Loading…

Performance evaluation of support vector machine (SVM)-based predictors in genomic selection

The aim was to compare predictive performance of SVM-based predictors constructed using different kernel functions (radial, sigmoid, linear and polynomial) in different genetic architectures of a trait (number of QTL, distribution of QTL effects) and heritability levels. To this end, a genome compri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Indian journal of animal sciences 2017-10, Vol.87 (10)
Main Authors: KASNAVI, SEYED AMIR, AFSHAR, MAHDI AMIN, SHARIATI, MOHAMMAD MAHDI, JOMEH KASHAN, NASSER EMAM, HONARVAR, MAHMOOD
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-685a9463d6390a474ece5d0520b5992c71eceac08978e417b8dcbaf03b932b03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-685a9463d6390a474ece5d0520b5992c71eceac08978e417b8dcbaf03b932b03
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page
container_title Indian journal of animal sciences
container_volume 87
creator KASNAVI, SEYED AMIR
AFSHAR, MAHDI AMIN
SHARIATI, MOHAMMAD MAHDI
JOMEH KASHAN, NASSER EMAM
HONARVAR, MAHMOOD
description The aim was to compare predictive performance of SVM-based predictors constructed using different kernel functions (radial, sigmoid, linear and polynomial) in different genetic architectures of a trait (number of QTL, distribution of QTL effects) and heritability levels. To this end, a genome comprised of five chromosomes, oneMorgan each, was simulated on which 10,000 bi-allelic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) were distributed.Cross validation employing a grid search was used to tune the meta-parameters of each kernel function. Pearson’scorrelation between the true and predicted genomic breeding values (rp,t) and mean squared error of predictedgenomic breeding values (MSEp) were used, respectively, as measures of the predictive accuracy and the overallfit. Meta-parameter optimization had a significant effect on predictive performance of SVM-based predictors insuch a way that by using improper meta-parameters, the predictive power of models decreased significantly. In allmodels, the accuracy of prediction increased following increase in heritability and decrease in the number ofQTLs. In most of scenarios, radial- and sigmoid-based SVM predictors outperformed polynomial and linear models.The linear-and polynomial-based SVM had lower rp,t and higher MSEp and, therefore, were not recommended forgenomic selection. The prediction accuracy of radial and sigmoid models was approximately the same in most ofthe studied scenarios; however, considering all pros and cons of radial and sigmoid kernels, radial kernel wasrecommended as the best kernel function for constructing SVM. All of studied SVM-based predictors were efficientusers of time and memory.
doi_str_mv 10.56093/ijans.v87i10.75270
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_56093_ijans_v87i10_75270</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_56093_ijans_v87i10_75270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-685a9463d6390a474ece5d0520b5992c71eceac08978e417b8dcbaf03b932b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkFFLwzAUhYMoOKe_wJc86kPnbW7bJI8ydAoTBYdPQknTW81Ym5J0Bf-9dfPpwHc45-Fj7DqFRV6Axju3NV1cjEq6CclcSDhhM4E6SxCFPGUzwEImClN1zi5i3AKgFljM2OcbhcaH1nSWOI1mtzeD8x33DY_7vvdh4CPZwQfeGvvtOuI37x8vt0llItW8D1S7vzZy1_Ev6nzrLI-0mybTyyU7a8wu0tV_ztnm8WGzfErWr6vn5f06sSLTQ1Ko3OiswLpADSaTGVnKa8gFVLnWwsp0AsaC0lJRlspK1bYyDWClUVSAc4bHWxt8jIGasg-uNeGnTKE8-CkPfsqjn_LgB38B9Z1cjw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance evaluation of support vector machine (SVM)-based predictors in genomic selection</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>KASNAVI, SEYED AMIR ; AFSHAR, MAHDI AMIN ; SHARIATI, MOHAMMAD MAHDI ; JOMEH KASHAN, NASSER EMAM ; HONARVAR, MAHMOOD</creator><creatorcontrib>KASNAVI, SEYED AMIR ; AFSHAR, MAHDI AMIN ; SHARIATI, MOHAMMAD MAHDI ; JOMEH KASHAN, NASSER EMAM ; HONARVAR, MAHMOOD</creatorcontrib><description>The aim was to compare predictive performance of SVM-based predictors constructed using different kernel functions (radial, sigmoid, linear and polynomial) in different genetic architectures of a trait (number of QTL, distribution of QTL effects) and heritability levels. To this end, a genome comprised of five chromosomes, oneMorgan each, was simulated on which 10,000 bi-allelic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) were