Derrida and the Autoimmunity of Democracy

Derrida argues that the idea of democracy suffers from a fatal “autoimmunity”: its freedom and equality requirements cancel each other out. But he also feels that because of this malady democracy can enjoy a form of “reasonableness” and “possibility as impossible” that favors it over all other kinds...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of speculative philosophy 2016-08, Vol.30 (3), p.303-315
Main Author: Evans, Fred
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Autoimmunity
Democracy
Dialogism
Direct democracy
Injunctions
Legacies
Oracles
Solidarity
Temporality
Voting
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-b8b8b6b98e07505b758b59a76c255dc25ea4dc49fdc3b6aed9954baae030f6af3
cites
container_end_page 315
container_issue 3
container_start_page 303
container_title The Journal of speculative philosophy
container_volume 30
creator Evans, Fred
description Derrida argues that the idea of democracy suffers from a fatal “autoimmunity”: its freedom and equality requirements cancel each other out. But he also feels that because of this malady democracy can enjoy a form of “reasonableness” and “possibility as impossible” that favors it over all other kinds of polity. In particular, recognition of the inherent limitations of this autoimmunity might help counter harmful policies arrogantly carried out in democracy's name. While approving of Derrida's admonitions, I question the guiding role he assigns to an unconditional “democracy to come.” I argue that his characterization of this idea immanently undoes his argument for the autoimmunity of conditional democracies. But I also claim that the promise he finds in autoimmunity is derivable from a different and overlooked aspect of his thinking—his philosophical use of “voice” throughout his work and its implications for three political virtues that he also favors: solidarity, heterogeneity, and fecundity or the creation of new voices.
doi_str_mv 10.5325/jspecphil.30.3.0303
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5325_jspecphil_30_3_0303</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.5325/jspecphil.30.3.0303</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.5325/jspecphil.30.3.0303</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-b8b8b6b98e07505b758b59a76c255dc25ea4dc49fdc3b6aed9954baae030f6af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-Ai-9emiddjppc1x2_QcLHlTwFtI0ZVu2m5K0h357U1Y8y8DM6ffmvcfYfQoJYUaPnR-MHg7tMUFIMAEEvGCrlLIiFljiJVtBKdKYZ_R9zW687wBA5DxbsYedca6tVaROdTQeTLSZRtv2_XRqxzmyTbQzvdVO6fmWXTXq6M3d712zr-enz-1rvH9_edtu9rFGpDGuyjC8EqWBgoCqgsqKhCq4zojqsIzKa52LptZYcWVqISivlDLBdMNVg2uGZ13trPfONHJwba_cLFOQS1r5l1YiSJRL2kDlZ2pwtjN67CdvZGcndwpeJc9KzlP5sTSyFJJyDA1QETA4Y50frfvXpx9SRmuw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Derrida and the Autoimmunity of Democracy</title><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><creator>Evans, Fred</creator><creatorcontrib>Evans, Fred</creatorcontrib><description>Derrida argues that the idea of democracy suffers from a fatal “autoimmunity”: its freedom and equality requirements cancel each other out. But he also feels that because of this malady democracy can enjoy a form of “reasonableness” and “possibility as impossible” that favors it over all other kinds of polity. In particular, recognition of the inherent limitations of this autoimmunity might help counter harmful policies arrogantly carried out in democracy's name. While approving of Derrida's admonitions, I question the guiding role he assigns to an unconditional “democracy to come.” I argue that his characterization of this idea immanently undoes his argument for the autoimmunity of conditional democracies. But I also claim that the promise he finds in autoimmunity is derivable from a different and overlooked aspect of his thinking—his philosophical use of “voice” throughout his work and its implications for three political virtues that he also favors: solidarity, heterogeneity, and fecundity or the creation of new voices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0891-625X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5325/jspecphil.30.3.0303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pennsylvania State University Press</publisher><subject>Autoimmunity ; Democracy ; Dialogism ; Direct democracy ; Injunctions ; Legacies ; Oracles ; Solidarity ; Temporality ; Voting</subject><ispartof>The Journal of speculative philosophy, 2016-08, Vol.30 (3), p.303-315</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © Pennsylvania State University</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-b8b8b6b98e07505b758b59a76c255dc25ea4dc49fdc3b6aed9954baae030f6af3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Evans, Fred</creatorcontrib><title>Derrida and the Autoimmunity of Democracy</title><title>The Journal of speculative philosophy</title><description>Derrida argues that the idea of democracy suffers from a fatal “autoimmunity”: its freedom and equality requirements cancel each other out. But he also feels that because of this malady democracy can enjoy a form of “reasonableness” and “possibility as impossible” that favors it over all other kinds of polity. In particular, recognition of the inherent limitations of this autoimmunity might help counter harmful policies arrogantly carried out in democracy's name. While approving of Derrida's admonitions, I question the guiding role he assigns to an unconditional “democracy to come.” I argue that his characterization of this idea immanently undoes his argument for the autoimmunity of conditional democracies. But I also claim that the promise he finds in autoimmunity is derivable from a different and overlooked aspect of his thinking—his philosophical use of “voice” throughout his work and its implications for three political virtues that he also favors: solidarity, heterogeneity, and fecundity or the creation of new voices.