Loading…
Despiking of magnetic resonance signals in time and wavelet domains
ABSTRACT In this paper three different despiking methods for surface‐NMR data are investigated and compared. Two of these are applied in the time domain: a threshold is determined that identifies and marks a spiky event. Afterward, the marked time sequence is substituted with zeros or with the mean...
Saved in:
Published in: | Near surface geophysics (Online) 2014-04, Vol.12 (2), p.185-198 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3187-323c703a52427674f872e8b4f1405df1216177cd484d64b9e02cf0337bbeb96c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3187-323c703a52427674f872e8b4f1405df1216177cd484d64b9e02cf0337bbeb96c3 |
container_end_page | 198 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 185 |
container_title | Near surface geophysics (Online) |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Costabel, Stephan Müller‐Petke, Mike |
description | ABSTRACT
In this paper three different despiking methods for surface‐NMR data are investigated and compared. Two of these are applied in the time domain: a threshold is determined that identifies and marks a spiky event. Afterward, the marked time sequence is substituted with zeros or with the mean value of the signal amplitude of the measurement repetitions for the same passage on the time axis. The third despiking approach takes advantage of the wavelet‐like nature of spiky events. It isolates and eliminates spiky signals in the wavelet domain, i.e., after transforming a single record with the help of the discrete wavelet transform. The latter is able to reconstruct the original signal content in the (spike‐caused) distorted time sequence to some extent. If the spiky noise in surface‐NMR measurements consists mainly of single spiky events, the three despiking methods show very similar results and are able to remove spiky noise from data very effectively, as we can show with two real data examples. However, a synthetic study shows that, if a series of spikes within a relatively short period of time occurs, the wavelet‐based despiking approach shows significant shortcomings. Because the NMR signal content cannot be restored completely in a single record, the fitting of the signal after stacking leads to underestimation of the initial amplitude up to approximately 10%. Nevertheless, we can show that, in principle, the processing of surface‐NMR data in the wavelet domain works and can lead to the same results as straight‐forward applications. Moreover, wavelet‐based strategies have some interesting properties and thus have some potential for further development regarding surface‐NMR processing, which is discussed in detail. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3997/1873-0604.2013027 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_3997_1873_0604_2013027</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>NSG2013027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3187-323c703a52427674f872e8b4f1405df1216177cd484d64b9e02cf0337bbeb96c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EElXpA3DzC6T4Z2MnRxSgIFVwAM6W46wji8Sp4oiqb0-qFq6cdrXabzQzhNxytpZlqe94oWXGFIO1YFwyoS_I4u92Oe-5KjMAyK_JKqVQMwDFGRR6QaoHTLvwFWJLB09720acgqMjpiHa6JCm0EbbJRoinUKP1MaG7u03djjRZuhtiOmGXPn5BVfnuSSfT48f1XO2fdu8VPfbzMrZTSaFdJpJmwsQWmnwhRZY1OA5sLzxXHDFtXYNFNAoqEtkwnkmpa5rrEvl5JLwk64bh5RG9GY3ht6OB8OZORZhjqHNMbQ5FzEz5YnZhw4P_wPm9X3zy_4AbplfsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Despiking of magnetic resonance signals in time and wavelet domains</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Costabel, Stephan ; Müller‐Petke, Mike</creator><creatorcontrib>Costabel, Stephan ; Müller‐Petke, Mike</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
In this paper three different despiking methods for surface‐NMR data are investigated and compared. Two of these are applied in the time domain: a threshold is determined that identifies and marks a spiky event. Afterward, the marked time sequence is substituted with zeros or with the mean value of the signal amplitude of the measurement repetitions for the same passage on the time axis. The third despiking approach takes advantage of the wavelet‐like nature of spiky events. It isolates and eliminates spiky signals in the wavelet domain, i.e., after transforming a single record with the help of the discrete wavelet transform. The latter is able to reconstruct the original signal content in the (spike‐caused) distorted time sequence to some extent. If the spiky noise in surface‐NMR measurements consists mainly of single spiky events, the three despiking methods show very similar results and are able to remove spiky noise from data very effectively, as we can show with two real data examples. However, a synthetic study shows that, if a series of spikes within a relatively short period of time occurs, the wavelet‐based despiking approach shows significant shortcomings. Because the NMR signal content cannot be restored completely in a single record, the fitting of the signal after stacking leads to underestimation of the initial amplitude up to approximately 10%. Nevertheless, we can show that, in principle, the processing of surface‐NMR data in the wavelet domain works and can lead to the same results as straight‐forward applications. Moreover, wavelet‐based strategies have some interesting properties and thus have some potential for further development regarding surface‐NMR processing, which is discussed in detail.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1569-4445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-0604</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3997/1873-0604.2013027</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Near surface geophysics (Online), 2014-04, Vol.12 (2), p.185-198</ispartof><rights>2014 European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3187-323c703a52427674f872e8b4f1405df1216177cd484d64b9e02cf0337bbeb96c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3187-323c703a52427674f872e8b4f1405df1216177cd484d64b9e02cf0337bbeb96c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Costabel, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller‐Petke, Mike</creatorcontrib><title>Despiking of magnetic resonance signals in time and wavelet domains</title><title>Near surface geophysics (Online)</title><description>ABSTRACT