distributed.Cross validation employing a grid search was used to tune the meta-parameters of each kernel function. Pearson’scorrelation between the true and predicted genomic breeding values (rp,t) and mean squared error of predictedgenomic breeding values (MSEp) were used, respectively, as measures of the predictive accuracy and the overallfit. Meta-parameter optimization had a significant effect on predictive performance of SVM-based predictors insuch a way that by using improper meta-parameters, the predictive power of models decreased significantly. In allmodels, the accuracy of prediction increased following increase in heritability and decrease in the number ofQTLs. In most of scenarios, radial- and sigmoid-based SVM predictors outperformed polynomial and linear models.The linear-and polynomial-based SVM had lower rp,t and higher MSEp and, therefore, were not recommended forgenomic selection. The prediction accuracy of radial and sigmoid models was approximately the same in most ofthe studied scenarios; however, considering all pros and cons of radial and sigmoid kernels, radial kernel wasrecommended as the best kernel function for constructing SVM. All of studied SVM-based predictors were efficientusers of time and memory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0367-8318</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2394-3327</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.56093/ijans.v87i10.75270</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Indian journal of animal sciences, 2017-10, Vol.87 (10)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-685a9463d6390a474ece5d0520b5992c71eceac08978e417b8dcbaf03b932b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-685a9463d6390a474ece5d0520b5992c71eceac08978e417b8dcbaf03b932b03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>KASNAVI, SEYED AMIR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AFSHAR, MAHDI AMIN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHARIATI, MOHAMMAD MAHDI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOMEH KASHAN, NASSER EMAM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HONARVAR, MAHMOOD</creatorcontrib><title>Performance evaluation of support vector machine (SVM)-based predictors in genomic selection</title><title>Indian journal of animal sciences</title><description>The aim was to compare predictive performance of SVM-based predictors constructed using different kernel functions (radial, sigmoid, linear and polynomial) in different genetic architectures of a trait (number of QTL, distribution of QTL effects) and heritability levels. To this end, a genome comprised of five chromosomes, oneMorgan each, was simulated on which 10,000 bi-allelic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) were distributed.Cross validation employing a grid search was used to tune the meta-parameters of each kernel function. Pearson’scorrelation between the true and predicted genomic breeding values (rp,t) and mean squared error of predictedgenomic breeding values (MSEp) were used, respectively, as measures of the predictive accuracy and the overallfit. Meta-parameter optimization had a significant effect on predictive performance of SVM-based predictors insuch a way that by using improper meta-parameters, the predictive power of models decreased significantly. In allmodels, the accuracy of prediction increased following increase in heritability and decrease in the number ofQTLs. In most of scenarios, radial- and sigmoid-based SVM predictors outperformed polynomial and linear models.The linear-and polynomial-based SVM had lower rp,t and higher MSEp and, therefore, were not recommended forgenomic selection. The prediction accuracy of radial and sigmoid models was approximately the same in most ofthe studied scenarios; however, considering all pros and cons of radial and sigmoid kernels, radial kernel wasrecommended as the best kernel function for constructing SVM. All of studied SVM-based predictors were efficientusers of time and memory.