Good Fun: Cecily Chaumpaigne and the Ethics of Chaucerian Obscenity

This essay examines the interplay between enjoyment of Chaucer's obscene humor (particularly in the Canterbury Tales) and scholarly interpretations of the most troubling episode from Chaucer's life: Cecily Chaumpaigne's accusations of raptus. It argues that, because scholars and reade...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Chaucer review 2021-01, Vol.56 (4), p.360-377
Main Author: Flannery, Mary C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This essay examines the interplay between enjoyment of Chaucer's obscene humor (particularly in the Canterbury Tales) and scholarly interpretations of the most troubling episode from Chaucer's life: Cecily Chaumpaigne's accusations of raptus. It argues that, because scholars and readers are determined to protect their ability to enjoy Chaucer's work freely, they often allow their views of Chaucer as a bawdy humorist to infiltrate their discussions of the Chaumpaigne case. Drawing on Sara Ahmed's figure of the “feminist killjoy,” this essay concludes with the suggestion that we approach Chaucer's work and biography with the willingness to think critically about our enjoyment of his work, and how it might affect our judgment of the poet himself.
ISSN:0009-2002
1528-4204
DOI:10.5325/chaucerrev.56.4.0360