Relation and Rupture at the End of Life

This article considers three kinds of relations: being-there-alongside, waiting, and staying, that come into focus at or after the end of life. The first relation is explored in light of Heidegger’s and Levinas’s contrasting accounts of responsibility, the second in terms of Bergson’s notion of hesi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of speculative philosophy 2024-01, Vol.38 (1), p.31-46
Main Author: Craig, Megan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
death
History
holding environment
palliative care
Philosophy
relation
rupture
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-7e0d99dba9fd22e20231a7c00255624960525f0cc2d8c9e6105856db51a2a55a3
container_end_page 46
container_issue 1
container_start_page 31
container_title The Journal of speculative philosophy
container_volume 38
creator Craig, Megan
description This article considers three kinds of relations: being-there-alongside, waiting, and staying, that come into focus at or after the end of life. The first relation is explored in light of Heidegger’s and Levinas’s contrasting accounts of responsibility, the second in terms of Bergson’s notion of hesitation, and the third in relation to Winnicott’s description of a “holding environment.” The work serves as a plea for spaces and practices that support more generous, open-ended, and nuanced relations among those who are dying and those who attend to and survive them.
doi_str_mv 10.5325/jspecphil.38.1.0031
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>projectmuse_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5325_jspecphil_38_1_0031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>918688_S1527938324100000</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-7e0d99dba9fd22e20231a7c00255624960525f0cc2d8c9e6105856db51a2a55a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Ai-9eWqdTJpscpRl_YAFYVXwFrLplG3d3YakPfjvbVnx6FwGBp6ZeV7GbjkUUqC8b1MgH3bNvhC64AWA4GdsxiUuciO0OGcz0IbnCuXnJbtKqQUAUyqcsbsN7V3fdMfMHatsM4R-iJS5Put3lK3GUVdn66ama3ZRu32im98-Zx-Pq_flc75-fXpZPqxzj1r1-YKgMqbaOlNXiISAgruFB0ApFZZGgURZg_dYaW9IcZBaqmoruUMnpRNzJk57fexSilTbEJuDi9-Wg51c7Z-rFdpyO7mOVHmiQuxa8v1hSGTbbojH8VdruFZa27cpjykOLDlMNWL8hFXDFw0hUko2Bf_vqR_Su2jx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relation and Rupture at the End of Life</title><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><creator>Craig, Megan</creator><creatorcontrib>Craig, Megan</creatorcontrib><description>This article considers three kinds of relations: being-there-alongside, waiting, and staying, that come into focus at or after the end of life. The first relation is explored in light of Heidegger’s and Levinas’s contrasting accounts of responsibility, the second in terms of Bergson’s notion of hesitation, and the third in relation to Winnicott’s description of a “holding environment.” The work serves as a plea for spaces and practices that support more generous, open-ended, and nuanced relations among those who are dying and those who attend to and survive them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0891-625X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5325/jspecphil.38.1.0031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pennsylvania State University Press</publisher><subject>death ; History ; holding environment ; palliative care ; Philosophy ; relation ; rupture</subject><ispartof>The Journal of speculative philosophy, 2024-01, Vol.38 (1), p.31-46</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © Pennsylvania State University</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-7e0d99dba9fd22e20231a7c00255624960525f0cc2d8c9e6105856db51a2a55a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Craig, Megan</creatorcontrib><title>Relation and Rupture at the End of Life</title><title>The Journal of speculative philosophy</title><description>This article considers three kinds of relations: being-there-alongside, waiting, and staying, that come into focus at or after the end of life. The first relation is explored in light of Heidegger’s and Levinas’s contrasting accounts of responsibility, the second in terms of Bergson’s notion of hesitation, and the third in relation to Winnicott’s description of a “holding environment.” The work serves as a plea for spaces and practices that support more generous, open-ended, and nuanced relations among those who are dying and those who attend to and survive them.</description><subject>death</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>holding environment</subject><subject>palliative care</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>relation</subject><subject>rupture</subject><issn>0891-625X</issn><issn>1527-9383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Ai-9eWqdTJpscpRl_YAFYVXwFrLplG3d3YakPfjvbVnx6FwGBp6ZeV7GbjkUUqC8b1MgH3bNvhC64AWA4GdsxiUuciO0OGcz0IbnCuXnJbtKqQUAUyqcsbsN7V3fdMfMHatsM4R-iJS5Put3lK3GUVdn66ama3ZRu32im98-Zx-Pq_flc75-fXpZPqxzj1r1-YKgMqbaOlNXiISAgruFB0ApFZZGgURZg_dYaW9IcZBaqmoruUMnpRNzJk57fexSilTbEJuDi9-Wg51c7Z-rFdpyO7mOVHmiQuxa8v1hSGTbbojH8VdruFZa27cpjykOLDlMNWL8hFXDFw0hUko2Bf_vqR_Su2jx</recordid><startdate>20240110</startdate><enddate>20240110</enddate><creator>Craig, Megan</creator><general>Pennsylvania State University Press</general><general>Penn State University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240110</creationdate><title>Relation and Rupture at the End of Life</title><author>Craig, Megan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-7e0d99dba9fd22e20231a7c00255624960525f0cc2d8c9e6105856db51a2a55a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>death</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>holding environment</topic><topic>palliative care</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>relation</topic><topic>rupture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Craig, Megan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of speculative philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Craig, Megan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relation and Rupture at the End of Life</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of speculative philosophy</jtitle><date>2024-01-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>31-46</pages><issn>0891-625X</issn><eissn>1527-9383</eissn><abstract>This article considers three kinds of relations: being-there-alongside, waiting, and staying, that come into focus at or after the end of life. The first relation is explored in light of Heidegger’s and Levinas’s contrasting accounts of responsibility, the second in terms of Bergson’s notion of hesitation, and the third in relation to Winnicott’s description of a “holding environment.” The work serves as a plea for spaces and practices that support more generous, open-ended, and nuanced relations among those who are dying and those who attend to and survive them.</abstract><pub>Pennsylvania State University Press</pub><doi>10.5325/jspecphil.38.1.0031</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0891-625X
ispartof The Journal of speculative philosophy, 2024-01, Vol.38 (1), p.31-46
issn 0891-625X
1527-9383
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5325_jspecphil_38_1_0031
source Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection
subjects death
History
holding environment
palliative care
Philosophy
relation
rupture
title Relation and Rupture at the End of Life
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A46%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-projectmuse_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relation%20and%20Rupture%20at%20the%20End%20of%20Life&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20speculative%20philosophy&rft.au=Craig,%20Megan&rft.date=2024-01-10&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=31-46&rft.issn=0891-625X&rft.eissn=1527-9383&rft_id=info:doi/10.5325/jspecphil.38.1.0031&rft_dat=%3Cprojectmuse_cross%3E918688_S1527938324100000%3C/projectmuse_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-7e0d99dba9fd22e20231a7c00255624960525f0cc2d8c9e6105856db51a2a55a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true