Loading…

Selected Abstracts Submitted to the Third International Symposium on Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer

Background: Germline mutation screening of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes is performed in suspected familial breast cancer cases, but a causative mutation is found in only 30% of patients. The development of additional methods to identify good candidates for BRCA1 and BRCA2 analysis would therefore increase...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Current oncology (Toronto) 2009-09, Vol.16 (5), p.91-110
Main Authors: Banneau, G., Guedj, M., Schiappa, R., Petel, F., Sévenet, N., De Mascarel, I., Mac Grogan, G., Longy, M., Bonnet, F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1189-47071c029239bf6e2f255f4d21a3669c8c0cf795c915ff5ed797647bcc8543d63
cites
container_end_page 110
container_issue 5
container_start_page 91
container_title Current oncology (Toronto)
container_volume 16
creator Banneau, G.
Guedj, M.
Schiappa, R.
Petel, F.
Sévenet, N.
De Mascarel, I.
Mac Grogan, G.
Longy, M.
Bonnet, F.
description Background: Germline mutation screening of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes is performed in suspected familial breast cancer cases, but a causative mutation is found in only 30% of patients. The development of additional methods to identify good candidates for BRCA1 and BRCA2 analysis would therefore increase the efficacy of diagnostic mutation screening. With this in mind, we developed a study to determine molecular signatures of BRCA1—or BRCA2—mutated breast cancers. Materials and Methods: Array-cgh (comparative genomic hybridization) and transcriptomic analysis were performed on a series of 103 familial breast cancers. The series included 7 breast cancers with a BRCA1 mutation and 5 breast cancers with a BRCA2 mutation. The remaining 91 cases were obtained from 73 families selected on the basis of at least 3 affected first-degree relatives or at least 2 affected first-degree relatives with breast cancer at an average age of 45 years. Array-cgh analyses were performed on a 4407 BAC-array (CIT-V8) manufactured by IntegraGen. Transcriptomic analyses were performed using an Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 chip. Results: Using supervised clustering analyses we identified two transcriptomic signatures: one for BRCA1-mutated breast cancers consisting of 600 probe sets and another for BRCA2-mutated breast cancers also consisting of 600 probes sets. We also defined cgh-array signatures, based on the presence of specific genomic rearrangements, one for BRCA1-mutated breast cancers and one for BRCA2-mutated breast cancers. Conclusions: This study identified molecular signatures of breast cancers with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations. Genes present in these signatures could be exploited to find new markers for such breast cancers. We also identified specific genomic rearrangements in these breast cancers, which could be screened for in a diagnostic setting using fluorescence in situ hybridization, thus improving patient selection for BRCA1 and BRCA2 molecular genetic analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.3747/co.v16i5.529
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3747_co_v16i5_529</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_3747_co_v16i5_529</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1189-47071c029239bf6e2f255f4d21a3669c8c0cf795c915ff5ed797647bcc8543d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1OAjEYRRujiYjufIA-gIP9mU6nSyQKJCQswPWk87UNNUxL2kLC2wvqwtW9uYuTm4PQMyUTLmv5CnFyoo0XE8HUDRpRSdtKSqZu__V79JDzFyGcSylHyG_s3kKxBk_7XJKGkvHm2A--XLcScdlZvN35ZPAyFJuCLj4Gvceb83CI2R8HHANe2GSNLzqd8VuyOhesg8Hrk05eBzzTAWx6RHdO77N9-ssx-vx4384W1Wo9X86mqwoobVVVSyIpEKYYV71rLHNMCFcbRjVvGgUtEHBSCVBUOCeskUo2tewBWlFz0_AxevnlQoo5J-u6Q_LD5VpHSXfV1EHsfjR1F038G1s4XM8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selected Abstracts Submitted to the Third International Symposium on Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Banneau, G. ; Guedj, M. ; Schiappa, R. ; Petel, F. ; Sévenet, N. ; De Mascarel, I. ; Mac Grogan, G. ; Longy, M. ; Bonnet, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Banneau, G. ; Guedj, M. ; Schiappa, R. ; Petel, F. ; Sévenet, N. ; De Mascarel, I. ; Mac Grogan, G. ; Longy, M. ; Bonnet, F.