Loading…

Usability evaluation of an online media resource guide

This study used a survey research design to evaluate the effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, credibility, and therefore, the overall usability of CottonLink, an online media resource guide as determined by members of the Texas Plains region associated press medium. Using a modified version of D...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of agricultural education 2010-03, Vol.51 (1), p.43-54
Main Authors: Cooper-Jennett, Kim, Akers, Cindy, Doerfert, David, Chambers, Todd
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 54
container_issue 1
container_start_page 43
container_title Journal of agricultural education
container_volume 51
creator Cooper-Jennett, Kim
Akers, Cindy
Doerfert, David
Chambers, Todd
description This study used a survey research design to evaluate the effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, credibility, and therefore, the overall usability of CottonLink, an online media resource guide as determined by members of the Texas Plains region associated press medium. Using a modified version of Dillman’s (2000) Tailored Design Method, the response rate reached 54.2%, with a total of 39 completed online surveys. The researcher designed instrument achieved acceptable reliability scores for each portion of usability: effectiveness ,0.95; efficiency,0 .98; satisfaction, 0.92; credibility, 0.92; and overall usability, 0.97. Respondent’s found the Web site to be effective, efficient, satisfying, credible, and usable. Findings were relevant for both researchers and practitioners. Future research should evaluate terminology related to usability test actual agriculture knowledge and experience, analyze usability qualitatively, and replicate this study with a larger population. Recommended practices for practitioners include continually develop usable educational resources for media members, extend media resource guides for additional commodities and states, and hold training workshops for both media and industry representatives.
doi_str_mv 10.5032/jae.2010.01043
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>fao_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5032_jae_2010_01043</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>US201301815662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1033-46934d152c1fdc9cb5be730876803333f66eec609ce8023be6b8341dc15289083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj01PwzAMhiMEEmNw5Ur_QIsTN1l6RBNf0iQO0HOUps6UqWtRsiLt35MxDrZlv3osPYzdc6gkoHjcWaoE5C1XjRdsIbgSpRRcXLJFPokSZM2v2U1KOwCUXPMFU22yXRjC4VjQjx1mewjTWEy-sLmPQxip2FMfbBEpTXN0VGzn0NMtu_J2SHT3P5esfXn-Wr-Vm4_X9_XTpnQcEMtaNVj3XArHfe8a18mOVgh6pXSOEb1SRE5B40iDwI5Up7HmvcuIbkDjklXnvy5OKUXy5juGvY1Hw8GcrE22Nidr82edgYcz4O1k7DaGZNrPnCNkXamUwF-a-FJl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Usability evaluation of an online media resource guide</title><source>Freely Accessible Science Journals</source><creator>Cooper-Jennett, Kim ; Akers, Cindy ; Doerfert, David ; Chambers, Todd</creator><creatorcontrib>Cooper-Jennett, Kim ; Akers, Cindy ; Doerfert, David ; Chambers, Todd</creatorcontrib><description>This study used a survey research design to evaluate the effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, credibility, and therefore, the overall usability of CottonLink, an online media resource guide as determined by members of the Texas Plains region associated press medium. Using a modified version of Dillman’s (2000) Tailored Design Method, the response rate reached 54.2%, with a total of 39 completed online surveys. The researcher designed instrument achieved acceptable reliability scores for each portion of usability: effectiveness ,0.95; efficiency,0 .98; satisfaction, 0.92; credibility, 0.92; and overall usability, 0.97. Respondent’s found the Web site to be effective, efficient, satisfying, credible, and usable. Findings were relevant for both researchers and practitioners. Future research should evaluate terminology related to usability test actual agriculture knowledge and experience, analyze usability qualitatively, and replicate this study with a larger population. Recommended practices for practitioners include continually develop usable educational resources for media members, extend media resource guides for additional commodities and states, and hold training workshops for both media and industry representatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-0541</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-5212</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1042-0541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5032/jae.2010.01043</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>agriculture ; case studies ; communications technology ; information dissemination ; Internet</subject><ispartof>Journal of agricultural education, 2010-03, Vol.51 (1), p.43-54</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cooper-Jennett, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akers, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doerfert, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chambers, Todd</creatorcontrib><title>Usability evaluation of an online media resource guide</title><title>Journal of agricultural education</title><description>This study used a survey research design to evaluate the effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, credibility, and therefore, the overall usability of CottonLink, an online media resource guide as determined by members of the Texas Plains region associated press medium. Using a modified version of Dillman’s (2000) Tailored Design Method, the response rate reached 54.2%, with a total of 39 completed online surveys. The researcher designed instrument achieved acceptable reliability scores for each portion of usability: effectiveness ,0.95; efficiency,0 .98; satisfaction, 0.92; credibility, 0.92; and overall usability, 0.97. Respondent’s found the Web site to be effective, efficient, satisfying, credible, and usable. Findings were relevant for both researchers and practitioners. Future research should evaluate terminology related to usability test actual agriculture knowledge and experience, analyze usability qualitatively, and replicate this study with a larger population. Recommended practices for practitioners include continually develop usable educational resources for media members, extend media resource guides for additional commodities and states, and hold training workshops for both media and industry representatives.</description><subject>agriculture</subject><subject>case studies</subject><subject>communications technology</subject><subject>information dissemination</subject><subject>Internet</subject><issn>1042-0541</issn><issn>2162-5212</issn><issn>1042-0541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotj01PwzAMhiMEEmNw5Ur_QIsTN1l6RBNf0iQO0HOUps6UqWtRsiLt35MxDrZlv3osPYzdc6gkoHjcWaoE5C1XjRdsIbgSpRRcXLJFPokSZM2v2U1KOwCUXPMFU22yXRjC4VjQjx1mewjTWEy-sLmPQxip2FMfbBEpTXN0VGzn0NMtu_J2SHT3P5esfXn-Wr-Vm4_X9_XTpnQcEMtaNVj3XArHfe8a18mOVgh6pXSOEb1SRE5B40iDwI5Up7HmvcuIbkDjklXnvy5OKUXy5juGvY1Hw8GcrE22Nidr82edgYcz4O1k7DaGZNrPnCNkXamUwF-a-FJl</recordid><startdate>20100328</startdate><enddate>20100328</enddate><creator>Cooper-Jennett, Kim</creator><creator>Akers, Cindy</creator><creator>Doerfert, David</creator><creator>Chambers, Todd</creator><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100328</creationdate><title>Usability evaluation of an online media resource guide</title><author>Cooper-Jennett, Kim ; Akers, Cindy ; Doerfert, David ; Chambers, Todd</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1033-46934d152c1fdc9cb5be730876803333f66eec609ce8023be6b8341dc15289083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>agriculture</topic><topic>case studies</topic><topic>communications technology</topic><topic>information dissemination</topic><topic>Internet</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cooper-Jennett, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akers, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doerfert, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chambers, Todd</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of agricultural education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cooper-Jennett, Kim</au><au>Akers, Cindy</au><au>Doerfert, David</au><au>Chambers, Todd</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Usability evaluation of an online media resource guide</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agricultural education</jtitle><date>2010-03-28</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>43-54</pages><issn>1042-0541</issn><eissn>2162-5212</eissn><eissn>1042-0541</eissn><abstract>This study used a survey research design to evaluate the effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, credibility, and therefore, the overall usability of CottonLink, an online media resource guide as determined by members of the Texas Plains region associated press medium. Using a modified version of Dillman’s (2000) Tailored Design Method, the response rate reached 54.2%, with a total of 39 completed online surveys. The researcher designed instrument achieved acceptable reliability scores for each portion of usability: effectiveness ,0.95; efficiency,0 .98; satisfaction, 0.92; credibility, 0.92; and overall usability, 0.97. Respondent’s found the Web site to be effective, efficient, satisfying, credible, and usable. Findings were relevant for both researchers and practitioners. Future research should evaluate terminology related to usability test actual agriculture knowledge and experience, analyze usability qualitatively, and replicate this study with a larger population. Recommended practices for practitioners include continually develop usable educational resources for media members, extend media resource guides for additional commodities and states, and hold training workshops for both media and industry representatives.</abstract><doi>10.5032/jae.2010.01043</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1042-0541
ispartof Journal of agricultural education, 2010-03, Vol.51 (1), p.43-54
issn 1042-0541
2162-5212
1042-0541
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5032_jae_2010_01043
source Freely Accessible Science Journals
subjects agriculture
case studies
communications technology
information dissemination
Internet
title Usability evaluation of an online media resource guide
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A16%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fao_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Usability%20evaluation%20of%20an%20online%20media%20resource%20guide&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agricultural%20education&rft.au=Cooper-Jennett,%20Kim&rft.date=2010-03-28&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=43-54&rft.issn=1042-0541&rft.eissn=2162-5212&rft_id=info:doi/10.5032/jae.2010.01043&rft_dat=%3Cfao_cross%3EUS201301815662%3C/fao_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1033-46934d152c1fdc9cb5be730876803333f66eec609ce8023be6b8341dc15289083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true