Loading…

Roka Listeria Detection Method Using Transcription Mediated Amplification to Detect Listeria Species in Select Foods and Surfaces

The Roka Listeria Detection Assay was compared to the reference culture methods for nine select foods and three select surfaces. The Roka method used Half-Fraser Broth for enrichment at 35 ± 2°C for 24–28 h. Comparison of Roka's method to reference methods requires an unpaired approach. Each me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of AOAC International 2012-11, Vol.95 (6), p.1672-1688
Main Authors: DONNELLY, Catherine, RYSER, Elliot, YI CHEN
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-b129fcf25b5bada8f4d428c673d291642657de6df9367abfcf4befa120402943
cites
container_end_page 1688
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1672
container_title Journal of AOAC International
container_volume 95
creator DONNELLY, Catherine
RYSER, Elliot
YI CHEN
description The Roka Listeria Detection Assay was compared to the reference culture methods for nine select foods and three select surfaces. The Roka method used Half-Fraser Broth for enrichment at 35 ± 2°C for 24–28 h. Comparison of Roka's method to reference methods requires an unpaired approach. Each method had a total of 545 samples inoculated with a Listeria strain. Each food and surface was inoculated with a different strain of Listeria at two different levels per method. For the dairy products (Brie cheese, whole milk, and ice cream), our method was compared to AOAC Official MethodSM993.12. For the ready-to-eat meats (deli chicken, cured ham, chicken salad, and hot dogs) and environmental surfaces (sealed concrete, stainless steel, and plastic), these samples were compared to the U.S. Department of Agriculture/Food Safety and Inspection Service-Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (USDA/FSIS-MLG) method MLG 8.07. Cold-smoked salmon and romaine lettuce were compared to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration/Bacteriological Analytical Manual, Chapter 10 (FDA/BAM) method. Roka's method had 358 positives out of 545 total inoculated samples compared to 332 positive for the reference methods. Overall the probability of detection analysis of the results showed better or equivalent performance compared to the reference methods.
doi_str_mv 10.5740/jaoacint.12-063
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pascalfrancis_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_5740_jaoacint_12_063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>26777044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-b129fcf25b5bada8f4d428c673d291642657de6df9367abfcf4befa120402943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkDtPwzAURi0EEuUxs3phTOtX7GasCgWkIiRa5ujGD3BJ48g2AyP_nJQWmO7V_e75hoPQFSXjUgky2UAA7bs8pqwgkh-hEa2EKFTF2PGwE0kKzhQ9RWcpbQgRVBI2Ql_P4R3w0qdsowd8Y7PV2YcOP9r8Fgx-Sb57xesIXdLR94fIeMjW4Nm2b73zGn7OORzw_7pVb7W3CfsOr2y7ixYhmIShM3j1ER1omy7QiYM22cvDPEfrxe16fl8sn-4e5rNloTlluWgoq5x2rGzKBgxMnTCCTbVU3LCKSsFkqYyVxlVcKmiGV9FYB5QRQVgl-Dma7Gt1DClF6-o--i3Ez5qSeiew_hVYU1YPAgfiek_0kDS0bnCgffrDmFRKESH4N9XYdXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Roka Listeria Detection Method Using Transcription Mediated Amplification to Detect Listeria Species in Select Foods and Surfaces</title><source>Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list)</source><creator>DONNELLY, Catherine ; RYSER, Elliot ; YI CHEN</creator><creatorcontrib>DONNELLY, Catherine ; RYSER, Elliot ; YI CHEN</creatorcontrib><description>The Roka Listeria Detection Assay was compared to the reference culture methods for nine select foods and three select surfaces. The Roka method used Half-Fraser Broth for enrichment at 35 ± 2°C for 24–28 h. Comparison of Roka's method to reference methods requires an unpaired approach. Each method had a total of 545 samples inoculated with a Listeria strain. Each food and surface was inoculated with a different strain of Listeria at two different levels per method. For the dairy products (Brie cheese, whole milk, and ice cream), our method was compared to AOAC Official MethodSM993.12. For the ready-to-eat meats (deli chicken, cured ham, chicken salad, and hot dogs) and environmental surfaces (sealed concrete, stainless steel, and plastic), these samples were compared to the U.S. Department of Agriculture/Food Safety and Inspection Service-Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (USDA/FSIS-MLG) method MLG 8.07. Cold-smoked salmon and romaine lettuce were compared to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration/Bacteriological Analytical Manual, Chapter 10 (FDA/BAM) method. Roka's method had 358 positives out of 545 total inoculated samples compared to 332 positive for the reference methods. Overall the probability of detection analysis of the results showed better or equivalent performance compared to the reference methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1060-3271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7922</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5740/jaoacint.12-063</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC International</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Food industries ; Food microbiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Methods of analysis, processing and quality control, regulation, standards</subject><ispartof>Journal of AOAC International, 2012-11, Vol.95 (6), p.1672-1688</ispartof><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-b129fcf25b5bada8f4d428c673d291642657de6df9367abfcf4befa120402943</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26777044$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DONNELLY, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RYSER, Elliot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YI CHEN</creatorcontrib><title>Roka Listeria Detection Method Using Transcription Mediated Amplification to Detect Listeria Species in Select Foods and Surfaces</title><title>Journal of AOAC International</title><description>The Roka Listeria Detection Assay was compared to the reference culture methods for nine select foods and three select surfaces. The Roka method used Half-Fraser Broth for enrichment at 35 ± 2°C for 24–28 h. Comparison of Roka's method