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Germline mutation screening of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes is performed in suspected familial breast cancer cases, but a causative mutation is found in only 30% of patients. The development of additional methods to identify good candidates for BRCA1 and BRCA2 analysis would therefore increase the efficacy of diagnostic mutation screening. With this in mind, we developed a study to determine molecular signatures of BRCA1—or BRCA2—mutated breast cancers. Materials and Methods: Array-cgh (comparative genomic hybridization) and transcriptomic analysis were performed on a series of 103 familial breast cancers. The series included 7 breast cancers with a BRCA1 mutation and 5 breast cancers with a BRCA2 mutation. The remaining 91 cases were obtained from 73 families selected on the basis of at least 3 affected first-degree relatives or at least 2 affected first-degree relatives with breast cancer at an average age of 45 years. Array-cgh analyses were performed on a 4407 BAC-array (CIT-V8) manufactured by IntegraGen. Transcriptomic analyses were performed using an Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 chip. Results: Using supervised clustering analyses we identified two transcriptomic signatures: one for BRCA1-mutated breast cancers consisting of 600 probe sets and another for BRCA2-mutated breast cancers also consisting of 600 probes sets. We also defined cgh-array signatures, based on the presence of specific genomic rearrangements, one for BRCA1-mutated breast cancers and one for BRCA2-mutated breast cancers. Conclusions: This study identified molecular signatures of breast cancers with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations. Genes present in these signatures could be exploited to find new markers for such breast cancers. We also identified specific genomic rearrangements in these breast cancers, which could be screened for in a diagnostic setting using fluorescence in situ hybridization, thus improving patient selection for BRCA1 and BRCA2 molecular genetic analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1718-7729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1718-7729</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3747/co.v16i5.529</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Current oncology (Toronto), 2009-09, Vol.16 (5), p.91-110</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1189-47071c029239bf6e2f255f4d21a3669c8c0cf795c915ff5ed797647bcc8543d63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Banneau, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guedj, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiappa, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petel, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sévenet, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Mascarel, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mac Grogan, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longy, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnet, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Selected Abstracts Submitted to the Third International Symposium on Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer</title><title>Current oncology (Toronto)</title><description>Background: Germline mutation screening of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes is performed in suspected familial breast cancer cases, but a causative mutation is found in only 30% of patients. The development of additional methods to identify good candidates for BRCA1 and BRCA2 analysis would therefore increase the efficacy of diagnostic mutation screening. With this in mind, we developed a study to determine molecular signatures of BRCA1—or BRCA2—mutated breast cancers. Materials and Methods: Array-cgh (comparative genomic hybridization) and transcriptomic analysis were performed on a series of 103 familial breast cancers. The series included 7 breast cancers with a BRCA1 mutation and 5 breast cancers with a BRCA2 mutation. The remaining 91 cases were obtained from 73 families selected on the basis of at least 3 affected first-degree relatives or at least 2 affected first-degree relatives with breast cancer at an average age of 45 years. Array-cgh analyses were performed on a 4407 BAC-array (CIT-V8) manufactured by IntegraGen. Transcriptomic analyses were performed using an Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 chip. Results: Using supervised clustering analyses we identified two transcriptomic signatures: one for BRCA1-mutated breast cancers consisting of 600 probe sets and another for BRCA2-mutated breast cancers also consisting of 600 probes sets. We also defined cgh-array signatures, based on the presence of specific genomic rearrangements, one for BRCA1-mutated breast cancers and one for BRCA2-mutated breast cancers. Conclusions: This study identified molecular signatures of breast cancers with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations. Genes present in these signatures could be exploited to find new markers for such breast cancers. We also identified specific genomic rearrangements in these breast cancers, which could be screened for in a diagnostic setting using fluorescence in situ hybridization, thus improving patient selection for BRCA1 and BRCA2 molecular genetic analysis.</description><issn>1718-7729</issn><issn>1718-7729</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkM1OAjEYRRujiYjufIA-gIP9mU6nSyQKJCQswPWk87UNNUxL2kLC2wvqwtW9uYuTm4PQMyUTLmv5CnFyoo0XE8HUDRpRSdtKSqZu__V79JDzFyGcSylHyG_s3kKxBk_7XJKGkvHm2A--XLcScdlZvN35ZPAyFJuCLj4Gvceb83CI2R8HHANe2GSNLzqd8VuyOhesg8Hrk05eBzzTAWx6RHdO77N9-ssx-vx4384W1Wo9X86mqwoobVVVSyIpEKYYV71rLHNMCFcbRjVvGgUtEHBSCVBUOCeskUo2tewBWlFz0_AxevnlQoo5J-u6Q_LD5VpHSXfV1EHsfjR1F038G1s4XM8</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Banneau, G.