In this paper three different despiking methods for surface‐NMR data are investigated and compared. Two of these are applied in the time domain: a threshold is determined that identifies and marks a spiky event. Afterward, the marked time sequence is substituted with zeros or with the mean value of the signal amplitude of the measurement repetitions for the same passage on the time axis. The third despiking approach takes advantage of the wavelet‐like nature of spiky events. It isolates and eliminates spiky signals in the wavelet domain, i.e., after transforming a single record with the help of the discrete wavelet transform. The latter is able to reconstruct the original signal content in the (spike‐caused) distorted time sequence to some extent. If the spiky noise in surface‐NMR measurements consists mainly of single spiky events, the three despiking methods show very similar results and are able to remove spiky noise from data very effectively, as we can show with two real data examples. However, a synthetic study shows that, if a series of spikes within a relatively short period of time occurs, the wavelet‐based despiking approach shows significant shortcomings. Because the NMR signal content cannot be restored completely in a single record, the fitting of the signal after stacking leads to underestimation of the initial amplitude up to approximately 10%. Nevertheless, we can show that, in principle, the processing of surface‐NMR data in the wavelet domain works and can lead to the same results as straight‐forward applications. Moreover, wavelet‐based strategies have some interesting properties and thus have some potential for further development regarding surface‐NMR processing, which is discussed in detail.</description><issn>1569-4445</issn><issn>1873-0604</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EElXpA3DzC6T4Z2MnRxSgIFVwAM6W46wji8Sp4oiqb0-qFq6cdrXabzQzhNxytpZlqe94oWXGFIO1YFwyoS_I4u92Oe-5KjMAyK_JKqVQMwDFGRR6QaoHTLvwFWJLB09720acgqMjpiHa6JCm0EbbJRoinUKP1MaG7u03djjRZuhtiOmGXPn5BVfnuSSfT48f1XO2fdu8VPfbzMrZTSaFdJpJmwsQWmnwhRZY1OA5sLzxXHDFtXYNFNAoqEtkwnkmpa5rrEvl5JLwk64bh5RG9GY3ht6OB8OZORZhjqHNMbQ5FzEz5YnZhw4P_wPm9X3zy_4AbplfsQ</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Costabel, Stephan</creator><creator>Müller‐Petke, Mike</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Despiking of magnetic resonance signals in time and wavelet domains</title><author>Costabel, Stephan ; Müller‐Petke, Mike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3187-323c703a52427674f872e8b4f1405df1216177cd484d64b9e02cf0337bbeb96c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Costabel, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller‐Petke, Mike</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Near surface geophysics (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Costabel, Stephan</au><au>Müller‐Petke, Mike</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Despiking of magnetic resonance signals in time and wavelet domains</atitle><jtitle>Near surface geophysics (Online)</jtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>185</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>185-198</pages><issn>1569-4445</issn><eissn>1873-0604</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
In this paper three different despiking methods for surface‐NMR data are investigated and compared. Two of these are applied in the time domain: a threshold is determined that identifies and marks a spiky event. Afterward, the marked time sequence is substituted with zeros or with the mean value of the signal amplitude of the measurement repetitions for the same passage on the time axis. The third despiking approach takes advantage of the wavelet‐like nature of spiky events. It isolates and eliminates spiky signals in the wavelet domain, i.e., after transforming a single record with the help of the discrete wavelet transform. The latter is able to reconstruct the original signal content in the (spike‐caused) distorted time sequence to some extent. If the spiky noise in surface‐NMR measurements consists mainly of single spiky events, the three despiking methods show very similar results and are able to remove spiky noise from data very effectively, as we can show with two real data examples. However, a synthetic study shows that, if a series of spikes within a relatively short period of time occurs, the wavelet‐based despiking approach shows significant shortcomings. Because the NMR signal content cannot be restored completely in a single record, the fitting of the signal after stacking leads to underestimation of the initial amplitude up to approximately 10%. Nevertheless, we can show that, in principle, the processing of surface‐NMR data in the wavelet domain works and can lead to the same results as straight‐forward applications. Moreover, wavelet‐based strategies have some interesting properties and thus have some potential for further development regarding surface‐NMR processing, which is discussed in detail.</abstract><doi>10.3997/1873-0604.2013027</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1569-4445 |
ispartof | Near surface geophysics (Online), 2014-04, Vol.12 (2), p.185-198 |
issn | 1569-4445 1873-0604 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_3997_1873_0604_2013027 |
source | Wiley |
title | Despiking of magnetic resonance signals in time and wavelet domains |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A53%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Despiking%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20signals%20in%20time%20and%20wavelet%20domains&rft.jtitle=Near%20surface%20geophysics%20(Online)&rft.au=Costabel,%20Stephan&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=185-198&rft.issn=1569-4445&rft.eissn=1873-0604&rft_id=info:doi/10.3997/1873-0604.2013027&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ENSG2013027%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3187-323c703a52427674f872e8b4f1405df1216177cd484d64b9e02cf0337bbeb96c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |