Loading…

Decay Development and its Restriction in Trees

The major hypotheses that have been proposed to explain the patterns of decay development and its restriction in the wood (xylem) of living trees are outlined briefly. The current understanding of the biochemical and physiological events that contribute to the protection of pre-existing functional s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arboriculture & urban forestry 2000-01, Vol.26 (1), p.1-11
Main Author: Pearce, R.B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The major hypotheses that have been proposed to explain the patterns of decay development and its restriction in the wood (xylem) of living trees are outlined briefly. The current understanding of the biochemical and physiological events that contribute to the protection of pre-existing functional sapwood is reviewed, with particular reference to the formation of reaction zones at the host-pathogen interface in Acer species, especially the European sycamore maple {Acer pseudoplatanus) in which the interactions between wood-inhabiting fungi and sapwood have been extensively investigated. Studies using conventional anatomical and biochemical approaches have been integrated with the application of advanced physical techniques (nuclear magnetic resonance [NMR] imaging, proton induced X-ray emission [PIXE] microanalysis and mapping, and electron paramagnetic resonance [EPR] spectroscopy), allowing a model describing the development and function of reaction zones in this species to be proposed. Results from other woody angiosperms indicate that in some (e.g., European beech [Fagus sylvatica]) reaction zones may be essentially similar but that in others there may be significant differences. The implications of our developing understanding of antimicrobial defense in trees on the practice of arboriculture is discussed briefly.
ISSN:1935-5297
2155-0778
DOI:10.48044/jauf.2000.001