Loading…
The Initial Mass-Final Luminosity Relation of Type II Supernova Progenitors: Hints of New Physics?
We revise the theoretical initial mass-final luminosity relation for progenitors of Type IIP and IIL supernovae. The effects of the major uncertainties, such as those due to the treatment of convection, semiconvection, rotation, mass loss, nuclear reaction rates, and neutrinos production rates, are...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Astrophysical journal 2019-08, Vol.881 (2), p.158 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We revise the theoretical initial mass-final luminosity relation for progenitors of Type IIP and IIL supernovae. The effects of the major uncertainties, such as those due to the treatment of convection, semiconvection, rotation, mass loss, nuclear reaction rates, and neutrinos production rates, are discussed in some detail. The effects of mass transfer between components of close-binary systems are also considered. By comparing the theoretical predictions to a sample of Type II supernovae for which the initial mass of the progenitors and the pre-explosive luminosity are available, we conclude that stellar rotation may explain a few progenitors that appear brighter than expected in the case of nonrotating models. In the most extreme case, SN 2012ec, an initial rotational velocity up to 300 km s−1 is required. Alternatively, these objects could be mass-losing components of close binaries. However, most of the observed progenitors appear fainter than expected. This occurrence seems to indicate that the Compton and pair neutrino energy-loss rates, as predicted by the standard electro-weak theory, are not efficient enough and that an additional negative contribution to the stellar energy balance is required. We show that axions coupled with parameters accessible to currently planned experiments, such as IAXO and, possibly, BabyIAXO and axion-like particles, may account for the missing contribution to the stellar energy loss. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0004-637X 1538-4357 |
DOI: | 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3222 |