Loading…

Goed of fout: Niet-standaard inflectie in het hedendaags Standaardnederlands

Modern colloquial standard Dutch has a number of features involving non-standard inflection (verbal, adnominal, pronominal; involving gender, person, number and case), which appear to participate in ongoing processes of deflection. We focus on ten constructions, nine of which concern non-standard in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nederlandse taalkunde (Groningen) 2014-09, Vol.19 (2), p.131-184
Main Authors: Bennis, Hans, Hinskens, Frans
Format: Article
Language:dut
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 184
container_issue 2
container_start_page 131
container_title Nederlandse taalkunde (Groningen)
container_volume 19
creator Bennis, Hans
Hinskens, Frans
description Modern colloquial standard Dutch has a number of features involving non-standard inflection (verbal, adnominal, pronominal; involving gender, person, number and case), which appear to participate in ongoing processes of deflection. We focus on ten constructions, nine of which concern non-standard inflection. After discussing each phenomenon from the perspective of its place in the grammatical system, we introduce an online survey on the evaluation and reported use of each phenomenon. Sociobiographical background data are available for over 1600 of the respondents, a third of whom claim to speak a specific Dutch dialect. The data for the 1515 Dutch respondents for each feature are analysed quantitatively on three different scales, as well as on a dialect-standard scale, for the reported own use as well as the perceived use in the respondents’ environments. The features appear to be stratified both according to evaluation and style. Several features turn out to be sensitive to the speakers’ dialect background, only few of them to sociobiographical background and a third subset to neither. At least one phenomenon seems to be subject to ongoing change, driven by age; some phenomena have de facto been elevated to the standard norm. In the patterning of the phenomena studied, internal grammatical factors do not appear to play a significant role as against sociolinguistic ones. Especially perceptual and evaluative considerations appear to determine the results.
doi_str_mv 10.5117/NEDTAA2014.2.BENN
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5117_NEDTAA2014_2_BENN</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_5117_NEDTAA2014_2_BENN</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_5117_NEDTAA2014_2_BENN3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzNTQ01_dzdQlxdDQyMDTRM9JzcvXzY2LgNDI2NdIFShqyMHAaGluY6JpamJhyMPAWF2cZGBgYGhqZGhobczLwuOenpijkpymk5ZeW8DCwpiXmFKfyQmluBkM31xBnD93kovzi4qLUtPiCoszcxKLKeEODeJDN8Qib443iQTYbk6MHAPH1NLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Goed of fout: Niet-standaard inflectie in het hedendaags Standaardnederlands</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><creator>Bennis, Hans ; Hinskens, Frans</creator><creatorcontrib>Bennis, Hans ; Hinskens, Frans</creatorcontrib><description>Modern colloquial standard Dutch has a number of features involving non-standard inflection (verbal, adnominal, pronominal; involving gender, person, number and case), which appear to participate in ongoing processes of deflection. We focus on ten constructions, nine of which concern non-standard inflection. After discussing each phenomenon from the perspective of its place in the grammatical system, we introduce an online survey on the evaluation and reported use of each phenomenon. Sociobiographical background data are available for over 1600 of the respondents, a third of whom claim to speak a specific Dutch dialect. The data for the 1515 Dutch respondents for each feature are analysed quantitatively on three different scales, as well as on a dialect-standard scale, for the reported own use as well as the perceived use in the respondents’ environments. The features appear to be stratified both according to evaluation and style. Several features turn out to be sensitive to the speakers’ dialect background, only few of them to sociobiographical background and a third subset to neither. At least one phenomenon seems to be subject to ongoing change, driven by age; some phenomena have de facto been elevated to the standard norm. In the patterning of the phenomena studied, internal grammatical factors do not appear to play a significant role as against sociolinguistic ones. Especially perceptual and evaluative considerations appear to determine the results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1384-5845</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-1171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5117/NEDTAA2014.2.BENN</identifier><language>dut</language><ispartof>Nederlandse taalkunde (Groningen), 2014-09, Vol.19 (2), p.131-184</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bennis, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinskens, Frans</creatorcontrib><title>Goed of fout: Niet-standaard inflectie in het hedendaags Standaardnederlands</title><title>Nederlandse taalkunde (Groningen)</title><description>Modern colloquial standard Dutch has a number of features