to reference methods requires an unpaired approach. Each method had a total of 545 samples inoculated with a Listeria strain. Each food and surface was inoculated with a different strain of Listeria at two different levels per method. For the dairy products (Brie cheese, whole milk, and ice cream), our method was compared to AOAC Official MethodSM993.12. For the ready-to-eat meats (deli chicken, cured ham, chicken salad, and hot dogs) and environmental surfaces (sealed concrete, stainless steel, and plastic), these samples were compared to the U.S. Department of Agriculture/Food Safety and Inspection Service-Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (USDA/FSIS-MLG) method MLG 8.07. Cold-smoked salmon and romaine lettuce were compared to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration/Bacteriological Analytical Manual, Chapter 10 (FDA/BAM) method. Roka's method had 358 positives out of 545 total inoculated samples compared to 332 positive for the reference methods. Overall the probability of detection analysis of the results showed better or equivalent performance compared to the reference methods.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Food microbiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Methods of analysis, processing and quality control, regulation, standards</subject><issn>1060-3271</issn><issn>1944-7922</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkDtPwzAURi0EEuUxs3phTOtX7GasCgWkIiRa5ujGD3BJ48g2AyP_nJQWmO7V_e75hoPQFSXjUgky2UAA7bs8pqwgkh-hEa2EKFTF2PGwE0kKzhQ9RWcpbQgRVBI2Ql_P4R3w0qdsowd8Y7PV2YcOP9r8Fgx-Sb57xesIXdLR94fIeMjW4Nm2b73zGn7OORzw_7pVb7W3CfsOr2y7ixYhmIShM3j1ER1omy7QiYM22cvDPEfrxe16fl8sn-4e5rNloTlluWgoq5x2rGzKBgxMnTCCTbVU3LCKSsFkqYyVxlVcKmiGV9FYB5QRQVgl-Dma7Gt1DClF6-o--i3Ez5qSeiew_hVYU1YPAgfiek_0kDS0bnCgffrDmFRKESH4N9XYdXA</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>DONNELLY, Catherine</creator><creator>RYSER, Elliot</creator><creator>YI CHEN</creator><general>AOAC International</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>Roka Listeria Detection Method Using Transcription Mediated Amplification to Detect Listeria Species in Select Foods and Surfaces</title><author>DONNELLY, Catherine ; RYSER, Elliot ; YI CHEN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-b129fcf25b5bada8f4d428c673d291642657de6df9367abfcf4befa120402943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Food microbiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Methods of analysis, processing and quality control, regulation, standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DONNELLY, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RYSER, Elliot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YI CHEN</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of AOAC International</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DONNELLY, Catherine</au><au>RYSER, Elliot</au><au>YI CHEN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Roka Listeria Detection Method Using Transcription Mediated Amplification to Detect Listeria Species in Select Foods and Surfaces</atitle><jtitle>Journal of AOAC International</jtitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1672</spage><epage>1688</epage><pages>1672-1688</pages><issn>1060-3271</issn><eissn>1944-7922</eissn><abstract>The Roka Listeria Detection Assay was compared to the reference culture methods for nine select foods and three select surfaces. The Roka method used Half-Fraser Broth for enrichment at 35 ± 2°C for 24–28 h. Comparison of Roka's method to reference methods requires an unpaired approach. Each method had a total of 545 samples inoculated with a Listeria strain. Each food and surface was inoculated with a different strain of Listeria at two different levels per method. For the dairy products (Brie cheese, whole milk, and ice cream), our method was compared to AOAC Official MethodSM993.12. For the ready-to-eat meats (deli chicken, cured ham, chicken salad, and hot dogs) and environmental surfaces (sealed concrete, stainless steel, and plastic), these samples were compared to the U.S. Department of Agriculture/Food Safety and Inspection Service-Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (USDA/FSIS-MLG) method MLG 8.07. Cold-smoked salmon and romaine lettuce were compared to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration/Bacteriological Analytical Manual, Chapter 10 (FDA/BAM) method. Roka's method had 358 positives out of 545 total inoculated samples compared to 332 positive for the reference methods. Overall the probability of detection analysis of the results showed better or equivalent performance compared to the reference methods.</abstract><cop>Gaithersburg, MD</cop><pub>AOAC International</pub><doi>10.5740/jaoacint.12-063</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1060-3271
ispartof Journal of AOAC International, 2012-11, Vol.95 (6), p.1672-1688
issn 1060-3271
1944-7922
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_5740_jaoacint_12_063
source Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list)
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Food industries
Food microbiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Methods of analysis, processing and quality control, regulation, standards
title Roka Listeria Detection Method Using Transcription Mediated Amplification to Detect Listeria Species in Select Foods and Surfaces
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T15%3A04%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pascalfrancis_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Roka%20Listeria%20Detection%20Method%20Using%20Transcription%20Mediated%20Amplification%20to%20Detect%20Listeria%20Species%20in%20Select%20Foods%20and%20Surfaces&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20AOAC%20International&rft.au=DONNELLY,%20Catherine&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1672&rft.epage=1688&rft.pages=1672-1688&rft.issn=1060-3271&rft.eissn=1944-7922&rft_id=info:doi/10.5740/jaoacint.12-063&rft_dat=%3Cpascalfrancis_cross%3E26777044%3C/pascalfrancis_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-b129fcf25b5bada8f4d428c673d291642657de6df9367abfcf4befa120402943%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true