Reading Hamilton Backward: Some Difficulties in Hamilton's Democratic Prescriptions

Hamilton's focus on representation rather than “participatory democracy” is welcome. He has (usefully) highlighted the representational nature of so-called participatory democracy rather than offered putative alternatives to representation. However, his critique of representation deficits in So...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The good society - PEGS (Organization) 2017-06, Vol.26 (1), p.87-103
Main Author: Glaser, Daryl
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
conciliar democracy
democracy
Government
group democracy
group representation
Law
proportional representation
Public Policy
representation
representative democracy
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Hamilton's focus on representation rather than “participatory democracy” is welcome. He has (usefully) highlighted the representational nature of so-called participatory democracy rather than offered putative alternatives to representation. However, his critique of representation deficits in South Africa shows insufficient appreciation of the importance of proportional representation to equal freedom. An examination of the history of council theory and practice on the left provides a basis for some skeptical thoughts about Hamilton's council-tribune model. Although Hamilton's particular institutional prescription is not required by his theory of representation, flaws in the former may be influenced his theorization of group representation.
ISSN:1089-0017
1538-9731
DOI:10.5325/goodsociety.26.1.0087