</creator><creator>Guedj, M.</creator><creator>Schiappa, R.</creator><creator>Petel, F.</creator><creator>Sévenet, N.</creator><creator>De Mascarel, I.</creator><creator>Mac Grogan, G.</creator><creator>Longy, M.</creator><creator>Bonnet, F.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Selected Abstracts Submitted to the Third International Symposium on Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer</title><author>Banneau, G. ; Guedj, M. ; Schiappa, R. ; Petel, F. ; Sévenet, N. ; De Mascarel, I. ; Mac Grogan, G. ; Longy, M. ; Bonnet, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1189-47071c029239bf6e2f255f4d21a3669c8c0cf795c915ff5ed797647bcc8543d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Banneau, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guedj, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiappa, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petel, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sévenet, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Mascarel, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mac Grogan, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longy, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnet, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Current oncology (Toronto)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Banneau, G.</au><au>Guedj, M.</au><au>Schiappa, R.</au><au>Petel, F.</au><au>Sévenet, N.</au><au>De Mascarel, I.</au><au>Mac Grogan, G.</au><au>Longy, M.</au><au>Bonnet, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selected Abstracts Submitted to the Third International Symposium on Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Current oncology (Toronto)</jtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>91-110</pages><issn>1718-7729</issn><eissn>1718-7729</eissn><abstract>Background: Germline mutation screening of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes is performed in suspected familial breast cancer cases, but a causative mutation is found in only 30% of patients. The development of additional methods to identify good candidates for BRCA1 and BRCA2 analysis would therefore increase the efficacy of diagnostic mutation screening. With this in mind, we developed a study to determine molecular signatures of BRCA1—or BRCA2—mutated breast cancers. Materials and Methods: Array-cgh (comparative genomic hybridization) and transcriptomic analysis were performed on a series of 103 familial breast cancers. The series included 7 breast cancers with a BRCA1 mutation and 5 breast cancers with a BRCA2 mutation. The remaining 91 cases were obtained from 73 families selected on the basis of at least 3 affected first-degree relatives or at least 2 affected first-degree relatives with breast cancer at an average age of 45 years. Array-cgh analyses were performed on a 4407 BAC-array (CIT-V8) manufactured by IntegraGen. Transcriptomic analyses were performed using an Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 chip. Results: Using supervised clustering analyses we identified two transcriptomic signatures: one for BRCA1-mutated breast cancers consisting of 600 probe sets and another for BRCA2-mutated breast cancers also consisting of 600 probes sets. We also defined cgh-array signatures, based on the presence of specific genomic rearrangements, one for BRCA1-mutated breast cancers and one for BRCA2-mutated breast cancers. Conclusions: This study identified molecular signatures of breast cancers with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations. Genes present in these signatures could be exploited to find new markers for such breast cancers. We also identified specific genomic rearrangements in these breast cancers, which could be screened for in a diagnostic setting using fluorescence in situ hybridization, thus improving patient selection for BRCA1 and BRCA2 molecular genetic analysis.</abstract><doi>10.3747/co.v16i5.529</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1718-7729
ispartof Current oncology (Toronto), 2009-09, Vol.16 (5), p.91-110
issn 1718-7729
1718-7729
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_3747_co_v16i5_529
source PubMed Central
title Selected Abstracts Submitted to the Third International Symposium on Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T18%3A22%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selected%20Abstracts%20Submitted%20to%20the%20Third%20International%20Symposium%20on%20Hereditary%20Breast%20and%20Ovarian%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Current%20oncology%20(Toronto)&rft.au=Banneau,%20G.&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=91-110&rft.issn=1718-7729&rft.eissn=1718-7729&rft_id=info:doi/10.3747/co.v16i5.529&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_3747_co_v16i5_529%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1189-47071c029239bf6e2f255f4d21a3669c8c0cf795c915ff5ed797647bcc8543d63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true