involving non-standard inflection (verbal, adnominal, pronominal; involving gender, person, number and case), which appear to participate in ongoing processes of deflection. We focus on ten constructions, nine of which concern non-standard inflection. After discussing each phenomenon from the perspective of its place in the grammatical system, we introduce an online survey on the evaluation and reported use of each phenomenon. Sociobiographical background data are available for over 1600 of the respondents, a third of whom claim to speak a specific Dutch dialect. The data for the 1515 Dutch respondents for each feature are analysed quantitatively on three different scales, as well as on a dialect-standard scale, for the reported own use as well as the perceived use in the respondents’ environments. The features appear to be stratified both according to evaluation and style. Several features turn out to be sensitive to the speakers’ dialect background, only few of them to sociobiographical background and a third subset to neither. At least one phenomenon seems to be subject to ongoing change, driven by age; some phenomena have de facto been elevated to the standard norm. In the patterning of the phenomena studied, internal grammatical factors do not appear to play a significant role as against sociolinguistic ones. Especially perceptual and evaluative considerations appear to determine the results.</description><issn>1384-5845</issn><issn>2352-1171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzNTQ01_dzdQlxdDQyMDTRM9JzcvXzY2LgNDI2NdIFShqyMHAaGluY6JpamJhyMPAWF2cZGBgYGhqZGhobczLwuOenpijkpymk5ZeW8DCwpiXmFKfyQmluBkM31xBnD93kovzi4qLUtPiCoszcxKLKeEODeJDN8Qib443iQTYbk6MHAPH1NLQ</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Bennis, Hans</creator><creator>Hinskens, Frans</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Goed of fout</title><author>Bennis, Hans ; Hinskens, Frans</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_5117_NEDTAA2014_2_BENN3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>dut</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bennis, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinskens, Frans</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Nederlandse taalkunde (Groningen)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bennis, Hans</au><au>Hinskens, Frans</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Goed of fout: Niet-standaard inflectie in het hedendaags Standaardnederlands</atitle><jtitle>Nederlandse taalkunde (Groningen)</jtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>131-184</pages><issn>1384-5845</issn><eissn>2352-1171</eissn><abstract>Modern colloquial standard Dutch has a number of features involving non-standard inflection (verbal, adnominal, pronominal; involving gender, person, number and case), which appear to participate in ongoing processes of deflection. We focus on ten constructions, nine of which concern non-standard inflection. After discussing each phenomenon from the perspective of its place in the grammatical system, we introduce an online survey on the evaluation and reported use of each phenomenon. Sociobiographical background data are available for over 1600 of the respondents, a third of whom claim to speak a specific Dutch dialect. The data for the 1515 Dutch respondents for each feature are analysed quantitatively on three different scales, as well as on a dialect-standard scale, for the reported own use as well as the perceived use in the respondents’ environments. The features appear to be stratified both according to evaluation and style. Several features turn out to be sensitive to the speakers’ dialect background, only few of them to sociobiographical background and a third subset to neither. At least one phenomenon seems to be subject to ongoing change, driven by age; some phenomena have de facto been elevated to the standard norm. In the patterning of the phenomena studied, internal grammatical factors do not appear to play a significant role as against sociolinguistic ones. Especially perceptual and evaluative considerations appear to determine the results.</abstract><doi>10.5117/NEDTAA2014.2.BENN</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1384-5845
ispartof Nederlandse taalkunde (Groningen), 2014-09, Vol.19 (2), p.131-184
issn 1384-5845
2352-1171
language dut
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5117_NEDTAA2014_2_BENN
source EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text
title Goed of fout: Niet-standaard inflectie in het hedendaags Standaardnederlands
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T23%3A15%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Goed%20of%20fout:%20Niet-standaard%20inflectie%20in%20het%20hedendaags%20Standaardnederlands&rft.jtitle=Nederlandse%20taalkunde%20(Groningen)&rft.au=Bennis,%20Hans&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=131-184&rft.issn=1384-5845&rft.eissn=2352-1171&rft_id=info:doi/10.5117/NEDTAA2014.2.BENN&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_5117_NEDTAA2014_2_BENN%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_5117_NEDTAA2014_2_BENN3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true