferences about some deficiencies in the parameterization scheme of the model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1600-0870</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0870</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3402/tellusa.v43i5.11954</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><ispartof>Tellus. Series A, Dynamic meteorology and oceanography, 1991-01, Vol.43 (5), p.306-320</ispartof><rights>1991 The Author(s). Published by Taylor &amp; Francis. 1991</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1944-80157ea8491d418edf36982e2da6daae2de4d31c9e0ef0c2e685dd40eca234fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1944-80157ea8491d418edf36982e2da6daae2de4d31c9e0ef0c2e685dd40eca234fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3402/tellusa.v43i5.11954$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3402/tellusa.v43i5.11954$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27501,27923,27924,59142,59143</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raustein, Elmer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundqvist, Hilding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsaros, Kristina B.</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative comparison between simulated cloudiness and clouds objectively derived from satellite data</title><title>Tellus. Series A, Dynamic meteorology and oceanography</title><description>The cloud cover and cloud water content obtained from integration of a limited area mesoscale prediction model are compared with the corresponding quantities derived from AVHRR and SSM/I satellite data. The model has an elaborate condensation-cloud parameterization scheme, in which cloud water is a prognostic variable. From AVHRR data, both cloud cover and liquid water content are retrieved by utilization of radiances from the visible, near infrared and infrared channels. From the 37GHz polarization difference in the microwave data obtained from SSM/I measurements, liquid water content is interpreted; this is only possible over the sea. An important feature of this comparison exercise is that the retrieved data are distributed on the same grid as the model. The difference between the simulation and the analysed cloud fields can thus easily be quantified and exhibited on the model domain. It is demonstrated that this type of retrieved meteorological parameters constitutes potentially useful data samples for quantitative verification of model simulations. There are some weaknesses in the retrieval methods that have to be removed before we can have sufficient confidence in the data to make quantitative verification meaningful. Furthermore, calibration against cloud parameters obtained through other measurements is necessary, although the three data sets show a remarkably good agreement in pattern and range of magnitude in the liquid water content. Even if improvements are needed, the present study has made it possible to make inferences about some deficiencies in the parameterization scheme of the model.</description><issn>1600-0870</issn><issn>1600-0870</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWKtP4CYvMGMyyUxnNoIU_6Aggq7DbXIjKZlJSTItfXv7t3Dl6py7-A6Xj5B7zkohWfWQ0fsxQbmRwtUl510tL8iEN4wVrJ2xyz_9mtyktGKM8a4RE_LzOcKQXYbsNkh16NcQXQoDXWLeIg40uX70kNFQ7cNo3IApURjOZ6JhuUJ9gP2OGoz7YqiNoacJDl-5jNRAhltyZcEnvDvnlHy_PH_N34rFx-v7_GlRaN5JWbSM1zOEVnbcSN6isaLp2gorA40B2CdKI7jukKFlusKmrY2RDDVUQtqlmBJx2tUxpBTRqnV0PcSd4kwdXKmzK3V0pY6u9tTjiXKDDbGHbYjeqAw7H6KNMGiXlPhv4BcKCHmK</recordid><startdate>19910101</startdate><enddate>19910101</enddate><creator>Raustein, Elmer</creator><creator>Sundqvist, Hilding</creator><creator>Katsaros, Kristina B.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910101</creationdate><title>Quantitative comparison between simulated cloudiness and clouds objectively derived from satellite data</title><author>Raustein, Elmer ; Sundqvist, Hilding ; Katsaros, Kristina B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1944-80157ea8491d418edf36982e2da6daae2de4d31c9e0ef0c2e685dd40eca234fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raustein, Elmer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundqvist, Hilding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsaros, Kristina B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Tellus. Series A, Dynamic meteorology and oceanography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raustein, Elmer</au><au>Sundqvist, Hilding</au><au>Katsaros, Kristina B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative comparison between simulated cloudiness and clouds objectively derived from satellite data</atitle><jtitle>Tellus. Series A, Dynamic meteorology and oceanography</jtitle><date>1991-01-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>306</spage><epage>320</epage><pages>306-320</pages><issn>1600-0870</issn><eissn>1600-0870</eissn><abstract>The cloud cover and cloud water content obtained from integration of a limited area mesoscale prediction model are compared with the corresponding quantities derived from AVHRR and SSM/I satellite data. The model has an elaborate condensation-cloud parameterization scheme, in which cloud water is a prognostic variable. From AVHRR data, both cloud cover and liquid water content are retrieved by utilization of radiances from the visible, near infrared and infrared channels. From the 37GHz polarization difference in the microwave data obtained from SSM/I measurements, liquid water content is interpreted; this is only possible over the sea. An important feature of this comparison exercise is that the retrieved data are distributed on the same grid as the model. The difference between the simulation and the analysed cloud fields can thus easily be quantified and exhibited on the model domain. It is demonstrated that this type of retrieved meteorological parameters constitutes potentially useful data samples for quantitative verification of model simulations. There are some weaknesses in the retrieval methods that have to be removed before we can have sufficient confidence in the data to make quantitative verification meaningful. Furthermore, calibration against cloud parameters obtained through other measurements is necessary, although the three data sets show a remarkably good agreement in pattern and range of magnitude in the liquid water content. Even if improvements are needed, the present study has made it possible to make inferences about some deficiencies in the parameterization scheme of the model.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.3402/tellusa.v43i5.11954</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1600-0870
ispartof Tellus. Series A, Dynamic meteorology and oceanography, 1991-01, Vol.43 (5), p.306-320
issn 1600-0870
1600-0870
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3402_tellusa_v43i5_11954
source Taylor & Francis Open Access
title Quantitative comparison between simulated cloudiness and clouds objectively derived from satellite data
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A18%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20comparison%20between%20simulated%20cloudiness%20and%20clouds%20objectively%20derived%20from%20satellite%20data&rft.jtitle=Tellus.%20Series%20A,%20Dynamic%20meteorology%20and%20oceanography&rft.au=Raustein,%20Elmer&rft.date=1991-01-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=306&rft.epage=320&rft.pages=306-320&rft.issn=1600-0870&rft.eissn=1600-0870&rft_id=info:doi/10.3402/tellusa.v43i5.11954&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_infor%3E10_3402_tellusa_v43i5_11954%3C/crossref_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1944-80157ea8491d418edf36982e2da6daae2de4d31c9e0ef0c2e685dd40eca234fb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true