Loading…

NOPPAIN-Br cognitive debriefing and reliability

Abstract Objectives To perform cognitive debriefing and test the Non-Communicative Patient’s Pain Instrument (NOPPAIN) reliability. Methods This is a methodological study to verify NOPPAIN adapted to the Brazilian culture. Cognitive debriefing: 56 healthcare professionals and caregivers participated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta paulista de enfermagem 2024, Vol.37
Main Authors: Araujo, Raquel Soares, Pereira, Lílian Varanda, Araujo, Debora Soares de, Tatagiba, Bruna da Silva Ferreira, Hortense, Priscilla
Format: Article
Language:eng ; por
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objectives To perform cognitive debriefing and test the Non-Communicative Patient’s Pain Instrument (NOPPAIN) reliability. Methods This is a methodological study to verify NOPPAIN adapted to the Brazilian culture. Cognitive debriefing: 56 healthcare professionals and caregivers participated; its task was to assess and make suggestions about NOPPAIN-Br equivalence and adequacy. The final version entitled “NOPPAIN-Versão brasileira” was submitted to a committee of experts (n=8). The Content Validity Index was calculated. To test reliability, three observers applied the new version of NOPPAIN to a sample (n=171) of older adults with dementia and impaired communication where interobserver agreement was calculated - KAPPA. Results NOPPAIN-Br was changed in words such as “não comunicativo”, “enfermeiro”, “deve fazer” and “paciente”. The equivalence of the new version with the original instrument was reinforced (CVI>0.80). Interobserver agreement was almost perfect for “Activity Checklist I” (Kappa>0.80), “Pain Behaviors II: Presence” (Kappa>0.80) and “Pain Behaviors III: Intensity” (Kappa>0.80; ICCsingle>0.75). Evidence of high reliability (ICCsingle>0.75) was observed for all subscales of the instrument and total score. The best agreement was for general pain intensity (ICCsingle 0.97). Conclusion NOPPAIN-Br is equivalent to the original and reliable instrument and can be made available for further research and assessment of pain in Brazilians with dementia and impaired communication. Resumo Objetivos Realizar o cognitive debriefing e testar a fidedignidade do Non-Communicative Patient’s Pain Instrument (NOPPAIN). Métodos Estudo metodológico de verificação do NOPPAIN (versão brasileira) adaptado à cultura brasileira. Cognitive debriefing: participaram 56 profissionais de saúde e cuidadores; sua tarefa foi avaliar e fazer sugestões sobre a equivalência e adequação do NOPPAIN-Br. A versão final, intitulada “NOPPAIN-Versão brasileira” foi submetida a um Comitê de Especialistas (n=8). Foi calculado o Índice de Validade de Conteúdo. Para testar a fidedignidade três observadores aplicaram a nova versão do NOPPAIN em uma amostra (n=171) de pessoas idosas com demência e comunicação prejudicada onde foi calculada a concordância interobservadores - KAPPA. Resultados O NOPPAIN-Br foi alterado em palavras tais como: “não comunicativo”, “enfermeiro”, “deve fazer” e “paciente”. A equivalência da nova versão com o instrumento original foi reforçada (IVC>0,80). A conc
ISSN:0103-2100
1982-0194
DOI:10.37689/acta-ape/2024ao000008344