</description><subject>Autoimmunity</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Dialogism</subject><subject>Direct democracy</subject><subject>Injunctions</subject><subject>Legacies</subject><subject>Oracles</subject><subject>Solidarity</subject><subject>Temporality</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>0891-625X</issn><issn>1527-9383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-Ai-9emiddjppc1x2_QcLHlTwFtI0ZVu2m5K0h357U1Y8y8DM6ffmvcfYfQoJYUaPnR-MHg7tMUFIMAEEvGCrlLIiFljiJVtBKdKYZ_R9zW687wBA5DxbsYedca6tVaROdTQeTLSZRtv2_XRqxzmyTbQzvdVO6fmWXTXq6M3d712zr-enz-1rvH9_edtu9rFGpDGuyjC8EqWBgoCqgsqKhCq4zojqsIzKa52LptZYcWVqISivlDLBdMNVg2uGZ13trPfONHJwba_cLFOQS1r5l1YiSJRL2kDlZ2pwtjN67CdvZGcndwpeJc9KzlP5sTSyFJJyDA1QETA4Y50frfvXpx9SRmuw</recordid><startdate>20160808</startdate><enddate>20160808</enddate><creator>Evans, Fred</creator><general>Pennsylvania State University Press</general><general>Penn State University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160808</creationdate><title>Derrida and the Autoimmunity of Democracy</title><author>Evans, Fred</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-b8b8b6b98e07505b758b59a76c255dc25ea4dc49fdc3b6aed9954baae030f6af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Autoimmunity</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Dialogism</topic><topic>Direct democracy</topic><topic>Injunctions</topic><topic>Legacies</topic><topic>Oracles</topic><topic>Solidarity</topic><topic>Temporality</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Evans, Fred</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of speculative philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Evans, Fred</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Derrida and the Autoimmunity of Democracy</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of speculative philosophy</jtitle><date>2016-08-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>303</spage><epage>315</epage><pages>303-315</pages><issn>0891-625X</issn><eissn>1527-9383</eissn><abstract>Derrida argues that the idea of democracy suffers from a fatal “autoimmunity”: its freedom and equality requirements cancel each other out. But he also feels that because of this malady democracy can enjoy a form of “reasonableness” and “possibility as impossible” that favors it over all other kinds of polity. In particular, recognition of the inherent limitations of this autoimmunity might help counter harmful policies arrogantly carried out in democracy's name. While approving of Derrida's admonitions, I question the guiding role he assigns to an unconditional “democracy to come.” I argue that his characterization of this idea immanently undoes his argument for the autoimmunity of conditional democracies. But I also claim that the promise he finds in autoimmunity is derivable from a different and overlooked aspect of his thinking—his philosophical use of “voice” throughout his work and its implications for three political virtues that he also favors: solidarity, heterogeneity, and fecundity or the creation of new voices.</abstract><pub>Pennsylvania State University Press</pub><doi>10.5325/jspecphil.30.3.0303</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0891-625X
ispartof The Journal of speculative philosophy, 2016-08, Vol.30 (3), p.303-315
issn 0891-625X
1527-9383
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5325_jspecphil_30_3_0303
source Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection
subjects Autoimmunity
Democracy
Dialogism
Direct democracy
Injunctions
Legacies
Oracles
Solidarity
Temporality
Voting
title Derrida and the Autoimmunity of Democracy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A22%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Derrida%20and%20the%20Autoimmunity%20of%20Democracy&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20speculative%20philosophy&rft.au=Evans,%20Fred&rft.date=2016-08-08&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=303&rft.epage=315&rft.pages=303-315&rft.issn=0891-625X&rft.eissn=1527-9383&rft_id=info:doi/10.5325/jspecphil.30.3.0303&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E10.5325/jspecphil.30.3.0303%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-b8b8b6b98e07505b758b59a76c255dc25ea4dc49fdc3b6aed9954baae030f6af3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.5325/jspecphil.30.3.0303&rfr_iscdi=true