Loading…
Usability evaluation of an online media resource guide
This study used a survey research design to evaluate the effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, credibility, and therefore, the overall usability of CottonLink, an online media resource guide as determined by members of the Texas Plains region associated press medium. Using a modified version of D...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of agricultural education 2010-03, Vol.51 (1), p.43-54 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 54 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 43 |
container_title | Journal of agricultural education |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Cooper-Jennett, Kim Akers, Cindy Doerfert, David Chambers, Todd |
description | This study used a survey research design to evaluate the effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, credibility, and therefore, the overall usability of CottonLink, an online media resource guide as determined by members of the Texas Plains region associated press medium. Using a modified version of Dillman’s (2000) Tailored Design Method, the response rate reached 54.2%, with a total of 39 completed online surveys. The researcher designed instrument achieved acceptable reliability scores for each portion of usability: effectiveness ,0.95; efficiency,0 .98; satisfaction, 0.92; credibility, 0.92; and overall usability, 0.97. Respondent’s found the Web site to be effective, efficient, satisfying, credible, and usable. Findings were relevant for both researchers and practitioners. Future research should evaluate terminology related to usability test actual agriculture knowledge and experience, analyze usability qualitatively, and replicate this study with a larger population. Recommended practices for practitioners include continually develop usable educational resources for media members, extend media resource guides for additional commodities and states, and hold training workshops for both media and industry representatives. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5032/jae.2010.01043 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>fao_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5032_jae_2010_01043</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>US201301815662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1033-46934d152c1fdc9cb5be730876803333f66eec609ce8023be6b8341dc15289083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj01PwzAMhiMEEmNw5Ur_QIsTN1l6RBNf0iQO0HOUps6UqWtRsiLt35MxDrZlv3osPYzdc6gkoHjcWaoE5C1XjRdsIbgSpRRcXLJFPokSZM2v2U1KOwCUXPMFU22yXRjC4VjQjx1mewjTWEy-sLmPQxip2FMfbBEpTXN0VGzn0NMtu_J2SHT3P5esfXn-Wr-Vm4_X9_XTpnQcEMtaNVj3XArHfe8a18mOVgh6pXSOEb1SRE5B40iDwI5Up7HmvcuIbkDjklXnvy5OKUXy5juGvY1Hw8GcrE22Nidr82edgYcz4O1k7DaGZNrPnCNkXamUwF-a-FJl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Usability evaluation of an online media resource guide</title><source>Freely Accessible Science Journals</source><creator>Cooper-Jennett, Kim ; Akers, Cindy ; Doerfert, David ; Chambers, Todd</creator><creatorcontrib>Cooper-Jennett, Kim ; Akers, Cindy ; Doerfert, David ; Chambers, Todd</creatorcontrib><description>This study used a survey research design to evaluate the effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, credibility, and therefore, the overall usability of CottonLink, an online media resource guide as determined by members of the Texas Plains region associated press medium. Using a modified version of Dillman’s (2000) Tailored Design Method, the response rate reached 54.2%, with a total of 39 completed online surveys. The researcher designed instrument achieved acceptable reliability scores for each portion of usability: effectiveness ,0.95; efficiency,0 .98; satisfaction, 0.92; credibility, 0.92; and overall usability, 0.97. Respondent’s found the Web site to be effective, efficient, satisfying, credible, and usable. Findings were relevant for both researchers and practitioners. Future research should evaluate terminology related to usability test actual agriculture knowledge and experience, analyze usability qualitatively, and replicate this study with a larger population. Recommended practices for practitioners include continually develop usable educational resources for media members, extend media resource guides for additional commodities and states, and hold training workshops for both media and industry representatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-0541</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-5212</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1042-0541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5032/jae.2010.01043</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>agriculture ; case studies ; communications technology ; information dissemination ; Internet</subject><ispartof>Journal of agricultural education, 2010-03, Vol.51 (1), p.43-54</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cooper-Jennett, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akers, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doerfert, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chambers, Todd</creatorcontrib><title>Usability evaluation of an online media resource guide</title><title>Journal of agricultural education</title><description>This study used a survey research design to evaluate the effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, credibility, and therefore, the overall usability of CottonLink, an online media resource guide as determined by members of the Texas Plains region associated press medium. Using a modified version