Loading…
Searching for Balmer-dominated Type Ia Supernova Remnants in M33
We searched for Balmer-dominated Type Ia supernova remnants (SNRs) in M33 by selecting thermal X-ray sources with L X ≥ 5 × 10 35 erg s−1, identifying associated H emission features, and checking their [S ii] and [O iii] emission properties. Our search did not find any Balmer-dominated Type Ia SNRs...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Astrophysical journal 2020-09, Vol.900 (2), p.149 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We searched for Balmer-dominated Type Ia supernova remnants (SNRs) in M33 by selecting thermal X-ray sources with L X ≥ 5 × 10 35 erg s−1, identifying associated H emission features, and checking their [S ii] and [O iii] emission properties. Our search did not find any Balmer-dominated Type Ia SNRs in M33. This result is puzzling because M33 is 2-3 times more massive than the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), yet the LMC hosts five Balmer-dominated Type Ia SNRs and M33 has none. We have considered observational biases; interstellar densities and ionization conditions; the Type Ia SN rate expected from the star formation history and Type Ia SN delay time distribution function; and the metallicity effect. None of these can explain the absence of X-ray-bright Balmer-dominated Type Ia SNRs in M33. It is intriguing that the Galaxy has X-ray-bright and thermal Type Ia SNRs (Kepler and Tycho), as well as X-ray-faint and nonthermal Type Ia SNRs (G1.9+0.3, SN1006, and RCW86), while the LMC does not have the X-ray-faint and nonthermal ones and M33 does not have the X-ray-bright and thermal ones. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0004-637X 1538-4357 |
DOI: | 10.3847/1538-4357/abac68 |