Loading…

Strong and Rapid X-Ray Variability of the Super-Eddington Accreting Quasar SDSS J081456.10+532533.5

We report strong and rapid X-ray variability found from the super-Eddington accreting quasar SDSS J081456.10+532533.5 at z = 0.1197. It has a black hole mass of 2.7 × 10 7 M ⊙ and a dimensionless accretion rate of ≈4 measured from reverberation-mapping observations. It showed weak X-ray emission in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Astrophysical journal 2023-06, Vol.950 (1), p.18
Main Authors: Huang, Jian, Luo, Bin, Brandt, W. N., Du, Pu, Garmire, Gordon P., Hu, Chen, Liu, Hezhen, Ni, Qingling, Wang, Jian-Min
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We report strong and rapid X-ray variability found from the super-Eddington accreting quasar SDSS J081456.10+532533.5 at z = 0.1197. It has a black hole mass of 2.7 × 10 7 M ⊙ and a dimensionless accretion rate of ≈4 measured from reverberation-mapping observations. It showed weak X-ray emission in the 2021 February Chandra observation, with the 2 keV flux density being 9.6 − 4.6 + 11.6 times lower compared to an archival Swift observation. The 2 keV flux density is also 11.7 − 6.3 + 9.6 times weaker compared to the expectation from its optical/UV emission. In a follow-up XMM-Newton observation 32 days later, the 2 keV flux density increased by a factor of 5.3 − 2.4 + 6.4 , and the spectra are best described by a power law modified with partial-covering absorption; the absorption-corrected intrinsic continuum is at a nominal flux level. Nearly simultaneous optical spectra reveal no variability, and there is only mild long-term optical/infrared variability from archival data (with a maximum variability amplitude of ≈50%). We interpret the X-ray variability with an obscuration scenario, where the intrinsic X-ray continuum does not vary but the absorber has a variable column density and covering factor along the line of sight. The absorber is likely the small-scale clumpy accretion wind that has been proposed to be responsible for similar X-ray variability in other super-Eddington accreting quasars.
ISSN:0004-637X
1538-4357
DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/accd64