of Dillman’s (2000) Tailored Design Method, the response rate reached 54.2%, with a total of 39 completed online surveys. The researcher designed instrument achieved acceptable reliability scores for each portion of usability: effectiveness ,0.95; efficiency,0 .98; satisfaction, 0.92; credibility, 0.92; and overall usability, 0.97. Respondent’s found the Web site to be effective, efficient, satisfying, credible, and usable. Findings were relevant for both researchers and practitioners. Future research should evaluate terminology related to usability test actual agriculture knowledge and experience, analyze usability qualitatively, and replicate this study with a larger population. Recommended practices for practitioners include continually develop usable educational resources for media members, extend media resource guides for additional commodities and states, and hold training workshops for both media and industry representatives.</description><subject>agriculture</subject><subject>case studies</subject><subject>communications technology</subject><subject>information dissemination</subject><subject>Internet</subject><issn>1042-0541</issn><issn>2162-5212</issn><issn>1042-0541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotj01PwzAMhiMEEmNw5Ur_QIsTN1l6RBNf0iQO0HOUps6UqWtRsiLt35MxDrZlv3osPYzdc6gkoHjcWaoE5C1XjRdsIbgSpRRcXLJFPokSZM2v2U1KOwCUXPMFU22yXRjC4VjQjx1mewjTWEy-sLmPQxip2FMfbBEpTXN0VGzn0NMtu_J2SHT3P5esfXn-Wr-Vm4_X9_XTpnQcEMtaNVj3XArHfe8a18mOVgh6pXSOEb1SRE5B40iDwI5Up7HmvcuIbkDjklXnvy5OKUXy5juGvY1Hw8GcrE22Nidr82edgYcz4O1k7DaGZNrPnCNkXamUwF-a-FJl</recordid><startdate>20100328</startdate><enddate>20100328</enddate><creator>Cooper-Jennett, Kim</creator><creator>Akers, Cindy</creator><creator>Doerfert, David</creator><creator>Chambers, Todd</creator><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100328</creationdate><title>Usability evaluation of an online media resource guide</title><author>Cooper-Jennett, Kim ; Akers, Cindy ; Doerfert, David ; Chambers, Todd</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1033-46934d152c1fdc9cb5be730876803333f66eec609ce8023be6b8341dc15289083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>agriculture</topic><topic>case studies</topic><topic>communications technology</topic><topic>information dissemination</topic><topic>Internet</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cooper-Jennett, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akers, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doerfert, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chambers, Todd</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of agricultural education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cooper-Jennett, Kim</au><au>Akers, Cindy</au><au>Doerfert, David</au><au>Chambers, Todd</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Usability evaluation of an online media resource guide</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agricultural education</jtitle><date>2010-03-28</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>43-54</pages><issn>1042-0541</issn><eissn>2162-5212</eissn><eissn>1042-0541</eissn><abstract>This study used a survey research design to evaluate the effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, credibility, and therefore, the overall usability of CottonLink, an online media resource guide as determined by members of the Texas Plains region associated press medium. Using a modified version of Dillman’s (2000) Tailored Design Method, the response rate reached 54.2%, with a total of 39 completed online surveys. The researcher designed instrument achieved acceptable reliability scores for each portion of usability: effectiveness ,0.95; efficiency,0 .98; satisfaction, 0.92; credibility, 0.92; and overall usability, 0.97. Respondent’s found the Web site to be effective, efficient, satisfying, credible, and usable. Findings were relevant for both researchers and practitioners. Future research should evaluate terminology related to usability test actual agriculture knowledge and experience, analyze usability qualitatively, and replicate this study with a larger population. Recommended practices for practitioners include continually develop usable educational resources for media members, extend media resource guides for additional commodities and states, and hold training workshops for both media and industry representatives.</abstract><doi>10.5032/jae.2010.01043</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1042-0541 |
ispartof | Journal of agricultural education, 2010-03, Vol.51 (1), p.43-54 |
issn | 1042-0541 2162-5212 1042-0541 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_5032_jae_2010_01043 |
source | Freely Accessible Science Journals |
subjects | agriculture case studies communications technology information dissemination Internet |
title | Usability evaluation of an online media resource guide |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T06%3A16%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-fao_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Usability%20evaluation%20of%20an%20online%20media%20resource%20guide&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agricultural%20education&rft.au=Cooper-Jennett,%20Kim&rft.date=2010-03-28&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=43-54&rft.issn=1042-0541&rft.eissn=2162-5212&rft_id=info:doi/10.5032/jae.2010.01043&rft_dat=%3Cfao_cross%3EUS201301815662%3C/fao_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1033-46934d152c1fdc9cb5be730876803333f66eec609ce8023be6b8341dc15289083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |