Loading…

Clinical Presentations and Management of Patients with Ureteric Colic: A Retrospective Study

Objectives: This study aims to describe the clinical presentations and management of patients with ureteric colic attending the emergency department. Methods: A retrospective chart review at King Abdulaziz Hospital analyzed medical records from 2018 to 2022, focusing on adult patients aged 18-80, pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of pioneering medical sciences 2024-12, Vol.13 (7), p.60-67
Main Authors: Alhulaybi, Abdulrahman A., Almaghlouth, Abdullatif K., Alamoudi, Abdullah I., Bastawisy, Ahmed N., Aldawsari, Raed M., Ajjaj, Abdulabari Bin, Alhazzani, Nasser A., Alzahrani, Meshari A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 67
container_issue 7
container_start_page 60
container_title Journal of pioneering medical sciences
container_volume 13
creator Alhulaybi, Abdulrahman A.
Almaghlouth, Abdullatif K.
Alamoudi, Abdullah I.
Bastawisy, Ahmed N.
Aldawsari, Raed M.
Ajjaj, Abdulabari Bin
Alhazzani, Nasser A.
Alzahrani, Meshari A.
description Objectives: This study aims to describe the clinical presentations and management of patients with ureteric colic attending the emergency department. Methods: A retrospective chart review at King Abdulaziz Hospital analyzed medical records from 2018 to 2022, focusing on adult patients aged 18-80, presenting to the emergency department with a confirmed diagnosis of ureteric stones. Patients with incomplete records or unverified diagnoses were excluded. The results of patients were collected and statistically analyzed. Results: This study involved 221 patients with ureteric colic, with a mean age of 44.9 ± 12.6 years and a majority of males (77.7%); most of the patients presented in the summer season (n = 133, 60.2%). About 47.5% (n = 105) of them had a history of urolithiasis, and 21.3% (n = 47) had a positive family history of urolithiasis. The most common symptoms and signs were fluctuating pain (n = 170, 76.9%), pain localized to the side, back, or below the ribs (n = 161, 72.9%), Nausea/vomiting (n = 114, 51.6%), dysuria (n = 100, 45.2%). Over half of the 117 patients (52.9%), reported severe pain as measured by the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). In older patients, the presence of hematuria, pyuria, and stones located in the lower and middle ureter were associated with increased pain severity. The majority of patients (99.1%) received analgesics, while 71.0% (n=157) underwent medical explosive therapy (MET). The invasive procedures showed that about 67.9% (n = 150) required double-J stent insertion, and 32.1% (n = 71) of them had ureteroscopy (URS). More than half of the patients were discharged on the same day of attending the emergency department (n = 122, 55.2%). Most patients improved by the given treatment (n = 192, 87.3%), while few of them had some complications. Conclusion: The majority of patients with ureteric colic were effectively managed through conservative treatment, with significant improvement. Timely intervention using minimally invasive techniques led to positive outcomes and shorter hospital stays.
doi_str_mv 10.47310/jpms2024130711
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_47310_jpms2024130711</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_47310_jpms2024130711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c125t-ff4d7f1f387c763512e7df3024b6227bf003dd836f70f145c23077c84b892de23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUEtLxDAYDKLgsu7Za_5A3e9L0qb1thRfsOKi7k0oaR6apduWJCr77y3qQU8zzMAwM4ScI1wIyRGWu3EfGTCBHCTiEZkxDlUmqxKP__BTsohxBwDIBUMoZ-Sl7nzvteroJtho-6SSH_pIVW_overVq91PIh0c3UzORCP99OmNboNNNnhN66Hz-pKu6KNNYYij1cl_WPqU3s3hjJw41UW7-MU52V5fPde32frh5q5erTONLE-Zc8JIh46XUsuC58isNI5Pa9qCMdk6AG5MyQsnwaHI9bRHSl2KtqyYsYzPyfInV08NYrCuGYPfq3BoEJrvf5r___AvcAxZRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Presentations and Management of Patients with Ureteric Colic: A Retrospective Study</title><source>Nexis UK</source><creator>Alhulaybi, Abdulrahman A. ; Almaghlouth, Abdullatif K. ; Alamoudi, Abdullah I. ; Bastawisy, Ahmed N. ; Aldawsari, Raed M. ; Ajjaj, Abdulabari Bin ; Alhazzani, Nasser A. ; Alzahrani, Meshari A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alhulaybi, Abdulrahman A. ; Almaghlouth, Abdullatif K. ; Alamoudi, Abdullah I. ; Bastawisy, Ahmed N. ; Aldawsari, Raed M. ; Ajjaj, Abdulabari Bin ; Alhazzani, Nasser A. ; Alzahrani, Meshari A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: This study aims to describe the clinical presentations and management of patients with ureteric colic attending the emergency department. Methods: A retrospective chart review at King Abdulaziz Hospital analyzed medical records from 2018 to 2022, focusing on adult patients aged 18-80, presenting to the emergency department with a confirmed diagnosis of ureteric stones. Patients with incomplete records or unverified diagnoses were excluded. The results of patients were collected and statistically analyzed. Results: This study involved 221 patients with ureteric colic, with a mean age of 44.9 ± 12.6 years and a majority of males (77.7%); most of the patients presented in