</description><issn>0367-8318</issn><issn>2394-3327</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkFFLwzAUhYMoOKe_wJc86kPnbW7bJI8ydAoTBYdPQknTW81Ym5J0Bf-9dfPpwHc45-Fj7DqFRV6Axju3NV1cjEq6CclcSDhhM4E6SxCFPGUzwEImClN1zi5i3AKgFljM2OcbhcaH1nSWOI1mtzeD8x33DY_7vvdh4CPZwQfeGvvtOuI37x8vt0llItW8D1S7vzZy1_Ev6nzrLI-0mybTyyU7a8wu0tV_ztnm8WGzfErWr6vn5f06sSLTQ1Ko3OiswLpADSaTGVnKa8gFVLnWwsp0AsaC0lJRlspK1bYyDWClUVSAc4bHWxt8jIGasg-uNeGnTKE8-CkPfsqjn_LgB38B9Z1cjw</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>KASNAVI, SEYED AMIR</creator><creator>AFSHAR, MAHDI AMIN</creator><creator>SHARIATI, MOHAMMAD MAHDI</creator><creator>JOMEH KASHAN, NASSER EMAM</creator><creator>HONARVAR, MAHMOOD</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Performance evaluation of support vector machine (SVM)-based predictors in genomic selection</title><author>KASNAVI, SEYED AMIR ; AFSHAR, MAHDI AMIN ; SHARIATI, MOHAMMAD MAHDI ; JOMEH KASHAN, NASSER EMAM ; HONARVAR, MAHMOOD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-685a9463d6390a474ece5d0520b5992c71eceac08978e417b8dcbaf03b932b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KASNAVI, SEYED AMIR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AFSHAR, MAHDI AMIN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHARIATI, MOHAMMAD MAHDI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOMEH KASHAN, NASSER EMAM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HONARVAR, MAHMOOD</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of animal sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KASNAVI, SEYED AMIR</au><au>AFSHAR, MAHDI AMIN</au><au>SHARIATI, MOHAMMAD MAHDI</au><au>JOMEH KASHAN, NASSER EMAM</au><au>HONARVAR, MAHMOOD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance evaluation of support vector machine (SVM)-based predictors in genomic selection</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of animal sciences</jtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>10</issue><issn>0367-8318</issn><eissn>2394-3327</eissn><abstract>The aim was to compare predictive performance of SVM-based predictors constructed using different kernel functions (radial, sigmoid, linear and polynomial) in different genetic architectures of a trait (number of QTL, distribution of QTL effects) and heritability levels. To this end, a genome comprised of five chromosomes, oneMorgan each, was simulated on which 10,000 bi-allelic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) were distributed.Cross validation employing a grid search was used to tune the meta-parameters of each kernel function. Pearson’scorrelation between the true and predicted genomic breeding values (rp,t) and mean squared error of predictedgenomic breeding values (MSEp) were used, respectively, as measures of the predictive accuracy and the overallfit. Meta-parameter optimization had a significant effect on predictive performance of SVM-based predictors insuch a way that by using improper meta-parameters, the predictive power of models decreased significantly. In allmodels, the accuracy of prediction increased following increase in heritability and decrease in the number ofQTLs. In most of scenarios, radial- and sigmoid-based SVM predictors outperformed polynomial and linear models.The linear-and polynomial-based SVM had lower rp,t and higher MSEp and, therefore, were not recommended forgenomic selection. The prediction accuracy of radial and sigmoid models was approximately the same in most ofthe studied scenarios; however, considering all pros and cons of radial and sigmoid kernels, radial kernel wasrecommended as the best kernel function for constructing SVM. All of studied SVM-based predictors were efficientusers of time and memory.</abstract><doi>10.56093/ijans.v87i10.75270</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0367-8318
ispartof Indian journal of animal sciences, 2017-10, Vol.87 (10)
issn 0367-8318
2394-3327
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_56093_ijans_v87i10_75270
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Performance evaluation of support vector machine (SVM)-based predictors in genomic selection
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T23%3A07%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20evaluation%20of%20support%20vector%20machine%20(SVM)-based%20predictors%20in%20genomic%20selection&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20animal%20sciences&rft.au=KASNAVI,%20SEYED%20AMIR&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=10&rft.issn=0367-8318&rft.eissn=2394-3327&rft_id=info:doi/10.56093/ijans.v87i10.75270&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_56093_ijans_v87i10_75270%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-685a9463d6390a474ece5d0520b5992c71eceac08978e417b8dcbaf03b932b03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true