the summer season (n = 133, 60.2%). About 47.5% (n = 105) of them had a history of urolithiasis, and 21.3% (n = 47) had a positive family history of urolithiasis. The most common symptoms and signs were fluctuating pain (n = 170, 76.9%), pain localized to the side, back, or below the ribs (n = 161, 72.9%), Nausea/vomiting (n = 114, 51.6%), dysuria (n = 100, 45.2%). Over half of the 117 patients (52.9%), reported severe pain as measured by the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). In older patients, the presence of hematuria, pyuria, and stones located in the lower and middle ureter were associated with increased pain severity. The majority of patients (99.1%) received analgesics, while 71.0% (n=157) underwent medical explosive therapy (MET). The invasive procedures showed that about 67.9% (n = 150) required double-J stent insertion, and 32.1% (n = 71) of them had ureteroscopy (URS). More than half of the patients were discharged on the same day of attending the emergency department (n = 122, 55.2%). Most patients improved by the given treatment (n = 192, 87.3%), while few of them had some complications. Conclusion: The majority of patients with ureteric colic were effectively managed through conservative treatment, with significant improvement. Timely intervention using minimally invasive techniques led to positive outcomes and shorter hospital stays.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2309-7981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2309-7981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.47310/jpms2024130711</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of pioneering medical sciences, 2024-12, Vol.13 (7), p.60-67</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alhulaybi, Abdulrahman A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almaghlouth, Abdullatif K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alamoudi, Abdullah I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastawisy, Ahmed N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldawsari, Raed M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajjaj, Abdulabari Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alhazzani, Nasser A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alzahrani, Meshari A.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Presentations and Management of Patients with Ureteric Colic: A Retrospective Study</title><title>Journal of pioneering medical sciences</title><description>Objectives: This study aims to describe the clinical presentations and management of patients with ureteric colic attending the emergency department. Methods: A retrospective chart review at King Abdulaziz Hospital analyzed medical records from 2018 to 2022, focusing on adult patients aged 18-80, presenting to the emergency department with a confirmed diagnosis of ureteric stones. Patients with incomplete records or unverified diagnoses were excluded. The results of patients were collected and statistically analyzed. Results: This study involved 221 patients with ureteric colic, with a mean age of 44.9 ± 12.6 years and a majority of males (77.7%); most of the patients presented in the summer season (n = 133, 60.2%). About 47.5% (n = 105) of them had a history of urolithiasis, and 21.3% (n = 47) had a positive family history of urolithiasis. The most common symptoms and signs were fluctuating pain (n = 170, 76.9%), pain localized to the side, back, or below the ribs (n = 161, 72.9%), Nausea/vomiting (n = 114, 51.6%), dysuria (n = 100, 45.2%). Over half of the 117 patients (52.9%), reported severe pain as measured by the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). In older patients, the presence of hematuria, pyuria, and stones located in the lower and middle ureter were associated with increased pain severity. The majority of patients (99.1%) received analgesics, while 71.0% (n=157) underwent medical explosive therapy (MET). The invasive procedures showed that about 67.9% (n = 150) required double-J stent insertion, and 32.1% (n = 71) of them had ureteroscopy (URS). More than half of the patients were discharged on the same day of attending the emergency department (n = 122, 55.2%). Most patients improved by the given treatment (n = 192, 87.3%), while few of them had some complications. Conclusion: The majority of patients with ureteric colic were effectively managed through conservative treatment, with significant improvement. Timely intervention using minimally invasive techniques led to positive outcomes and shorter hospital stays.</description><issn>2309-7981</issn><issn>2309-7981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUEtLxDAYDKLgsu7Za_5A3e9L0qb1thRfsOKi7k0oaR6apduWJCr77y3qQU8zzMAwM4ScI1wIyRGWu3EfGTCBHCTiEZkxDlUmqxKP__BTsohxBwDIBUMoZ-Sl7nzvteroJtho-6SSH_pIVW_overVq91PIh0c3UzORCP99OmNboNNNnhN66Hz-pKu6KNNYYij1cl_WPqU3s3hjJw41UW7-MU52V5fPde32frh5q5erTONLE-Zc8JIh46XUsuC58isNI5Pa9qCMdk6AG5MyQsnwaHI9bRHSl2KtqyYsYzPyfInV08NYrCuGYPfq3BoEJrvf5r___AvcAxZRg</recordid><startdate>20241230</startdate><enddate>20241230</enddate><creator>Alhulaybi, Abdulrahman A.</creator><creator>Almaghlouth, Abdullatif K.</creator><creator>Alamoudi, Abdullah I.</creator><creator>Bastawisy, Ahmed N.</creator><creator>Aldawsari, Raed M.</creator><creator>Ajjaj, Abdulabari Bin</creator><creator>Alhazzani, Nasser A.</creator><creator>Alzahrani, Meshari A.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241230</creationdate><title>Clinical Presentations and Management of Patients with Ureteric Colic: A Retrospective Study</title><author>Alhulaybi, Abdulrahman A. ; Almaghlouth, Abdullatif K. ; Alamoudi, Abdullah I. ; Bastawisy, Ahmed N. ; Aldawsari, Raed M. ; Ajjaj, Abdulabari Bin ; Alhazzani, Nasser A. ; Alzahrani, Meshari A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c125t-ff4d7f1f387c763512e7df3024b6227bf003dd836f70f145c23077c84b892de23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alhulaybi, Abdulrahman A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almaghlouth, Abdullatif K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alamoudi, Abdullah I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastawisy, Ahmed N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldawsari, Raed M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajjaj, Abdulabari Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alhazzani, Nasser A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alzahrani, Meshari A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of pioneering medical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alhulaybi, Abdulrahman A.</au><au>Almaghlouth, Abdullatif K.</au><au>Alamoudi, Abdullah I.</au><au>Bastawisy, Ahmed N.</au><au>Aldawsari, Raed M.</au><au>Ajjaj, Abdulabari Bin</au><au>Alhazzani, Nasser A.</au><au>Alzahrani, Meshari A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Presentations and Management of Patients with Ureteric Colic: A Retrospective Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pioneering medical sciences</jtitle><date>2024-12-30</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>60-67</pages><issn>2309-7981</issn><eissn>2309-7981</eissn><abstract>Objectives: This study aims to describe the clinical presentations and management of patients with ureteric colic attending the emergency department. Methods: A retrospective chart review at King Abdulaziz Hospital analyzed medical records from 2018 to 2022, focusing on adult patients aged 18-80, presenting to the emergency department with a confirmed diagnosis of ureteric stones. Patients with incomplete records or unverified diagnoses were excluded. The results of patients were collected and statistically analyzed. Results: This study involved 221 patients with ureteric colic, with a mean age of 44.9 ± 12.6 years and a majority of males (77.7%); most of the patients presented in the summer season (n = 133, 60.2%). About 47.5% (n = 105) of them had a history of urolithiasis, and 21.3% (n = 47) had a positive family history of urolithiasis. The most common symptoms and signs were fluctuating pain (n = 170, 76.9%), pain localized to the side, back, or below the ribs (n = 161, 72.9%), Nausea/vomiting (n = 114, 51.6%), dysuria (n = 100, 45.2%). Over half of the 117 patients (52.9%), reported severe pain as measured by the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). In older patients, the presence of hematuria, pyuria, and stones located in the lower and middle ureter were associated with increased pain severity. The majority of patients (99.1%) received analgesics, while 71.0% (n=157) underwent medical explosive therapy (MET). The invasive procedures showed that about 67.9% (n = 150) required double-J stent insertion, and 32.1% (n = 71) of them had ureteroscopy (URS). More than half of the patients were discharged on the same day of attending the emergency department (n = 122, 55.2%). Most patients improved by the given treatment (n = 192, 87.3%), while few of them had some complications. Conclusion: The majority of patients with ureteric colic were effectively managed through conservative treatment, with significant improvement. Timely intervention using minimally invasive techniques led to positive outcomes and shorter hospital stays.</abstract><doi>10.47310/jpms2024130711</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2309-7981
ispartof Journal of pioneering medical sciences, 2024-12, Vol.13 (7), p.60-67
issn 2309-7981
2309-7981
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_47310_jpms2024130711
source Nexis UK
title Clinical Presentations and Management of Patients with Ureteric Colic: A Retrospective Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T23%3A11%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Presentations%20and%20Management%20of%20Patients%20with%20Ureteric%20Colic:%20A%20Retrospective%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pioneering%20medical%20sciences&rft.au=Alhulaybi,%20Abdulrahman%20A.&rft.date=2024-12-30&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=60-67&rft.issn=2309-7981&rft.eissn=2309-7981&rft_id=info:doi/10.47310/jpms2024130711&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_47310_jpms2024130711%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c125t-ff4d7f1f387c763512e7df3024b6227bf003dd836f70f145c23077c84b892de23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true